Presentation given at the 3rd International Consumer Brand Relationships Conference, www.consumer-brand-relationships.org
Copyright by
Maxian Xavier
Samuel D. Bradley
Wesley T. Wise
E. N. Toulouse
Brand Love is in the Heart Physiological Responding to Advertised Brands
1. Brand Love is in the Heart
Physiological Responding to Advertised Brands
Presented by:
Wendy Maxian
Xavier University
Cincinnati, Ohio
Co-authors:
Samuel D. Bradley (USF)
Wesley T. Wise (KSU)
E. N. Toulouse (TTU)
Published in Psychology & Marketing, 30(6), 469-478 (June 2013)
2. Primary Goal
Test premises in Lovemarks (Roberts, 2005)
Consumers show “loyalty beyond
reason” via:
● Emotional connections
● Idiosyncratic set of loved brands
3. Defining Brand Love
Emotional connection not new
(Watson, c. 1920s)
Similar to interpersonal love
(Shimp & Madden, 1988);Ahuvia, 2005; Carroll & Ahuvia, 2006;
Whang, Allen, Sahoury, & Zhang, 2004; Albert, Merunka, & Valette-
Florence, 2008)
Individual-level phenomenon
(Roberts, 2005)
Can be informational or symbolic
reward
(Foxall, 2010)
4. Measuring Brand Love
Measuring emotional connection
Motivational model of emotion
(P.J. Lang & colleagues)
Clear test of emotional stimuli
Emotion as action disposition
Positive valance, psychological arousal
●Both perceived and physiological
●Both conscious and subsconscious
5. Measures
Self-report, 7-pt. semantic differentials
● Abr (Meeds, 1999; Thorson, Chi, & Leavitt, 1992)
● Arousal
Physiological
● Heart rate (HR)
● Skin conductance response (SCR)
● Facial electromyography (EMG)
Abr score established more- and less-
loved brands, sets of 6
6. Expected Response Patterns
More-loved brands should elicit:
elicit greater arousal, both reported and
physiological (H1),
sustained cardiac deceleration (H2), and
greater orbicularis oculi activation (H3)
than less-loved brands.
Less-loved brands should elicit greater
activation of corrugator supercilii than
more-loved brands (H4).
7. Competing Hypotheses
Category preference shows same
pattern of response (H5a-d).
Higher Abr score in category will elicit
larger reported and physiological arousal,
sustained cardiac deceleration, and
greater orbicularis oculi activation.
10. Analysis and Results
Standard data reduction procedures
For each participant, calculated unique
more- and less-loved brands
Hypothesis tests:
● t-tests
● Cohen’s d, pooled variance
14. What does it all mean?
Individual-level, emotional responses
Subconscious reaction to static stimulus
● Reflexive smile and frown
Likely underestimated responses
Hearts “skipped a beat,” genuine smiles