The document describes a website evaluation tool that automatically analyzes websites based on over 60 technical factors related to performance, usability, accessibility, and SEO. The tool provides a summary score for each site, highlights issues in green/yellow/red, and allows users to give detailed feedback to website owners. The creator seeks feedback on the concept to help improve the tool and determine user interest before further development.

1. Websites: PromisesandReality Is Yourwebsitereadyforvisitors? Youwishandpayfor: …andthat‘sYourreality: Performance Accessibility What‘sthat? … andI‘vepaidfor ! Don‘tYou want tochange that? Usability Search-Engine Optimization

2. Every time You’re using the www You couldget crazy. Should this be the future? The website holder has the best ranking in www by words, but You’re waitingfor loading his website. The site was developed over months, but there is badly readable content. You’ve paid for Your website, for SEO, to be find in search engines for Your content. But the website is on page 999 in search results. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

3. The quality of online services isdetermined by an huge amount of little things. Time spending and error liability parts for displaying websites are multiplex. The website visitor is only viewing the resultsof a complex process. Often he can only evaluate websites throw the loading time, usability/accessibility and position in search engine results. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

4. How to change the website quality? … I’m only the website visitor! … I’m not so familiar with computers  How often you’re asking yourself: Is this website ready for visitors? Feel free to sendfeedback to website holders and website developers ! Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

5. Feedback is the answer of the problem. Useful feedback is better! Every website visitor can give useful feedback. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

6. Where to get Basic’s for feedback? I’ve notime to study computers!!! But You have time! ... to wait for loading websites, … unreadable content, … to search for informations for hours … Day by day, isn’t it frustrating? Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

8. buy tools for testing websites for a lot of money,

9. read results from website testing services, …… but You rather would give some feedback Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

10. You want to help to improve websites. Let’s do it! Youdon’t want to spend a lotoftime or money for preparing qualified feedback, of course. You’re doing your hard job. The www is only giving information for your purposes. So, how can You do it? Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

11. That’s also my current situation. I asked myself, is there a way to evaluate websites automatically? You’re guessing it, there is! I spent lots of time to find a way to show combined und detailedwebsite evaluations at a glance. Let’s explain … Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

12. Website evaluation by facts. Colors, the configuration of pictures on websites, the original content and many other things are a matter of taste. The quality is depending on lots of technical facts. I combined technical facts within a service in three parts: Performance, Usability/Accessibility and SEO Onpage Optimization. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

13. Evaluated Facts (overview). Performance: syntax-errors/warnings image count/size number of files compression routine possible software optimization arrangement of files in source code Usability/Accessibility: content-headers and their order keypad functions alternate description for images website preparation for printout tables incl. summary description geographic tagging information use of favicon and cookies Search Engine Optimization: list of keywords website description links o.k./broken? emphasis words in content stopwordsamong keywords keywords in content Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

14. Results of website evaluation ata glance. There are over 60 technical facts. It can be tested, if they are present, by the quality of software standards and text-parts which they are containing. At the end the result is shown in a percentage. 100% are given for a super perfect site (in practice nearly impossible). Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

15. Resultsin a percentage(overview). The number of green/yellow/red evaluated and marked results are shown in a diagram. The summary (quality) ofall facts is shown in a percentage. Nearby is a legend for color and percentages. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

16. Results of website evaluation in details. The over 60 technical facts which have been evaluated are shown in a table.By moving the mouse over the text in the table there is shown a short explanation for the tested fact. The background color of one cell in the table depends on the result for the actual fact.It can be green, yellow and red. Here are two examples: Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

19. List of the results. It’s possible to test different single websites of a homepage. For later comparisons it’s also possible to assign a branch (culture, sports, industry …) to each evaluated website. The following list contains results of evaluated sites. If different sites from one homepage were evaluated, the last result and the min / max –results are shown in one line. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

21. Short information during evaluation. During the automatic evaluation You will be informed about the progress like this: Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

22. Give feedback! How You could see: There is no need to be in computers. With this single factsheet You can give detailed feedback back to the website holder and developer. … to improve the website Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

23. Further development. In the screenshots there are some buttons for menu items like FAQ, feedback and so on. This items are under construction. Just now I’m testing a lot of different websites to get some special cases for evaluation. Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

24. That’s Your part. Your opinions and ideas are wanted! In the current stage of development I’ve to decide over the amount of further development. Questions are: Does the tool make sense? Does it give the visitors enough advantages? How many visitors / developers would use it? Are there ideas for improvement? Feel free and contact me! (see next page) Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de

25. mail@fit-for-bit.de Bernd Köppen www.fit-for-bit.de Thank You for visiting this pages! Your ideas are welcome, thanks in advance! Yours sincerely! Bernd Köppen Bernd Köppen mail@fit-for-bit.de