Educational accountability
11 May 2018•0 j'aime•1,979 vues
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Signaler
Formation
Accountability will always be one of the foundations of an education system. It also serves as an indicator in determining the success of educational management.
Department of EducationSuivre
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Theories of Educational ManagementImelda Castillo
Process of Curriculum DevelopmentVijayalakshmi Murugesan
Curriculum planningGretchen Gevela
Concept of educational planningMrinal Mondal
Curriculum organizationMaybelle Animas
Curriculum Evaluationvalarpink
Similaire à Educational accountability
Bronxville School LeadershipDavid Quattrone
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)Blacketor Consultants, LLC
Cagayan State University Supply Chainjamz105
OGS 2011 trainingsChristinaStallings
Writing Sample: RttT Closeout Report-HHHunter Huffman
84305X_FY2022.pptxNecitasCabral
Dernier
9.28.23 The Social Construction of Race.pptxMaryPotorti1
Year 10 Information Evening: 2023 WestHatch
Forensic Accounting PPT - INCHARA J.M - 23COMA24.pptxKumarasamy Dr.PK
Teaching Activities: Technology (October 2023)Cambridge English Spain
Personal Brand Exploration - Michael Q TrucksMichael Trucks
Congruency vs EqualityManik Bhola
Educational accountability
- 2. Accountability accomptare -to account computare -to calculate putare -to reckon
- 3. “Accountability can be defined as a social relation in which an actor feels an obligation to explain and to justify his or her conduct to some significant other. - Boven, 2005
- 4. “A program, often legislated, that attributes the responsibility for student learning to teachers, school administrators, and/or students. Test results typically are used to judge accountability, and often consequences are imposed for shortcomings. - National Council on Measurement of Education
- 5. DIMENSIONS Transparency Liability Controllability Responsibility Responsiveness
- 6. TYPES Compliance with regulations Adherence to professional norms Results driven
- 7. STAGES Defining accountability to whom and for what Informing the stakeholders Judgment
- 8. FUNCTIONS Democratic control Enhancing the integrity of public governance Supporting performance improvement Maintaining and enhancing the legitimacy of public governance Mechanism for catharsis
- 10. SCOUTERS ROCK
- 11. SCOUTERS ROCK Strengthen the merit system and support open ranking procedures.
- 12. SCOUTERS ROCK Create and nurture productive partnerships with all stakeholders in implementing various education programs, projects and activities.
- 13. SCOUTERS ROCK Open all channels of communication (suggestion boxes, on-line and other media) to keep everybody updated on all policies and opportunities for professional growth and to gather constructive comments and feedback for enhanced delivery of services.
- 14. SCOUTERS ROCK Uphold the norms of conduct for public servants (commitment to public interest, professionalism, justness and sincerity, political neutrality, responsiveness to the public, nationalism and patriotism, commitment to democracy, and simple living)
- 15. SCOUTERS ROCK Take active part in monitoring and supervising teaching-learning activities as well as in providing technical assistance towards better outcomes.
- 16. SCOUTERS ROCK Enable every school-aged child and youth to benefit from high quality basic education services.
- 17. SCOUTERS ROCK Recognize and scale up research- enabled best practices of exemplary performance to sustain a culture of excellence.
- 18. SCOUTERS ROCK Systematically push higher levels of practice in School-Based Management.
- 19. SCOUTERS ROCK Render regular and accurate financial reports on MOOE and other funds generated from other sources and keep an updated and reliable e-BEIS.
- 20. SCOUTERS ROCK Optimize the utilization of ICT in improving access to and quality of basic education services.
- 21. SCOUTERS ROCK Conserve water, energy and other resources while performing tasks. Project KIDLAT There is a 24% decrease in KwH used after 3 months of implementing project KIDLAT. (Before the project implementation the school’s consumes 4253 KwH a month, after 3 months the consumption was 3232 KwH).
- 22. SCOUTERS ROCK Keep schools and offices safe and child-friendly.
- 23. THANKS!
- 24. References Hammond, Linda (2006). Standards, Assessments and Educational Policy: In Pursuit of Genuine Accountability. USA: Stanford University Levitt, et.al. (2008). Accountability of Teachers. England: General Teaching Council Anderson, Joan (2005). Accountability in Education. Paris: The International Institute for Educational Planning National Council on Measurement in Education (2 April, 2017). Glossary of Important Assessment and Measurement Terms. Retrieved from http://www.ncme.org/ncme/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary1.aspx?hkey =4bb87415-44dc-4088-9ed9-e8515326a061#anchorA Bouffard, William. (2 April 2017). The Multiple Accountabilities Disorder. Retrieved from http://puttincologneontherickshaw.com/authors-blog/the-multiple-accountabilities-disorder/
Notes de l'éditeur
- Transparency is the literal value of accountability; the idea that an accountable organization must explain or account for its actions. Liability attaches culpability to transparency. In this view, individuals and organizations should be held liable for their actions, punished for malfeasance, and rewarded for success. Controllability which is the dominant conception of accountability, i.e., if X can induce the behavior of Y, it is said that X controls Y–and that Y is accountable to X. Although few relationships between boss and employee are so straightforward, this conception is the starting point for many analyses of organizational accountability. Responsibility means that people and organizations are constrained by laws, rules, and norms.
- 1. Simply stated, educators were accountable for adherence to rules and accountable to the bureaucracy. 2. Although neither mandated nor required, the impact of widespread agreement on certain principles and practices has done much to elevate education as a profession. , Within this system, educators are accountable for adherence to standards and accountable to their peers 3. with results defined in terms of student learning. In these systems educators are accountable for student learning and accountable to the general public
- Defining accountability to whom/for what In the first stage, stakeholders define accountability requirements and agree on the scope of accountability. Actors inform stakeholders about their conduct, providing various sorts of data about the performance of tasks, about outcomes, or about procedures 2 Informing the stakeholders In the next stage, stakeholders stake their claims to hold the actor to account. Stakeholders can determine their scope of this accountability by asking actors to give further details and explanations of their actions and behaviours, in order for the stakeholders to understand how the actors seek to legitimise or justify their conduct. Judgement (leading to affirmation or sanctions) 3. The third stage constitutes a judgement decision on the actor’s conduct. When the result of the conduct assessment is positive, the actor can expect affirmation of his or her actions from the stakeholders. The consequence of a negative judgement may be the introduction of sanctions. The ultimate punishment, in cases of professional misconduct, may be dismissal and loss of opportunity to work further in the profession.
- 1. Democratic control Firstly, accountability has a role in the democratic control that is exercised by civil society and by individual citizens. Democratically elected representatives are subject to public scrutiny and are judged on their effectiveness and efficiency in serving the public. 2. Enhancing the integrity of public governance Secondly, accountability arrangements enhance the integrity of public governance; they strengthen commitment to honesty and appropriate conduct, and encourage consistency of actions.29 3. Supporting performance improvement A third function of public accountability is to support performance improvement that flow from organisational learning and avoidance of unintended outputs or outcomes. 4. Maintaining and enhancing the legitimacy of public governance A fourth accountability function is maintaining and/or enhancing the legitimacy of public governance. Here it works as an instrument ensuring transparency and answerability between elected governors and the public, bridging those two spheres. Accountability also ensures that the public voice is heard, which should underpin the legitimacy of their elected representatives by enabling individual institutions to be answerable to their particular public. 5. Mechanism for catharsis Finally, accountability serves as a mechanism for catharsis. That function is evident in cases of serious misconduct and breach of public trust. Detailed investigation that explores all factors that led to the unacceptable consequences provides an opportunity to acknowledge what went wrong and why, and usually also informs revisions to policies and control mechanisms. This function of accountability may prevent recurrence of errors and help to support better compliance with rules and regulations.
- Nippon Paint Phils. Malayan Colleges Laguna BASF Company Milo Colgate PTA