Call for justice if any lawyers out there want a case I can use representation

1. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
1 | P a g e
Call for Justice Stand Alone
Statutory Power Jr3
To: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/AND WHO IT MAY CONCERN;
Interpretation:
Published consolidation is evidence
31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated
regulation published by the Minister under this Act
in either print or electronic form is evidence of that
statute or regulation and of its contents and every copy
purporting to be published by the Minister is deemed to
be so published, unless the contrary is shown.
Citing legislation and consolidation Act R.S.C., 1985, c S-20 R.R.C., c.
A) Contrary to a status report the evidence in the report is certain to the best of my ability in
every way and with the only doubt and uncertainty to the certainty is an inner placed
artificial minion technology a weapon that is an unlawful presence physiologically
stigmatizing and psychologically abusing a person (instrument) in the worst way known
to man it is a man-made severity to the obtainment of informed consent precluded
overexploited and delayed for research grants at the cost of unnecessary adverse
impacts to a subset species where cooperative and informed consent has not been
given yet.
Cited: Statutory Instruments Act R.S.C., 1985, c. S-22
Proof of incorporated document, index, rate or
number
18.5 (1) In any proceeding in which a document, index,
rate or number — that is incorporated by reference in a
regulation — is relevant, a certificate appearing to be issued
by or on behalf of the regulation-making authority
that includes any of the following statements is, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, presumed to be authentic
and proof of the matters set out in those statements:
(a) a statement that the document attached to the certificate,
or the index, rate or number set out in it, is the
document, index, rate or number that was incorporated
in the regulation on a specified date or during a
specified period; or
(b) a statement regarding the manner in which the incorporated
document, index, rate or number was accessible
on that date or during that period.
B) Having which is the document incorporated by reference evidence to the contrary has
been added on to in a ESU/DU status report 59600237(01) individualizing an
assessment unit subject to all the tests in the different legislations in the international

2. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
2 | P a g e
Upper Columbia River Water Basin involving Hydroelectric, and Endangered Species
Act, the Species At Risk Act human dimension pilot programs run under these
legislations, that can be incorporated under any Schedule I Species At Risk DU/ESU
and is a struggle to complete an educated competent hypothesized report, while
considering an unethical environment where you are attacked through it and your
research is never not disrupted on the subject is a fight to keep your train of thought and
retention of a short term memory. Regulation-making authority that in the report
evidence to the contrary shows and explains the abuses of a an Individual of the fish &
wildlife, and plants, marine protected/critical habitat legislation that a person maybe
listed under or is not easy to discover and put a picture behind why everything has
become so hostile and dangerous as the person is literally put at risk and studied as a
ecological biological diversity assessment unit in a document created as the addition to
evidence to the contrary that is still in need of proof reading and that it is very difficult
task to partake considering the level of the abuses are turned up in the instant you begin
work on any or every document that to the contrary is an actual Indian status number of
a designated unit itself which is a living document but the last date on it was Oct 4 2016
which it was not realized the day of significance 4th
year since my father passed away
and this rude awakening of awareness began taking place not much longer after that.
(citing Colloquially Species at Risk Act).
Doubt as to nature of proposed statutory instrument Détermination du caractère de règlement
4 Where any regulation-making authority or other authority
responsible for the issue, making or establishment
of a statutory instrument, or any person acting on
behalf of such an authority, is uncertain as to whether a
proposed statutory instrument would be a regulation if it
were issued, made or established by that authority, it or
he shall cause a copy of the proposed statutory instrument
to be forwarded to the Deputy Minister of Justice
who shall determine whether or not the instrument
would be a regulation if it were so issued, made or established.
R.S., 1985, c. S-22, s. 4; 2015, c. 33, s. 3(F).
C) The authority responsible for the Instrument as a an instrument made or established by
that authority as to being a regulation as the charter of rights and freedoms being not
afforded to the instrument that it or he shall cause a copy of he purposed statutory
instrument to the Deputy Minister of Justice is the evidence to the contrary is the copy of
the document is for the Minister to decide and a consultation to the instrument its self
who does not consent to anyone or body being representative or controlling interest of it,
but the instrument its self be informed and in control of any situation or matter and
financial disclosure be afforded by that authority to have made or established the
Instrument.
Cited and referenced below; Aboriginal Title as a Constitutionally protected property Right
Thanks to; Kent McNeil
sufficient importance to the broader community as a whole”71 (i.e., the
Canadian public), the taking would be justifiable under the Sparrow test.
This means that the real property rights of the Aboriginal peoples
are not just subject to legislative regulation in the public interest,72 as are
all property rights, for purposes such as environmental protection. Aboriginal
title is also subject to legislative taking,73

3. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
3 | P a g e
(1) Sufficient importance to the broader community as a whole and as an utmost importance
of the peoples safety is at issue because of governmental exercises subject to legislative
takings of not only a designate being targeted and tortured and the participants
themselves belonging to first nation stewardship groups their family members are dying
too as I have seen it all unfold in front of my eyes environmental protection has been put
secondary to a force technology on its face that is being used making the harassments
by the on the ground stewardship approach enhanced or are more of an agnostic
approach seem like child’s play compared to this mind control remote viewing voice to
skull state of the art technology that is much more advanced then realized to believe by
intern frustrating it is an unlawful presence that can hurt you in the worst ways known to
man. ESA harm form of take is a good definition to explain it or a legislative regulated
taking to where your behaviours are impaired to the point of serious injurie or death.
(citing endangered species Act 1973)
Indeed, compensation for breaches of fiduciary duty are [sic] a
well-established part of the landscape of aboriginal rights: Guerin,
[supra n.22]. In keeping with the duty of honour and good faith on
the Crown, fair compensation will ordinarily be required when aboriginal
title is infringed. The amount of compensation payable
will vary with the nature of the particular aboriginal title affected
and with the nature and severity of the infringement and the extent
to which aboriginal interests were accommodated.79
(2) Breaches in fiduciary duty have been breached crushed stomped on genetically
detrimentally discriminated on and as to a way of life stolen in a disinformation
ecosystem kept of balance manipulated into a criminal subculture by this minion force
that coercive pulsations to a on going adverse persuasion is the weapons technology
used to control the target, in a case of a dwelling and, due to hardship and loss and an
un informed no consent and a statute of many malicious Acts, FRA, Agreements and
that breach in a fiduciary duty by not only the Crown but Chief Lewis as represented by
OIB for taking controlling interest in an entity designation to be a targeted of these
ancillary operations and cumulative impacts over decades have been that rude
awakening with a hope that the Crown keep with duty and honor and faith on the Crown
for fair compensation for a service rendered without prior consent an accommodation of
legal help, and due to the severity is in the nature of an infringement of being listed as
species my own people represented by leadership abusing that trust in nature and
precluding the discovery by the designated Individual , Osoyoos Indian Band Taxation
law 2009, Forest Revenue Sharing Agreement, and many other Acts designated as
being an Statutory Instrument of where monetary relief alone would not be sufficient for
the injustice bestowed on the assessment unit.
“[t]he exercise of the power of expropriation interferes
drastically with private property rights and therefore the courts generally
construe expropriation statutes strictly and in favour of the individual
whose rights are affected.”
Citing: Columbia River System Operation Review Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix P
CEA
(3) The power of expropriation interferes not only with property rights but as a result is being
used for decades as a listed species being equated with nature to the degree that is put

4. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
4 | P a g e
into regulatory takings of Individuals through this harm form of take force technology
developed by Army Corps of Engineers among others could be any high tech weaponry
testing agency that species at risk individuals are designated to be subject to as this
operation the bearing of an operational plan that hurts a person in the worst ways it kills
and involves serious injurie as it badgers its target structure made to feel culpable to
atrocious actions that society has been persuasively been duked into, and the sentence
of that individual who has no knowledge of the ambient environmental dwelling that is
staged in its environmental setting, there is no amount of compensation that can give
back what was taken, but to acquire the power to protect any historical river water basin
and develop an evolutionary unit in the development of an Environmental Protection
Agency for the actual protection of all and no exceptions and at all costs necessary will
not subject any individuals to unethical research unless informed consent is given by
that Individual personally whether being claimed incompetent not an issue because of
schemes of the acts should not justify the taking of a species and a person should still
be consulted and accommodated construed by government especially if the impacts are
to affect itself adversely, and a chief who should protect his people is using it as a way to
collect more money otherwise would not be available to him for economic development
that he should not of resorted to, at the cost of the survival of individuals of the species,
who are being precluded from justice and fair remedy for a service rendered.
these may be reduced to three principal or primary articles; the
right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right
of private property; because, as there is no other known method of
compulsion, or of abridging man’s natural free will, but by an infringement
or diminution of one or other of these important
rights, the preservation of these, inviolate, may justly be said to include
the preservation of our civil immunities in their largest and
most extensive sense.11
(4) Principal or primate is the question the right to personal security is second issue after the
dismantling of any true livelihood and the determination to expose and estoppel to the
narcissistic activities that will beat your phycological wellness to the ground and kick it
while you’re down it shows no mercy are has no compassion whatsoever stealing and
manipulating thought as quick as they come and taunting you with those thoughts with
the actual voice of that person you think of happens instantly its as scary as hell when
they use dead family members as that voice, while preservation and a tribal immunity,
for any trickery that should be included in that gross infringement of a aboriginal person
being listed as an endangered species at risk act in those legislations and subject to
biomedical research without consent of that person being listed as species, should have
protections and a way to qualified legal help outside the disinformation ecosystem are
with out the determination to expose this injustices to a people its chance of survival is
not good if not impossible to live through, for justice to preserve our immunities and right
the wrongs.
If so, they have unique status in Anglo-Canadian law
which probably enhances their claim to a right of self-government,44 but
does not affect the proprietary nature of their Aboriginal title.
A final sui generis aspect of Aboriginal title is the “inherent

5. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
5 | P a g e
(5) Being a Designated Unit or subspecies of a subset species of any schedule 1
Species at Risk Act or Evolutionary Significant Unit of the Endangered Species Act or
subject to adverse exercises of the Indian Act hence giving a proprietary interest in and
as represents nature to aboriginal title of Okanagan/Colville Endangered Species at Risk
Act in a dwelling a Broad Homeowner Policy, along with certificate of possession Indian
Lands Register BCR and Instrument date 1978/May/15, registration # 58832 on the date
of 1978/Jul/19, land affected lot 15, Plan CLSR 58051, Grantor(s) Band, Grantee(s)
Henry Baptiste #00007 Area 44,000 Acres, CP 29361, Previous Legal Description:
Reserve: 07395 OSOYOOS NO. 1, Region Province: BRITISH COLUMBIA, Band 596
– Osoyoos. An inherent latent vice and proprietary nature to aboriginal title to its
intended person Henry Baptiste as the Broad protection of the environment as well as all
living things is an outlook to an approach that would be better for us, and the future of
ethics in research enforced as from enduring a life cycle full of unethical research is a
desire to ensure the safety and well being to all organisms and bring awareness to the
world and to start a due process of gaining the capacity to a new self government of a
Inkameep Tribal Administration being a self government and proprietary interest to the
Designated Unit of evolutionary significance to the entitlement with the assistance of all
governments involved to reach a workable agreement that works for all and will benefit
every governmental agency involved with no undue discrimination and a bonding and
cooperative way of learning from and not looking back at this long-term adverse
experience of being subject to these undesirable acts, and begin with enhancing a claim
to self government, under its statute.
s.35(1) did not create aboriginal rights; rather, it accorded constitutional
status to those rights which were “existing” in 1982. The
provision, at the very least, constitutionalized those rights which
aboriginal peoples possessed at common law, since those rights existed
at the time s.35(1) came into force. Since aboriginal title was
a common law right whose existence was recognized well before
1982 (e.g., Calder [v. Attorney-General of British Columbia, [1973]
S.C.R. 313]), s.35(1) has constitutionalized it in its full form.53
(6) s.35(1) creating a constitutionalized status to those rights and are an existence to this
test in an unhumanitarian approach to fight to survive a power imbalance that is not
supposed to be contested we as a subset species are supposed to be compensated
through the Columbia River System Operations Review Pilot Program of Anadromous
“fishes” (individuals) SOS’s of the ESA environmental impact statement, BC hydro the
entity and representative regulatory authority for Canada in the Columbia River
Operations Review, Environmental Impact Statement and in honor of the Crown shall
uphold the obligation to pay its intended family’s from the Canadian Entitlement
Allocation Agreements to a threshold of un due hardship pain and suffering and
significant loss BC Hydro amongst others should and be liable to pay for that
compensation for this pilot program out of those trust funds violating human rights and
shall give consultation and financial disclosure to the allocation instrument of these
malicious acts and the creator of this document.
At common law aboriginal rights did not, of course, have constitutional
status, with the result that Parliament could, at any time, extinguish
or regulate those rights...; it is this which distinguishes
the aboriginal rights recognized and affirmed in s.35(1) from the

6. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
6 | P a g e
aboriginal rights protected by the common law.
(7) Evolutionary Designated Unit at Risk status # 59600237(01) the operational plan a
weapon used that is not understandable unless it happens to the individual that this thing
is an array of elements including distorted acoustic weaponry and electromagnetic RF
pulses of pollution and surrounding elements of attack are all implemented causing
adverse impacts that makes it hard to work as this inherent vice squeezes your organs,
you are being cooked from the inside out, and the preclusion of justice being blocked is
a common law right to be acknowledged and accommodated by the Province due to OIB
Chief implementing a program that is genetically discriminative and has excluded the
designate that was banned from all public buildings and recourses on reserve for in-kind
benefits of a political subdivision and as to an incidental take isolate and target in a
punitive process not a punishment to me is an extended punishment and as a result of
an unhandled exception without the means/finances to bring this to court pinned down
involuntary house arrest hence just throwing the work on the internet has been a way to
be herd outside the controlled ecosystem of the Okanagan/Colville aboriginal species,
and its status report distinguishing aboriginal rights in its international Critical Habitat
Canada/U.S traditional territory of the Okanagan/Colville tribes.
s.35(1) aboriginal rights cannot be extinguished and can only be regulated
or infringed consistent with the justificatory test laid out by
this Court in Sparrow, supra [n.33].68
Citing the Indian Act
(8) Extinguished in those rights is the test of survival that has been life long right from
the whom the doctors left my mother strapped to the table as I was coming out she
thought I was going to fall to the floor at birth, taking place in Tonasket Washington an
acclimation pond for spring run chinook salmonids (Individuals) artificial propagation, or
pilot program this life long test in a disinformation ecosystem, and the last 4 years since
discovery has been the fight for life as the justificatory test turned up to the highest level
and a nonstop work ethic in ambient environmental conditions of physical and self
education training is and still is the only way to fight back you have to take the abuses
with a smile on your face isolated in a habitat inside a habitat and just doing papers like
this and the irritable research with constant cyber incidents 404 not founds and an
average of at least 14 hours a day 7 days a week since 2012 and still going because you
constantly have to be moving and working or it feels like your going to burn up from the
inside out, and 4 years ago a rude awakening of this discovery and has been an
adjustment and to function around society a choir while being punished from the inside
out and just recently I pissed this technology off a voice to skull technology I can only
recon it is that is a patented technology did not know how this state of the art acoustic
weaponry is literally in your head preying on your thought process so far in depth it can
actually use that voice you thought of and pester you with it to explain lot of the tortures
where nothing worse can happen to a man to be given shock treatment and other things
to induce thoughts or so subtle to extreme force you would not even notice it, just a thorn
in the heart feeling like you have to scratch your insides as it attacks you it has no
shame as it hits hard at every bodily movement, from chewing on food to reaching out
and grabbing something it is zapping you nervous system and at the same time
screaming in your head “don’t think like that” it is so controlling and disgustingly creepy I
do not wish it on my worst enemy and the thought of my children going through this is
enough for me if exposure is seeming to become the instrument needed to change the

7. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
7 | P a g e
research to strive for ethics and truly protect the environment from this terror stopping
this force technology and taking it out of hands that deploy it in an adverse possession is
a possession and disruption of an individual affecting it in a fundamental way of life in
every aspect in that life with no consideration or compassion for the life of a human
being or the surrounding environment of that species for more detail see evidence to the
contrary status report.
WHAT HAS BEEN SUCESSFUL – THE FISHING BY-LAY CASES
Citing Utilizing Indian Act by-laws as a tool of self government by John W. Gailus
Very few section 81 by-law cases have been considered by appellant courts. However two Supreme Canada
Cases have considered the scope of councils by-law making authority under section 81(1)(o). Nikal and its
companion case, Lewis considered why a bands by-law making power to regulate a ‘fishery’ extended into a
river that ran through the Bands reserve both cases were regulatory offences under the Fisheries Act and in
its regulations. In both cases, the bands had enacted fishing by-laws which, if applicable, would constitute a
defence to the fisheries charges. The court held that the ad medium filium acquae rule by which ownership
of the bed of non-tidal river or streams belongs in equal halves to the owners of a riparian land, did not apply
as the rivers were navigable. As a result, by-laws were found to not apply as the rivers were not ‘on the
reserve’. The problem with these decisions is that they have efficiently struck any effective application of
section 81(1)(o) except perhaps in instances where the first nation has a fish bearing lake entirely within the
bounds of the reserve.
(9) Section 81(1)(o) by-law case have been considered by appellant courts OSOYOOS
FIRST NATION BOARD OF REVIEW APPEAL NO. 16-47-0003 BETWEEN HANK
BAPTISTE AND APPELLANTS THE ASSESSER – OSOYOOS FIRST NATION.
Osoyoos Indian Band Property Assessment Law 2009 or the Fiscal and Statistical
Management Act. Assessment Roll Number 47-125. Application of Law. 5 This law
applies to all interests in land.
“Holder” means a person in possession of an interest in land or a person who, for the
time being , (a) is entitled through lease, licence or other legal means (b) is in actual
occupation in the interest in the land (c) has any right, title, estate or interest in the
interest of the land (d) is a trustee of the interest of the land
IV assessed Value (5) Except where otherwise provided, the assessor must assess
interests in land and their market value as if held in a fee simple off the reserve.
In the attempt to proceed with the appellant courts on this matter of being a case of
discrimination and conflict of interest gross misconduct under;
(12) As an exception under subsection (11) class 7 (Managed Forest Land) must include
only lands respecting which a licence or permit to cut timber has been issued under the
Indian Act.
(9) where a lease or other instrument granting an interest in land places a restriction on
the use of property, other than right of termination or a restriction of the duration of the
interest in land, the assessor must consider the restriction.
Now as an instrument and Holder, that may have been used by a trustee of interest of
the land acquiring the trustee position through abuse of power and obscuring that
information from the holder and instrument by designation through managed forest lands
1.10 matrix OIB FRA?

8. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
8 | P a g e
Being banned from all public buildings on reserve including the band office kept me from
observing the assessment role to which I would not have been able to observe anyway
because;
(15)(1) On application of the holder the tax administrator may omit or obscure the
holders name, address or information about the holder that would ordinarily be included
in an assessment role if, in the tax administrators opinion the inclusion of the name
could reasonably expected to threaten the safety or mental or physical health of the
holder or a member of the holders household.
Regardless why would the tax administrator have to omit or obscure the holders name
upon application if the operations of the forest management is what is adversely
affecting the holder.
15(2) Where the tax administrator omits or obscures information under subsection (1),
such information must be obscured from all assessment roles that are available for
public inspection.
Makes no sense to me this must be the scheme of the act because what unfolds in my
pursuit of the truth is doors shut in my face from the BC tax assessment lady trying to
talk me out of pursuing my case and mistakenly not hanging up here phone and leaving
about a 5-minute conversation of her and a co-worker discussing what they could say to
me so I would go away forget about it.
16(1) Any person holding a charge on the accessible property may at any time give
notice with full particulars of the nature extent and duration of the charge, to the
assessor and request that his or her name be added to the assessment roll with respect
of that assessable property, for the duration of the charge.
Now I made a complaint received a letter from BC assessments March 22 2016 with
property Identification area 47 jurisdiction 125 and regarding schedule of an appeal I
was then sent a notice and appeal number 16-47-0003 and was told I had 30 days to file
in the competent jurisdiction which I was unaware where that was so I called the BC
Assessments representative and she would not give any information, and told me to get
a lawyer which absolutely no one will help being trapped in this habitat inside a habitat
and isolated and tortured in the mean time while being precluded crucial information.
The chairman of the board emails me and tells me as legal advice and competent
jurisdiction you will have to get a lawyer to assist you and lets me know I have 30 days
so about 5 days before the due date I email him and tell him If you could please tell me
the competent jurisdiction I need more time and figured it may be in a U.S court because
of political subdivision, of the United States or can I get more time, so the deadline goes
by and about 10 days or more later after he emails me back and says oh sorry about not
answering you sooner but I was out of the Country and the competent jurisdiction would
be BC supreme court and its to late to file sorry I can not afford you any more time.
Not that I have the money or that any lawyer would talk to me and this is the type of the
way people treat me is that every body I’m in contact with is or if not becomes or express
that type behaviour towards me and like I say while I’m being precluded I am being
extremely harassed and attacked by this unlawful utility presence that is very damaging

9. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
9 | P a g e
to self worth as this is continuous adverse attacks 24/7 in this biological response
research, inflicted by many different research agencies academia and governmental
stakeholders.
A conflict of interest the receptionist of the band and sits on the board Doris chapman is
where being hung up on by here because of calling her on it that every time I phone the
band office the department I call for information is never in rarely do I get past here and
never get return calls and being banned from there the band absolutely doing whatever it
takes at all costs to keep me from this information or any kind of financial disclosure.
As to a river running through the north end of the OIB reserve and the cases being
regulatory offences against its statutory instrument in nature and in both cases the band
trying to enact fishing by-laws in that which would constitute a defence to the fisheries
charges in reality the enacting the fisheries by-law was in the case of unethical research
as Designated Unit of the forestry management 1.10 matrix or subspecies of the
Okanagan Chinook DU and a cheap way of not being accountable for the atrocities
implemented on the instrument and a subset species in which the reserve has a fish
bearing lake right on part of the family private property who I also have been thrown
under the bus by my own family as they were thanked in a fishes assessment for making
it easier for chief and council to implement this taking my dads life savings he put in the
property after he passed away and excluding me and my two boys and niece from the
property this is a very evil thing these government exercises, activities, and operational
plans are not saving us as a species listed and designated under Species at Risk Act,
Indian Act, First Nations Fiscal Statistical Management Act, Endangered Species Act
1973, Federal Power Act 215, Forestry Revitalization Act, Forest Act many Acts, MOA,
MOU’s. and have been over exploited and a need for the accommodation and
recognized for the hard work and work ethic it takes to adjust and survive through a
nightmare of what comes of being an instrument and the more that is learned on the
process of amending legislations is what is needed to implement safer ethical research
is a main priority and goal to strive to further self education for and to have the
researchers and political abusers of the technology quit or be held accountable for the
serious crimes against man-kind and it is not ok to designate a person without informed
consent to a test that I never asked for are a test I would not like my worst enemy to go
through the power imbalance is 99.9% of chance that you will quit or give up or die of
disease made to look natural or staged accident taking your life or harm form of take
causing a violent death blamed and scapegoated by and on drug subculture, is not in
the nature as a father and uncle that could not bear to watch them my children be hurt in
this way, for that matter any living thing or an ecological organism.
Appeals
51(1) An appeal lies from the assessment review board to a court of competent
jurisdiction on a question of law.
51(2) an appeal under subsection(1) must be commenced within (30) days of the delivery
of the Assessment Review Boards decision under subsection 49(1).
As stated above there was an breach I would say by sending me the appeal Collins
telling me to see a lawyer when he could have easily told me is obvious my situation,
and not letting me know till after the deadline then telling me that it was BC supreme

10. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
10 | P a g e
Court, rubbing it in, anyways it was very un-just, and conflict of interest with the
secretary of the band also on the board.
Part XI General Provisions
52(1) Any person who has custody or control of information or records obtained or
created under this law must not disclose the records except;
(b) in proceedings before the assessment review board, a court of law or pursuant to a
court order,
(2) assessor may disclose the agent of a holder confidential information relating to the
property if the disclosure has been authorized in writing by the holder.
Disclosure for Researcher Purposes
53(b) where the research cannot reasonably be accomplished unless the information is
provided in an identifiable form, the third party has sighed an agreement with the council
to comply with council requirements respecting the use, confidentiality and security of
the information.
Subject to this unethical research shown by the banning from the public buildings and
discrimination and nasty way of strategical tactics too where it took me 3 years to and
am still not free of their wrath even though I don’t use any resource’s of the band they
use the reserve liaison cop to harass me on many occasions Susan Harper would go out
of her way to harass or charge me for anything, taking some hunting shells from the 90’s
and charging me with a no weapons breach and possession of prohibited weapon. To
comply with council requirements for the researchers to respect confidentiality a security
of the confidential information is what I may have received if given a chance to file with a
competent jurisdiction is as far as I have gotten thus far, and while people are fighting
tooth and nail to keep the program going I am supressed as a research subject that is
sick as hell the things that are done in this experimental research of who knows how
many different governmental agencies, academia fish & wildlife, Forestry Revenue
Agreement and this First Nation Fiscal and Statistical Management Act, operations,
activities, and operational plans of these acts and MOA’s and an yearly annual list of the
FRA Agreement with British Columbia are malicious and accountability and justice for
violating human rights the charter of rights and freedoms, need to be addressed its not
right and is against the law, realistically there is not enough compensation you could
give to cover the losses but being accountable is a start and as it stands it is brutal as I
am in a continued 1.10 matrix to have a continued tortuous existence and subject to the
un ethical research nobody should have to bear hell on earth this way and disclosure
from 53(b) of all research that has and continues to adversely affect the well being of me
as a species of an Okanagan/Colville aboriginal persons of ancient decent.
Summary:
There is a lot that Is and does point to me as the interest in the land and holder or debtor
It is without no doubt that I am being a subsequent subject to experimental studies to all
the Acts that are mentioned and many more I believe I am being used by the Chief in
council of OIB to accumulate as much benefit that they can get out of designating me in
a number of different research projects from fish & wildlife to the OIB taxation law to the

11. Inkameep Tribal Society of Endangered Species at Risk Extirpated Threatened Individual Administration
11 | P a g e
right of way agreements Forest Act and although I see my story “evidence to the
contrary” is in the Statutory Instruments Act as 31(1) consolidation is evidence and I will
send this into the Department of Justice Canada and hope for some expedited
accommodation and consultation as nothing is changing anytime soon as to the day to
day adversity of harassments with an array of elements and different tactics all with the
same goal is aggression experiments and the engineering done to manipulate timed
events that are perfectly structured throughout the day as they accumulate along the day
in hopes of an recorded outburst to keep me in trouble or by some means always having
an authoritative leash that and the one’s putting me in that position have been getting
away with an abuse that is not humane and benefitting of it.
I Henry Baptiste Jr swear that this or these suggestions would be addressed and I am
the writer of this paper and is done to the best of my ability given the extraordinary
circumstances so any mistakes please exempt as to those circumstances and was not
meant to hurt nobody and welcome any accommodation or consultation and will be
cooperative in participating and taking control of my own entity and am not consenting to
anyone chiefly that represented me with out knowledge or consent and in statute would
relieve any such person or body corporate from those duties and be intrusted to is
infringed aboriginal intended title holder in fee simple or easement to the designated unit
and statute in creature or ‘(Individual)’ Thank You;
Henry Baptiste Jr
Henrybaptiste3@gmail.com
1068 Mckinney Rd
Resident Dwelling
Oliver BC V0H1T8
HenryBaptisteJr 2016-11-12
Domiciled at Mable George’s
Resident Dwelling 620 East Omak
WA. 98841 PO Box 2021