Presentation slides for ASTD ICE2010, Session 116.
"Better Results With No Extra Cash: *Motivational Ideas for Global Projects"
Meant for HRD professionals and managers interested in developing motivating working environment for their teams and organizations.
1. M116
Better Results With No Extra Cash:
Motivational Ideas for Global Projects
May 17, 2010 12:30 pm to 1:45 pm
Hiromi Nohara
HRD consultant
nohara@es.main.jp
2. Learning Objectives
1. Identify issues caused by regional
differences in your global projects.
2. Apply motivational theories and ideas to
increase your members’ productivity.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 2
3. Little Intro of Hiromi Nohara
HRD Consultant
Believer of HRD for business betterment
Alliances with other professionals and universities
Experiences in HRD global projects
http://nohara.main.jp/eng/
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 3
4. Why are global projects difficult?
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 4
5. Why difficult?
Regional differences in:
Regulations
Compensation systems
Labor relations These differences
Labor market/recruitment make the situation
Business customs MORE complex in
Available resources global environments.
Business priorities
Values
Individual career visions
Individual priorities Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 5
6. Let me share a case
to deepen our thoughts.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 6
7. Global Case: Company X
Project Objective
Implementing standardized Business Practices
through all global regions
Method
Developing certified trainers
Process
1. HQ/Local communication
2. Two Train-the-Trainer sessions in each region
3. In-between writing assignment
4. Trainer certification
5. Trainer debut
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 7
8. Global Case
Obstacles
1. Different attitudes toward the Business Practices
2. Political issues, “
Headquarter is invading!”
3. Lack of manpower in some regions
4. No managerial support for trainers in some regions
Consequences
Project schedule delays
Low-level motivation of the trainer candidates
Overwhelmed atmosphere
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 8
9. Global Case
Obstacles
Obstacles
1. Different attitudes toward the Business Practices
1. Different attitudes toward the Business Practices
2. Political issues, “
Headquarter is invading!”
2. Political issues, “Headquarter is invading!”
What we did to overcome
We did NOT teach. We DISCUSSED.
Lots of dialogues and constant communication.
Reviewed corporate mission and vision.
Clarified BP values, and trainers’ roles and responsibility.
Clarified how the project contribute to the group companies
and individual career/work.
Got back to our PURPOSES
Reviewed and discussed the project objectives and effects.
Clarified roles and responsibilities.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 9
10. Global Case
Obstacles
Obstacles
3. Lack of manpower in some regions
3. Lack of manpower in some regions
4. No managerial support for trainers in some regions
4. No managerial support for trainers in some regions
What we did to overcome
Prioritized QUALITY to Speed
Modified Schedule to be realistic and keep quality.
Balance the ideal and reality.
Video conferences with local CHOs
Gained C-level agreement and confirmation.
Local CHO arranged staffing.
Agreed on the value of the project.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 10
11. Pair/Group Discussion
Have you had similar experiences or obstacles?
What did you do to overcome the difficulties?
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 11
12. Let’look at our global projects
s
from members’ motivation side.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 12
13. What is “
motivation”anyway…?
,
What are “
ingredients” motivation?
of
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 13
14. Some recipes
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 14
15. Dainel Pink’ Dimension
s
Similar to Edward Deci’
s
Autonomy
Mastery Purpose
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 15
16. Kenneth Thomas’ Dimension
s
Feelings of 4 factors
Meaningfulness Choice
Competence Progress
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 16
17. Great Place to Work’ Dimension
s
Credibility
Trust Respect
Fairness
Pride Camaraderie
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 17
19. Compare the Dimensions
Credibility Purpose
Trust
Choice
Respect Mastery
Competence
These dimensions seem to
Fairness focus mostly on individuals
Competence
Autonomy
Pride Meaningfulness
Mastery
Progress
Camaraderie
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 19
20. Compare the Dimensions
Credibility Purpose
Trust
Choice
Respect Mastery
Competence
Focuses on
organization Seem to focus on individuals
Fairness
and team
Competence
Autonomy
Pride Meaningfulness
Mastery
Progress
Camaraderie
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 20
21. “Great Place to Work for”Survey
Based on employee survey in 80s & 90s.
Great Place to Work Institute interviewed some
thousand employees from 150 companies.
Those employees tend to have same image toward
“great work”and “
great place to work for”
“Great Place to Work for” selected every
are
year based on questionnaire and research
results.
The survey lists “
Fortune 100 best”and “ best
50
small & medium company”
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 21
22. GPTW Dimension
Dimension How it plays out in the workplace
Communications are open and accessible
Credibility Competence in coordinating human and material resources
Integrity in carrying out vision with consistency
Supporting professional development and showing appreciation
Trust
Respect Collaboration with employees on relevant decisions
Caring for employees as individuals with personal lives
Equity - balanced treatment for all in terms of rewards
Fairness Impartiality - absence of favoritism in hiring and promotions
Justice - lack of discrimination and process for appeals
In personal job, individual contributions
Pride In work produced by one’team or work group
s
In the organization’products and standing in the community
s
Abilityto be oneself
Camaraderie Socially friendly and welcoming atmosphere
Sense of “ family” “
or team”
Reference: GPTW Web page. http://www.greatplacetowork.com/what_we_do/model.php
Used with written permission by GPTW Institute.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 22
23. Motivational Cycle
Dimensions are systematically connected.
Credibility
Trust Respect
Fairness
Camaraderie
Pride
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 23
24. Organization and Project
For long-lasting effects,
we need to work both on
Organizational and
Team Levels.
Our focus-balance
depends on our roles.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 24
25. Ideas for Great Place to Work for
Team Dimension Organization
Clarify (or ask to clarify) the objective, Executives communicate with
who does what by when for the project employees through various media
Send messages to the entire team to such as videos, conferences,
remind project goal and objectives. meetings newsletters and emails.
Credibility
Connect and explain the corporate Executives and managers repeatedly
vision and the project work refer to the corporate mission, visions
and behavioral norms, and share
their stories related to mission.
Listen to members feedback Improvement actions based on ES
Praise not only good results but also survey results.
work processes and members’ efforts Subordinates evaluate superiors
Trust
Give detailed constructive feedback Benefit programs based on employee
Offer advice on knowledge/skill needs
development Respect Training opportunities both formal
Share knowledge tools and informal
When possible, let members choose Employee awards
who they want to work with Good office environments and
Send appreciative messages and build facilities
support team culture
Clarify what members are expected Equal promotion opportunities
Evaluate members based on facts Clear and fair evaluation criteria
Fairness
Explain reasons for your evaluation Flexibility in work hours
results
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 25
26. Ideas for Great Place to Work for
Team Dimension
Clarify
objective, who, what and when
Message to the whole Credibility
Connect vision and work
Listen
Praise
Constructive feedback
Trust
Offer advice Respect
Share tools
Let them chooose
Appreciate
Clarifyexpectation
Evaluate based on facts Fairness
Explain reasons
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 26
27. Ideas for Great Place to Work for
Team Dimension Organization
Praiseand award members Sharing customers’
Constantly share customers’voice appreciative voice with all
and how their works are employees
appreciated Clarify company values and
Pride
hire only good fits
Let the employees know
company’involvement in
s
community or social activities
Develop knowledge share system Develop events and activities
Managers share time to to appreciate cultural
communicate with their members Camaraderie diversities in the company
and respond to their mails quickly Mentors help new employees
for smooth start
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 27
28. Ideas for Great Place to Work for
Team Dimension
Praiseand award
Share customers’voice Pride
Share
knowledge
Camaraderie
Communicate and respond
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 28
29. Ideas for Great Place to Work for
Team Dimension Organization
Clarify (or ask to clarify) who does what by Executives communicate with employees
when for the project through various media such as videos,
Constantly send messages to the entire team conferences, meetings newsletters and
and nurture sense of togetherness emails.
Praise not only good results but also work Credibility Executives and managers repeatedly refer
processes and members’ efforts to the corporate mission, visions and
behavioral norms, and share their stories
No need to copy.
Explain the connection between corporate
vision and current work of the team. Help them
see beyond just a small assigned task
related to mission.
Encourage opinion exchange Improvement actions based on ES survey
results.
Trust
Managers offer servant leadership
•Consider our company mission, vision,
Monitor and praise members Subordinates evaluate superiors
Benefit programs based on employee
Build appreciative team culture
and current situation first.
Respect needs
Training opportunities both formal and
•Prioritize and optimize the measures informal
Employee awards
according to our situation. Good office environments and facilities
Appreciate motivation Equal promotion opportunities
Monitor each employee and evaluate him/her Clear and fair evaluation criteria
based on facts Fairness Flexibility in work hours
Offer advice on knowledge/skill development
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 29
30. SAS Institute ~#1 in 2010~
Develops analytical software systems
Quick Facts
Website: www.sas.com
Year founded: 1976
Location: Cary, NC
US Employees: 5,487
US Revenue: 818 million
Voluntary Turnover: 2%
Job Application: 26,432
Job Filled: 156
Reference: http://resources.greatplacetowork.com/article/pdf/sas_2010.pdf
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 30
31. SAS Institute ~#1 in 2010~
Dimension What they do
Directcommunication opportunities with executives.
Employees give feedback to executives.
Credibility
Webcasts by executives and live audience polls during the sessions.
Blogs as a communication tool between executives and employees
Great office environments and facilities
Trust
Supporting professional development and showing appreciation
Respect
Collaboration with employees on relevant decisions
Caring for employees as individuals with personal lives
No outsourcing in areas such as security, food service and healthcare.
Fairness Equal fringe benefits for all (part/full-time) employees
Flexibility in work hours
Hiring people with characteristics that parallel the company values
Pride Offer education programs to local communities.
Clarifyexpectations employees to make a difference.
Camaraderie
Their products are used by many Non-Governmental Organizations
Reference: GPTW http://www.greatplacetowork.com/what_we_do/lists-us-bestusa.htm
Used with written permission by GPTW Institute.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 31
32. SAS Institute ~#1 in 2010~
Dimension What they do
Credibility Directcommunication opportunities with executives.
Employees give feedback to executives.
Webcasts by executives and live audience polls during the sessions.
Blogs as a communication tool between executives and employees
Respect Greatoffice environments and facilities
we are in
“ Supporting professionalbelief that and showing appreciation
Trust
SAS starts with the development
the business of people –whether that is
Collaboration with employees on relevant decisions
Caring for employees as individuals with personal lives
with customers, employees or business
Fairness No outsourcing in areas such as security, food service and healthcare.
contacts.” benefits for all (part/full-time) employees
Equal fringe
Flexibility in work hours
Hiring
SAS CEO, Mr. Jim Goodnight
people with characteristics that parallel the company values
Pride
Offer education programs to local communities.
Camaraderie Clarifyexpectations employees to make a difference.
Their products are used by many Non-Governmental Organizations
Reference: GPTW http://www.greatplacetowork.com/what_we_do/lists-us-bestusa.htm
Used with written permission by GPTW Institute.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 32
33. For our global projects
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 33
34. What we can do for global projects
In addition to the previously introduced “
Ideas for Team”
Dimension Global team ideas
Credibility Use free internet tools for communication
and Knowledge management
Trust
Respect Hold Web conferences
Involve board members of companies
Fairness Offer additional help when possible
Pride Share positive evaluation toward members
with their bosses
Camaraderie Mailing list to share Q&A. Make sure each
question is answered
Clarify when to contact who
Develop positive team culture
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 34
35. Synchronous vs. Asynchronous
Synchronous
Face-to-Face
Traditional Meeting
Asynchronous
Collaboration
Message Board Media
Web Meeting
FAQ list
Virtual
Web Call
Mailing List
Helpline
Web Community
Resource Rearrangement
Member Directory Community
Good Reputation Forwarding Development
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 35
36. Dialogue
Any more ideas?
Any successful experiences?
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 36
37. Job Aid Sample
Project name:
Project period:
Members:
1. Project Objectives 2. Project Goals
3. How to Reach the Goals 4. Deliverables
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 37
38. Job Aid (continued) Sample
5. Schedule
What to do Who Due Actual
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 38
39. Job Aid (continued) Sample
Dimension What to do
Credibility
Trust
Respect
Fairness
Pride
Camaraderie
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 39
40. References
My LinkedIn: Presentation slides are available
http://jp.linkedin.com/in/hirominohara
Great Place to Work Institute Web page
http://www.greatplacetowork.com/index.php
SAS Web page
http://www.sas.com/
Daniel H. Pink “ Drive: The surprising truth about what
motivates us”Riverhead Books (2009)
,
Edward L. Deci Richard Flaste, “ Why we do what we do:
Understanding Self-motivation”Penguin (1996),
,
Kenneth W. Thomas, “ Intrinsic Motivation at Work: What
Really Drives Employee Engagement”Berrett-Koehler
,
(2009)
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 40
41. Thank you very much.
Let’enjoy our global projects!
s
Hiromi Nohara
nohara@es.main.jp
Twitter:hirominohara
Skype:hirominohara
LinkedIn:hirominohara
Ⓒ Hiromi Nohara, nohara@es.main.jp 41