Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
How to knock down silos with a hammer how do siloed organizations become more integrated final afp
1. How to Knock Down Silos With A Hammer!
How do siloed nonprofit organizations
become more integrated?
. Page 1
2. Take our survey at the end of
the session!
At the end of the session, we’ll ask you to go online and fill out
our integration survey. We’ll select 1 WINNER to receive
complimentary 1-hour integrated fundraising consulting
session
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MK85BCT
. Page 2
3. Learning Outcomes
1) Be better at planning and executing cross channel
and integrated fundraising and communications
2) Understand that this will lead to improved
cooperation between “competing” departments
within your nonprofit organization
3) Understand how to embed innovation into your
fundraising culture
4) Look at what channels work for you
5) Making the right investment to reach your target
audience
. Page 3
4. Today‟s Agenda
1) Our Take on The Barriers to Integrated Marketing
2) Our Current Reality
What is driving changes in how we fundraise?
3) Integration
What’s the value of being integrated?
4) Self-Assessment
Where are you as an organization?
5) Facilitated Solutions
How do you align culture, staff, and technology?
6) Evidence – Put It All Together
What does integration look like in the real world?
. Page 4
11. Current Reality
1) Nonprofit offline donors are aging
2) Donor files and acquisition list sources are shrinking
3) Donor Fatigue is evident
4) Revenues are flat and – in many cases – are falling
5) Direct mail costs are increasing/ fundraising margins are shrinking
6) Online – when keep in a silo - underperforms
Nonprofits need younger more valuable donors
More personal relationships with loyal donors
Investment in a multi-channel approach
WHAT‟S MISSING IN YOUR CURRENT REALITY?
. Page 11
12. Online donor retention of single gift donors can be
terrible...
Year Acquired Number Acquired Gave in Year 2
2006 99 32.30%
2007 1736 24.20% 25.5% average
2008 3194 19.30% retention rate
2009 2913 26.40% Benchmark 28%
2010 7656
2011 7570
How can we improve this?
14. The Three Main Benefits
• Integrated Marketing Benefits
• Deepens constituent loyalty and increases lifetime value
• Strengthens the brand
• Engage new audiences, grow revenue, and maybe even save
money.
. Page 14
15. Value of Multi-Channel: Loyalty
Annual Donor Value1 Retention Rate2
$255.74
82.3%
$191.35
70.1%
62.3%
$102.64
Sources:
1. Convio / Strategic One White Paper: Integrating Online Marketing (eCRM) with Direct Mail Fundraising: Adding a New Communication
and Donation Channel Increases Donations; total contributions over 12 month period, excluding $10k+ gifts for SPCA of Texas
2. Ibid. Comparison of retention rates for multi-year donors, SPCA of Texas
. Page 15
16. Self-Assessment
Where Are You in the Multi-Channel Evolution?
. Page 16
17. Where are you?
Single Silos Coordinated Integrated
• Online Marketing • Separate Metrics & • Thematically • Unified Strategy & Full
Makes Minimal Team for Online Integrated Integration Across
Contribution Marketing Channel Managers
• Coordinated Appeals
• Calendar-Based • No Calendar / • Measures Success
Campaigning Campaign • Integrated Calendar
Across Channels, Not
• Not Financially
Coordination • Shared Metrics By Channel
Committed to Second • Online Constitutes 5- • More Stuff, More • Seamlessly Integrates
Channel 25% Direct Response Channels New Media across
Revenue channels
• Shared success,
budget and goals
. Page 17
18. On A Scale of 1 to 10…
• “1” = Silos, “5” = Coordinated, and “10” =
Integrated
• Where do you fall on the scale?
. Page 18
23. How are you doing?
What‟s happening
next door.
24.
25. Three Factors for Integration
• Leadership commitment to the
philosophy
• Planning and investing in the systems &
process to make it happen
• Removing silos between teams and
departments
. Page 25
26. Making It Happen
Optimizing Talent and Finding Leverage
. Page 26
27. An integrated approach for Sick Kids
• The cultivation survey:
• Sent to 57,400 donors
• 3 key segments: Monthly,
Active & Lapsed
• 5,530 responses (response
rate of 11%)
• Raised $17,574 – a bonus!
• Reactivated 30 donors
• Found 85 expectances and
292 legacy leads and 143
middle and major donor
leads!
• Key: shared budgeting!
. Page 27
29. Holiday 2011 Campaign
The campaign featured a landing page, which displayed
“messages of hope”, left by constituents when they were
making donations.
The landing page also featured a video with a brief
explanation of what the BC Cancer Foundation is, a
campaign thermometer and a promotion of the ability to
send eCards.
. Page 29
31. Holiday 2011 Campaign
The campaign was active for about three weeks, ending
on December 31, 2011. It included:
1. Google AdWords Search Network (Paid Account)
2. Google AdWords Display Network
3. Google AdWords Search Network (Google Grant
Account)
4. Email – 4 waves
. Page 31
33. Results and Learnings
Overall Revenue: 1,272 gifts, $275,003, $216.20
average gift
1. Big Breakthrough #1: Google Search, Adwords -
$2,500 spent with a return of $58,000.
2. Big Breakthrough #2: Integration across channels
worked
3. Big Breakthrough #3: More emails, with
personalization and e-cards, led to more money
online
. Page 33
34. A Public Broadcaster
• Brand is perceived as authentic
• They had no online fundraising presence and non
integration in the recent past
. Page 34
35. Things needed to be improved
• 2nd gift conversion dropped from 83% to 30%
• Net loss of donors since 2005.
• LTV of donors decreasing significantly since 2001
• Magazine, which was the primary stewardship vehicle,
stopped in 2007.
• Share of voice, i.e.number of times donors hear from
TVO in a year, has decreased.
. Page 35
36. It would take an integrated solution…
• Senior management support
• Cross departmental cooperation
• Create an integrated plan and stick to it
. Page 36
42. The stirring conclusion…
• So what did you learn today?
• One more time…integrated communication works!
• Where is your organization in the multi channel
journey?
• How do you get buy in at the senior level and then if
you make an integrated plan – stick with it!
. Page 42
43. Remember to fill out the
online survey to win FREE
consulting session!
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MK85BCT
. Page 43
Editor's Notes
Win a multi-channel consulting session
A
A
A
MWe are going to ask the group for participation here.Cost of donor acquisitionNeed to increase donor retention ratesConstituent expectations / Constituent serviceCompetition for donor dollarsNeed to reach new audiencesNeed to cultivate constituents with multiple relationships to our organization (e.g. volunteer + donor, donor + advocate, etc.)Other (if they can type something in…)
MWe are going to ask the group for participation here.Cost of donor acquisitionNeed to increase donor retention ratesConstituent expectations / Constituent serviceCompetition for donor dollarsNeed to reach new audiencesNeed to cultivate constituents with multiple relationships to our organization (e.g. volunteer + donor, donor + advocate, etc.)Other (if they can type something in…)
Organizations can maximize the value of donor relationships with the use of multi-channel strategies.
***This isn't a published piece, so we can't use the citation - but we can say that this is hot off the presses from a research piece we are about to publish and talk about who we surveyed in the notes***- An integrated approach to marketing & communications makes sense. Nonprofit leaders agree that integrated marketing is a logical approach, with myriad benefits.- This logic is not new. What is new and driving urgency is that audiences themselves are becoming increasingly multi-channel and it’s becoming harder and more expensive to raise every dollar.
Categories from Convio/Edge Research Multi-Channel/Integrated Study, Spring 2011
- Find the bright spots- Script the critical moves- Point to the destination
- Find the feeling- Shrink the Change;- Grow your people
- Tweak the environment- Build habits- Rally the herd
Convio/Edge ResearchWhile the concept is logical, moving toward an integrated approach is ANYTHING but easy!
First time for a dedicated landing page for our EOY campaign
Who has GoogleAdwords? Who has Google Grant?1) Paid search: first time using pad search on campaign - $1200 spend / $59K in revenue2) Display network: $300 spend / $0K in revenue (but 351,000 impressions)3) Google grant: shifted most important keywords to paid account - competition4) Email campaign – 4 waves – audience of 97,000 – last email on Dec 30th (who sends email on last days of Dec? – Do it!)- Open rates of 30% / 27% / 19% / 16% (however CTR’s below 1%) trackable to $45K in revenue5) Note also significant media presence (ads / PSAs) but did not reference campaign
Who gave? Most significantly: DM recipients ($95K) first time online ($188K ) likely includes some DM and paid search directed Even received gifts from emailsupression groups- communication restrictions ($75K)- even a few donations from supressed as deceased
Overall: contributed to $312K in Dec vs. $214K in Dec. 2011Yes, paid search critical – esp. at this time of year. And for us helps to address brand confusion. Integration / familiarity across channels – DM in particular4 emails each contributing to incremental opens and clicksDedicated landing page played a key role – engagement, reinforcement, integrated to campaign promotion (relevance between ad copy / page copy)Do better?Strong home presence of campaign on home page of websiteFurther refinement of paid search strategies