Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key

P
PRASANTHI PETLURUAssitant Professor à B V RAJU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

FE Supply key

Code No: A26A3
B V RAJU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NARSAPUR
(UGC - AUTONOMOUS)
B.Tech III Year II Semester Supplementary Examinations, Sep/Oct 2020
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING KEY
( C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g )
Max Marks: 70
1. a) Need of soil exploration (8 M)
The information from soil investigations will enable a Civil engineer to plan, decide, design, and
execute a construction project. Soil investigations are done to obtain the information that is
useful for one or more of the following purposes.
1. To know the geological condition of rock and soil formation.
2. To establish the groundwater levels and determine the properties of water.
3. To select the type and depth of foundation for proposed structure
4. To determine the bearing capacity of the site.
5. To estimate the probable maximum and differential settlements.
6. To predict the lateral earth pressure against retaining walls and abutments.
7. To select suitable construction techniques
8. To predict and to solve potential foundation problems
9. To ascertain the suitability of the soil as a construction material.
10. To determine soil properties required for design
11. Establish procedures for soil improvement to suit design purpose
12. To investigate the safety of existing structures and to suggest the remedial measures.
13. To observe the soil the soil performance after construction.
1 b) Procedure of obtaining a chunk sample. (8 M)
• A cylindrical container open at both the ends is used for sampling.
• The soil is trimmed to shape at the bottom of the test pit One end of container is closed and
inverted over the soil chunk and the soil sample is removed using spatula
• This method is suitable for cohesive soil. Obtaining chunk sample.
2. Procedure of conducting a standard penetration test:
Standard Penetration Test.: (8 M)
The standard Penetration Test is the most commonly used in –site test, especially for cohesion
less soils which cannot be easily sampled, the test is extremely useful for determining the relative
density and the angle to determine the UCC strength of the cohesive soil.
The standard penetration test is conducted in a bore hole using a standard split spoon sampler,
when the bore hole has been drilled to the desired depth, the drilling tools are removed and the
sampler is lowered to the bottom of the hole. The sampler is driven into the soil by a drop
hammer of 63.5kg mass falling through a height of 750mm at the rate of 30 blows per minutes.
The number of hammer blows required to drive 150mm of the sample is counted.
The sampler is further driven by 150mm and the number of blows recorded. Likewise the
sampler is once again further driven by 150mm and the number of blows recorded. The number
of blows recorded for the first 150mm is disregarded. The plumber of blows recorded for the last
two 150mm intervals are added to give the standard Penetration Number (N). In other words, the
standard Penetration number is equal to the number of blows required for 300mm of penetration
beyond a seating drive of 150mm.
If the number of blows for 150mm drive exceeds 50, it is taken as refusal and the test is
discontinued. The standard Penetration number is corrected for decadency correction and our
burden correction.
(a) Dilatancy Correction. (4 M)
Silty fine sands and fine sands below the water table develop pore pressure which is not
easily dissipated. The pore pressure increases the resistance of the soil and hence the Penetration
number (N). Terzaghi and peck recommend the following correction when the observed N value
exceeds 15. The corrected Penetration Number,
Nc = 15 + ½ [NR – 15]
Where,
Nc – corrected value
NR – Recorded Value
If NR ≤ 15, then Nc = NR
(b) Over burden Pressure Correction: (4 M)
In granular soils, the overburden pressure affects the penetration resistance. Generally, the
soil with high confining pressure gives higher penetration number. As the confining pressure in
cohesion soil increases with depth, the penetration number for the soils at shallow depths is
under estimated and that at greater depths is over estimated for uniformity, the N values obtained
from field tests under different effective overburden pressure are corrected to a standard effective
overburden pressure.
For dry or moist clean sand, (Gibbs and Holtz)
Nc =
𝐍𝐑 𝐗 𝟑𝟓𝟎
̅ 𝟎 +𝟕𝟎
Where,
Nc - corrected value
NR - Recorded Value
̅0 - effective over burden pressure
It is applicable for ̅ ≤ 280kN/m2
. Usually the overburden correction is applied first and then
dilatancy correction is applied first and then dilatancy correction is applied.
The value of standard Penetration number N depends upon the relative density of the
cohesionless soil and the unconfined compressive strength of the cohesive soil. If the soil is
compact or stiff, the penetration number is high.
3. a) Static method in bearing capacity of piles: (4 M)
Static analysis:
Qup = Qp + Qs
where,
Qup = ultimate load on pile.
Qp = tip resistance= qn x A
Qs =skin resistance = 𝜋 𝐷 𝑙 × 𝑙s
Where, fs = unit skin friction between pie and soil.
3. b) Classification of piles: (10 M)
Piles can be classified according to
1. The material used
2. The mode of transfer of load
3. The method of construction
4. The use and
5. Displacement of soil
1. Classification according to material used
There are four types of piles according to materials used
(i) Steel piles
(ii) Concrete piles
(iii) Timber piles
(iv) Composite piles
2. Classification based on mode of transfer of load
Based on the mode of transfer of loads, the pile can be classified into three categories:
(i) End bearing piles
(ii) Friction piles
(iii) Combined end bearing and friction piles
3. Classification based on method of installation
Based on the method of construction, the piles may be classified into the following 5 categories
(i) Driven pile
(ii) Driven and cast in situ piles
(iii) Bored and cast in situ piles
(iv) Screw piles
(v) Jacked piles
4. Classification based on use
The piles can be classified into the following 6 categories depending upon their use.
(i) Load bearing piles
(ii) Compaction piles
(iii) Tension piles
(iv) Sheet piles
(v) Fender piles
(vi) Anchor piles
Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key
5. Classification based on displacement of soil:
Based on the volume of the soil displacement during installation the piles can be classified into 2
categories
(i) Displacement piles
(ii) Non- displacement piles
5. Components of a well foundation
4 M
Well Components: (10M)
• Cutting Edge
• Well Curb
• Well steining
• Bottom Plug
• Sand Fill
• Top Plug
• Well cap
Cutting Edge:
Sharp edge which is provided at the lower end of the well or open and pneumatic caisson for
accelerating sinking operation is called cutting edge. It is made up steel or it is made in R.C.C.
Its angle to vertical is 30 0 and normally slope of 1 horizontal to 2 vertical given better result.
Well Curb
It is made of concrete or brick. Cutting edge of well or caisson is attached to well curb. During
sinking operation well curb impart to the well-stening and facilities the formation of bottom
Well Steining
Steining is constructed in concrete or masonary work.
Use of stening is to provide dead load during sinking operation
Topping
Covering provided over the well or caisson is called as topping.
Sand is filled in between topping and bottom plug. Topping also acts as a part of shuttering for
laying the well cap.
Bottom Plug:
The lower portion of well is sealed by the concrete is called as bottom plug.
Well Cap
R.C.C Slab covering provided over the top of well is termed as well cap.
Sand filling
The portion between top and bottom plug is filled with sand so as to increase the self weight of
the well and makes safe during earthquake.
6. a) Different shapes of well foundations: (8 M)
Caisson are constructed into two basic shapes and
combination of basic shape.
Shapes of Caissons:
(I) Basic Shape
(II) Combination of Basic Shape
Basic Shape:
(I) Circular
(II) Rectangular
(III) Square
(IV) Octagonal
6 b) Rectifying methods of tilts & shifts in well foundations (8M)
Following are the remedial measures to be carefully implemented to avoid tilting of caisson
during sinking process:
Water Jetting: This is the one of the method used to prevent tilting. In this method, water jet is
forcedly applied on tilt.
Eccentric loading: The caisson is normally given the additional loading called kentledge in
order to have necessary sinking effort. In this method, eccentric loading or kentledge is applied
in higher side so as to have greater sinking effort.
Excavation under cutting edge: During sinking process, filled caisson will not set or straighten
due to unbroken stiff strata on its higher side. In such situation, dewatering is preferably done to
loosen stiff strata. If dewatering is not possible or unsafe, then drivers are sent to loosen the stiff
strata.
Regulation of Excavation: Sinking of caisson on higher side due to excess excavation is more.
This is all right in the early stages, otherwise dewatering of caisson or well is needed and open
excavation may be done on higher side.
Providing temporary obstacles below the cutting edge: Rectification of tilt can be done by
inserting the wooden sleeper temporarily as an obstacles below the cutting edge on the lower
side so as to prevent further tilt of the well or caisson.
Strutting the caissons or well: Method of strutting the caisson or well is used to prevent any
further and possible rise in tilting of the caisson or well.
Pushing the caissons or well with jack: Mechanical jack or hydraulic jack can be used to
rectify the tilt of well or caisson. Well or caisson can be pushed by jack to bring it a vertical
position.
7 a) Different types of retaining walls:
An earth retaining structure can be considered to have the following types:
1. Gravity wall
2. Semi gravity wall
3. Cantilever wall
4. Buttress wall
5. Counter fort walls
7 b) Stability analysis of a retaining wall.
1. Check for sliding
2. Check for overturning
3. Check for bearing capacity failure
4. Check for base shear failure
The minimum factors of safety for the stability of the wall are:
1. Factor of safety against sliding =1.5
2. Factor of safety against overturning = 2.0
3. Factor of safety against bearing capacity failure = 3.0
To ensure the stability of a retaining wall, the following conditions or requirements must be met:
• The wall should be structurally capable of resisting the pressure applied to it.
• The wall should be so properly proportioned that it will not get overturned by the lateral
pressure.
• The wall should be safe from consideration of sliding, i.e., the wall should not be pushed
out by the lateral pressure.
• The weight of wall together with the force resulting from the earth pressure acting on it,
should not stress its foundation to a value greater than safe bearing capacity of the soil.
• It is important to prevent accumulation of water behind a retaining wall. The backing
material should be suitably drained by providing weep holes.
• Long masonry retaining walls should be provided with expansion joints located at 6 to
9m apart.
• Weep holes may be provided to relieve water pressure.
Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key
Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key

Recommandé

Gte set2usedGte set2used
Gte set2usedjagadish108
253 vues2 diapositives
Gte ii-readyGte ii-ready
Gte ii-readyjagadish108
317 vues3 diapositives
TeTe
Tejagadish108
187 vues2 diapositives
Gte set1usedGte set1used
Gte set1usedjagadish108
275 vues2 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Tendances(19)

Dss set2usedDss set2used
Dss set2used
jagadish108162 vues
Dss readyDss ready
Dss ready
jagadish108431 vues
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Latif Hyder Wadho2.8K vues
Civil technical quizCivil technical quiz
Civil technical quiz
premsai057.7K vues
Civil quesCivil ques
Civil ques
Prionath Roy1.7K vues
PROJECTPROJECT
PROJECT
Samuel Ray263 vues
Soil question by meSoil question by me
Soil question by me
Prionath Roy332 vues
Soil question by meSoil question by me
Soil question by me
Prionath Roy433 vues
Bearing capacity shear_waveBearing capacity shear_wave
Bearing capacity shear_wave
Binod21.1K vues
Estimation of CBR value using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer  Estimation of CBR value using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Estimation of CBR value using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Guru Nank Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India-14100629.8K vues
CBR TestCBR Test
CBR Test
Priyansh Singh59.8K vues
Bearing capacity of  rockBearing capacity of  rock
Bearing capacity of rock
akash yadav1.2K vues

Similaire à Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key

Chapter 09Chapter 09
Chapter 09SantistebanCampos
379 vues48 diapositives
anyany
anybabariyah
5.7K vues24 diapositives
Well FoundationWell Foundation
Well FoundationDave Chinmyee
905 vues61 diapositives
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationYogesh Pandey
31.2K vues62 diapositives

Similaire à Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key(20)

Chapter 09Chapter 09
Chapter 09
SantistebanCampos379 vues
Site inveswtigation vandana missSite inveswtigation vandana miss
Site inveswtigation vandana miss
SHAMJITH KM5.8K vues
anyany
any
babariyah5.7K vues
Well FoundationWell Foundation
Well Foundation
Dave Chinmyee905 vues
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavation
Yogesh Pandey31.2K vues
SUBSOIL EXPLORATION 35.pptxSUBSOIL EXPLORATION 35.pptx
SUBSOIL EXPLORATION 35.pptx
KamalineeNayak68 vues
Unit iii braced_cutsUnit iii braced_cuts
Unit iii braced_cuts
Gimmick12K vues
FoundationFoundation
Foundation
Parth Malhotra7.5K vues
Plate load testPlate load test
Plate load test
M Dinesh kumar6.8K vues
ppt foundation.pptxppt foundation.pptx
ppt foundation.pptx
AnshuBarmase97 vues
GE Lab manual.pdfGE Lab manual.pdf
GE Lab manual.pdf
KRUNALBHAIPRAJAPATI17 vues
2.pile foundation 2.ppt2.pile foundation 2.ppt
2.pile foundation 2.ppt
DAYANANDWANDRE83 vues
Ex 11 vane shear testEx 11 vane shear test
Ex 11 vane shear test
bhimaji40151 vues
Geotechnical engineering   2Geotechnical engineering   2
Geotechnical engineering 2
R VIJAYAKUMAR8.7K vues
Chapter 17Chapter 17
Chapter 17
SantistebanCampos363 vues
Shaft  sinking 2Shaft  sinking 2
Shaft sinking 2
Er.Sunil Wasade15.1K vues

Plus de PRASANTHI PETLURU(20)

Unit VI : Boundary layer theory notesUnit VI : Boundary layer theory notes
Unit VI : Boundary layer theory notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU218 vues
Flow through pipes notesFlow through pipes notes
Flow through pipes notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU244 vues
Unit III : Fluid dynamics notesUnit III : Fluid dynamics notes
Unit III : Fluid dynamics notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU128 vues
unit II : Fluid kinematics notesunit II : Fluid kinematics notes
unit II : Fluid kinematics notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU132 vues
Unit I : Fluid statics  notesUnit I : Fluid statics  notes
Unit I : Fluid statics notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU335 vues
Ay 2017 2018 fe see keyAy 2017 2018 fe see key
Ay 2017 2018 fe see key
PRASANTHI PETLURU32 vues
Ay 2017 2018 fe see qpAy 2017 2018 fe see qp
Ay 2017 2018 fe see qp
PRASANTHI PETLURU23 vues
Ay 2016 2017 fe see qpAy 2016 2017 fe see qp
Ay 2016 2017 fe see qp
PRASANTHI PETLURU20 vues
2018 2019 a26 a3  fe see qp key2018 2019 a26 a3  fe see qp key
2018 2019 a26 a3 fe see qp key
PRASANTHI PETLURU29 vues
Slope stability Hand written notesSlope stability Hand written notes
Slope stability Hand written notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU343 vues
 Well foundations notes Well foundations notes
Well foundations notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU639 vues
Unit 1 soil exploration Hand written notesUnit 1 soil exploration Hand written notes
Unit 1 soil exploration Hand written notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU810 vues
Boundary layer theory hand written notesBoundary layer theory hand written notes
Boundary layer theory hand written notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU1.4K vues
Unit III - Fluid dynamics notesUnit III - Fluid dynamics notes
Unit III - Fluid dynamics notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU1K vues
Unit I - Fluid statics Hand written notesUnit I - Fluid statics Hand written notes
Unit I - Fluid statics Hand written notes
PRASANTHI PETLURU773 vues

Dernier(20)

SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptxSIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptx
SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptx
nisrinamadani2146 vues
Gopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptxGopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptx
Gopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptx
Debapriya Chakraborty221 vues
BYSC infopack.pdfBYSC infopack.pdf
BYSC infopack.pdf
Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Przedsiębiorczego144 vues
Education and Diversity.pptxEducation and Diversity.pptx
Education and Diversity.pptx
DrHafizKosar56 vues
Class 10 English  lesson plansClass 10 English  lesson plans
Class 10 English lesson plans
Tariq KHAN172 vues
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY UNIT 1 { PART-1}ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY UNIT 1 { PART-1}
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY UNIT 1 { PART-1}
DR .PALLAVI PATHANIA156 vues
Psychology KS5Psychology KS5
Psychology KS5
WestHatch53 vues
Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36
Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup75 vues
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptxChemistry of sex hormones.pptx
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptx
RAJ K. MAURYA97 vues
Nico Baumbach IMR Media ComponentNico Baumbach IMR Media Component
Nico Baumbach IMR Media Component
InMediaRes1186 vues
Lecture: Open InnovationLecture: Open Innovation
Lecture: Open Innovation
Michal Hron82 vues
231112 (WR) v1  ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf231112 (WR) v1  ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf
231112 (WR) v1 ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf
WilfredRubens.com100 vues
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdfCWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
SukhwinderSingh895865467 vues

Ay 2020 2021 fe supply key

  • 1. Code No: A26A3 B V RAJU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NARSAPUR (UGC - AUTONOMOUS) B.Tech III Year II Semester Supplementary Examinations, Sep/Oct 2020 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING KEY ( C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g ) Max Marks: 70 1. a) Need of soil exploration (8 M) The information from soil investigations will enable a Civil engineer to plan, decide, design, and execute a construction project. Soil investigations are done to obtain the information that is useful for one or more of the following purposes. 1. To know the geological condition of rock and soil formation. 2. To establish the groundwater levels and determine the properties of water. 3. To select the type and depth of foundation for proposed structure 4. To determine the bearing capacity of the site. 5. To estimate the probable maximum and differential settlements. 6. To predict the lateral earth pressure against retaining walls and abutments. 7. To select suitable construction techniques 8. To predict and to solve potential foundation problems 9. To ascertain the suitability of the soil as a construction material. 10. To determine soil properties required for design 11. Establish procedures for soil improvement to suit design purpose 12. To investigate the safety of existing structures and to suggest the remedial measures. 13. To observe the soil the soil performance after construction. 1 b) Procedure of obtaining a chunk sample. (8 M)
  • 2. • A cylindrical container open at both the ends is used for sampling. • The soil is trimmed to shape at the bottom of the test pit One end of container is closed and inverted over the soil chunk and the soil sample is removed using spatula • This method is suitable for cohesive soil. Obtaining chunk sample. 2. Procedure of conducting a standard penetration test: Standard Penetration Test.: (8 M) The standard Penetration Test is the most commonly used in –site test, especially for cohesion less soils which cannot be easily sampled, the test is extremely useful for determining the relative density and the angle to determine the UCC strength of the cohesive soil. The standard penetration test is conducted in a bore hole using a standard split spoon sampler, when the bore hole has been drilled to the desired depth, the drilling tools are removed and the sampler is lowered to the bottom of the hole. The sampler is driven into the soil by a drop hammer of 63.5kg mass falling through a height of 750mm at the rate of 30 blows per minutes. The number of hammer blows required to drive 150mm of the sample is counted. The sampler is further driven by 150mm and the number of blows recorded. Likewise the sampler is once again further driven by 150mm and the number of blows recorded. The number of blows recorded for the first 150mm is disregarded. The plumber of blows recorded for the last two 150mm intervals are added to give the standard Penetration Number (N). In other words, the standard Penetration number is equal to the number of blows required for 300mm of penetration beyond a seating drive of 150mm. If the number of blows for 150mm drive exceeds 50, it is taken as refusal and the test is discontinued. The standard Penetration number is corrected for decadency correction and our burden correction.
  • 3. (a) Dilatancy Correction. (4 M) Silty fine sands and fine sands below the water table develop pore pressure which is not easily dissipated. The pore pressure increases the resistance of the soil and hence the Penetration number (N). Terzaghi and peck recommend the following correction when the observed N value exceeds 15. The corrected Penetration Number, Nc = 15 + ½ [NR – 15] Where, Nc – corrected value NR – Recorded Value If NR ≤ 15, then Nc = NR (b) Over burden Pressure Correction: (4 M) In granular soils, the overburden pressure affects the penetration resistance. Generally, the soil with high confining pressure gives higher penetration number. As the confining pressure in cohesion soil increases with depth, the penetration number for the soils at shallow depths is under estimated and that at greater depths is over estimated for uniformity, the N values obtained from field tests under different effective overburden pressure are corrected to a standard effective overburden pressure. For dry or moist clean sand, (Gibbs and Holtz) Nc = 𝐍𝐑 𝐗 𝟑𝟓𝟎 ̅ 𝟎 +𝟕𝟎 Where, Nc - corrected value NR - Recorded Value ̅0 - effective over burden pressure It is applicable for ̅ ≤ 280kN/m2 . Usually the overburden correction is applied first and then dilatancy correction is applied first and then dilatancy correction is applied. The value of standard Penetration number N depends upon the relative density of the cohesionless soil and the unconfined compressive strength of the cohesive soil. If the soil is compact or stiff, the penetration number is high. 3. a) Static method in bearing capacity of piles: (4 M) Static analysis: Qup = Qp + Qs where, Qup = ultimate load on pile. Qp = tip resistance= qn x A
  • 4. Qs =skin resistance = 𝜋 𝐷 𝑙 × 𝑙s Where, fs = unit skin friction between pie and soil. 3. b) Classification of piles: (10 M) Piles can be classified according to 1. The material used 2. The mode of transfer of load 3. The method of construction 4. The use and 5. Displacement of soil 1. Classification according to material used There are four types of piles according to materials used (i) Steel piles (ii) Concrete piles (iii) Timber piles (iv) Composite piles 2. Classification based on mode of transfer of load Based on the mode of transfer of loads, the pile can be classified into three categories: (i) End bearing piles (ii) Friction piles (iii) Combined end bearing and friction piles 3. Classification based on method of installation Based on the method of construction, the piles may be classified into the following 5 categories (i) Driven pile (ii) Driven and cast in situ piles (iii) Bored and cast in situ piles (iv) Screw piles (v) Jacked piles 4. Classification based on use The piles can be classified into the following 6 categories depending upon their use. (i) Load bearing piles (ii) Compaction piles (iii) Tension piles (iv) Sheet piles (v) Fender piles (vi) Anchor piles
  • 6. 5. Classification based on displacement of soil: Based on the volume of the soil displacement during installation the piles can be classified into 2 categories (i) Displacement piles (ii) Non- displacement piles 5. Components of a well foundation 4 M Well Components: (10M) • Cutting Edge • Well Curb • Well steining • Bottom Plug • Sand Fill • Top Plug • Well cap Cutting Edge: Sharp edge which is provided at the lower end of the well or open and pneumatic caisson for accelerating sinking operation is called cutting edge. It is made up steel or it is made in R.C.C. Its angle to vertical is 30 0 and normally slope of 1 horizontal to 2 vertical given better result. Well Curb It is made of concrete or brick. Cutting edge of well or caisson is attached to well curb. During sinking operation well curb impart to the well-stening and facilities the formation of bottom
  • 7. Well Steining Steining is constructed in concrete or masonary work. Use of stening is to provide dead load during sinking operation Topping Covering provided over the well or caisson is called as topping. Sand is filled in between topping and bottom plug. Topping also acts as a part of shuttering for laying the well cap. Bottom Plug: The lower portion of well is sealed by the concrete is called as bottom plug. Well Cap R.C.C Slab covering provided over the top of well is termed as well cap. Sand filling The portion between top and bottom plug is filled with sand so as to increase the self weight of the well and makes safe during earthquake. 6. a) Different shapes of well foundations: (8 M) Caisson are constructed into two basic shapes and combination of basic shape. Shapes of Caissons: (I) Basic Shape (II) Combination of Basic Shape Basic Shape: (I) Circular (II) Rectangular (III) Square (IV) Octagonal
  • 8. 6 b) Rectifying methods of tilts & shifts in well foundations (8M) Following are the remedial measures to be carefully implemented to avoid tilting of caisson during sinking process: Water Jetting: This is the one of the method used to prevent tilting. In this method, water jet is forcedly applied on tilt. Eccentric loading: The caisson is normally given the additional loading called kentledge in order to have necessary sinking effort. In this method, eccentric loading or kentledge is applied in higher side so as to have greater sinking effort. Excavation under cutting edge: During sinking process, filled caisson will not set or straighten due to unbroken stiff strata on its higher side. In such situation, dewatering is preferably done to loosen stiff strata. If dewatering is not possible or unsafe, then drivers are sent to loosen the stiff strata. Regulation of Excavation: Sinking of caisson on higher side due to excess excavation is more. This is all right in the early stages, otherwise dewatering of caisson or well is needed and open excavation may be done on higher side. Providing temporary obstacles below the cutting edge: Rectification of tilt can be done by inserting the wooden sleeper temporarily as an obstacles below the cutting edge on the lower side so as to prevent further tilt of the well or caisson. Strutting the caissons or well: Method of strutting the caisson or well is used to prevent any further and possible rise in tilting of the caisson or well. Pushing the caissons or well with jack: Mechanical jack or hydraulic jack can be used to rectify the tilt of well or caisson. Well or caisson can be pushed by jack to bring it a vertical position. 7 a) Different types of retaining walls: An earth retaining structure can be considered to have the following types:
  • 9. 1. Gravity wall 2. Semi gravity wall 3. Cantilever wall 4. Buttress wall 5. Counter fort walls 7 b) Stability analysis of a retaining wall. 1. Check for sliding 2. Check for overturning 3. Check for bearing capacity failure 4. Check for base shear failure The minimum factors of safety for the stability of the wall are: 1. Factor of safety against sliding =1.5 2. Factor of safety against overturning = 2.0 3. Factor of safety against bearing capacity failure = 3.0 To ensure the stability of a retaining wall, the following conditions or requirements must be met: • The wall should be structurally capable of resisting the pressure applied to it. • The wall should be so properly proportioned that it will not get overturned by the lateral pressure. • The wall should be safe from consideration of sliding, i.e., the wall should not be pushed out by the lateral pressure. • The weight of wall together with the force resulting from the earth pressure acting on it, should not stress its foundation to a value greater than safe bearing capacity of the soil. • It is important to prevent accumulation of water behind a retaining wall. The backing material should be suitably drained by providing weep holes. • Long masonry retaining walls should be provided with expansion joints located at 6 to 9m apart. • Weep holes may be provided to relieve water pressure.