Once upon time, dad woke up in the morning and get in to the toilet, since he gets in there, suddenly he fell dizzy and fall on the plant pot which was on the wall near him. He fainted because of the strength of the fall. Mum is the one who was there at that moment and she listened to the sound of the fall. When she looked at him, he was full of blood and she called the ambulance directly. They went to the hospital and did check-up and it was all good, he didn’t suffer from a pressure or diabetes. There was a slit in theright eyebrow by eye which was bleeding strongly,broken nose and leg with a pain in his shoulder. First of all, they sew 13 stitches in the eyebrow from the two sides in and out. Second, they moved him to the bones section to do the X-ray for his shoulder, they realized it was broken and they made him wear the shoulder splint. Other than that, the X-ray shows that his leg was broken as well, and they cast it for two months. Thirdly, in the department ofEar, Nose andThroat the doctor was trying to fix the bone and get it the right place by his hand and then they cast it as well. After that, dad was staying in the hospital for 10 days to do some comprehensivetests in the Department ofInternal Medicine to know the reason why he fell dizzy and fainted. One of the doctors asked him to do the MRI for his head, planningfor the heart, Sonar to the neck and check ofthe middle earand the results were hale. After two months ofcast his leg and shoulder he starts doing physiotherapy, and he take of the cast of his nose and eyebrow getting well. PROJECT: ANATOMICAL DIALOGUE Submission Date: Tuesday 13th May (Week 11) for Tasks 1 and 2 General Objective: Demonstrate higher processing skills in the areas of synthesis and evaluation through an analysis of how anatomy is used and represented in our personal lives and future profession. Specific Objectives: Synthesise a personal account of an injury or medical condition that was experienced by yourself, a family member or a friend using language suitable for (a) a layperson; and (b) a medical professional. Reflect on the ramifications of audience-specific terminology in the workplace. Critique anatomical dialogue of one peer. Length: Three complementary project tasks across the semester Individual submission guidelines are below; if working in a pair, submission is twice the length of these guidelines. Project Task 1: approximately 700-1000 words Project Task 2: approximately 1000-1500 words (including reflection) Guidelines: Maximum of 5 single-sided A4 pages for TASK 1 and 2 plus one completed criteria sheet 12 point font; single line spacing; minimum page margins set at 2cm Top and Left, 1.5cm Bottom and Right Weighting: 25% [Tasks 1 and 2: 20%] Overview The study of anatomy is more than just memorisation of facts. Anatomy is embedded in our personal lives, on the television, in the newspaper and tempts society to test its ethical and moral bound.

1. Once upon time, dad woke up in the morning and get in to the
toilet, since he gets in there, suddenly he fell dizzy and fall on
the plant pot which was on the wall near him. He fainted
because of the strength of the fall. Mum is the one who was
there at that moment and she listened to the sound of the fall.
When she looked at him, he was full of blood and she called the
ambulance directly. They went to the hospital and did check-up
and it was all good, he didn’t suffer from a pressure or diabetes.
There was a slit in theright eyebrow by eye which was bleeding
strongly,broken nose and leg with a pain in his shoulder. First
of all, they sew 13 stitches in the eyebrow from the two sides in
and out. Second, they moved him to the bones section to do the
X-ray for his shoulder, they realized it was broken and they
made him wear the shoulder splint. Other than that, the X-ray
shows that his leg was broken as well, and they cast it for two
months. Thirdly, in the department ofEar, Nose andThroat the
doctor was trying to fix the bone and get it the right place by
his hand and then they cast it as well.
After that, dad was staying in the hospital for 10 days to do
some comprehensivetests in the Department ofInternal Medicine
to know the reason why he fell dizzy and fainted. One of the
doctors asked him to do the MRI for his head, planningfor the
heart, Sonar to the neck and check ofthe middle earand the
results were hale.
After two months ofcast his leg and shoulder he starts doing
physiotherapy, and he take of the cast of his nose and eyebrow
getting well.
PROJECT: ANATOMICAL DIALOGUE
Submission Date:
Tuesday 13th May (Week 11) for Tasks 1 and 2
General Objective:

2. Demonstrate higher processing skills in the areas of synthesis
and evaluation through an analysis of how anatomy is used and
represented in our personal lives and future profession.
Specific Objectives:
Synthesise a personal account of an injury or medical condition
that was
experienced by yourself, a family member or a friend using
language suitable for
(a) a layperson; and (b) a medical professional. Reflect on the
ramifications of
audience-specific terminology in the workplace. Critique
anatomical dialogue of
one peer.
Length:
Three complementary project tasks across the semester
Individual submission guidelines are below; if working in a
pair, submission is twice the length of these guidelines.
Project Task 1: approximately 700-1000 words
Project Task 2: approximately 1000-1500 words (including
reflection)

3. Guidelines:
Maximum of 5 single-sided A4 pages for TASK 1 and 2
plus one completed criteria sheet
12 point font; single line spacing; minimum page margins set at
2cm Top and Left,
1.5cm Bottom and Right
Weighting:
25% [Tasks 1 and 2: 20%]
Overview
The study of anatomy is more than just memorisation of facts.
Anatomy is embedded in our personal lives, on the television, in
the newspaper and tempts society to test its ethical and moral
boundaries. As we study anatomy we therefore need to learn
how to use anatomical terminology in different contexts and
demonstrate a deep understanding of the current perceptions of
anatomy in society.
The following pages describe in detail the requirements for each
of the three tasks required to complete your project.
You must include the following completed tasks in your project:
1. Project Task 1: Creating an Anatomical Dialogue [Layperson
version]

4. 2. Project Task 2: Creating an Anatomical Dialogue
[Anatomical/medical professional version]
3. Project Task 3: Critique of peer work
Most of you coming into LQB183 will be what is commonly
known as a layperson, that is, an inexperienced anatomist in this
case. However during the course of this unit you will start to
learn, use and be tested on specific anatomical terminology,
such that you should no longer be an anatomical layperson by
the end of the semester! In order to track your personal
development this task offers you an opportunity to write about a
personal medical experience at the start of the semester when
many of you will be writing as a layperson (and if not will be
encouraged to do so). Later in the semester you will then be
asked to revisit your ‘story’ and modify it based on your
learning experiences in LQB183 such that it is suitable for an
experienced anatomist to read or hear. This will enable you to
reflect on your growth in mastering the use of anatomical
terminology and prepare you for the workforce where you will
need to communicate with persons of multiple backgrounds!
In this activity you will need to synthesise a personal account of
an injury or medical condition that was experienced by yourself,
a family member or a friend. There will be two parts to this
process: [Part A] written from the perspective of a layperson
and [Part B] written from the perspective of an experienced
anatomist or medical professional. Each part will describe the
same ‘story’ but each will use a different ‘language’ to contrast
communication between laypersons versus communication
between medical professionals.
The third part of the task requires you to read, evaluate and
provide a judgement of the work of one of your peers within the
LQB183 class. This will provide support to your peers so that
they can read your comments and use them to improve their task
1 and 2 submission, and will also provide insights into your

5. own work by having to evaluate the work of others.
Recommended Commencement Date:[Task 1] Week 1; [Task 2]
Week 4.
Why are we doing this task?
It is not only medical professionals that talk about anatomy. In
fact almost all people at some stage or another will
communicate about a medical situation and use some anatomical
terminology (haven’t you?!). However the way they
communicate and the terminology they use depends on who they
are and what audience they are communicating with. For
example if we compare an individual with no anatomical
training to one with medical training or experience, the
language they each use to describe a similar experience or
event, for example how they broke their leg, will significantly
differ.
For Example:
Dialogue between two Laypersons with no anatomical or
medical training:“Yesterday my brother broke his tail-bone after
falling off a rope swing and landing on his bum. Now he has to
sleep on his tummy or side to reduce the pain from the massive
bruising!”
Dialogue between two Medical professionals or
anatomists:“Yesterday my brother fractured his coccyx after
falling off a rope swing and landing on his gluteal region. The
anteroposterior radiograph presented a hairline fracture on the
left cornua of the 1st coccygeal vertebra. Now he will have to
sleep in a prone or lateral decubitus position to avoid applying
pressure to the contused area.”
Note in the reconstruction that terminology is modified to
reflect the change in audience from a layperson to a medical
professional/anatomist; anatomical language is used to enhance
the understanding of the injury. When conversing with a
medical professional more detail is needed to explain the

6. medical condition accurately and specifically.
In fact it is far more complex for an experienced anatomist to
discuss a medically-related situation to an inexperienced friend
or family member than it would be to discuss it with a
colleague, for the experienced anatomist needs to decide what
terminology is appropriate and familiar or known to the
intended audience. As a biomedical scientist you will need to
communicate effectively with clinicians and biomedical
researchers as well as patients, the latter often being
inexperienced in anatomical language. It is therefore important
to be able to recognise and apply different forms of anatomical
communication. This will enable you to communicate medical
knowledge appropriately to various audiences.
Step 1: [Task 1] Creating an anatomical dialogue as a layperson
write a personal account of an injury or medical condition that
was experienced by yourself, a family member or a friend from
a laypersons perspective. Describe the injury or medical
condition using terminology that would be understood by a
layperson. It is essential that you focus on how the human body
was affected during and after this experience and do not write
too much on how the event came about for example. Make sure
your story is medically oriented. Your account must be
approximately 700-1000 words in length (this should be
approximately 1.5 A4 pages of typing). If your story is not long
enough, you may need to write about two different medical
incidents.
Your story will be communicated to your peers and teaching
team and therefore should not be confidential or include details
that may cause personal embarrassment or discomfort to
yourself or others.
Step 2: [Task 1] Editing your first draft for a layperson
audience
Task 1 should be written using only layperson and general
terminology. This may make your story sound very simple and

7. vague – but this is what we are looking for.
If in doubt about the appropriateness of a term, consider: is
there another way of communicating the same message that a
greater number of people in the general population will
understand?Always use the simplest terms when communicating
with laypeople (even if they seem a bit silly or colloquial!).
Consider the following questions when editing your draft:
· Was a term/word used that you do not fully understand or
don’t know the definition of? What would be an alternate
term/word that a layperson would/does understand?
· Were the simplest terms used throughout? Can any terms be
simplified further?
· Did the story describe the effect on the human body in enough
detail, that is, did it contain sufficient anatomical information
for this task?
· Is the story within the word-limit for this task, ie. 700-1000
words?
Remember to try to avoid all medical terminology and any
complex terms that could be restated in simpler terms. This is
what you will be marked on!!
Step 3: [Task 2] Reconstruction of your anatomical dialogue for
discussion with a medical professional or anatomist
Describe the injury or medical condition now using terminology
that would be understood by a medical professional and
anatomist (and unlikely to be understood by the layperson) by
reconstructing your story from Task 1 of this task.
Note that the genre used for Task 1 may not be appropriate for
the new audience of experienced anatomists/health
professionals! Therefore use a communication style that is
appropriate for a medical audience – remember to still be

8. creative and it can be submitted in a written or digital medium!
Submissions using digital media will need to be accompanied by
a written transcript of any included audio.
It is essential to read over the criteria sheet whilst preparing
your final draft to ensure you have completed all set elements
for the task.
Step 4: [Task 2] Write a reflection on the importance of using
audience-specific terminology appropriately
A reflective piece of approximately 500 words should follow
your story summarising your personal growth in anatomical
terminology usage and understanding of the importance of
audience-specific terminology in health professions. Consider
the following questions/suggestions:
· Did you find it difficult to communicate as a layperson in
Task 1? Why or why not?
· Provide an example or examples of terminology that was/were
changed during the editing process of Task 1 ie. terminology
that may not have been appropriate for a layperson and needed
simplification;
· Did you find it difficult to communicate as an experienced
anatomist in Task 2? Were you still using language that would
be more appropriate for a layperson?
· Are you automatically using correct anatomical terminology
now or do you still have to think through it carefully?
· Would you now consider yourself to be an anatomist or do you
believe you are still a layperson? Why?
· Provide at least two examples of terminology that were
changed from [Task 1] to [Task 2] of your story and comment

9. on the implications of these different ways of describing the
same medical event in the community (**Note: this should be
the focus of your reflection)
· Describe the personal relevance of using audience-specific
terminology in your desired career.
CRITERIA Project (Applied): Creating an Anatomical Dialogue
5
4
3
2
1
CRITERIA C
Analysis: Discrimination of Appropriate Language
- ability to recognise inappropriate terminology
- depth of reflection
- demonstrates understanding of purpose of task
All terminology is appropriate for context in both Part A and
Part B.
Correct terminology for context is used appropriately on nearly
every occasion in both Part A and Part B.
Correct terminology for context is used appropriately most of
the time.
Correct terminology for context is inconsistent with multiple
errors in Part A or Part B.
Your use of appropriate terminology for context is poor with
multiple errors in both Part A and Part B.
You have provided sufficient, relevant and meaningful examples
to illustrate language discrimination between the layperson and
the experienced anatomist; and have provided a number of
insightful and analytical personal statements upon reflection of

10. this task. You have demonstrated a clear understanding of the
purpose of this task.
Relevant personal statements are provided upon reflection of
this task and sufficient examples of language discrimination are
included but reflection lacks depth. An understanding of the
purpose of this task is demonstrated.
At least one personal statement is provided upon reflection of
this task, but sufficient or relevant examples are lacking. You
have a basic understanding of the purpose of this task.
Personal statements upon reflection of this task are limited and
unclear; and sufficient and relevant examples are lacking. You
have not demonstrated an understanding of the purpose of this
task.
Personal statements upon reflection of this task are
inappropriate or absent; and no examples have been included.
CRITERIA C
Synthesis: Adaptation of Anatomical Dialogue
- ability to select and use appropriate terminology for new
anatomical context
- depth of response
All modifications to Part B are highly appropriate and used in
the correct context demonstrating excellent adaptation skills.
All modifications to Part B are appropriate and used in the
correct context demonstrating good adaptation skills (some
terminology though is not the most appropriate for context).
Most modifications to Part B are sufficient and used in the
correct context but did not use the most appropriate terminology
for context consistently.
Several modifications demonstrated a lack of understanding of
task and/or a lack of appropriate use of language in different
contexts.

11. Modifications to your story are limited demonstrating minimal
or a lack of adaptation skills.
Sufficient and relevant detail is provided in Part B related to the
experienced anatomist reader.
Detail was lacking in one or two phrases in Part B.
Detail provided in Part B is minimal.
Detail provided in Part B is minimal.
Detail provided in Part B is lacking.
CRITERIA D
Expression and Style used in Construction of Dialogue:
- use of creative writing style
- clarity of expression
- demonstrates competency in writing skills
- within word-limit
Your work provides a vivid and highly engaging response to the
topic by using appropriate storytelling writing style for each
task.
Through the use of appropriate storytelling you have
constructed an interesting anatomical dialogue.
Only one of the tasks uses an appropriate writing style for
audience.
Your story lacks creativity.
You have not adhered to the instructions for this task.
Your work is clearly and succinctly expressed and you have
adhered to correct conventions of grammar, punctuation and
spelling throughout this essay.
You express yourself clearly and in a scholarly way, using
correct conventions of grammar, punctuation and spelling on
nearly every occasion.

12. You have expressed yourself well through the use of grammar,
spelling and punctuation conventions that are used correctly
most of the time.
Your clarity of expression is not consistent and you need to
adhere more closely to the conventions of grammar, spelling
and punctuation.
Many errors in the construction of your story make it very
difficult to understand. You need to adhere much more closely
to the conventions of grammar, spelling and punctuation.
NAME:
TOTAL = /30
i
Task 1
I have an assignment which is about to write a story (make-up a
story) about an injury or an accident. i wrote about 300 words
but i need at least 700 words. can you please fix it a bit and
complete it to me just add more medical details as much as you
can in simple and easy words. thats for task 1.
Task 2
It’s about to re-write task 1 but in anatomical words in at least
1000 words.
I will upload the instructions in more details and the one i
wrote.
Here are the two file (instruction + my work what I start with )
For task1 please just fix it a bit and extend it to at least 700
easy and basics words.
Task 2: is about to re-write task 1 but in anatomical words (at
least 1000 words)

13. please make sure that you read all the instructions and the
criteria sheet.