Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study

Horizons RG
Horizons RGResponsible Gambling Conference à BCLC
Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study
Financial Literacy for Lottery Players
Hoosier Lottery Case Study Indiana,
USA
Overview
• Gain insight into the appropriate role of the gaming
industry in promoting financial literacy
• Opportunity to review & critique the Hoosier Lottery’s
evaluation the program.
• Gain insight into concept of shared value and the
importance of proactive stakeholder engagement
Confidential & Proprietary
Show of hands…
• Who knows what “Hoosier” means?
• Who knows the percentage of adults on average
that use a budget?
• How many people in the room feel that it’s
appropriate for the gaming industry to produce and
promote financial literacy?
Confidential & Proprietary
About the Hoosier Lottery
• Insert logos
Confidential & Proprietary
Why Financial Literacy
• Partnership with local stakeholders
• Audience: Lottery winners, players, Ivy Tech students
• Strategy: Helping winners through life changing event,
general education on budgeting for entertainment
expense
• Launch and support
Confidential & Proprietary
Course Content
Confidential & Proprietary
Measurement & KPIs
• Current Metrics/Monitoring:
– 626 registrations
– 6% completion rate
– Qualitative analysis on the feedback generated by
players, winners, and the general public on the
usefulness of the content.
• Future Metrics/Monitoring: All of the above plus
results of survey
Confidential & Proprietary
Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study
Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study
Completion Rate by Module
Confidential & Proprietary
Stakeholder Feedback:
Players
• Liked:
• The words “invitation to learn” was used. Made it feel special and not like a requirement
or demand like a “teacher hitting you with a plastic ruler”
• Getting a certificate, felt like a special accomplishment
• Being able to take it “at my leisure”
• That it promoted the Hoosier Lottery as “socially aware”
• That it was free for anyone
• Disliked:
• Videos hard to understand - felt accent was distracting
• Questions in surveys were too repetitive and easy
• Felt like “Final Literacy” wording was intimidating and sounded “hoity-toity”
• Too intellectual focused.
Confidential & Proprietary
Stakeholder Feedback:
Treatment Community
• Suggested more promotion of the program.
• Called it “Good corporate citizenship”
• Suggested adding information about the program on
tickets.
• Praised the concept and asked for brochures to hand
out at future events.
Confidential & Proprietary
What does research say?
• There is a need for more research specific to financial literacy
as a responsible gaming tool.
• “Cokely and Kelley (2009) found that higher levels of
quantitative reasoning resulted in better decisions involving
risk, specifically lotteries and gambling.”
– N=80 undergraduate psychology majors
• Informed player choice – generally, players that have tools to
make wise choices stick to them.
Confidential & Proprietary
Lessons Learned
• Need lottery-specific data: Survey tool
• Re-launch with bigger PR push
• Inserting stakeholder feedback into the changes
Confidential & Proprietary
Questions?
Confidential & Proprietary
Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study
1. Open New Horizons app
2. Select the Agenda button
3. Select This Session
4. Select Take Survey at the bottom
To provide session feedback:
If you are unable to download the app, please
see one of our conference hosts located just
outside the room.
1 sur 18

Contenu connexe

Tendances(20)

Dr. Tilman LeschDr. Tilman Lesch
Dr. Tilman Lesch
Horizons RG3.6K vues
Dr. Debi LaPlante   Dr. Debi LaPlante
Dr. Debi LaPlante
Horizons RG3.3K vues
Ryan PersaudRyan Persaud
Ryan Persaud
Horizons RG3.4K vues
Hyoun S. (Andrew) Kim   Hyoun S. (Andrew) Kim
Hyoun S. (Andrew) Kim
Horizons RG3.6K vues
Lindsay Richardson   Lindsay Richardson
Lindsay Richardson
Horizons RG3.3K vues
Dr. Jeffrey L. Derevensky Dr. Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Dr. Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Horizons RG3.2K vues

Similaire à Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study (20)

Consumer Relations InternationalConsumer Relations International
Consumer Relations International
Ohio University945 vues
Gameshows aqa Gameshows aqa
Gameshows aqa
HeworthMedia1610 vues
Assessing Readiness to Engage (Jan 2021)Assessing Readiness to Engage (Jan 2021)
Assessing Readiness to Engage (Jan 2021)
CHICommunications58 vues
GlobalGiving Denver Workshop 2015GlobalGiving Denver Workshop 2015
GlobalGiving Denver Workshop 2015
GlobalGiving266 vues
Market Research for Athletics Market Research for Athletics
Market Research for Athletics
rubylu818899 vues
Your Home Matters Campaign SummaryYour Home Matters Campaign Summary
Your Home Matters Campaign Summary
Silver Caoili97 vues

Financial literacy for lottery players - Indiana case study

  • 2. Financial Literacy for Lottery Players Hoosier Lottery Case Study Indiana, USA
  • 3. Overview • Gain insight into the appropriate role of the gaming industry in promoting financial literacy • Opportunity to review & critique the Hoosier Lottery’s evaluation the program. • Gain insight into concept of shared value and the importance of proactive stakeholder engagement Confidential & Proprietary
  • 4. Show of hands… • Who knows what “Hoosier” means? • Who knows the percentage of adults on average that use a budget? • How many people in the room feel that it’s appropriate for the gaming industry to produce and promote financial literacy? Confidential & Proprietary
  • 5. About the Hoosier Lottery • Insert logos Confidential & Proprietary
  • 6. Why Financial Literacy • Partnership with local stakeholders • Audience: Lottery winners, players, Ivy Tech students • Strategy: Helping winners through life changing event, general education on budgeting for entertainment expense • Launch and support Confidential & Proprietary
  • 8. Measurement & KPIs • Current Metrics/Monitoring: – 626 registrations – 6% completion rate – Qualitative analysis on the feedback generated by players, winners, and the general public on the usefulness of the content. • Future Metrics/Monitoring: All of the above plus results of survey Confidential & Proprietary
  • 11. Completion Rate by Module Confidential & Proprietary
  • 12. Stakeholder Feedback: Players • Liked: • The words “invitation to learn” was used. Made it feel special and not like a requirement or demand like a “teacher hitting you with a plastic ruler” • Getting a certificate, felt like a special accomplishment • Being able to take it “at my leisure” • That it promoted the Hoosier Lottery as “socially aware” • That it was free for anyone • Disliked: • Videos hard to understand - felt accent was distracting • Questions in surveys were too repetitive and easy • Felt like “Final Literacy” wording was intimidating and sounded “hoity-toity” • Too intellectual focused. Confidential & Proprietary
  • 13. Stakeholder Feedback: Treatment Community • Suggested more promotion of the program. • Called it “Good corporate citizenship” • Suggested adding information about the program on tickets. • Praised the concept and asked for brochures to hand out at future events. Confidential & Proprietary
  • 14. What does research say? • There is a need for more research specific to financial literacy as a responsible gaming tool. • “Cokely and Kelley (2009) found that higher levels of quantitative reasoning resulted in better decisions involving risk, specifically lotteries and gambling.” – N=80 undergraduate psychology majors • Informed player choice – generally, players that have tools to make wise choices stick to them. Confidential & Proprietary
  • 15. Lessons Learned • Need lottery-specific data: Survey tool • Re-launch with bigger PR push • Inserting stakeholder feedback into the changes Confidential & Proprietary
  • 18. 1. Open New Horizons app 2. Select the Agenda button 3. Select This Session 4. Select Take Survey at the bottom To provide session feedback: If you are unable to download the app, please see one of our conference hosts located just outside the room.

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. 2 min