Findings on the B.C. Lottery Corporation (BCLC) voluntary self-exclusion program
Dr. Amanda McCormick, University of the Fraser Valley
Presented at the New Horizons in Responsible Gambling Conference in Vancouver, February 1-3, 2016
Findings on the B.C. Lottery Corporation (BCLC) voluntary self-exclusion program
2. Findings from the Review of
BCLCs VSE Program
Dr. Irwin Cohen
Dr. Amanda McCormick
3. Previous Study
n = 169
2-Year Follow
Up
35% Violations
Low
Counselling
Access
Satisfaction
High
GSAs at
Enrollments
Psychological
Barrier
Jackpot Rule
4. Current Study
• Longitudinal
– Interviews over 18 Months with VSE Participants
– Low Attrition Rates – 73%
• Qualitative
– In-Depth “Violator” Interviews
• Cross-Sectional
– VSE Participants versus Non-VSE Gamblers
5. Program Evaluation
• Williams et al. (2007)
– Utilization Rates
– Percent who refrain from attempting to re-enter
– Impact on overall gambling behaviour
6. Program Utilization in B.C.
• B.C. Problem Gambling Prevalence Study
(2014)
– 75% Past-Year Gambling
– 3.3% Moderate or High-Risk
• 6% Utilization
• Current Study @ T1 (June 2013-March 2014)
– n = 326
9. VSE compared to Non-VSEFactor VSE Non-VSE
Female 53% 57%
Age 48 years 51 years
MARITAL STATUS
Single 37% 23%
Married 35% 48%
Divorced 9% 10%
EDUCATION
Less than High School 18% 3%
High School / GED 29% 21%
Some Post-Secondary 54% 75%
EMPLOYMENT & INCOME
Employed 71% 58%
Retired 17% 32%
Under 50k 72% 21%
10. VSE compared to Non-VSEFactor VSE Non-VSE
RESIDENCE
Interior 39% 14%
Lower Mainland 45% 65%
LANGUAGE SPOKEN
English 88% 91%
Chinese 5% 2%
Vietnamese 2% 0%
ETHNICITY
Caucasian 75% 77%
First Nations 6% 1%
South Asian 5% 2%
Asian 10% 17%
32. Agreement Violators at T2
• 97% reported successfully re-entering on at
least one attempt
• 67% went to different casino
• 46% were caught in past 6 months
34. Marital Status
• Violators More Likely Single (53% vs 35%) or
Common Law (20% vs 9%)
• Non-Violators More Likely Married (40% vs
20%) or Divorced (10% vs 5%)
35. Percent of PGSI Group who Violated
(n = 270)
7% 6%
15%
45%
No Problem Low Level Moderate Problem
Gambling
39. Strategies Used to Avoid Being
Caught27
12 11
6
4
Visited a
Different
Casino
Did Nothing Wore a
Disguise
Played a
different game
or lower stakes
Avoided
Casino Parking
Lot
40. What Would Stop Violations
14
7
6
1
Mandatory ID
Checks
Nothing - It's a
Personal Choice
Increasing Fines Arrest for
Trespassing
44. PGSI Elements Over the 3 Time
Periods
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Time 1 Time 2 Time 3
Bet more than could afford to lose Needed to gamble with larger amounts for same excitement
Go back another day to try and win back lost money Borrowed money or sold something for money to gamble
Felt you might have a problem with gambling Gambling caused health problems
People criticized your betting or told you you had a problem Gambling caused financial problems*
Felt guilty about gambling or what happens when you gamble* Claimed to be winning money gambling but weren’t
Hidden betting slips or other signs of gambling Lost time from work or school due to gambling
47. What’s Related to Access?
Access No Access
PGSI at Time 1* 16.5 11.3
PGSI at Time 2 6.3 3.7
Violations 22.5% 14%
48. Consent and Access to
Counselling
31%
37%
27%
51%
66%
42%
Overall GSA Present No GSA
Consented Accessed
49. Reasons for Accessing Counselling
(n = 96)
90%
65%
55%
15% 13%
9%
Gambling Problem Owed it to Others Needed It Pressured Demonstration Thought Mandatory
50. Reasons for Avoiding Counselling
84%
37% 35%
29%
21% 19% 17%
9% 7% 7%
3%
Deal with it
Myself
Don't Have
Problem
Couldn't
Help
No Time Keep
Gambling
Private
Too
Ashamed
Other Feared
Being
Made Fun
Of
Language
Barrier
Can't
Afford
Didn't
Know
51. Reasons for No Counselling x PGSI
No Problem Low/Mod Problem
Wanted to Deal with it Myself 60% 86% 83%
Didn’t Think it Could Help 20% 18% 42%
Don’t Think I have a Problem 60% 51% 32%
Didn’t have Time for it 40% 19% 32%
Didn’t Want Others to Know 0% 16% 24%
Too Ashamed to Talk to Anyone 0% 13% 22%
Thought Others Would Make Fun 0% 8% 9%
Didn’t Think They’d Speak My Language 20% 6% 6%
Couldn’t Afford It 0% 10% 6%
Didn’t Know It was Available 0% 2% 3%
55. I Would Recommend VSE to
Others
1.3%
1.3%
30.1%
66.9%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
56. Increase Effectiveness?
• Facial Recognition – 92%
• 5 Year Enrolment Option – 85%
• Mandatory ID Check at Entrance – 83%
• Advertise the program outside of casinos – 81%
• Have Someone from BCLC Call Before
Exclusion Ends to Ask about Reenrollment –
80%
• Enforcement of Penalties for Violations – 79%
• Re-enrolling over the phone – 78%
57. Major Findings
• Low Rate of Violation Attempts
• Substantial Reduction in Problem Gambling
Symptoms
• Low Rates of Counselling Access
• High Rates of Program Satisfaction
60. 1. Open New Horizons app
2. Select the Agenda button
3. Select This Session
4. Select Take Survey at the bottom
To provide session feedback:
If you are unable to download the app,
please raise your hand for a paper version.