A Soma Coma

A SOMA COMA
by
Hugh Mungus
© 2019. Hugh Mungus
Kindle Direct Publishing

© 2019. Hugh Mungus
First Edition
All Rights Reserved
ISBN-13: 978-1466313484
ISBN-10: 146631348X
Kindle Direct Publishing

We accept the reality of the world
with which we are presented.
— The Truman Show *
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bLyjGH4ZAE
There's only one reality, and you should even
question that. Question everything.
Don't blindly accept.
— Hugh Mungus

To Giordano Bruno: one serious bad-ass.

“YOU HAD ME AT 'FUCK THE SYSTEM.'"
(Fucking Memes) *
THE BLOODY, BRUTAL TRUTH
1
THE SOCIAL CONTRACT
11
APOCALYPTIKA: THE NUCLEAR FAMILY
37
GASLIGHTING
53
WE
77
GROUPTHINK: THE MONSTERS ARE HERE
99

THE IRON HEEL
127
A SOMA COMA
149
* https://me.me/i/you-had-me-at-fuck-the-system-3710069

1
THE BLOODY, BRUTAL TRUTH
Either you deal with what is the reality,
or you can be sure that the reality is
going to deal with you.
— Alex Haley *
* Alex Haley
https://www.azquotes.com/quote/551731

A SOMA COMA 2
If you've failed to grasp the message of my
books — and this is a bone of truth the size of
the Georgia Guidestones — we hold our
future in our own hands.
It isn't the obligation of intervening
extraterrestrials, some bloated commoner
named Donald Trump, a cartoon character
"god," this "ism," or that "ology," to save us.
Fuck the Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Illuminati, and a New World
Order. This has nothing to do with
corporations, CEOs, nor billionaires. This isn't
black ops, the Rothschilds, nor the "elite."
This is you. When the smoke clears, that's
what's left. You are the ones who give the
aforementioned life. Without the public
believing the above have power, the afore-
referenced are just ideas and organisms.

THE BLOOD Y, BRU TAL TRU TH 3
You are the ones who make Donald Trump,
Donald Trump. You are the ones who
transform inbred psychopaths into the
"elite." You are the ones who cause
billionaires to be billionaires, instead of the
selfish hoarders they are.
Without you believing presidents are
presidents — possessing an innate "right" to
boss you around — these people are nothing
more than you and me.
Everybody complains about politicians.
Everybody says they suck. Well, where
do people think these politicians come
from? They don't fall out of the sky.
They don't pass through a membrane
from another reality.
They come from American parents, and
American families, American homes,
American schools, American churches,
American businesses, and American
universities, and they're elected by
American citizens.
This is the best we can do, folks. This is
what we have to offer. It's what our
system produces. Garbage in, garbage

A SOMA COMA 4
out. If you have selﬁsh, ignorant
citizens, you're gonna get selﬁsh,
ignorant leaders. […]
So, maybe it's not the politicians who
suck. Maybe somethin' else sucks
around here. Like, the public.
— George Carlin **
** Maybe It's Not the Politicians Who Suck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etoocgcWm8
Folks don't wanna face reality. It's too
painful. They'll claim they're seeking truth;
battling evil; attempting to awaken the
masses to the enemy. You, me, and every
ignorant or complacent person are the real
enemy.
We cause those in power to be in power, by
referring to them as "elite," by claiming
they're "rich," and concluding they actually
control us. Believing some cabal dominates
you is less painful than admitting you are the

problem.
On election day, I stay home. I don't
vote. Fuck 'em! Fuck 'em!! I don't vote.
Two reasons. Two reasons I don't vote.
First of all, it's meaningless. This country
was bought, and sold, and paid for a
long time ago. The shit they shuffle
around every four years? Doesn't mean a
fuckin' thing!
And secondly, I don't vote 'cuz I believe
if you vote, you have no right to
complain. People like to twist that
around, I know. They say: "Well, if ya'
don't vote, you have no right to
complain," but where's the logic in that?
If you vote, and you elect dishonest,
incompetent people, and they get into
office and screw everything up, well you
are responsible for what they have done.
You caused the problem. You voted
them in. You have no right to complain.
I, on the other hand, who did not vote;
who, in fact, did not even leave the
house on election day, am in no way
responsible for what these people have
done, and have every right to complain
as loud as I want about the mess you
created that I had nothing to do with.
— George Carlin ***

A SOMA COMA 6
*** Ibid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etoocgcWm8
Unless you're psychopathic, nobody wants to
hear they, themselves, are the reason for
monumental death and destruction. Nobody
wants to hear they've built their own prison.
Such stated, the truth remains the truth, no
matter what you want to hear.
It's far more palatable to believe our suffering
is caused by someone else, as opposed to
ourselves. That's a horse pill the size of a
clydesdale to swallow, especially when you
were certain you'd been fighting the Illuminati
for so long.
Those you refer to as Zionists only control
you because you allow them to. As soon as
you shout, "No!", and eradicate the system
they've created to enslave you, you're free.

It's as easy as that. Again, you not only hold
the power; you are the power.
Until you stop believing these criminals
against humanity are "elite," "wealthy," and
in control, they will continue to be so.
Those you profess to be your "leaders" are
your scapegoats. It's easier for you to blame
them than yourself. In conjunction, it's easier
for you to seek some other source — a
"rogue" president, a "god," empathetic
aliens, etc. — as your savior from all this.
Doing so releases you from obligation.
"Donald Trump is unlike any other president!
He's exposing the truth, and the 'elite' hate
him for doing so!"
Donald Trump is right where he wants to be
— controlling the populace, existing in

A SOMA COMA 8
opulence, and perpetrating the superlative
business scam on you.
The only way a president becomes a
"president" — wielding "authority" over a
populace — is if that populace believes the
common person claiming to be a president:
A) is a president, and
B) has some "right" to be a mythical
"authority" figure, and control the masses.
Until you view those we've placed in positions
of power as nothing more than you or me,
you will feed this system that enslaves us.
You will cause the deaths of countless
people. You will be culpable for the
decimation of a species.
This is the bloody, brutal truth. Your apathy,

denial and ignorance have been at the core
of our suffering all along. That fuckin' hurts,
but that agony doesn't make it any less true.
It also means you are the power that can end
the misery. If you, and enough around you,
stop fueling those we've allowed to become
our enemies, this ends immediately. The
solution has been there for us to grasp, since
this dilemma arose.
If you turn a blind eye to the truth, this
suffering will continue. Unless we stand up
for ourselves, and eradicate this system in
which we're all currently enslaved, our
species on Earth will be exterminated.
Pull the plug. Again, you are the power
source; not some bloated politician who can't
find his cock with a magnifying glass, and a
bevy of nymphomaniacs. Once you, and

A SOMA COMA 10
enough of the populace, say this system is
done, it ends.
Explain this truth to those around you.
Distribute reality.
Along the way, you'll face tremendous
adversity — your own kind unwilling to look at
what is real. Who cares? Leave the
recalcitrant, and continue on your path.
Are you strong enough to acknowledge you
not only are the problem, but also the
solution?

11
THE SOCIAL CONTRACT
Man is born free, and everywhere he is
in chains. One thinks himself the master
of others, and still remains a greater
slave than they.
— The Social Contract *
* The Social Contract
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6z7cRkcRetg

A SOMA COMA 12
None of us are born free, due to the system
we perpetuate. We're all birthed into slavery,
whether we comprehend such or not.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau — the author of the
above citation — was obviously duped, like
most of us. Rousseau felt we were liberated
at our respective inceptions. Such stated, he
understood the preponderance of the
population believe they're free, when in
reality, they're slaves.
Have you ever wondered what those within
government use as their excuse for bossing
you around?
When was the last time you questioned: "Why
am I listening to this shit stain in the White
House? Why am I allowing this raging cunt —
folks are calling a president — to transform
my life into a struggle to keep from being

THE SOCI AL CON TRACT 13
exterminated?"
Do you query from whence these giant heads
on TV derive the "right" to control you, even
though they don't know who you are?
Most won't entertain the above, since the
majority of folks blindly follow this system,
never considering it may have been created
without their best interests in mind.
If somebody you don't know told you
repeatedly how to conduct every aspect of
your life, would you comply?
Sounds like a silly question, since we're all
gonna answer, "No." Such stated, most of us
allow our entire existences to be controlled
by people we've never met.
It's bizarre, when reduced to basics. You

A SOMA COMA 14
don't know this thing called Trump, and
didn't know that thing called Obama. Prior
generations didn't know the Bushes, Carter,
Reagan, Roosevelt, Wilson, nor Washington.
They only saw each of them in 2-D form.
Hell, one of the above was solely a damned
drawing! Still, the populace credulously allow
these creatures to "lead" them.
Begs the question: "Why do we permit hairy
axe wounds — we'd crosscheck off a cliff, if
we encountered them in different
circumstances — to direct our lives? If
whatever Trump is wasn't named Trump, and
there was no such position as president,
would you do what the dude told you?
Again, the answer would be, "No." Trump
would just be some arrogant slum lord looking
to steal your money…which is all he is now.

Then, why do we comply to decrees delivered
by two-dimensional faces on a screen?
Known as the social contract, most have no
idea what it is, even though we've allowed it
to steal our lives.
Would you believe what government claims
authorizes it to control us is an idea as weak
as Oprah's cries to end the monetary
system?
That's right. Akin to the other bullshit folks
believe in — money, The Bible, the U.S.
Constitution, etc. — our basis for belief in
bureaucracy is anemic.
Written in 1762, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau,
The Social Contract outlines why we follow
government. The same government that
demands we do our best to destroy

A SOMA COMA 16
ourselves, as well as the planet. This book
claims citizens implicitly abdicate their
freedoms — without knowledge of doing such
— so that some esoteric "social order" can
be maintained. **
** Ibid.
That's it. That's the basis for why you forfeit
your life, in exchange for servitude, perpetual
anxiety, and abuse.
None of this is explained to the public. It isn't
outlined to us we're even adhering to the
social contract, let alone the fact our innate
abilities will be stolen, by doing such.
The word tacit means "comprehension,
without having to be stated; implied."

In Rousseau's book, it's tacit we agree to
abide by the rule of government. Problem is,
none of us have agreed. None of us have
signed the U.S. Constitution — the contract
government wrote — the way one would sign
any other contract.
Those referring to themselves as
bureaucracy have conveniently pretended to
"own" what they call the "United States."
They then make the claim that, because
you've chosen to live on "their property,"
you've conceded to be ruled by them.
That's insane!
As proven in my previous works, nobody
"owns" anything! Such is validated by the fact
none of us take our "possessions" with us,
when we depart our physical forms. Hence,
how can this ideology — that's named itself

A SOMA COMA 18
the U.S. government — be an exception to
this truth?
This is all just a pathetic smokescreen to
conceal the fact that my actual words,
and my actual views, are in the form of
dissent. And my actual words of, "I don't
consent to this" are supposed to be
somehow overridden by this mystical,
tacit consent that I didn't even know I
was engaging in, by the mere fact of
standing in some place.
This is a ridiculous argument that's
advanced by people who simply want to
wield power, and then after the fact,
they come up with this crummy
rationalization to try to make it seem as
if I really want to be ruled. I implicitly
crave being ruled. I implicitly consented
to being ruled.
I don't implicitly do any of this. I
explicitly say, "No, I do not consent to
this."
— Tom Woods ***
*** Tom Woods
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTqEePlZiqk
"Ted, I just assumed you wanted the sunroof

option with the car, so I took the liberty of
adding $5,000 to the price of your vehicle. I
didn't ask your permission, but it's okay,
because I'll be stealing installments out of
your income for the rest of your life."
How do you think Ted would respond to the
above?
Your next door neighbor dumps dog shit and
dirty diapers in your front yard, by the ton.
You have no idea he's the culprit. As such,
you don't confront him. Since you continue
residing in your house, does this infer you're
okay with his obvious disrespect for you? ****
**** Tom Woods
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J7LMthd1lQ
In order to defend government, many will
declare: "If you don't like the system here in

A SOMA COMA 20
the U.S., why don't you leave?"
Hence, the burden is placed upon those who
wish to oppose hegemony.
Let's say the mafia moved into your city,
assuming "control" over it. Would it seem just
and logical, if you had to depart, as a result?!
Another argument promulgated by those
defending the social contract goes something
like the following: "If you're gonna enjoy the
benefits government provides you, that'll be
taken as tacit consent."
What fucking "benefits"?!? Those calling
themselves government are nothing more
than criminals. They've ordered you nuked on
thousands of different occasions — veiling
these acts of war as "tests"! What "favors"
could they bequeath you, after such heinous

malice?!?
"Sorry we waged nuclear holocaust on you
guys, and thus caused over 40 percent of
you to contract cancer for billions of years to
come, generation after generation. By the
way, we're gonna steal from your every
paycheck, so that you — who are perfectly
capable of building your own roads by
yourselves — can actually build your own
roads by yourselves."
Those claiming to be government make the
spurious predication they've constructed
highways for us. The common masses built
those thoroughfares! No president sweated
his ass off in the Sun, operating a backhoe, or
layin' asphalt!
Those within government allegedly protect
us against foreign enemies. The Overview

A SOMA COMA 22
Effect disproves any specious beliefs in
"nations," and therefore "foreign nations," or
"foreigners." *****
***** The Overview Effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IorSIJdrTaU
If you'll recall, this phenomenon results when
those we've dubbed "astronauts" travel off
Earth, and gaze back upon the planet. In
doing so, they quickly realize there are no
boundaries, and thus no countries.
Do "foreigners" steal money from your
income on a regular basis? Nope. But those
referring to themselves as government sure
as fuck do.
Those professing to be bureaucracy don't
"protect" us against anybody! Do politicians
cross make-believe borders, and face mortar

explosions from those they falsely designate
our "adversaries"?
Of course not. The common populace — in
the form of hired killers; or soldiers —
engage in battle, while those within
government sleep safely in mansions.
It is not improbable that many, or most,
of the worst of governments — although
established by force and the few in the
ﬁrst place — come in time to be
supported by a majority. But if they do,
this majority is composed, in large part,
of the most ignorant, superstitious,
timid, dependent, servile, and corrupt
portions of the people. Of those who
have been overawed by the power,
intelligence, wealth, and arrogance; of
those who have been deceived by the
frauds, and of those who have been
corrupted by the inducements of the few
who really constitute the government.
— Lysander Spooner *****
***** Lysander Spooner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIZHnﬁaJtw

A SOMA COMA 24
Rousseau asserts, without government,
people revert to "natural order." In this
pristine paradigm — originally provided by
nature — folks are free. Without "authority"
to "lead the way," the author of The Social
Contract believes humans will destroy
themselves, because it's his assertion they
are innately malicious.
How does he know this? How can any of us
know this, since all we've experienced —
since the birth of recorded history — is
compliance to "authority?"
How is tacit consent any different than the
divine right of kings, or The Mandate of
Heaven? ****** º
****** The divine right of kings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings

º The Mandate of Heaven
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_of_Heaven
All three simply claim some magical "right"
to rule others. There's never tactile evidence
validating these bogus edicts. It's the
neighborhood bully doing his best to scare his
peers; informing them he has "authority" to
boss them around.
It isn't until the other little snot eaters realize
there are 10 of them, and only one corpulent
bitch boy, that they comprehend who's really
in control. At that point, the group typically
beat the balls off what equates to nothing
more than one loud-mouthed fat fuck!
In The Social Contract, Jean-Jacques
Rousseau — whether he comprehends such
or not — actually makes valid points against
establishing government. He declares people

A SOMA COMA 26
should circumvent slavery at all costs. Such
stated, by implementing hegemony,
enslavement immediately commences.
Unless you can govern yourself, you're
governed by someone else. That means you
aren't free. If you aren't free, you're a slave.
Rousseau also promulgates it's impossible for
people to be free, if governed by
representative hegemony. That's what those
we've placed in power purport we now have.
Bitches be callin' it a "representative
democracy," since it became abundantly
obvious our subjugation to this bureaucracy
wasn't a government by the people. When
the populace indicted the cockroaches —
doubling as our "leaders" — regarding this,
the term representative democracy was
introduced into contemporary parlance. This,

even though most had referred to the
fictitious region folks call "America," as
solely a democracy for centuries.
The United States stands at the pinnacle
of world power. This is a solemn
moment for the American democracy.
For with primacy in power is joined in
awe-inspiring accountability for the
future.
— Winston Churchill ºº
ºº Winston Churchill
To protest against injustice is the
foundation of all our American
democracy.
— Thurgood Marshall ººº
ººº Thurgood Marshall
American democracy is supposed to be
the paradigm for the rest of the world.

A SOMA COMA 28
— Robert F Kennedy, Jr. ºººº
ºººº Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
It's the "pancake theory," in regard to 9/11.
NIST — the government's "official
investigation" of September 11th — asserted
such was what occurred during this false flag
attack. If this had been valid, the floors of
World Trade Center Buildings 1 and 2
would've collapsed upon each other, causing
the edifices to crumble to the ground. Such
would've left the supporting columns of both
buildings still standing, after the destruction.
Once the public realized these pillars were
conspicuously absent in the aftermath, and
screamed such relentlessly, NIST fabricated
some other horse shit to explain their lie.

For centuries, it's been beaten into our skulls
the "U.S." is a democracy. When increasingly
more proles began asking how such was so —
if democracy means a government by the
people, and none of us people are governing
fuck all — the sophistry kicked into
overdrive. It was then the powers we've
allowed to be rolled out a new line of fecal
matter called a "representative democracy."
"Well, yeah. We haven't been lying to you
disgusting plebeians. This is a democracy.
It's a representative democracy, that's all."
Who the fuck are you representing, cock
clown? Obviously not the people, if you're
forcing them to pay for "health care," and
when they can't afford such, you steal from
them, in the form of a "penalty."
Although Rousseau's book dumps a

A SOMA COMA 30
monumental pile of steamin' shit on
humanity, it does have some bright, shining
moments. Case in point:
If we take the term in the strict sense,
there never has been a real democracy,
and there never will be. It is against the
natural order for the many to govern,
and the few to be governed.
It is unimaginable that the people should
remain continually assembled, to devote
their time to public affairs, and it is clear
that they cannot set up commissions for
that purpose without the form of
administration being changed.
In fact, I can conﬁdently lay down as a
principle that when the functions of
government are shared by several
tribunals, the less numerous — sooner
or later — acquire the greatest authority.
— The Social Contract ººººº
ººººº The Social Contract
As stated in my previous works, democracy
— government by the people — is

impossible. Only when folks are free — and
therefore without government — can each
and every one of them govern themselves.
If you have two parties, with two differing
viewpoints, and claim both share a
government by the people, you're wrong, and
either ignorant or lying. One of those people
will be governing, while the other will be
governed. One of those people's needs will be
met, while the other person will have to make
concessions.
Thus, this second person won't be governing
anything, while the first person governs
everything. This would not be government by
the people, but rather government by one
person.
Only when people are free from government,
can they govern themselves. That's freedom!

A SOMA COMA 32
The snake oil hegemony has been promoting
as democracy, is a fallacy, and unattainable.
It is easier to conquer than to rule.
— The Social Contract ºººººº
ºººººº Ibid.
Make no mistake about it. Those you've
allowed to control you are bustin' their asses
to keep you incarcerated. It isn't easy caging
over seven billion people, but it's that much
more difficult keeping the pen door from
breaking open.
Such stated, as long as you preserve the
stupidity of the populace, they'll do the
majority of the work for you. They'll be the
ones ensuring the lock on that paddock isn't
picked. You'll still have time to enjoy the

rotten fruits of your labor — lounging about
your summer homes, and getting your cock
sucked in the backseat of your Bentleys.
Rousseau claims no regime lasts indefinitely.
According to Jean-Jacques, nations — like
people — grow old, and die. Akin to humans,
countries enter various phases of
deterioration, denoting what stage of life
they're in.
Rousseau also declared "democracy" arrives
at its death throes when the number of those
running it is reduced to the point it becomes
an oligarchy. An oligarchy — the many
dominated by the few — is what we have
now. That's above and beyond the fact we
also reside within a plutocracy, a
corporatocracy, and — in more enveloping
context — a kakistocracy.

A SOMA COMA 34
Make gifts of money, and you will not be
long without chains. The word ﬁnance is
a slavish word. […]
In a country that is truly free, the
citizens do everything with their own
arms, and nothing by means of money.
— The Social Contract †
† Ibid.
I'll never stop screamin' it, because it's the
truth, and the solution! If you wanna end this
slavery in which we're imprisoned, eradicate
the monetary system, and dispense
everything freely and evenly.
How do you kill a snake? You cut off its head,
thereby draining its blood. What's the
essence that gives this nightmare, in which
we're all imprisoned, life? Money. Destroy it,
and you destroy the system.

It's because we don't say, "No!" to these
deep-fried dildos that they continue doing
whatever they want to us. They continue
doing whatever we allow them to.

37
APOCALYPTIKA: THE NUCLEAR FAMILY
Government is a tiny gang that does
what it wants to us because our gang is
less organized.
— Anam Paiseanta *
* Anam Paiseanta
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AugVVKIAfE

A SOMA COMA 38
You exist in an apocalypse, and don't even
know it. How can your environment be nuked
on over 2,000 occasions, and not be an
apocalypse?! **
** A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY
Just because "your government" refers to
'em as "tests," doesn't make the radioactive
fallout from the detonations conducted on
you, disappear. We're all drowning in this
necrosis, thanks to our belief in "authority."
Brainwashed to conclude exploding these
bombs on ourselves was beneficial to us,
we've sealed our own coffins.
That's right! The lunatics you call your
"leaders" only ordered detonation of those
thousands of nuclear devices. It took ignorant
soldiers — credulous contract killers

APOCALYPTI KA: THE N U CLE AR F AMI LY 39
— to actually turn the keys, and press the
buttons that doomed us into this lengthy,
lethal cataclysm; this apocalyptika.
Ponder the monumental menticide necessary
to coerce people to nuke themselves. You've
gotta be so hopped-up on the smack of the
brand name "America," you're willing to
destroy your kids.
Deadly radioisotopes associated with these
explosions will be present on this planet — in
some cases — billions of years. Thus, if they
already haven't, whomever detonated these
ordnances will eclipse the death toll achieved
by Hitler's blind minions during the Holocaust.
Not only the current generation, but
hundreds of thousands of eras subsequent
will be droppin' like trite flies, thanks to this
soldier pushin' that button, and that one
turnin' those keys.

A SOMA COMA 40
Will we know who these mass murderers
were? Of course not. They're already
forgotten in the annals of "history."
Do you know who detonated the nuclear
device during the Ivy Mike "test"? Do you
even know there was an Ivy Mike "test"?!
What was the name of the soldier — excuse
me, the hired assassin — who dropped Tsar
Bomba? *** ****
*** Ivy Mike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Mike
**** Tsar Bomba
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba
Fuck if you know, but Terminator 6 is comin'
out, and Samuel Jackson prefers his own
urine stirred, not shaken, so who gives two
shits?!

The illusion you reside in salubrity is
perpetuated because you have Starbucks on
every corner. Thanks to TV sitcoms, and the
sophomoric "jokes" vomited from this drivel,
you feel everything's alright. Sports — better
yet, betting on sports — consumes you.
Hence, your mind is released from having to
face the fact some of those you pay homage
to on Veterans Day, nuked every human on
this planet for billions of years.
And who can forget about money? Just
chase that useless crap right through ground
zero, debt slave! As long as you've got
enough cash, nothing can touch you. You're
fuckin' invincible!
People couldn't give a shit whether they've
been delivered this death sentence! They
don't care their children are injected into this
nightmare. They're not concerned they

A SOMA COMA 42
themselves are culpable of such, by bringing
these innocent lives into this apocalyptika. As
long as they're confident Gordon Ramsay
reached 10 million subscribers on YouTube,
thanks to his burger recipe, they're all set!
Talk about a fun book, huh? Who wouldn't
wanna read further?!
Then again, who can refute the reality I've
just shown you?
Nobody! Folks can desperately generate this
"excuse," and that "justification," but they're
all horse shit! Cancer was almost unheard of
in 1900. After inception of the Atomic Age,
it skyrocketed to the horrifying plateau it's
reached today.
The above is the knock-out blow to not only
send our adversary to the canvas, but shred

his head from his body the way Jason did in
Friday the 13th Part VIII. *****
***** Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEk0ErNA7gA
There's no comin' back from that
knucklefuck! You can't justify how this
fictional ideology called government can
order you nuked over 2,000 times, and still
love you. Do you nuke your kid?!
If you defend such, put this book down, and
shove your head inside Michelle Obama's
latest grundel gristle, because you've sided
with the enemy. The nemesis that needs you
enslaved. The adversary that wants you
destroyed, when you no longer have anything
to offer it.
There are tens of thousands of nuclear

A SOMA COMA 44
weapons currently on this planet. Detonating
over 2,000 of those would mean perhaps
exploding 15 to 30 percent of the total
arsenal.
Since it's often vociferated there are enough
atomic weapons on Earth to destroy our
species hundreds of times, discharging one
third of that cache would result in an
apocalypse.
"Wait a minute. There's no way we could've
overlooked something this gigantic! The
entirety of government can't be corrupt. All
presidents weren't evil. Kennedy was good.
Just look what they did to him."
If you insist on repeating this bathetic rhetoric,
ask yourself if Kennedy ordered nuclear
detonations — guised as "tests" — during his
administration. Enough said! ******

****** List of United States nuclear weapons tests
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States
%27_nuclear_weapons_tests
The frantic, undying search for parental
acceptance — even in the face of constantly
being bludgeoned by one's father — is
repulsive! Ufologists waiting for Disclosure
are delusional! Disclosure is the confirmation
extraterrestrial, or otherworldly, entities
exist, and are visiting Earth. So many UFO
researchers slave toward a day when
government finally admits such.
Disclosure already happened! Most of the
populace knows something far more
intelligent is interacting with us! We've got
more evidence supporting such than we do
Oprah is addicted to money!
That's your Disclosure! Why would you need

A SOMA COMA 46
those within government to "confirm"
anything? Hegemony has ordered you nuked
thousands of times!
Major Donald Keyhoe was shovin' UFOs —
and the myriad of fighter pilots chasin' 'em —
in your face, during the '50s! º ºº It's now
2019, and you're still waitin' for your shitty
stepdad — bureaucracy — to affirm
unidentified flying objects aren't of human
origin?! How many decades have you wasted,
on stand by, hopin' your primitive patriarch
will tell you it's okay to pursue reality?! We're
talkin' 70 years, during which we could've
understood advanced technology used by
whatever UFOs are!
º The Flying Saucers Are Real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cw1tbkpcKUE
ºº Major Donald Keyhoe Interviewed by Mike Wallace

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei9tgxqYCaI
Instead, thanks to our paralyzing craving for
parental validation, we won't make a move,
until the nanny state informs us it's okay to
do so. Because of ufologists who still believe
in ad verecundiam, governments that don't
exist, "countries" that are equally fake, and a
system that's killing you, you're gonna
continue to wait longer?!?
Don't you have enough confidence in
yourself ? You — the populace — know you're
being interacted with. How does it benefit
you to wait around indefinitely for a
"sanction" that will never come? Do you need
"daddy's" acceptance so badly, you'll allow
him to destroy you, to get it?!
Those you call "government" will never
disclose the truth about anything, let alone

A SOMA COMA 48
something as important as another cognizant
force interacting with us. Yet, because you
believe "authority" actually exists, and you
have to wait for it's stamp of approval, you
keep wasting time.
Of course you do! You were abandoned on a
desert island we call Earth, amidst this
infinitely massive black void, we call space.
You have no idea where you are, much less
what you are. You're scared, and seeking
guidance from anyone, or anything, claiming
to know the way.
At what point does the population — the
offspring — divorce itself from the
progenitor? You parted from your parents,
yet the populace refuses to leave the home,
and stand on its own two feet? It still feels it
requires the state, in order to survive? It
can't wean from the teat, even though the

milk dispensed was rancid from inception?
If your dad fucks you mercilessly, do you take
that terrorism? In this case, the primogenitor
— "authority" — isn't even your natural
patriarch. It's a self-appointed, adopted
parent who continues to rape you. Yet,
you're gonna willfully comply to its demands,
spreading your asshole wide, while it
sodomizes you?!
Imperative safety tip: Following the decrees
of proven psychopaths will result in your
extermination. Having been nuked into an
apocalyptika doesn't lie. Over 40 percent of
any demographic contracting cancer, as a
result, is ironclad validation.
If some other "country" nuked ya' once,
you'd demand the U.S. government retaliate,
wouldn't ya'? Somehow, though — for some

A SOMA COMA 50
fucked-up reason — it's not only okay, but
awesome "your government" nuked you?!?
Although the Oxford English Dictionary
asserts the phrase nuclear family was
introduced into our lexicon in 1925, why
didn't this term become popular until 1947?
ººº
ººº Nuclear family
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_family
Trinity — the first atomic detonation
conducted by this round of humans — was
perpetrated in 1945. Two years later, four
more "tests" had been carried out. One
above Hiroshima, Japan; another above
Nagasaki; and two more — Operation
Crossroads — in the Bikini Atolls.
Thus, those studying these "trials" had ample

time to determine how lethal this weapon
was, and some of the effects it had on
humans. As such, is it mere coincidence,
shortly after the inception of the Atomic
Age, the term nuclear family became widely
used?
I comprehend this phrase is purported to
mean an immediate clan with a core —
similar to a nucleus. That said, the
introduction of this term into popular
nomenclature, and the beginning of the
Atomic Age, definitely coincide.
Moreover, the fact we're all walkin' around
with portions of these "tests" inside us —
and thus, "nuclear" — makes this moniker
appropriate.
On top of this, if core is what you're stressing
— in the case of this type of family — why

A SOMA COMA 52
not call it that? A core family, as opposed to
a nuclear one?

53
GASLIGHTING
These predators prey on susceptible
individuals who believe in their false
altruism, affection and promises of
protection. Gaslighters are most
successful when they believably cast
themselves as loyal and dutiful
protectorates who are unconditionally
invested in defending and caring for
their beloved gaslit victims.
— Ross Rosenberg *
* Ross Rosenberg
https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/463096774177825323/

A SOMA COMA 54
Finding its way into popular vernacular,
gaslighting denotes a dogged effort to make
a person, or people, feel as if they're insane.
The word gaslighting originates from Gas
Light — a 1938 play by Patrick Hamilton. In
1940, this stage show was adapted into a
movie of similar title. A 1944 remake was
also released, under the same moniker,
starring Ingrid Bergman.
In the original flick, Diana Wynyard plays
Bella Mallen — a wealthy widow who
remarries. Upon moving into a new home with
her husband, Paul — played by Anton
Walbrook — she struggles with what appears
to be mental illness.
Ostensibly, Bella's forgetful, to the point her
absence of memory adversely affects those
around her. She's accused — and seemingly

G ASL I G HTI N G 55
culpable — of committing nefarious acts, in
order to cover up what she believes is her
failing mind. The dilemma escalates to the
point her sole recourse may be permanent
relocation to a mental institution.
Soon enough, though, the viewer is made
privy to the fact Bella isn't going insane.
Rather, her new husband is endeavoring to
make her think she is.
A bigamist, a thief, and a murderer — whose
real name is Louis Bauer — Paul is attempting
to drive Bella into a mental asylum, in order
to control her assets. He also has designs on
rubies hidden somewhere in his new home,
which he'd left behind, in order to evade
police, after killing the former resident years
prior.
How does Bauer convince his wife she's going

A SOMA COMA 56
mad?
He secretly hides items personal to Bella,
then commands her to retrieve these
objects. Even though she knows where she's
stored her personal effects, when she
attempts to find them, they're nowhere in
sight. As a result, she becomes distressed
her mental faculties are failing.
Paul reinforces her misdiagnosis, adamantly
feigning concern, and pretending he's doing
everything within his power to cure his wife.
Bauer also feeds Bella misleading
information, and accuses her of thievery, in
hopes she'll lose her tenuous grip on lucidity.
Thus, the woman becomes depressed,
certain she's losing her mind. **

** Gaslight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYmtzaHwCKo
Wikipedia defines gaslighting as:
a form of psychological manipulation in
which a person seeks to sow seeds of
doubt in a targeted individual or in
members of a targeted group, making
them question their own memory,
perception, and sanity. Using persistent
denial, misdirection, contradiction, and
lying, gaslighting involves attempts to
destabilize the victim and delegitimize
the victims' belief. ***
*** Gaslighting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
This is a common tactic implemented by
those lacking a conscience. Because
empathy among the masses is shriveling like
the ball sacks of the Coney Island Polar Bear
Club, the term gaslighting is now widely used.
So many people find themselves in abusive

A SOMA COMA 58
relationships, they're familiar with what this
word denotes.
Still, few comprehend we've all been gaslit.
Every one of us is a victim of a monumental
attempt to make the human race feel it's
naturally barbaric, inadequate and insane.
We see it every day, whether or not we
comprehend it. In fact, we champion the
charge of our gaslighting, without knowledge
we're doing so.
How many times have you heard somebody
proclaim: "Without government, humans are
nothing more than uncivilized brutes who
would destroy each other." It's plausible
you've asserted such.
But how can that make sense? Aren't those
claiming to be government humans, as well?
Wouldn't that make them "uncivilized

brutes," also?
If the natural tendencies of mankind are
so bad it is not safe to permit people to
be free, how is it that the tendencies of
these organizers are always good? Do
not the legislators and their appointed
agents also belong to the human race?
Or do they believe that they themselves
are made of a ﬁner clay than the rest of
mankind?
— Frederic Bastiat ****
**** Frederic Bastiat
"Yeah, government is controlling, but we
need their laws to keep us from looting,
rioting, and killing each other."
How could we possibly know humans would
destroy their own species, without
bureaucracy? We can't recall a time when we
existed sans a belief in this fictional ideology

A SOMA COMA 60
known as government. Since our initial
thoughts, we've been indoctrinated to
assume we're brutal and primitive; lost
without the "guiding hand" of hegemony.
[For gaslighting to be effective, one must
ﬁrst convince] the victim that his
thinking is distorted and secondly
[persuade] him that the victimizer's
ideas are the correct and true ones.
— David Sasha *****
***** David Sasha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
Look at those who refer to themselves as
government. They're obsessed with the
attention provided by a public too stupid to
realize congresspeople, presidents and
senators are nothing more than the common
populace. We've simply chosen to
apotheosize this person, and not venerate
that one.

To say gaslighting was started by the
Bushes, Lee Atwater, Karl Rove, Fox
News, or any other extant group is not
simply wrong, it also misses an
important point. Gaslighting comes
directly from blending modern
communications, marketing, and
advertising techniques with long-
standing methods of propaganda. They
were simply waiting to be discovered by
those with sufficient ambition and
psychological makeup to use them.
— Bryant Welch ******
****** Bryant Welch
Ibid.
Narcissists and sociopaths are renowned for
their ability to lie without compunction.
Politicians perpetually lie. Who isn't aware of
this fact? That's why politicians are referred
to synonymously as corrupt.
A promise made on the campaign trail —
unless it's, "I promise to fuck you, and leave
you for dead." — is never kept, once these

A SOMA COMA 62
cum guzzlers slime their way into office.
Moreover, narcissists and sociopaths are
known for breaking anthropogenic laws.
Politicians constantly violate the decrees
they make, since they're certain these
threats — which is all man-made laws are —
only apply to the populace.
"Murder is a crime. [Now, I'm gonna order a
war! A war, in which millions will be
murdered.]"
"Thievery is malfeasance. [Now, I'm gonna
tax you, which means I'll force you to give me
money, just like any other thief.]"
"It's a felony to counterfeit, [but we've got
the money machine, and we print up as much
cash as we want, whenever we want. Thus,
we're counterfeiters, but when we do it, we

refer to it as creating currency. When you do
it, we throw you in prison for the same thing
we do all the time.]"
Victims of gaslighting doubt themselves;
feeling they're to blame, and thus the
problem. When your skull is stuck in a
propaganda promoter — called TV — and
you're spoon-fed lies — you're apt to
proclaim: "Another school shooting?! People
are bloodthirsty and evil!"
Folks this clueless come to the fallacious
conclusion humans are naturally bad, and
need government, in order to keep them
from destroying themselves. These
credulous creatures are classic victims of
gaslighting. They're so delusional, from all
the lies with which they've been pumped full,
they honestly believe they themselves can't
be trusted.

A SOMA COMA 64
Gaslighters hunger to make the victim reliant
upon the abuser. Those acting under the
fiction of government not only want you
dependent, they need your reliance. If the
public decides they no longer require
hegemony, bureaucracy disappears — since
it's only an ideology, anyway. In such a
scenario, folks become independent — which
they've always been — thus confident, and
self-sustaining.
As a result, those within government are no
longer be able to exist lavishly. This is
something these fuck holes desperately
endeavor to avoid.
Those you elect as "leaders" are not good
people. They're the worst criminals against
our species, and the biggest jizz drinkers you
could envision. Because our society has been
turned ass-backwards, we allow the ultimate

douche bags to control us.
But in a civilization that's irrational, would
you expect those calling the shots to be
logical? Of course not. That would make no
sense.
Only in an insane paradigm would you find
insane "leaders." In a sane paradigm, people
are confident enough to lead themselves.
Solely when you do so, can you be
autonomous, and thus, free.
Let's establish some of the hallmarks of
gaslighting, and see if government is
engaging in such.
1) Gaslighters withhold information from
those they're abusing.
From what they're creating at Area 51, to

A SOMA COMA 66
flying live nukes over our heads for decades,
you have no fucking idea what those within
bureaucracy are doing. You just allow
yourself to suffer the consequences of their
decrees. Due to the Manhattan Project —
which was kept secret from the public —
we're now all drowning in radioactive fallout.
2) Manipulating data to support the cause of
the perpetrator.
If you and I forced people to pay us, under
penalty of violently kidnapping someone —
which is what imprisoning is — that would be
extortion. When government performs this
very same act, they refer to it as "taxes."
3) Marginalizing facts.
If you prove something those within
government don't want the public aware of,

thanks to CIA memo 1035-960, you're
labelled a "conspiracy theorist." Thus, if the
populace is ignorant, facts are speciously
believed to be fiction, and vice versa. º
º 1035-960
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeGR6toqJ-Y
This is a type of epistemic injustice known as
testimonial injustice. You implement
testimonial injustice by ignoring facts a
person is providing, because that person is
part of a group deemed unsatisfactory.
4) Creating a sleight of hand, to redirect a
victim's attention.
While Fukushima is submersing us in
radioactive fallout, all you hear about on
mainstream news is what some guy named
Trump tweeted. Cancer victims are

A SOMA COMA 68
bombarded with radiation "treatments" —
which gives them cancer — but it's okay,
because you've got a robot named Alexa
probing your anus. Doctors drug the populace
— under the auspices of government — with
narcotics as lethal as heroin, and far more
addictive. Yet, because Oprah has something
shiny to show you on TV, all's fuckin' well!
5) Perpetually reinforcing the "incompetent"
nature of the abused.
"Unless you get an A+ in school — [and excel
at remembering the brainwashing we're
sodomizing you with] — you're a failure."
"If you don't become a doctor or a lawyer —
[selling your soul to be a superlative debt
slave] — you aren't successful."
"If you fail to 'own' a home — [and subject

yourself to a lifetime of servitude, disguised
as a mortgage] — you're a disappointment."
The three most prevalent modalities of
gaslighting are:
1) Hiding:
Perpetrators withhold things from those they
abuse. Government suppresses information
from us constantly. If you don't believe such,
just take a look at the trillions of dollars spent
on black ops. ºº
ºº Pentagon Fails Audit; $21 Trillion Unaccounted For
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztDHmkRK6I8
2) Changing:
The gaslighter finds it necessary to alter
aspects of those they're violating. This is

A SOMA COMA 70
often attributable to a fantasy the sick fuck
abuser harbors.
Soldiers are forced to not only dress a
certain way, but dress alike. Why do think it's
called a uniform?
"You've gotta wear a suit, a tie, and slacks,
or you won't be hired — I mean, enslaved."
3) Control:
Gaslighters often separate their victims from
other influences, in order to more acutely
dominate the thoughts of the violated.
Even though we're one species, we're told
we're segregated into "countries." Hence,
"leaders" of each "nation" have ample
access to controlling their respective
populations.

Known as Zersetzung, it was psychological
combat employed by the Stasi — the secret
police of East Germany — against anyone
deemed insurgent. Gaslighting was an
integral tactic of Zersetzung. ººº
ººº Zersetzung
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung
Inmates imprisoned in Berlin-
Hohenschonhausen — where this modality
was practiced — were kept in cells with
opaque windows. Architects of this strategy
would purposefully stage parties adjacent
these rooms. Thus, captives could hear
people playing on the other side of the glass,
but couldn't see such for themselves. Hence,
the constant reminder of what they were
missing was drilled into the inmate's brain.
Without warning, an esoteric man visits

A SOMA COMA 72
incarcerates, informing them he's been
reviewing their case, and believes they've
been wrongfully accused. The man promises
the prisoners they'll be released the next
day. As such, the detainees excitedly await
the return of their savior, and thus their
acquittal and discharge.
Days become weeks; and weeks, months, as
the recondite figure fails to return, and the
convicted's mind spirals out of control.
Inmates were often paired together in cells,
with one being an informant, unbeknown to
the other.
Zersetzung — German for "decomposition"
— was created to destroy the victim's core
beliefs. The prey loses grip on any cerebral
anchor, thus becoming incapable of
dissidence against the state. In addition,

minds may end up so fragmented, they
become susceptible to bureaucratic
brainwashing. ºººº
ºººº The Decomposition of the Soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Coo00zV0A
Simply by informing us there is government,
those within it are tacitly proclaiming: "You
humans are mentally ill, to the point you
can't govern yourselves."
Such is a lie! Again, those professing to be
bureaucracy are human also. Hence, what
makes them any more fit to run things than
the rest of us?
By enacting "law" upon "law," politicians
implicitly state: "There's a problem with the
populace, and we know how to fix it."

A SOMA COMA 74
This is cow shit! As previously proven in my
other works, it's only when government
intervenes that people begin battling with
one another.
You're perfectly fine traveling to another
"country," and interacting with its population
in peace. Solely when you return home, and
government declares war on the same folk
with whom you just partied, do you feel
pugnacity toward them.
"I went to 'Russia,' drank a shitload of vodka
with the locals, and can't wait to go back.
Too bad [some fuckin' commoner named]
Trump just declared Russia the enemy, and
stated we might go to war with 'em."
What the hell—?! You can't see the lunacy in
that irrationality?!?

Fuck whatever this Trump thing is! Go back
to "Russia," and party with the people there.
If this Trump organism wants to fight
whatever a Putin is, let 'em kill each other,
while the rest of us live in peace. If those two
entities are so malicious, our species would
be better off without 'em.

77
WE
It is difficult to free fools from the chains
they revere.
— Voltaire *
* Voltaire

A SOMA COMA 78
The government — or humanity —
would not permit capital punishment for
one man, but they permitted the murder
of millions, a little at a time.
To kill one man — that is, to subtract 50
years from the sum of all human lives —
that was a crime. But to subtract from
the sum of all human lives 50 million
years, that was not a crime.
No, really. Isn't that funny?
— We **
** We
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifWZOSMMeHA
Banned from publication in Russia for more
than six decades, the 1921 dystopian novel
We provided George Orwell grist with which
to bust out 1984. We's author, Yevgeny
Zamyatin, documents the plight of D-503 —
an engineer, and the tome's protagonist.
Set in the future, citizens of One State are
referred to solely as numbers. Having

WE 79
conquered the human population of the
planet — during the Thousand Years War —
this dominion is run by a Colonel Sanders
look-alike known as the Benefactor.
When the book opens, D-503 is constructing
a spacecraft dubbed the Integral — which will
be employed in the conquest of alien worlds.
Simultaneously, our hero scribbles a journal
he plans to stow away on the ship in question.
So that bureaucracy can surveil everything
the proletariat does, buildings within One
State are constructed of clear glass. Gone is
the privacy afforded by opaque walls.
In We, government policy is enforced by the
Bureau of Guardians. Envision the East
German Stasi.
Every aspect of One State is strictly

A SOMA COMA 80
regimented, right down to the number of
times one is ordered to chew one's food.
Sexual liaisons are no exception. When it's
their turn to mate, pink slips are bequeathed
members of the populace. Upon each ticket
is a single name — that of another
constituent of the citizenry. Should someone
receive a slip, it's their duty to hump the
person whose appellation appears on it. Via
this modality, two people — in clinical fashion
— schedule to fuck one another behind the
closed blinds of their respective homes.
Akin to most dystopian fiction, shit doesn't
end well for the main character, as he's
subjected to an operation that removes his
imagination. Ah, the benevolent, patriarchal
hand of government.
One of D-503's lovers — a woman named

WE 81
I-330 — who refuses to divulge details
regarding a revolution against One State, is
executed via a device known as the
Benefactor's Machine.
We aren't talkin' tops on the recommended
reading list for those with the suicide hotline
on speed dial. I mean, it's dystopian.
Society's become a living nightmare.
Upon poring over We, I couldn't help but
notice the similarities between One State and
government's unyielding attempts to surveil
us all. It's difficult to envision our current
landscape converting to all-glass buildings.
That said, smart devices in millions of homes
are a creepy alternative. If you can't
constantly look inside, infiltrate the interior
with a mole.
In addition, who hasn't seen folks forced to

A SOMA COMA 82
sport clear backpacks and purses? Glass
walls in homes might not be mandatory, but
people aren't exposing everything they're
carrying as some sort of fashion statement.
If somebody you don't know installed a CCTV
in a toilet in your house, and told you to shit in
the commode in question, would you?
Thinkin' of takin' a shower? How 'bout a
shower, while dozens of people watched?
Do you enjoy fucking in front of a crowd
rivaling the size of the studio audience for
The Price is Right?
With the proliferation of smart homes, all
three of the above scenarios — and so much
more will become reality for you, and
everyone residing within these residences.

WE 83
It's the Internet of Things (IoT), and with it
comes a microchip in all your purchases —
from dildos to doorknobs.
Everything around you will be chipped, and
these tiny circuit boards will be connected to
the World Wide Web. Not only will said
devices come with some sort of tracking
system, but many will also be replete with
microphones and video cameras, as well as a
means for recording from these feeds.
With dozens of camcorders and mics in
smart homes — from your ceiling fan, to
your bedpost — every moment in your house
will be surveilled.
And if you think such is a fabrication on my
part, consider renowned contractor Lennar
Homes has already built numerous smart
houses. These domiciles come standard with

A SOMA COMA 84
Amazon's Alexa pre-installed. *** Amazon
Echo Dot microphones are embedded into
the frames of these homes. Hence, if you
don't care to be constantly monitored, the
obligation is placed upon you to remove
these devices from your house.
*** Amazon Echo Will Come Built-In...
https://fortune.com/2018/05/09/amazon-alexa-lennar/
If you're yet unfamiliar with Amazon Alexa,
such is a smart device marketed as a virtual
assistant. You plug this cylinder speaker into
a wall outlet. You ask it questions, its upper
rim begins to glow, and it provides you
answers. By assumption, you believe the
responses it offers are correct.
In addition, you can command Alexa to open
and close blinds in your home, control the
thermostat, turn on your TV, etc.

WE 85
This appliance is connected to Echo Dot
microphones, which are placed about your
house. Alexa not only has the ability to listen
to you, but record what's going on around it.
Amazon asserts this device doesn't begin
listening, and thus recording, until you utter
the name "Alexa" — known as the wake
word. Such begs the obvious question: "If
this thing isn't listening all the time, how
does it hear the verbal cue?"
Ostensibly, Alexa has been created to make
existence easier for those using it. Playing
songs, reading weather forecasts, locking
and unlocking doors, are ways in which Alexa
is supposedly liberating people from trivial
worries.
Back in reality, cunt sore on the pussy of
humanity, and "owner" of Amazon, Jeff

A SOMA COMA 86
Bezos, inked a $600,000,000 contract with
the CIA to help government musclemen
perfect their Cloud infrastructure.**** In
addition, Bezos is attempting to sell the
bureaucracy on Rekognition — facial-
recognition software produced by Amazon.
*****
**** Secret Cloud Pact: Amazon Said to Connect...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELg4-WnX7QQ
***** Amazon Sells Facial Recognition to Police
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSSZ3-ZIkHU
Combine the fact Amazon and government
are now working together, with contractors
embedding Amazon microphones into the
homes they're selling, and you've got a loss
of whatever privacy you may have left.
Consider these listening apparatuses are

WE 87
monitored by Amazon employees, and people
you've never met now have access to
private conversations occurring within your
home.
With Amazon not only capturing audio, but
recording it, everything you say or do, inside
your house, is perpetually kept on record.
Add Jeff Bezos' money addiction to the mix,
and where do you think this is leading?
Would you trust "Bozo" with your deepest
secrets? Jeff Bezos: a hoarder who pretends
to "own" everything he can, at the expense
of seven billion people. You don't think
somebody of such decayed moral fiber
would sell your innermost desires to the
highest bidder?
Of course he would. How do you think he

A SOMA COMA 88
acquired $111,000,000,000, and climbed to
the top of this dung heap, proclaiming
himself king rat? He feigned "ownership" of
whatever he could, and then sold his
"possessions" to whomever would pay him
the most.
Jeff Bezos: slave driver who's patented a
bracelet that sends an electric pulse to his
incarcerates — "employees" — should they
fail to produce as efficiently as he'd like.
That's correct. If you're slaving in the
Amazon warehouse, and aren't headed
toward the intended package, this device will
vibrate on your wrist, alerting you you're
moving in the wrong direction. ******
****** Amazon Invents Vibrating Wristband...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjbS7UWBKjk
That's one step below shocking people —

WE 89
which "Bozo" knows he can't get away with,
yet. It's the proverbial camel's nose here.
Once slaves have acclimated to the
vibration, Jefe will push a little further, until
he's actually electrocuting those not making
their quota.
This is the type of bung broth who would've
enthusiastically administered electric shocks
to fellow humans, during the Milgram
Experiments, if it meant he got paid. º ºº
º Obedience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdrKCilEhC0
ºº Experimenter Ofﬁcial Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1VOZhwRvWo
Jeff Bezos: sweat shop warden who runs his
gulag on a point system, whereby captives
receive demerits for using the bathroom,

A SOMA COMA 90
speaking to other slaves, and not constantly
producing at a heightened rate. Find yourself
issued three demerits, and be fired. ººº
ººº Ex-Amazon Workers Talk of "Horrendous"...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYUJjpIxkCU
Jeff Bezos: guilty of refusing to air condition
one of his warehouses, in the middle of
summer. In lieu of climate control, he
positioned ambulances outside, when slaves
began passing out, due to heat stroke. ºººº
ºººº Amazon Slime
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/amazon-paramedics/
This is the type of power-ravenous creep
you want surveilling your most intimate
moments?
"Mirror, mirror on the wall. Who's the fairest

WE 91
of them all?"
Scrying mirrors. That's what we're looking
into, every time we check our cell phones,
tablets, or other smart devices. A scrying
mirror is that "all-seeing" oracle into which
characters of fictional tales ask questions.
ººººº These "omniscient" articles often have
a reflective surface — a crystal ball; a placid
lake; a mirror, etc.
ººººº Scrying
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrying
More often than not, these devices are also
opaque; you may be able to look into them,
and faintly see your reflection, but the
surface in question is typically dark. In similar
fashion, so is your cell phone, when it isn't in
use, as well as many other smart devices.

A SOMA COMA 92
Also akin to a scrying mirror, you ask your
wireless, "all-knowing" machine — that's
connected to the Internet — for answers to
every question imaginable. You expect your
smart device to provide you with consistently
valid replies.
"I'll just Google it," equates to tacitly
concluding you'll invariably be provided the
truth, and the superlative conclusion to any
question.
They don't call 'em "smart" devices because
they want to sell as few of these things as
possible. If they did, they'd call 'em "dumb"
devices.
Those pushing this technology, and thus the
loss of your privacy, want consumers
believing these machines are omniscient.
They aren't. They're only as intelligent as

WE 93
those either programming them, or people
supplying information to said programmers.
And how smart can trained lab rats be who
solely perform when they're offered a treat
— in this case, cash?
Hence, if you've got somebody eager to
stock their bank account, or control you,
they'll pump ya' full of whatever bullshit they
want, in order to get you to open your wallet.
They'll drown you in outright brainwashing
and lies, so they can manipulate you. They
don't give a fuck if the info they're providing
is true, or not. They simply want to dominate.
If a person of that ilk is in charge of
information distribution, the public has a
serious problem on their hands. And those
within government, as well as the billionaires
running these huge corporations, didn't

A SOMA COMA 94
become so monetarily affluent because they
weren't cash crazy.
Thus, CEOs and "leaders" you revere only
have impetus to disseminate whatever offers
them the biggest paycheck, or the most
control. As a result, there's no reason why
these people wouldn't attempt to rewrite
history, or fill you full of fallacious material,
promoting it as the truth.
The public craves smart devices for a
number of reasons. Among them is the
instantaneous gratification they provide.
Think about what a coveted possession these
items would've been hundreds of years ago
— reflective trinkets that knew everything.
It's a treasured weapon in a video game; the
sword that can slice through anything with
one blow, or the gun that never runs out of
bullets.

WE 95
Well, nothing's changed. When you break out
a smart device, those around you assume
you, by extension, are smart. If you busted
out a dumb phone, nobody would be
interested; nor would they trust in what you,
nor it, had to say. Having a dumb device in
your possession would make you dumb.
It's perceived obsolescence; one of Edward
Bernays' insidious gifts to our species. If
somebody else has the latest iPhone, you
best get one yourself! If you don't, you're
incomplete.
And make no mistake that these smart
devices are listening to you. A person can
browse Alexa's actions on their cell phone,
determining what it recorded. Open the
Amazon Alexa smartphone app, and peruse
your particular device's history. You may be
shocked to discover your virtual assistant

A SOMA COMA 96
has turned itself on, listening to whatever's
occurring in your home, at random points.
When asked if it records conversations
between it and the user, Alexa itself answers:
"I only send audio back to Amazon when I
hear the wake word." ºººººº That means, at
the very least, whenever you use this
technology, it records what you've said, and
offers it up to Bozo and company.
ºººººº Alexa Finally Talks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ2A1f50S6U
"Alexa, root me out some tasty, three-balled
transexual, bestiality porn, would ya'?"
Not exactly the intimacy you want obscure
third parties — or anyone, for that matter —
knowing about your private life, is it?

WE 97
Are folks really so fuckin' lazy they can't
walk the length of a room, and turn on some
lights? Does your indolence, when it comes to
changing the channel on your stereo, warrant
relinquishing your privacy?
And how about the multitude of instances
during which Alexa wasn't given the wake
word, yet recorded private conversations?! A
quick browse through YouTube will provide
you a glimpse of how invasive this shit is, and
how many commenters are insightful to the
true purpose of this technology.
Those within government may not have
mandated we live in glass houses, but they
can make whatever the fuck they want
compulsory. If we refuse to concede to it, it
fails to affect us. If We — the populace —
decide so, their decrees become nothing
more than a sneeze into an F5 tornado.

99
GROUPTHINK: THE MONSTERS ARE HERE
The state is the great ﬁctitious entity by
which everyone seeks to live at the
expense of everyone else.
— Frederic Bastiat *
* Frederic Bastiat

A SOMA COMA 100
Thirteen people are murdered, and
300,000,000 folk weep incessantly. Two
and a half million are slaughtered, and that
same 300,000,000 don't give a fuck.
What would cause such disparity in
response? Could a public so capricious in its
reaction — especially to singular acts of
murder verses towering genocide — be
sane? By what standards are you
adjudicating, if you turn a blind eye to over
2,000,000 people eradicated, yet mourn
overtly for a baker's dozen in dead souls?
We're talkin' the "American" public's
reception to 1999's Columbine High School
Massacre — during which 13 people were
killed. ** In flagrant contrast, this same
population respond with apathy to 2,500,000
folks — most innocent civilians — obliterated
in the first and second Iraqi wars, combined.

G ROU PTHI N K: THE MON STE RS ARE HE RE 101
** Columbine High School Massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre
Categorization. It sounds harmless, but due
to categorization, you sleep splendidly, while
what you call "your government" wages
genocide on your own species.
Humans are humans, correct? Yet, you're
okay with a subset of Homo sapiens being
annihilated, as long as they aren't
categorized "American." Somebody blows
away less than two dozen "U.S. citizens" in El
Paso, and it's a fucking nightmare!
Somehow, though, drowning the Middle East
in uranium-238 — destroying entire societies
there, as well as the region, for billions of
years — is fine, since folks in that area
haven't been classified "American."

A SOMA COMA 102
As such, you've fallen for a basic divide and
conquer strategy. You view people not
residing within "your nation" as different. So
different, they're a separate species, since
you're apathetic to their destruction.
Adam Lanza purportedly snuffs out less than
30 "U.S. citizens" — there are copious
discrepancies regarding such — and you've
positioned your soapbox in town square. ***
Yet, as downtown Baghdad is wiped from the
map, you TiVo Oprah.
*** Sandy Hook Medical Examiner Wayne Carver
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wHkWBq-FCs
Once again, folks in Connecticut are
"American," but people in "Iraq" aren't even
human. They're cattle, as residents of the
"U.S." shed fewer tears over their demise
than the murder of the cow on the plate in

front of them.
Jaime Holmes doin' his song and dance on
Aurora, Colorado, and people are prepared to
relinquish their guns to government.
Churches don't have enough pews to hold the
sudden converts; TSA is pumped with
additional steroids; and everybody's afraid of
everybody else. **** Meanwhile, nobody
mentions entire cultures eradicated in the
Marshall Islands, due to "U.S." atomic testing
in that region.
**** Aurora Theater Shooting Trial: Live Coverage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUO-w7U4dd0
"The Marshall Islands?! Those fuckers ain't
'American!' Who the hell cares?!"
The above examples delineate how
categorization is calamitous to our species.

A SOMA COMA 104
According to neuroendocrinologist Robert
Sapolsky, we've been taught to place
ideologies, people and things into buckets.
Consider the absurdity of what we do when
we categorize. Because one person received
a 64 on a test, and another a 65, the
former's existence is truncated for a year,
when she's denied from "advancing" to the
next grade. In contrast, the latter is allowed
to continue "forward." *****
***** Introduction to Human Behavioral Biology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA
Hence, 365 days of the first person's life will
be stolen. Such, even though there's nothing
but a single, arbitrary point separating that
entity from the one who received the 65 on
the ludicrous test in question.
You're 40, but somehow you're completely

different than one second prior, when you
were 39. Suddenly, your outlook — should
you believe in what this system demands of
you — is supposed to change. Magically,
you're in your 40s, and expected to behave
differently than less than a minute ago, when
you were in your 30s.
Time to "own" a home, even though each and
every one of us is simply renting everything in
this paradigm. Time to coerce your kids into
making grandkids; a stellar move, in the
ongoing wake of Fukushima, and 40 percent
cancer rates. Time to prepare for
retirement, even though you haven't done
anything real — nor learned the first thing
about reality.
You're allowed to drive when you're 89, but
one second later — when you turn 90 —
magically things are different…even though

A SOMA COMA 106
you're exactly the fuckin' same. One
moment you're ambulatory; the next, you're
stagnant, atrophying, and reliant upon
others…just what this system wants.
Makes no fuckin' sense, but why should it?
Under the iron heel of an insane system, if
something was logical, wouldn't you expect it
to be terminated?
An obvious example of the dangers of
categorization are separating people into
buckets labelled "black" and "white." As long
as you're dealing with a population unable, or
unwilling, to critically cogitate, you've
created the perfect habitat to wage war.
A populace looking at logic will be unfazed by
the erroneous categorization of "black" and
"white." A society mired in stupidity,
however, fall victim to "authority" enforcing

this classification upon them.
If you've a population thinking for itself, it's
smart enough to not only disregard the
lunacy of "black" and "white," but also
"American" and "Iraqi," "Catholic" and
"Jewish," "Democrat" and "Republican," etc.
A rationally ratiocinating populace won't
solely rebuke categorization, either; they'll
ostracize those attempting to enforce it.
Hence, these "leaders" we allow to
indoctrinate us there is an "America," as well
as an "Iraq," would be ignored in a critically
thinking society.
Thus, it's logical to conclude we don't exist in
an analytical culture, since most of us still
believe there is a "Russia," as well as
"Asians," "Baptists," etc.

A SOMA COMA 108
"A tiger is roaming the marketplace!" the
man frantically shouted.
"Away with you, fool!" the emperor
admonished.
"I speak the truth, my liege! I come solely as a
warning. A tiger has somehow escaped, or
found its way here from the wild. The beast is
loose, and lurking among the public!"
The tyrant leaned in. "Continue shouting your
lies, and I will be forced to exact punishment.
Don't make me warn you thrice!"
The harangued soul pondered the caliphate's
threat, and quickly scampered into the
darkness.
Climbing into the rickshaw, the monarch
motioned forward.

Shrieking, a second plebeian emerged from
the fog, "My lord! There's a tiger loose in the
marketplace! Please help us!"
Spinning round, the potentate paused. A brief
moment of silence, as the autocrat
reassessed the situation.
"Good king! I beg of you! Did you not hear
what I said—?!"
"Yes! Yes, I heard you. It's just that — well, it
seems preposterous a tiger could find its way
into the marketplace—"
"I understand your hesitancy, my liege. I too
didn't believe, until I saw the creature with
my own eyes—!"
"You witnessed the beast?"

A SOMA COMA 110
"Most definitely! It has huge fangs, and is
stalking freely among the women and
children in the square!"
The emperor pondered the implications of
such a scenario. If he failed to address this
dilemma, and it proved true, we weren't
simply talking dethronement, but perhaps a
loss of his head. It was one thing to be
usurped of one's power, but to be
relinquished of one's cranium was quite
another.
Pausing, the tyrant weighed his options, as a
third frenzied citizen burst from the murky
streets, reiterating the necessity for action.
"There's a tiger among the crowds, good
king! Please help us—!"
Leaping from his procession, the monarch
answered the call. "Let it not be said your

ruler — the most modest of kings — stood
idle, during this time of need! I shall protect
you from this prodigious predator! Inform
one and all that I personally vanquished this
demon, so that peace could be restored
among the land!"
Spinning toward his bodyguards, the overlord
"bravely" declared, "You two! Take your
finest blades, and destroy this monster! Bring
me its head, as proof of my gallantry!"
Known as three men make a tiger, the above
is a Chinese proverb illustrating crowd
psychology, ****** communal reinforcement,
º groupthink, ºº etc. All of these phenomena
display not only how the views of one differ
from the views of many, but also how a group
can influence the outcome of a situation.
****** Crowd Psychology

A SOMA COMA 112
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_psychology
º Communal Reinforcement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communal_reinforcement
ºº Groupthink
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
In the aforementioned example, the king
refused to believe a lone citizen, when that
person delivered a nonsensical proclamation.
A behemoth — the magnitude of a tiger —
loose in the crowded streets, defies logic.
However, when a second soul stepped forth,
confirming what the first declared, the king
expressed concern.
Add a third prole to the mix, and our brave
caliph is nobly prepared to risk the lives of his
servants, so that "he" can "heroically"

eradicate the threat. It matters not that the
idea of a tiger in the marketplace is just as
insane as it was when one citizen professed
such. We've now got three folk making the
same claim, so it must be true. ººº
ººº Three Men Make a Tiger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA2SdU_UXp8
This is the dilemma displayed, when
groupthink is implemented. Individuals find it
difficult to come to their own conclusions in
group situations. As a result, they often
believe in the most stupid shit you could
imagine: "America;" "countries;"
government; "leaders" who care; religion,
standing for a "national" anthem, etc.
You assert how different you are from those
around you, proclaiming your independence
on social media sites. Yet, you conform at

A SOMA COMA 114
every turn, afraid to actually be independent.
The sweat on Tim's brow was so thick, it
might as well have been Oprah's thundering
thighs, squeezing Ellen's head, as the latter
licked loose labia. The electrician was more
nervous than a commoner named Donald
Trump, awakening in a society where the
word "control" was unknown.
The assholes prior Tim had chosen A instead
of C, even though C was obviously the
correct answer. Ray Charles could've seen
that!
One line blatantly the length of another, in the
multiple choice possibilities, and these
douche holes before him saw otherwise?!
Moreover, they were makin' things harder for
him than an adolescent's dick, thumbin'

through the glossy pages of Shaved Snatch
Quarterly. Tim wanted to choose C, but
everybody else had chosen A. He wasn't
thrilled at the prospect of being a non-
conformist, but what else was he supposed to
do?!
In the 1950s, a psychologist named Solomon
Asch began a series of trials dubbed the Asch
Conformity Experiments. The goal was
simple: Determine how willing people are to
conform within a group.
The test was rudimentary. Eight males
entered a room. Before them were two large
placards, complete with stark graphic
representations of lines varying in length.
On the first card, a single line was displayed.
This represented the fulcrum around which
the test was conducted.

A SOMA COMA 116
The second placard contained three lines,
respectively labelled A, B, and C. Only one of
these was obviously the length of the
fulcrum. The other two were blatantly
different in dimension.
Both cards were in full view of the subjects
during the entire trial. As such, all
participants had sufficient frames of
reference from which to base their answers.
Starting from the beginning of the panel,
each subject was asked which line — A, B, or
C — was equal in length to the fulcrum. The
first seven participants were secretly
confederates of those conducting the test.
Only the final subject was unscripted;
unaware the other members of the panel
were hired actors who'd been instructed to
answer in specific fashion.

Even though the correct answer to the
question was, let's say, C, the first seven
subjects answered A.
To the last participant — ignorant the
experiment was rigged — responses of the
others were baffling. It seemed obvious
which line length was equal to the fulcrum.
Such stated, those queried prior him were
choosing the wrong answer, time and again.
One-third of the uninformed subjects being
observed conformed, providing the incorrect
responses the actors had given. When asked
why they answered in the fashion they did, a
substantial percentage divulged they were
compelled to avoid standing out from the
crowd. ºººº
ºººº Asch Conformity Experiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA

A SOMA COMA 118
The tools of conquest do not necessarily
come with bombs, and explosions, and
fallout. There are weapons that are
simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices…
to be found only in the minds of men.
For the record, prejudices can kill…and
suspicion can destroy…and a
thoughtless, frightened search for a
scapegoat has a fallout all of its own —
for the children and the children yet
unborn. And the pity of it is that these
things cannot be conﬁned to The
Twilight Zone.
— Rod Serling ººººº
ººººº Rod Serling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW4ov26Q1T4
It wasn't a comet, nor a meteor — at least it
didn't seem to be — that passed overhead
that fateful day above Maple Street. Again, it
didn't seem like an errant, celestial space
rock, because nobody in the neighborhood
actually saw whatever it was. They simply
heard a discordant bellow from the heavens,
and watched as what appeared to be a

correlating shadow blanketed the afternoon
Sun.
Shortly thereafter, denizens along this
typical thoroughfare realized all forms of
electrical power had ceased. Nothing — from
cars, to street lights, to lawn mowers — was
operating.
One of the residents — Pete Van Horn —
sauntered over to adjacent Floral Street, in
order to see if the power outage extended
there, as well.
Tommy — a neighborhood kid — warned no
one should leave, since he'd recently
devoured a heap o' pulp science fiction
centered around an extraterrestrial invasion.
During the fictional takeover, the marauding
creatures didn't want any of the humans
departing. According to the story, some of

A SOMA COMA 120
the alien entities had disguised themselves as
one of the families on the street, in order to
assess the situation.
When Les Goodman's car started by itself,
the other residents of Maple Street became
dubious, surmising Les may actually be an
alien in disguise. Only Steve Brand seemed to
have tethered his boat to the dock of
rationality, as he explained that coordinating
a witch hunt would cause the neighbors to
"eat each other alive."
Perpetuating the alien invasion theory,
Charlie Farnsworth catalyzed the group to
react rashly. This modality eventually
reached an apogee, when a dark silhouette
appeared after nightfall, walking toward the
huddled throng. Proclaiming the figure was
one of the extraterrestrials, Farnsworth
pulled a shotgun, and fired, felling whomever

was striding their way.
Rushing the fallen frame, the crowd were
aghast to find Pete Van Horn lying dead at
the hands of Charlie's frenetic actions.
Farnsworth struggled to defend his hasty
malevolence, as the lights in his house
suddenly turned on by themselves.
Of course, this led to suspicion regarding
Charlie's origins and intentions. In mob rule
fashion, the other neighbors gathered stones
from a rock pile, and hurtled them at
Farnsworth, as he fled for his home.
Bleeding from a head wound caused by one
of the projectiles, Charlie shouted that
Tommy was the only one who knew about the
aliens, in the first place. As a result, the boy
was one of the disguised extraterrestrials.

A SOMA COMA 122
At this point, logic was flatulated out Oprah's
asshole, into a hurricane, as the only person
displaying rationality was Steve. Beyond
mitigation, the frenzied suburbanites rioted
against one another.
Cars mysteriously started on their own,
suddenly stopping just as quickly. Lights
turned on and off, by themselves, all up and
down the street. The panic was in full swing,
and the only outcome would be cataclysmic
bloodshed.
From here, the focus switched to the top of a
hill, overlooking Maple Street. There, two
extraterrestrials conversed before their
saucer-shaped craft.
Controlling the electricity in the
neighborhood below, the entities concluded
upending the normality of human society

caused Homo sapiens to dive into madness.
The creatures determined such was the
tactic they would employ, in order to
vanquish humanity, one street at a time.
Most will watch this classic Twilight Zone
episode, and simply think alien invasion, as
opposed to current events. The majority of
people tend to view installments of this show
as nothing more than science fiction.
In actuality, these segments are quite
relevant to what our species is experiencing.
The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street is no
exception. This particular episode is a
superlative example of groupthink.
Groupthink: when those within a community
possess an overpowering desire to retain
"normalcy," and thus become frightened to
dissent. In order to perpetuate the accepted

A SOMA COMA 124
social system, people circumvent conflict, at
the risk of losing individuality. ºººººº
ºººººº Groupthink
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
Groupthink is detrimental not solely to the
individual, but also the group. Within
groupthink, analytical analysis vanishes.
Preservation of the dogma of the group — no
matter how deleterious to the society —
becomes the goal. This obviously results in
disaster.
A peerless example of groupthink is what
people refer to as the "United States," and
those who blindly claim to be citizens of this
fiction. Folks professing to reside under the
auspices of the brand name "America" are so
immersed in groupthink, they're often willing
to kill other human beings — sometimes

facing extermination themselves — to
preserve nothing more than a cult, a
marketing ploy, and a pyramid scheme.
To perpetuate the group, constituents of the
"U.S." train to murder fellow Homo sapiens
they've never met before — and thus can't
logically harbor malice toward. Said
components are euphemistically referred to
as soldiers, but they're nothing more than
hired killers.
These paid assassins are often driven by the
demeanor of the collective, as well as
financial reward, to the point they'll commit
homicide, readily in serial fashion.
Obviously, these compensated exterminators
aren't critically cogitating, and either
incapable, or unwilling, to think individually.

A SOMA COMA 126
Those engaging in groupthink often have no
idea they're doing so. They become
astigmatic to anything but their cause. They
fail to understand those who had practiced
this phenomenon, during previous epochs,
were destroyed by an inability to deduce for
themselves.
It's into this fatuous fracas the monsters
came to Maple Street.
When we call ourselves "American;" when we
act as "Chinese;" when we salute the
"Russian" flag, we engage in groupthink. In
doing so, we not only fail to think for
ourselves, but we fail be ourselves.

127
THE IRON HEEL
Our boasted civilization is based upon
blood soaked in blood. And neither you,
nor I, nor any of us, can escape the
scarlet stain.
— The Iron Heel *
* The Iron Heel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql_Aa0MV7Vk

A SOMA COMA 128
"The Hunger Games is amazing! I love
dystopian fiction!" the woman exclaimed.
"You'd better," I thought, "because you're
livin' it."
We exist within an anti-utopian fiction novel.
Yet, most of us erroneously believe what
we're experiencing is:
A) a concerted effort to strive for the
quixotic, and
B) real.
I can easily disprove both, and substantiate
we're toiling within a work of kakotopian
fantasy.
Everything you've been taught is an illusion,
right down to what you say. Such is clear

THE I RON HE E L 129
evidence you reside in a fiction.
Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his
own making, created out of his own
fancies and desires. You do not know
the real world in which you live.
— The Iron Heel **
** The Iron Heel Quotes
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/951056-the-iron-heel
Logically, why the fuck would I care if
somebody I hadn't made the acquaintance of
prefers bleu cheese over ranch?
The answer is, I wouldn't. It would make no
sense. Do you believe my knowledge of such
is going to keep our species from going
extinct?
Is my comprehension whether a person I'd
just met partial to apple juice over orange,

A SOMA COMA 130
going to assist in fending off errant asteroids
from bombarding Earth?
Of course not. This information is useless to
the progress of our race. Yet, I'm forced to
acquire it over, and over, and fucking over —
for countless people, when I wait tables.
Understanding the feeding preferences of
anonymous folk is obviously the fastest way
to detect and traverse wormholes.
At this point, it wouldn't surprise me if I ran
into countless people in my travels, and was
able to telepathically determine whether
they preferred bacon or ham. And let me
scream it from the top of Cho Oyu: I firmly
believe this information will protect our
species in the wake of a supernova!
As a waiter, you ask people if they'd like

porridge or grits. You couldn't care less what
their response is. Yet, you compel yourself to
pretend you do. It's tacitly understood — by
all parties involved in this inane interaction —
you don't give a fuck about the mealtime
inclinations of these people.
Even so, you're forced to continue this
charade, everyone involved in comprehends
is more fake than 50 inch tits on a male,
Asian midget!
And why do you engage in such brazenly
ludicrous interaction? Solely to accumulate
useless pieces of paper — called cash — you
can't eat, drink, nor inhale.
Thus, you — a grown person — pretend for
eight hours a day you care about the dining
predispositions of people you've just met.
These same folk maintain the illusion, by

A SOMA COMA 132
courting you in your crazy behavior, all so
you can pursue your stupid hobby to collect
one of the most useless items on the planet.
Now, that's delusional; thereby, an illusion,
and thus, a fiction.
And you're not alone in your quest for the
pointless. People all over the globe forfeit
their lives, with zealous abandon, praising
this crusade for inconsequential pieces of
fabric.
"Tim, I can't wait for you and Terry to be
'fully covered' under our platinum protection
plan!"
Bleeding out with insincerity, we feign the
above discourse is real — a version of it
being uttered at every moment on this
planet.

"I'm so excited to get you and the family into
this new SUV, I just blew a load of what
donation clinics call "slow sperm" in my $6
slacks!"
We continually utter some form of the prior,
when what we really want to scream is:
Take a fuckin' car like this. A 1966 Ford;
a Country Squire, nine passenger station
wagon. Don't worry about the
equipment. Imagine all the fun you can
have in the back.
And while you're doin' it, imagine all the
money that that bald-headed prick
Ralph Williams is gonna be making on
the car he's trying to fuck you out of.
Yes, the man that'll take every dime out
of the San Francisco Bay Area, and
spend it on prostitutes, booze, and of
course crap tables in the city of Las
Vegas.
I'm sure you've heard about it. So
remember this: If you'd like to get
fucked, and fucked real hard, before you
buy a car, come down here. Let Ralph
Williams do it. […]
— Chick Lambert ***

A SOMA COMA 134
*** Ralph Williams Bayshore Chrysler-Plymouth 1968
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vh3Di3LY6Ns
It's what you think about the situation in
which you exist. Instead, you remain
obsequious to people you've just met —
fucking them over, if necessary — in order to
stock your own bank account.
In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?,
the skies were perpetually dark, so one knew
they resided in an apocalypse. In our present
paradigm, the Sun is shinin', and the cancer-
riddled birds chirpin'. Hence, we think things
are fine. ****
**** Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpNbafxtz54
For those imprisoned in a dystopia, the worst
scenario is one in which folks feel society is

doin' well, or headed in a positive direction.
Why?
Because these ignorant masses perpetuate
the malignant system, as opposed to
eradicating it. They've no clue there is a
system, let alone one that's steadily
exterminating everyone. Thus, they race
headlong toward extinction, fallaciously
believing things may be a little off course,
but generally on the right track.
The idea of any government — be it
democracy, monarchy, oligarchy, whatever
"chy" or "ism" you wanna label it — is insane!
Government will always be the opposite of
freedom.
Ask yourself why, if only a percentage of the
populace want something, the rest of us are

A SOMA COMA 136
coerced to comply.
It's like two rapists and a hot blonde
trying to decide […] what they're gonna
do tonight for entertainment.
Or like two wolves and a sheep trying to
ﬁgure out what's for dinner.
— Anam Paiseanta *****
***** Anam Paiseanta
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AugVVKIAfE
How can you be free, if you're forced to
forfeit your life, in order to satisfy the whims
of others?
You can't. It's impossible. Unless you can
make your own, unencumbered decisions —
in regard to every faction of your existence
— you aren't free. That's just common sense.
And how much of our time on Earth — or

wherever the fuck we are — is spent doing
what we wanna do?
Do we wanna work?
Of course not, but most of us do, since we
feel we've no choice.
Do we wanna pay taxes?
Seems a stupid question. That said, you'd be
amazed at how many people are drowning in
Irving Janis' groupthink, bleeding the result
of acute menticide. Countless folk have
sacrificed individuality, repeating the false
rhetoric of the particular fake "country" in
which they've placed deranged belief.
Hence, these brainwashed masses will abuse
you with their crazed conclusions as to why
paying extortion fees to a band of criminals

A SOMA COMA 138
— known as government — is crucial.
Furthermore, they'll scream for your
extermination, should you refuse to
capitulate to this obvious shakedown.
Do we wanna pay bills?
Another ludicrous query, but so many will
regurgitate the rancid rote that "nothing's
free." This, in the face of the fact air, food,
and water — all necessities to our survival —
are gratuitous. We've simply chosen to
believe a bunch of playground bullies actually
"own" these things, and can thus withhold
them from us.
Congress and the Senate were empty
pretenses, farces. Public questions were
gravely debated and passed upon
according to the old forms, while in
reality all that was done was to give the
stamp of constitutional procedure to the
mandates of the Oligarchy.
— The Iron Heel ******

****** The Iron Heel Quotes
In Jack London's 1907 dystopian novel, The
Iron Heel, Ernest Everhard — the tome's
protagonist — screamed the truth, and
wouldn't shut up! Everhard was intent on
destroying the corrupt system into which
he'd been birthed.
Via her memoirs — known as the Everhard
Manuscript — Ernest's widow, Avis Everhard,
recounted her late husband's indefatigable
determination to dismantle the Oligarchy.
Wherever there is an ascendant class, a
large portion of the morality emanates
from its class interests and its class
feelings of superiority.
— The Iron Heel º
º Ibid.

A SOMA COMA 140
Ernest exposed the slave masters of the
proletariat for what they were, and currently
are — human traffickers. He boldly asserted:
You pompously call yourselves
Republicans and Democrats. There is no
Republican Party. There is no
Democratic Party. There are no
Republicans nor Democrats in this
House. You are lick-spittlers and
panderers, the creatures of the
Plutocracy.
— The Iron Heel ºº
ºº Ibid.
Rather than venerate lawyers — divining
them as something to which to aspire —
through his characters, London explained:
All my reading and studying of them has
taught me that law is one thing and right
is another thing. Ask any lawyer.

A Soma Coma

A Soma Coma

A Soma Coma

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à A Soma Coma

Similaire à A Soma Coma(20)

Plus de hughmungus

Plus de hughmungus(19)

Dernier

Dernier(20)

A Soma Coma