IAQM AGM 2015 - Dr Ben Williams - UWEs response to the Defra Air Quality Plan Consultation
1. UWE response to the Defra Air
Quality Plan consultation
Dr Ben Williams
Air Quality Management Resource Centre, UWE
Ben3.williams@uwe.ac.uk
12th November 2015
2. Outline
• General Comments
• Model Assumptions
• Clean Air Zones
• National Responsibilities
• Points of Clarification
3. General Comments
• Disappointed that despite a public health crisis we still haven’t achieved
compliance within legally defined timeframes.
• This plan represents the national government’s interpretation of the Supreme
Court’s judgement of “…the need for immediate action”.
• Disappointed with the lack of clarity and lack of national government action
within the plan.
4. Model Assumptions
• Data used in COPERT 4 (v11) are not thought to be representative of real-world
emissions but are the basis for the modelling undertaken in the proposed Plan.
• Literature suggests real-world emissions are somewhere between 4 and 7 times
type-approval limits1.
• Alternative scenario seems more realistic, but needs to be properly assessed
when data and assumptions are made available.
• On the basis of the alternative scenario 30 zones and agglomerations would be
non-compliant by 2020.
1 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5945_en.htm
5. Clean Air Zones
• Unclear how many of the six local authorities have stated their desire to
implement CAZs.
• How will local authorities fund the scoping, development, implementation and
management of CAZs?
• If local authorities decide not to implement CAZ then the modelled outputs
won’t be appropriate for that area. Is there a plan B?
• If local authorities don’t take up CAZs will they be held accountable for national
government’s failure to comply with the Ambient Air Quality Directive?
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/311449/Annex_A_Letter_to_LAs_o
n_NO2_infraction.pdf
6. National Responsibilities
• National government bears responsibility for complying with the Ambient Air Quality
Directive.
• The national government needs to develop an air quality plan that actually addresses the
problem instead of masking it with model outputs.
• The national government needs to make clear that it will support stronger planning
decisions by local authorities that seek to reduce or limit air pollution emissions.
• The national government has to support the implementation of more stringent testing
regimes and ongoing testing of in-service vehicles to ensure standards are met during the
lifetime of the vehicle.
• Do proposed amendments to type-approval testing cycles go far enough?
7. Points of Clarification
• Which aspects of SL-PCM have been streamlined and how does this differ from the standard
PCM model?
• Clarification as to the basis of any conformity factors used.
• The data and assumptions used in calculating the “alternative scenario”.
• Have Defra undertaken a survey of local authorities to determine the likelihood of CAZ
uptake? If so, we would expect these data to be made publicly available.
• Under what circumstances, if any, will local authorities bear the cost of any fines imposed as
a result of non-compliance?