Adjudicating Compliance with Domestic Support Disciplines
1. IFPRI Policy Seminar
Farm Subsidies and International Trade Rules
Adjudicating Compliance with
Domestic Support Disciplines
Christian Lau
25 May 2023
2. Adjudicating Compliance with Domestic Support Disciplines
Disputes Involving Market Price Support (“MPS”)
EC – Sugar and Canada – Dairy
MPS giving rise to export subsidies
Korea – Beef
Price-Gap Formula and Quantity of Eligible Production
China – Agricultural Producers
Quantity of Eligible Production and On-Farm Consumption
Correspondence between Base Period and Current AMS
India – Sugar and Sugarcane
MPS need not require government purchase
3. Adjudicating Compliance with Domestic Support Disciplines
Disputes Involving Other Domestic Support Issues
Raised in US – Upland Cotton
Decoupled income support (planting flexibility)
Product-specific support
Trade effects (under SCM Agreement)
4. Adjudicating Compliance with Domestic Support Disciplines
Other Domestic Support Issues
Other issues not (yet?) raised in disputes, despite divergent
views in Committee on Agriculture, include:
Dividing line between (i) product-specific and (ii) non-product-
specific support
Shifting boxes without policy change
Mis-classification of certain support
Continued use of “amounts purchased” for MPS
Inflation adjustments in calculation of MPS
Bali “peace clause” for MPS linked to PSH
Does uncertainty over the proper approach to those and other
issues hinder reform negotiations?