SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                   Applications (IJERA)       ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                        Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648
         Study of the Effects of RF/MW Radiations on Humans
                            Kuldip Singh*, Younis Muhammad**
      *M.Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College of Engineering, Punjabi
                                         University, Patiala (Punjab)
   **
     Assitant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College of Engineering, Punjabi
                                        University, Patiala (Punjab)


ABSTRACT
         Electronic devices have become a very
important part of everyone’s life, as these
devices give some benefits of use on the other
hand they are risky in their use. These devices
emit radiations which are harmful for the
human beings as well as for the environment. In
this paper we have discussed about the sources
of electromagnetic radiations, tolerable level of
radiations, some effects that can be caused by
electromagnetic radiations and the effect on the
environment. Also some precautions are
discussed which can reduce the effect of
radiations to some extent. At the end of the
paper we found out that the electromagnetic
radiations produced from cell phones,
computers and related equipment, microwave
ovens, radio and TV transmitters and other
electrical and electronic appliances are
analogous to the cigarettes of 21th century.              Figure.1 Electromagnetic Spectrum
                                                          The Electromagnetic spectrum consists of all
Keywords - EM Radiations, Electromagnetic                 frequency domains increasing in frequency from
spectrum, Electromagnetic radiations (EMR).               lowest frequency(104) to highest frequency(1022)
Electromagnetic pollution.                                through Radio wave, Radar, Microwave, Infrared,
                                                          Ultraviolet, X-ray, Gamma rays .
I. INTRODUCTION
         The various equipments which generate            II. CLASSIFICATION:
electromagnetic radiations such as wireless phones                  The Electromagnetic radiation can be
various electrical equipments etc. have now               classified into ionizing radiations and non-ionizing
become a very important part of life. Life cannot be      radiations, based on whether they are capable of
imagined without these equipments. These                  ionizing atoms and breaking covalent bonds. Ultra
electromagnetic devices have various uses in              violet and higher frequencies, such as X-rays or
domestic, industries and medical technology.              gamma rays are ionizing. These pose their own
Induction heating is used in industries, MRI and          special hazards. Non-ionizing radiations are
CT scan are used to find out the abnormal                 associated with two major potential hazards:
conditions in human body and hyperthermia                 electrical and biological. Additionally, induced
technique is used to treat cancer and tumors. In          electric current caused by radiation can generate
spite of all usefulness the electromagnetic fields        sparks and create a fire or explosive hazard. The
impose a great danger to the human body .                 electromagnetic spectrum includes several different
Electromagnetic pollution (or EMF pollution) is a         classes of radiation: low frequency, radio waves,
term given to all the man made electromagnetic            microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet light,
fields (EMF) of various frequencies, which fill           x-rays and gamma rays. Wave frequency is what
homes, workplaces and public space.                       differentiates one class of radiation from another.
                                                          Figure 1 shows the electromagnetic spectrum [1].
                                                           Electromagnetic pollution is due to frequencies
                                                          below (oscillating slower than) visible light waves.
                                                          Of course, x-rays and gamma rays (which oscillate
                                                          faster than visible light) are highly dangerous but
                                                          homes and workplaces are not filled with these
                                                          rays. Electromagnetic pollution is everywhere.

                                                                                               1645 | P a g e
Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                   Applications (IJERA)       ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                        Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648
A. SOURCES OF            ELECTROMAGNETIC/RADIO         that is pulsed, has more harmful effects than an un
WAVES RADIATIONS                                       modulated, steady carrier. These so-called „window
Here's a short list of the main culprits:              effects‟ greatly complicate any attempt to
                                                       understand        the     relationship       between
     a)   Cell (and other mobile) phones               electromagnetic radiation and health. [5][6]
     b)   Computers and related equipments                       Some of the most known effects of
     c)   Microwave ovens                              RF/MW radiations are given below:
     d)   Radio and TV transmitters                                   Blood Brain Barrier
     e)   Electrical and electronic appliances                        DNA damage
     f)   House-wiring                                                Risk to children
     g)   High and low voltage power lines                            Effect on skin
     h)   Information Networks                                        Tinnitus and Ear damage
     i)   Cars, Motor cycles, Buses, Trains, Aero                     Effect on Eye/ melanoma.
           planes.                                     Increase in cancer risk

Level of radiation that is safe:                       C. Biological Effect on environment:
         Various standards and guidelines have
been developed by organizations and countries          (1) Farm animals:
over the past several decades. Safety factors are            Dairy cows – Decreased milk production,
then incorporated to arrive at specific levels of              spontaneous abortions, reproductive and
exposure to provide sufficient protection for                  developmental problems, and General
various segments of the population. Not all                    declines in overall health.
standards and guidelines throughout the world have           Sheep, dogs, cats, rabbits living near base
recommended the same limits for exposure. This                 stations are also affected by EM
philosophy is inconsistent with the approach taken             radiations.
by most other standards-setting bodies which base
limits on levels where recognized hazards may          (2) Birds:
occur and then incorporate appropriate safety                Interfere with navigation, reproduction,
margins to ensure adequate protection.                          thinning of egg shells.
                   In the United States, although            In India and London - 75% fall sparrow
the Federal Government has never itself developed               population due to EM radiation. Sparrows
RF/MW exposure standards, the FCC has adopted                   are “Red List” of endangered avian
and used recognized safety guidelines for                       species due to EM radiations.
evaluating RF/MW environmental exposure since
                                                             Prolonged EM radiation exposure in
1985. Federal health and safety agencies, such as
                                                                pigeons, swans, white stork and rock dove
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
                                                                reduces their immunity and causes many
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National
                                                                diseases such as bird flu which in turn
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
                                                                affects the humans.
(NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) have also been actively
involved in monitoring and investigating issues
related to RF/MW exposure. The Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the    III. SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE (SAR)
National Council on Radiation Protection and           AND CELL PHONE USE TIME LIMIT
Measurements (NCRP).The ANSI committee on                        The specific absorption rate (SAR) is the
RF exposure standards (Standards Coordinating          rate at which radiation is absorbed by human body,
Committee 28) became a committee of the IEEE,          measured in units of watts per (w/kg) which is
and revised its earlier standard and issued its own    actually for 6 minutes. In has a safety margin of 3
two-tiered standard that had been developed over a     to 4, so a person should not use cell phone for more
period of several years The ANSI/IEEE standards        than 18 to 24 minutes per day. This information is
have been widely used and cited and have served as     not commonly known to Indian people.
the basis for similar standards in the United States
and in other countries[2].

B. What biological effect can be caused by
RF/MW radiations?
         There are studies showing frequency-
specific   biological   effects,  and     studies
demonstrating that a high frequency signal
modulated at certain low frequencies, or a signal

                                                                                          1646 | P a g e
Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                   Applications (IJERA)       ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                        Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648
Cell phones and SAR value                           clothing thickness and coupling efficiency as a
                                                    function of frequency is shown below
                   Model           SAR
                                   Output
  Manufactures                     (W/Kg)

                   V 195
  Motorola                         1.6

                   Rival
  Motorola                         1.59

  Sony Ericsson    Satio
                                   1.56

   Nokia           E71X & X6
                                   1.53

                   Curve 8330
  BlackBerry                       1.54

  Samsung          Blue earth      0.196            Figure: Comparison of transmission coefficient
                                                    with and without clothing with no air gap
                                                    between skin and exterior clothing[4].
                   S3650corby
  Samsung                          0.75                       The water content in the human tissue will
                                                    influence the depth of energy penetration into the
                   Sgh-g800
                                                    body. Millimeter-wave radiation is reported by
  Samsung                          0.23
                                                    Gandhi and Riazi [4] to penetrate less than 2 mm
                                                    into the body because of the "Debye relaxation of
        LG         Rumor
                                   1.51             the water molecules" in the tissue [4]. The Debye
                                                    Effect was observed by a Dutch physicist named
  SAR is expressed         in   Watts     per       Peter Debye. He discovered that EM waves are
  Kilogram                                          absorbed by a dielectric because of molecular
                                                    dipoles present in the dielectric material. Water
  Current UK Standard = 1.0W/Kg                     molecules are essentially dipoles constructed from
                                                    atoms of hydrogen and oxygen. Hence, these
  Current US Standard = 1.6W/Kg                     dielectrics are rich in molecular dipoles and are
                                                    able to quickly absorb millimeter-wave radiation.
                                                    High frequency radiation emission are not expected
A San Francisco Govt. has made it mandatory for     to penetrate deeply into the human body [4]
the industry to display SAR value for each phone
(USA today 14 July, 2010)                           V. DEPTH OF PENETRATION
                                                             Energy emitted in the millimeter-wave
                                                    band is not li0)kely to penetrate to more the about 1
IV. FACT OF CLOTHING                                or 2 mm into the tissue [4]. Essentially, PF/MW
         It is known that RF/MW radiated energy     energy radiated at wavelengths less than 3
will be absorbed by the tissue of the human body.   centimeters will be captured in the outer skin
The depth of energy penetration into the tissue     surface. RF/MW wavelengths from 3 to 10
depends primarily on the wavelength of the          centimeters will penetrate to a depth of about I to
incident radiation and the water content of the     10 mm. The greatest depth of penetration into the
tissue [3] [4].Clothing can act as an impedance     body will occur at wavelengths between 25 to 200
matching transformer for RF/MW radiation. In        centimeters. At these wavelengths RF/MW radiated
1986, Gandhi and Riazi [4] reported that the        energy can directly affect internal body organs and
coupling efficiency of clothing may be as high as   cause serious injury. The human body is reported to
90-95 percent for incident radiation in the         be transparent to RF/MW radiated energy emitted
millimeter-wave band. They determined that the      at wavelengths greater than 200 centimeters. Also,
thickness of the clothing and frequency of the      at frequencies above 300 MHz it has been observed
incident radiation are important factors in the     that the depth of energy penetration fluctuates
coupling condition. The relationship between        rapidly with changes in frequency. In general, the


                                                                                        1647 | P a g e
Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                   Applications (IJERA)       ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                        Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648
depth of energy penetration into the body will          portion of their huge profits for R&D on
decline as the frequency of the incident radiation      eliminating the hazards posed by the EM
increases. At 10 GHz, the absorption of RF/MW           Radiations. Only then people all over the world
energy will be similar to IR radiation [3]. These       will carry out research to come out with solution.
figures were published by the U. S. Department of
Health, Education and Welfare [3].                    REFERENCES
                                                       [1]  Ali Zamanian and Cy Hardeman “EM
VI. HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR SELF                             radiation and human health” , July 2005.
FROM EM POLLUTION.
                                                        [2]   Robert F. Cleveland, Jr.Jerry L. Ulcek
       Cell phones with a lower specific                     “Questions and Answers about Biological
        absorption rate (SAR) should be used.                 Effects and Potential Hazards of
        That means SAR value of a cell phone                  Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”
        must one of the most important criterion              Aug 1999 .
        while buying a new Handset
       Making and receiving the calls should be        [3]   The Industrial Environment – Its
        done quickly so that the radiation                    Evaluation & Control, U.S Department of
        exposure time is minimal.                             Health, Education & Welfare, pp. 371-
       If a person cannot avoid talking for longer           372,                             1973.
        durations on the cell phone then it is
        recommended to use a wired headset              [4]   Gandhi and A. Riazi, "Absorption of
        because a Bluetooth paired headset will               Millimeter Waves by Human Beings and
        have its own EM radiation Envelope.                   its Biological Implications", IEEE
       Stricter radiation norms must be enforced             Transactions Microwave Theory and
        in India. This can only be done when                  Techniques, vol. MTT-34, pp. 228-235,
        people have the knowledge about the                   1986.
        dangers of EM radiations.
       Calls should not be made when the               [5]   Adey, W.R. “Tissue interactions with non-
        network Signal is low because the cell                ionizing electromagnetic fields”. Physiol.
        phone emits more EM radiations to                     Rev.61:435-514 (1981).
        compensate for the low network signal.
       Use of cell phones by the children should       [6]   Belyaev, I.Y. “Non-thermal Biological
        be discouraged otherwise it should be                 Effects   of    Microwaves”,Microwave
        limited to bare minimum.                              Review 11:13-2, 2005.
       Mobile base stations should be located far
        away from residential areas. This can only
        be done by passing strict laws and safety
        norms.

VII. CONCLUSION
  1) After the study it can be concluded that the
  radiations from Mobile base station towers, cell
  phones, computers, laptops, TV & FM towers
  and microwave ovens etc are very harmful for us
  and can have adverse effect on human body
  depending on the intensity and frequency of the
  electrometric radiation. It is always a good idea
  to avoid the unnecessary exposure to
  electromagnetic fields whenever possible. This
  does not mean that we have to stop living near
  the towers. We all know that automobiles create
  air pollution. Instead of avoiding them we came
  up with unleaded petrol, CNG driven vehicles,
  and hybrid vehicles etc similarly the solution to
  avoid excess radiation is to use the radiation
  shield.

  2) Mobile companies should not be in the denial
  mode and accept that radiation pose serious
  health problems. They should invest some

                                                                                         1648 | P a g e

More Related Content

What's hot

Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the organism
Electromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the organismElectromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the organism
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the organismWeb Design & Development
 
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower RadiationEnvironmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower RadiationGAURAV. H .TANDON
 
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human Body
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human BodyBiological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human Body
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human BodyNeha Kumar
 
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the
Electromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on theElectromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on theIvan Figueroa-Otero
 
Is cell tower radiation dangerous
Is cell tower radiation dangerousIs cell tower radiation dangerous
Is cell tower radiation dangerousSiva Samy
 
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS Neha Kumar
 
Biological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of EmrBiological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of EmrNeha Kumar
 
Ill effects of mobile towers
Ill effects of mobile towersIll effects of mobile towers
Ill effects of mobile towersanuroopmadhavan
 
The wackiest cell tower radiation myths
The wackiest cell tower radiation mythsThe wackiest cell tower radiation myths
The wackiest cell tower radiation mythsThe Radiation Doctor
 
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017Arazim Sheu
 
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECT
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECTEFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECT
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECTKomal Sharma
 
A presentation on hazards of cell phones
A presentation on hazards of cell phonesA presentation on hazards of cell phones
A presentation on hazards of cell phoneskalyanikatta
 
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic FieldsHealth Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic FieldsThe Radiation Doctor
 
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar Chandra
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar ChandraEMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar Chandra
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar ChandraThe Radiation Doctor
 
Kerala Science Congress - Poster Presentation
Kerala Science Congress - Poster PresentationKerala Science Congress - Poster Presentation
Kerala Science Congress - Poster PresentationHrudya Balachandran
 
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environment
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environmentMobile tower radiation and its impact on environment
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environmentNishat Fatima
 
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-coursework
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-courseworkThe importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-coursework
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-courseworkPaul Andrew
 

What's hot (20)

Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the organism
Electromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the organismElectromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the organism
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the organism
 
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower RadiationEnvironmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation
Environmental & Biological Effects of Cell Tower Radiation
 
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human Body
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human BodyBiological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human Body
Biological Effects Of Cell Tower Radiation On Human Body
 
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the
Electromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on theElectromagnetic pollution and its  health effects on the
Electromagnetic pollution and its health effects on the
 
Mobile Effects on Human Body
Mobile Effects on Human BodyMobile Effects on Human Body
Mobile Effects on Human Body
 
Is cell tower radiation dangerous
Is cell tower radiation dangerousIs cell tower radiation dangerous
Is cell tower radiation dangerous
 
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
 
Biological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of EmrBiological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of Emr
 
Ill effects of mobile towers
Ill effects of mobile towersIll effects of mobile towers
Ill effects of mobile towers
 
The wackiest cell tower radiation myths
The wackiest cell tower radiation mythsThe wackiest cell tower radiation myths
The wackiest cell tower radiation myths
 
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017
Rsh arazimsheu final project 2017
 
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECT
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECTEFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECT
EFFECT OF RADIATIONS ON HABITS OF BIRDS AND INSECT
 
A presentation on hazards of cell phones
A presentation on hazards of cell phonesA presentation on hazards of cell phones
A presentation on hazards of cell phones
 
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic FieldsHealth Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
Health Effects from Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
 
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar Chandra
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar ChandraEMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar Chandra
EMF and Health, by Dr. Eshwar Chandra
 
Kerala Science Congress - Poster Presentation
Kerala Science Congress - Poster PresentationKerala Science Congress - Poster Presentation
Kerala Science Congress - Poster Presentation
 
+ Body Electric, 3 6 08
+ Body  Electric, 3 6 08+ Body  Electric, 3 6 08
+ Body Electric, 3 6 08
 
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environment
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environmentMobile tower radiation and its impact on environment
Mobile tower radiation and its impact on environment
 
HEALTH EFFECTS OF EMF
HEALTH EFFECTS OF EMFHEALTH EFFECTS OF EMF
HEALTH EFFECTS OF EMF
 
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-coursework
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-courseworkThe importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-coursework
The importance-of-radiofrequency-safety-into-occupational-safety-coursework
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Hf2412861289
Hf2412861289Hf2412861289
Hf2412861289
 
In2414961500
In2414961500In2414961500
In2414961500
 
Lc2418711873
Lc2418711873Lc2418711873
Lc2418711873
 
Jv2416961699
Jv2416961699Jv2416961699
Jv2416961699
 
Lf2418891896
Lf2418891896Lf2418891896
Lf2418891896
 
Kx2418461851
Kx2418461851Kx2418461851
Kx2418461851
 
Kd2417341737
Kd2417341737Kd2417341737
Kd2417341737
 
Kz2418571860
Kz2418571860Kz2418571860
Kz2418571860
 
Ku2418231829
Ku2418231829Ku2418231829
Ku2418231829
 
Kq2418061809
Kq2418061809Kq2418061809
Kq2418061809
 
Jq2416671672
Jq2416671672Jq2416671672
Jq2416671672
 
Hy2414011407
Hy2414011407Hy2414011407
Hy2414011407
 
Ja2415771582
Ja2415771582Ja2415771582
Ja2415771582
 
Kl2417741781
Kl2417741781Kl2417741781
Kl2417741781
 
Hk2413161321
Hk2413161321Hk2413161321
Hk2413161321
 
Im2414901495
Im2414901495Im2414901495
Im2414901495
 
If2414451450
If2414451450If2414451450
If2414451450
 
Iw2415551560
Iw2415551560Iw2415551560
Iw2415551560
 
Jh2416211626
Jh2416211626Jh2416211626
Jh2416211626
 
Hz2514321439
Hz2514321439Hz2514321439
Hz2514321439
 

Similar to Jl2416451648

"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "
"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation ""The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "
"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "YousefYahya6
 
F03702046053
F03702046053F03702046053
F03702046053theijes
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Dmitri Popov
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Dmitri Popov
 
Antiradiation vaccine
Antiradiation  vaccineAntiradiation  vaccine
Antiradiation vaccineDmitri Popov
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Dmitri Popov
 
Electromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic FieldsElectromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic FieldsGreenFacts
 
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...IJICTJOURNAL
 
Emf pendant necklace protects
Emf pendant necklace protectsEmf pendant necklace protects
Emf pendant necklace protectsQuotesRe
 
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Editor IJARCET
 
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Editor IJARCET
 
Fdtd computation for sar induced in
Fdtd computation for sar induced inFdtd computation for sar induced in
Fdtd computation for sar induced inacijjournal
 
Radio Signal and Health.ppsx
Radio Signal and Health.ppsxRadio Signal and Health.ppsx
Radio Signal and Health.ppsxShefqet Meda
 
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health Hussain Raufi
 
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental HealthElectromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental HealthHussain Raufi
 
Health effects associated with wireless communication(3)
Health effects associated with  wireless communication(3)Health effects associated with  wireless communication(3)
Health effects associated with wireless communication(3)Muthanna Omar
 

Similar to Jl2416451648 (20)

"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "
"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation ""The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "
"The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation "
 
F03702046053
F03702046053F03702046053
F03702046053
 
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATIONELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
 
Antiradiation vaccine
Antiradiation  vaccineAntiradiation  vaccine
Antiradiation vaccine
 
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
Antiradiation Vaccine. Protection and Prophylaxis: Radiofrequency/Microwave ...
 
Electromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic FieldsElectromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic Fields
 
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...
Empirical studies on the effect of electromagnetic radiation from multiple so...
 
Emf pendant necklace protects
Emf pendant necklace protectsEmf pendant necklace protects
Emf pendant necklace protects
 
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
 
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
Volume 2-issue-6-2173-2176
 
Fdtd computation for sar induced in
Fdtd computation for sar induced inFdtd computation for sar induced in
Fdtd computation for sar induced in
 
Geopathic Stress
Geopathic StressGeopathic Stress
Geopathic Stress
 
Electromagnetic Pollution Emitted from Base Station
Electromagnetic Pollution Emitted from Base StationElectromagnetic Pollution Emitted from Base Station
Electromagnetic Pollution Emitted from Base Station
 
Radio Signal and Health.ppsx
Radio Signal and Health.ppsxRadio Signal and Health.ppsx
Radio Signal and Health.ppsx
 
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
 
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental HealthElectromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
Electromagnetic radiation_Environmental Health
 
B010520813
B010520813B010520813
B010520813
 
Health effects associated with wireless communication(3)
Health effects associated with  wireless communication(3)Health effects associated with  wireless communication(3)
Health effects associated with wireless communication(3)
 

Jl2416451648

  • 1. Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648 Study of the Effects of RF/MW Radiations on Humans Kuldip Singh*, Younis Muhammad** *M.Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College of Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala (Punjab) ** Assitant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College of Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala (Punjab) ABSTRACT Electronic devices have become a very important part of everyone’s life, as these devices give some benefits of use on the other hand they are risky in their use. These devices emit radiations which are harmful for the human beings as well as for the environment. In this paper we have discussed about the sources of electromagnetic radiations, tolerable level of radiations, some effects that can be caused by electromagnetic radiations and the effect on the environment. Also some precautions are discussed which can reduce the effect of radiations to some extent. At the end of the paper we found out that the electromagnetic radiations produced from cell phones, computers and related equipment, microwave ovens, radio and TV transmitters and other electrical and electronic appliances are analogous to the cigarettes of 21th century. Figure.1 Electromagnetic Spectrum The Electromagnetic spectrum consists of all Keywords - EM Radiations, Electromagnetic frequency domains increasing in frequency from spectrum, Electromagnetic radiations (EMR). lowest frequency(104) to highest frequency(1022) Electromagnetic pollution. through Radio wave, Radar, Microwave, Infrared, Ultraviolet, X-ray, Gamma rays . I. INTRODUCTION The various equipments which generate II. CLASSIFICATION: electromagnetic radiations such as wireless phones The Electromagnetic radiation can be various electrical equipments etc. have now classified into ionizing radiations and non-ionizing become a very important part of life. Life cannot be radiations, based on whether they are capable of imagined without these equipments. These ionizing atoms and breaking covalent bonds. Ultra electromagnetic devices have various uses in violet and higher frequencies, such as X-rays or domestic, industries and medical technology. gamma rays are ionizing. These pose their own Induction heating is used in industries, MRI and special hazards. Non-ionizing radiations are CT scan are used to find out the abnormal associated with two major potential hazards: conditions in human body and hyperthermia electrical and biological. Additionally, induced technique is used to treat cancer and tumors. In electric current caused by radiation can generate spite of all usefulness the electromagnetic fields sparks and create a fire or explosive hazard. The impose a great danger to the human body . electromagnetic spectrum includes several different Electromagnetic pollution (or EMF pollution) is a classes of radiation: low frequency, radio waves, term given to all the man made electromagnetic microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet light, fields (EMF) of various frequencies, which fill x-rays and gamma rays. Wave frequency is what homes, workplaces and public space. differentiates one class of radiation from another. Figure 1 shows the electromagnetic spectrum [1]. Electromagnetic pollution is due to frequencies below (oscillating slower than) visible light waves. Of course, x-rays and gamma rays (which oscillate faster than visible light) are highly dangerous but homes and workplaces are not filled with these rays. Electromagnetic pollution is everywhere. 1645 | P a g e
  • 2. Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648 A. SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC/RADIO that is pulsed, has more harmful effects than an un WAVES RADIATIONS modulated, steady carrier. These so-called „window Here's a short list of the main culprits: effects‟ greatly complicate any attempt to understand the relationship between a) Cell (and other mobile) phones electromagnetic radiation and health. [5][6] b) Computers and related equipments Some of the most known effects of c) Microwave ovens RF/MW radiations are given below: d) Radio and TV transmitters  Blood Brain Barrier e) Electrical and electronic appliances  DNA damage f) House-wiring  Risk to children g) High and low voltage power lines  Effect on skin h) Information Networks  Tinnitus and Ear damage i) Cars, Motor cycles, Buses, Trains, Aero  Effect on Eye/ melanoma. planes. Increase in cancer risk Level of radiation that is safe: C. Biological Effect on environment: Various standards and guidelines have been developed by organizations and countries (1) Farm animals: over the past several decades. Safety factors are  Dairy cows – Decreased milk production, then incorporated to arrive at specific levels of spontaneous abortions, reproductive and exposure to provide sufficient protection for developmental problems, and General various segments of the population. Not all declines in overall health. standards and guidelines throughout the world have  Sheep, dogs, cats, rabbits living near base recommended the same limits for exposure. This stations are also affected by EM philosophy is inconsistent with the approach taken radiations. by most other standards-setting bodies which base limits on levels where recognized hazards may (2) Birds: occur and then incorporate appropriate safety  Interfere with navigation, reproduction, margins to ensure adequate protection. thinning of egg shells. In the United States, although  In India and London - 75% fall sparrow the Federal Government has never itself developed population due to EM radiation. Sparrows RF/MW exposure standards, the FCC has adopted are “Red List” of endangered avian and used recognized safety guidelines for species due to EM radiations. evaluating RF/MW environmental exposure since  Prolonged EM radiation exposure in 1985. Federal health and safety agencies, such as pigeons, swans, white stork and rock dove the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the reduces their immunity and causes many Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National diseases such as bird flu which in turn Institute for Occupational Safety and Health affects the humans. (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have also been actively involved in monitoring and investigating issues related to RF/MW exposure. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the III. SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE (SAR) National Council on Radiation Protection and AND CELL PHONE USE TIME LIMIT Measurements (NCRP).The ANSI committee on The specific absorption rate (SAR) is the RF exposure standards (Standards Coordinating rate at which radiation is absorbed by human body, Committee 28) became a committee of the IEEE, measured in units of watts per (w/kg) which is and revised its earlier standard and issued its own actually for 6 minutes. In has a safety margin of 3 two-tiered standard that had been developed over a to 4, so a person should not use cell phone for more period of several years The ANSI/IEEE standards than 18 to 24 minutes per day. This information is have been widely used and cited and have served as not commonly known to Indian people. the basis for similar standards in the United States and in other countries[2]. B. What biological effect can be caused by RF/MW radiations? There are studies showing frequency- specific biological effects, and studies demonstrating that a high frequency signal modulated at certain low frequencies, or a signal 1646 | P a g e
  • 3. Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648 Cell phones and SAR value clothing thickness and coupling efficiency as a function of frequency is shown below Model SAR Output Manufactures (W/Kg) V 195 Motorola 1.6 Rival Motorola 1.59 Sony Ericsson Satio 1.56 Nokia E71X & X6 1.53 Curve 8330 BlackBerry 1.54 Samsung Blue earth 0.196 Figure: Comparison of transmission coefficient with and without clothing with no air gap between skin and exterior clothing[4]. S3650corby Samsung 0.75 The water content in the human tissue will influence the depth of energy penetration into the Sgh-g800 body. Millimeter-wave radiation is reported by Samsung 0.23 Gandhi and Riazi [4] to penetrate less than 2 mm into the body because of the "Debye relaxation of LG Rumor 1.51 the water molecules" in the tissue [4]. The Debye Effect was observed by a Dutch physicist named SAR is expressed in Watts per Peter Debye. He discovered that EM waves are Kilogram absorbed by a dielectric because of molecular dipoles present in the dielectric material. Water Current UK Standard = 1.0W/Kg molecules are essentially dipoles constructed from atoms of hydrogen and oxygen. Hence, these Current US Standard = 1.6W/Kg dielectrics are rich in molecular dipoles and are able to quickly absorb millimeter-wave radiation. High frequency radiation emission are not expected A San Francisco Govt. has made it mandatory for to penetrate deeply into the human body [4] the industry to display SAR value for each phone (USA today 14 July, 2010) V. DEPTH OF PENETRATION Energy emitted in the millimeter-wave band is not li0)kely to penetrate to more the about 1 IV. FACT OF CLOTHING or 2 mm into the tissue [4]. Essentially, PF/MW It is known that RF/MW radiated energy energy radiated at wavelengths less than 3 will be absorbed by the tissue of the human body. centimeters will be captured in the outer skin The depth of energy penetration into the tissue surface. RF/MW wavelengths from 3 to 10 depends primarily on the wavelength of the centimeters will penetrate to a depth of about I to incident radiation and the water content of the 10 mm. The greatest depth of penetration into the tissue [3] [4].Clothing can act as an impedance body will occur at wavelengths between 25 to 200 matching transformer for RF/MW radiation. In centimeters. At these wavelengths RF/MW radiated 1986, Gandhi and Riazi [4] reported that the energy can directly affect internal body organs and coupling efficiency of clothing may be as high as cause serious injury. The human body is reported to 90-95 percent for incident radiation in the be transparent to RF/MW radiated energy emitted millimeter-wave band. They determined that the at wavelengths greater than 200 centimeters. Also, thickness of the clothing and frequency of the at frequencies above 300 MHz it has been observed incident radiation are important factors in the that the depth of energy penetration fluctuates coupling condition. The relationship between rapidly with changes in frequency. In general, the 1647 | P a g e
  • 4. Kuldip Singh, Younis Muhammad / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1645-1648 depth of energy penetration into the body will portion of their huge profits for R&D on decline as the frequency of the incident radiation eliminating the hazards posed by the EM increases. At 10 GHz, the absorption of RF/MW Radiations. Only then people all over the world energy will be similar to IR radiation [3]. These will carry out research to come out with solution. figures were published by the U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare [3]. REFERENCES [1] Ali Zamanian and Cy Hardeman “EM VI. HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR SELF radiation and human health” , July 2005. FROM EM POLLUTION. [2] Robert F. Cleveland, Jr.Jerry L. Ulcek  Cell phones with a lower specific “Questions and Answers about Biological absorption rate (SAR) should be used. Effects and Potential Hazards of That means SAR value of a cell phone Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” must one of the most important criterion Aug 1999 . while buying a new Handset  Making and receiving the calls should be [3] The Industrial Environment – Its done quickly so that the radiation Evaluation & Control, U.S Department of exposure time is minimal. Health, Education & Welfare, pp. 371-  If a person cannot avoid talking for longer 372, 1973. durations on the cell phone then it is recommended to use a wired headset [4] Gandhi and A. Riazi, "Absorption of because a Bluetooth paired headset will Millimeter Waves by Human Beings and have its own EM radiation Envelope. its Biological Implications", IEEE  Stricter radiation norms must be enforced Transactions Microwave Theory and in India. This can only be done when Techniques, vol. MTT-34, pp. 228-235, people have the knowledge about the 1986. dangers of EM radiations.  Calls should not be made when the [5] Adey, W.R. “Tissue interactions with non- network Signal is low because the cell ionizing electromagnetic fields”. Physiol. phone emits more EM radiations to Rev.61:435-514 (1981). compensate for the low network signal.  Use of cell phones by the children should [6] Belyaev, I.Y. “Non-thermal Biological be discouraged otherwise it should be Effects of Microwaves”,Microwave limited to bare minimum. Review 11:13-2, 2005.  Mobile base stations should be located far away from residential areas. This can only be done by passing strict laws and safety norms. VII. CONCLUSION 1) After the study it can be concluded that the radiations from Mobile base station towers, cell phones, computers, laptops, TV & FM towers and microwave ovens etc are very harmful for us and can have adverse effect on human body depending on the intensity and frequency of the electrometric radiation. It is always a good idea to avoid the unnecessary exposure to electromagnetic fields whenever possible. This does not mean that we have to stop living near the towers. We all know that automobiles create air pollution. Instead of avoiding them we came up with unleaded petrol, CNG driven vehicles, and hybrid vehicles etc similarly the solution to avoid excess radiation is to use the radiation shield. 2) Mobile companies should not be in the denial mode and accept that radiation pose serious health problems. They should invest some 1648 | P a g e