Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

On Promoting Open Access at LBNL

654 vues

Publié le

Publié dans : Technologie, Formation
  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

On Promoting Open Access at LBNL

  1. 1. Jeffery Loo December 17, 2009 [email_address] On Promoting Open Access at LBNL
  2. 2. Agenda
  3. 3. 1 Awareness of open access principles
  4. 4. funding challenges journal subscription fees copyright ownership / control reader access return on public investment Research life cycle challenges
  5. 6. Open access responds to these challenges Publishing that is Digital and online Free access for readers * Fewer copyright restrictions not free for authors
  6. 7. Motivations for OA participation Self-interest Altruism
  7. 8. Advantages and concerns Advantages Greater visibility and citation rate Digital Free access Promotes collaboration and exchange Concerns Publishing quality Preservation and authenticity Sustainability of author-pays model Conflict of interest when author pays
  8. 9. 2 Open access models
  9. 10. Spectrum of open access models Less effort Individual level More effort Collaboration
  10. 11. Open access licenses an alternative to traditional copyright
  11. 12. Open access journals free to read, but not to produce
  12. 13. Springer Open Choice
  13. 14. Open access archives and repositories Self-archiving Where to archive: Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org Permission to self-archive? Sherpa-Romeo database http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/index.html
  14. 15. arXiv.org
  15. 16. publishing system and repository no fees for UC members and LBNL UCPubS - print on demand
  16. 17. Institutional support administrative and financial Compact for Open Access Publishing Equity
  17. 18. Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) Funding for OA publishing by UC Berkeley members
  18. 19. Institutional policy and mandates MIT – all faculties Harvard – Faculty of Arts and Sciences Stanford – School of Education
  19. 20. Institutional collaboration SCOAP 3 Collaboration to promote open access publications in high energy physics
  20. 21. Advocacy (for the law) Nobel Laureates Open letter re: Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA)
  21. 22. Spectrum of OA options The University of California recommends
  22. 23. What’s on the horizon? Open data GenBank Science Commons DataONE Encouragement by: CIHR Wellcome Trust eScience Cyberinfrastructure High performance computing at LBNL
  23. 24. Open Science transparency and collaboration open notebook science citizen science
  24. 25. Other research communication Pubcast on SciVee Object Re-Use and Exchange (ORE) Standard Herbert Van de Sompel (LANL)
  25. 29. 3 Discussion
  26. 31. Issues for reflection <ul><li>Open access awareness and activity </li></ul><ul><li>Key LBNL supporters of OA publishing </li></ul><ul><li>Administrative support for OA initiatives </li></ul><ul><li>Metrics for the awareness, activity, and support of OA </li></ul><ul><li>What OA support do LBNL members need? </li></ul><ul><li>Funding </li></ul><ul><li>How much is LBNL spending on OA publishing fees? </li></ul><ul><li>Are the OA journal pricing models prohibitive? </li></ul><ul><li>Are alternative models and sources of funding necessary? </li></ul><ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>Advocacy </li></ul>
  27. 32. Conclusion by haiku <ul><li>Open access helps </li></ul><ul><li>Protect, preserve, publicize - </li></ul><ul><li>What can be done here? </li></ul>