2. CONTENTS
- Comparison between PIAGET – VYGOTSKY
• Similarities
• Differences
Key factors
Strength & Weakness
Types of Learning
Strategies
Role of Learner and Instructor
-Role Playing
• Summary
-conclusion
- Q&A
2 / 18
3. SIMILARITIES
Common focus on understanding children's functioning
Children = Active stand in their own development
The same periods of development are experienced
by each child, but at different levels
Learn by exploring and testing their surroundings.
3 / 18
6. STRENGTH
piaget vygotsky
•The child’s spontaneity •Make passive student active
•Appropriate learning according to •Prompt many types of learning
child’s cognitive development
•Direct experience for raising •Use language as a learning tool
child’s comprehension
6 / 18
7. WEAKNESS
piaget vygotsky
•Standardized stages •No exact guidelines
• No explanation after final • A lot of time and resources
stages required
•Overlooked social and cultural •Problems to examine individual
characteristics participation
7 / 18
8. TYPES OF LEARNING
PIAGET VYGOTSKY
• Audio-visual aids • Anchored
instruction
• Digital multimedia
• Cognitive
apprenticeships
• Individualized
learning
• Problem-based
learning (PBL)
8 / 18
9. STRATEGY
PIAGET VYGOTSKY
• Proper learning environment • Scaffolding
according to learners’ – Quiz
developmental stage(4)
– Hint
• Verbal activities
– Role play
• Experimentation with – Dialogue
physical object
9 / 18
10. ROLE PLAY
KIM, NA-RI / STUDENT#1
KIM, MOON-JEONG / STUDENT#2
AN, JEONG-YOON / NARRATION
LEE, JAE-MIN / STUDENT#3
PYO, MIN-KYOUNG / TEACHER
10 / 18
11. ROLE OF
LEARNERS
PIAGET VYGOTSKY
Participation in classes
individually. Collaborative participation
in classes
Discover and Construct
knowledge Interact and Construct
knowledge
11 / 18
12. ROLE OF
INSTRUCTORS – Co-learner of
collaborative
•Consider the child’s present
cognitive level
learning
• Provide guidelines and stimulate •Consider student’s cultural
the students background
•Present materials and situations
that allow them to discover new •Give scaffolding to students
learning
•Design collaborative learning
• Make students participate in
active learning •Make students apply
information to real world
-Facilitator
of
knowledge.
12 / 18
13. PIAGET
Today's my learner just graduated
kindergarten.
They are in a concrete operational stage.
so. how I’m gonna teach them? Hum..
13 / 18
16. CONCLUSION
Key factor strategy implication
• Assimilation + • Proper • focus on the
accommodation instructing process of child
= equilibration according to ren’s thinking.(c
developmental ognitive constru
• Zone of stage ctivism)
Proximal
development • scaffolding • more advanced
learning than
current
level.(social
constructivism)
16 / 18
