Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

Synosis 1

synosis

  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

Synosis 1

  1. 1. BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) IN ARCHITECTURE THEORIES OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM (ARC61303/ARC2224) SYNOPSIS: REACTION PAPER (AUGUST 2016) [10 MARKS] NAME: Tay Jia Jian ID: 0315508 LECTURER: Nicholas Ng TUTORIAL TIME: 2-4pm SYNOPSIS NO: 1 READER TITLE: In The Cause Of Architecture AUTHOR: Frank Lloyd Wright In the book of “In the Cause of Architecture” Frank Lloyd Wright using the abstract way to describe the amazing of the nature toward him such as “her wealth of suggestion is inexhaustible”. From here we can see how important of the natural furnished to him. “Study nature, love nature, stay close to nature. It will never fail you.” quotes from him. In the cause of architecture also mention about “Simplicity and repose are qualities that measure the true value of any work of art.” Excessive of love of details or ornaments maybe ruin the more fine things from the standpoint of fine art. Wright stated decoration is dangerous unless we understand it thoroughly and good in a scheme as a whole. He think decoration must intimately associate with buildings but many people always just simply paste ornament to cover up the fault in design. Wright also set a Principles because of the replication of architecture style in European and America. The principle is to help the new generation people to develop their individuality of architect. He got say somethings about the individuality, “If an architect create a structure based merely on the replication of a “style”, then it is what it is a building with no soul or individuality.” He do not believe the uniformity of type which has characterized the so called great “styles.” He believe that only when one individual forms the concept, determine every detail only that will unity be secured which is the soul of the individual work of art. He keep stresses the importance of the individuality of architects. Wright concludes this essay with an expectation of the future, that “the work shall grow more truly simple; more expressive with fewer lines, fewer forms; more articulate with less labor, more plastic, more fluent, although more coherent; more organic.” In conclusions, I think Frank Lloyd Wright is really an architect with strong individuality but like what he say “there should many styles of houses because there are kinds of people and many differentiations.” I think maybe simplicity style is a great style but for sure it is no suitable for everyone. However, I like that idea close with nature and building design should harmonize with its surrounding because in this century many building just only simply place in a place that destroy the spiritual integrity of the environment. WORD COUNT 393 Key points (2.5) Appropriateness of Terminologies (2.5) Clarity in Opinions and Reactions (2.5) Logical Progression (2.5) DATE: TOTAL MARK & GRADE ASSSESSED BY:
  2. 2. SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Grades Marks Key points (2.5) Appropriateness of Terminologies (2.5) Clarity in Opinions and Reactions (2.5) Logical Progression (2.5) A 1.8 - 2.5 Evidence of outstanding understanding of Key points through clear explanation Appropriate use of Terminologies In discussing the Issues/ Concepts/Theories Outstanding Clarity in opinions and reactions - Supported with strong Logical explanation Outstanding Articulation of logical expressions ending with well- developed paragraphs B 1.5 - 1.79 Evidence of understanding of Key points through reasonable explanation Reasonable use of Terminologies In discussing the Issues/ Concepts/Theories with Minor unfamiliarity Reasonable clarity in opinions and reactions - Supported with Logical explanation Reasonable Articulation of logical expressions ending with well- developed paragraphs C 1.25 - 1.49 Evidence of Some Understanding of Key points through acceptable explanation Acceptable use of Terminologies In discussing the Issues/ Concepts/Theories with Noticeable unfamiliarity Acceptable Clarity in opinions and reactions - Supported with satisfactory explanation Acceptable Articulation of logical expressions ending with some ambiguous statements D 1 - 1.24 Evidence of Some Understanding of Key points through not quite acceptable explanation Evidence of Terminologies however poorly communicated in discussing The Issues/ Concepts/Theories With Weak Clarity in opinions and reactions - Supported with Lengthy explanation Poor Articulation of logical expressions ending with noticeable ambiguous statements F 0 - 0.99 Insufficient Evidence of Understanding of Key points through weak explanation Insufficient Evidence of Terminologies in discussing the Issues/ Concepts/Theories With Improper opinions and reactions. Not Matching the Issues/ Concepts/ Theories - Inadequate Reasons Unable to Articulate / illogical expressions. Poorly written synopsis.

×