One of the most common formats of audience participation in journalism consists of online reader comments in response to articles, weblogs or online television and radio broadcasts. Where the audience initially only commented on the media platforms themselves, Facebook made it possible to outsource commenting to a third-party platform. Outsourcing means less maintenance costs, while Facebook- commenting could also lead to more quality because anonymous commenting is no longer an option. The options users have, the rules commenters have to follow, the moderation regime they are faced with could also influence the quantity (and quality) of comments. Nevertheless, this influence has not been tested empirically. With this study we address the question how news media deal with audience comments on Facebook and their own news site and how this influences the quality and quantity of the comments. We compared comments on news platforms and Facebook of 62 Dutch national and regional newspapers, public and commercial broadcasters, newsweeklies, national news programs and online news sites. Subsequently we analysed the content of the comments with the qualitative text analysis tool MAXQDA. The results indicate that news media prefer outsourcing comments to Facebook although commenting on their own platforms is still possible. By discouraging anonymous responses, the quality of comments improved but above all the quantity of comments decreased after outsourcing comments to Facebook.
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
Engaging the social news consumer - The future of journalism Cardiff 2013
1.
2. Engaging the social news user
Comments on news sites and Facebook
Sanne Hille & Piet Bakker
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, School of Journalism
Future of Journalism Conference,
13-14 September 2013, Cardiff
3. User comments
“By requiring a Facebook
registration, it will cut down
on the mean-
spirited, profane and
sometimes useless
responses because one's
friends will also see the
comments in their
newsfeeds”.
Jimmy Orr, LA Times
3
Journalists and audience do not always
appreciate this form of audience participation
4. Facebook in the Netherlands
4
Population Facebook
users
Penetration
online
population
16
million
7,5
million
50 %
Socialbakers.com
18 22
38 39
58
46 42
26 25
6
Yes No
5. Comments on
news sites and Facebook
Research question:
In which way do news media deal with audience
comments on Facebook and their own news site
and how does this influence the quality and
quantity of the comments?
5
6. Methodology
62 news media 20 news media 3,489 comments
Representing Dutch news
media on the Internet:
✓Dutch national and
regional daily newspapers
✓News magazines
✓National news programs
✓Regional broadcasters
✓Web only
✓ Comment section on
news site
✓ Posted about:
✓ Content analysis of the
comment management
systems
✓ Analysed with MAXQDA
✓ Indicators of high and
low quality:
Defamation, incitement, a
busive content, racism and
hate speech, detected
sources, story ideas and
material follow up leads
provided by the
commenters
(Singer, 2011).
6
7. The amount of comments
7
76%
24%
News sites
Facebook
N=3,489
8. The quality of the comments
• Little to none off-topic response, provided
tips, leads and material, story ideas and
sources.
• Little to none abusive comments
• Little Identified typos and errors on NRC.nl
• Comments on Facebook do not contribute
to the content in a positive or negative
way
”Something I noticed today; Willem-Alexander
wore his wedding ring in recent years on his
left hand / finger (Catholic way).
Also during the ceremony of the abdication.
Immediately after the abdication, balcony
scene and Inauguration of the New Church, he
wears his wedding ring on his right hand /
finger (Protestant way). Something worth
knowing?”
Jon, NRC site
8
“She looked beautiful.... Hollywood you
are too late”
Mo Adag, NRC Facebook page
• Strong interaction between users on
Nu.nl and NRC.nl
• Little to none interaction between
news media and users
Good morning, my name is Sanne Hille and I am affiliated WITH the University of applied sciences Utrecht in the Netherlands. Today I will present - Our most recent research project – about user comments on news sites and Facebook. This study is part of my PhD thesis on audience participation in journalism in the Netherlands.
What is the situation now Dealing with user comments – Sometimes it can be a real struggle.On the one hand, are user comments a very easy way to involve the audience. On the other hand, Journalists and audience do not always appreciate this form of audience participation, especially the abusive and insulting comments are not appreciated. That’s why some news media in Europe and beyond switched to the Facebook comment systems where commenting in anonymity is not an option. And maybe, this would kill the trolls and raise the quality of the comments’.
And there is another ‘advantages’ of using Facebook. As you see in this table Socialbakers counted 7,5 million Dutch active users on Facebook in 2012.And as you see in the bar chart, the last chart shows that most of the Dutch news media found their way to into Facebook, by posting their content on the so called Fanpages.
This brings us to our research question. ’In which way do news media deal with audience comments on Facebook and their own news site - and how does this influence the quality and quantity of the comments?’
And these methods we have used. We started with a sample of 62 news media, which represent an important part of Dutch news media on the Internet. It contains Print, broadcast and online news media. And 20 of these news media had also a comment section AND reported about two important news events. The first case was about the inauguration of the Dutch King Willem-Alexander. An historic occasion on April 30,2013 and the second was the disappearance and dead of two young boys Ruben and Julian, which captivated the Netherlands during two-weeksin May 2013. We made an inventry of the comment management system of these 20 news media to determine the influence on the quality and quantity of the comments. And, eventually we collected and analysed 3,489 comments. We analysed these with the QUAlitative data anAlysis software program MAXQDA.To determine quality -- we labelled the comments- with indicators of high and low quality.
This outcome was veryinteresting I think. Because of the low trash hold of Facebook, we expected more comments on Facebook than on news sites. But we found much more comments on news sites than on Facebook, on the same articles.
These are outcomes from the content analysis. There was little to none off-topic response. There were little to none tips provided or leads and material. No story ideas or references to sources.And we found very few abusive comments. It seems that the various Moderation registration systems do their work. We found comments where users identified typos and errors and tips on NRC.nl. NRC is one of the biggest quality news papers in the Netherlands. The general impression of the Facebook comments was that they do not contribute to the content in a positive or negative way. The following quotes illustrate this clearly. At the top one of the users points out something he has noticed, while the Facebook comment not contribute anything. And, there was much interaction between the users, but almost no interaction between users and editors.
And lastly, the outcomes of the inventory. NRC.nl has the most elaborate comment management system. And, received the most tips, comments about errors and typos. NRC and Nu.nl, a web only news site, had both extensive list of house rules. As you see at 1Vandaag, a national foreign affairs television program relies entirely on the Facebook comment box, but received little to none interesting comments. And finally, commenting URregistered and anONymus is generaly not possible.