SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Thankfully, THE church is not only larger than Roman Catholicism but larger than
Christianity, even. The sickness described applies to its institutional aspects,
which, because of our radical finitude, while not otherwise theologically
essential, have been practically indispensable in this temporal realm (I’m
struggling to avoid using the cliche’ “necessary evil”). The form of church polity
is an accidental, not an essential, and this hierarchy, in my view, has not only
outlived its usefulness but is more of an obfuscation of the sense of the faithful
than an amplification, which is to say that it has been, in a word, unfaithful. The
voice of the faithful will emerge from the rocks and stones, if necessary.

Pastorally, some form of institution will likely remain necessary but it will less
likely be hierarchical and will more likely be more open-sourced and peer-topeer (P2P). And this should suffice to keep alive the voice of self-critical protest
in the church’s vital prophetic tradition. For all practical purposes, talking
substance over form, a de facto CBNR (catholic but not Roman) cohort has
emerged vis a vis Emergent Christianity, re-sourcing our mystical core as John
XXIII’s prayer for aggiornamento has been answered by the Spirit, albeit not in
the way many would’ve expected! Sadly and ironically, Rome is harvesting the
seeds of self-destruction that it has planted, itself, while trying to weed out fruitbearing crops, which will be fine in the long-run as they grow elsewhere!

IN RESPONSE TO:

“To be restored our sickness must grow worse”
Posted on June 6, 2012 by Richard Rohr, OFM

I am presently teaching European jail chaplains in Romania, the poorest country
in Europe. Seeking some guidance and consolation amidst the historic and
present suffering of these people, I had an afternoon of prayer and took to
reading T.S.Eliot’s FOUR QUARTETS. In “East Coker” he says that “our only
health is the disease” and that “to be restored our sickness must grow worse”
and even “the whole world is our hospital”. It gives me some strange direction
amidst this tragic communist experiment, the state of politics in the USA, and the
daily Vatican meltdown as it continues to try to regain some control and authority
by condemning things in every direction.
We are clearly in a very strategic period of history where people are grabbing
for power because they do not know how to heal, restore, or bring life. You
would think the Pope and bishops should know better, yet they only need to look
to this part of the world to see what imposed and authoritarian change
accomplishes–which is nothing and worse than nothing. The push back, the
1
alienation, the cynicism lasts for centuries, as I see here in a former Communist
state. I am afraid, as T.S.Eliot says “our sickness must grow worse” to see how
sick we are, and “our only health is in the disease” itself–to bring the poison to
the surface so none can deny it. The Roman Church and the US Congress are both
showing a very sad misuse of their power, which is no longer a power for good or
for the common good. The Catholic church has become its own worst enemy and
does not need atheists or agnostics to undo its mission. Like St. Peter himself, it is
denying and destroying its own message. The sadness I see here in Romania is
the sadness of power totally misused in the name of “reform”. I am afraid it is a
prophecy for the future of the Roman Catholic Church.

2

More Related Content

More from johnboy_philothea_net

Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathyMoral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathyjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
Emerging christianity   interfaith account of orthodoxic spiEmerging christianity   interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spijohnboy_philothea_net
 
The missing divine attribute omnipathy
The missing divine attribute   omnipathyThe missing divine attribute   omnipathy
The missing divine attribute omnipathyjohnboy_philothea_net
 
In all religions we are invited to dig deeper
In all religions we are invited to dig deeperIn all religions we are invited to dig deeper
In all religions we are invited to dig deeperjohnboy_philothea_net
 
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxyA soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxyjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionismFaith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionismjohnboy_philothea_net
 
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulnessIn defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulnessjohnboy_philothea_net
 
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics   not so fastThe role of change in metaphysics   not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics not so fastjohnboy_philothea_net
 
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics   not so fastThe role of change in metaphysics   not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics not so fastjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as loverOrthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as loverjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as loverOrthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as loverjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theologicalOntologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theologicaljohnboy_philothea_net
 
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrismThe (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrismjohnboy_philothea_net
 
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage pointA look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage pointjohnboy_philothea_net
 
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchangeInterfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchangejohnboy_philothea_net
 

More from johnboy_philothea_net (20)

Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathyMoral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
 
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
Emerging christianity   interfaith account of orthodoxic spiEmerging christianity   interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
 
Eucharistic model
Eucharistic modelEucharistic model
Eucharistic model
 
The missing divine attribute omnipathy
The missing divine attribute   omnipathyThe missing divine attribute   omnipathy
The missing divine attribute omnipathy
 
In all religions we are invited to dig deeper
In all religions we are invited to dig deeperIn all religions we are invited to dig deeper
In all religions we are invited to dig deeper
 
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxyA soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
 
Deconstructing deconstructionism
Deconstructing deconstructionismDeconstructing deconstructionism
Deconstructing deconstructionism
 
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionismFaith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
 
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulnessIn defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
 
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics   not so fastThe role of change in metaphysics   not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
 
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics   not so fastThe role of change in metaphysics   not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
 
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as loverOrthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
 
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as loverOrthodoxy weds polydoxy   god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
 
To john caputo yes, but
To john caputo   yes, butTo john caputo   yes, but
To john caputo yes, but
 
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theologicalOntologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
 
Deconstruct this!
Deconstruct this!Deconstruct this!
Deconstruct this!
 
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrismThe (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
 
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage pointA look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
 
Dorothy day and gospel norms
Dorothy day and gospel normsDorothy day and gospel norms
Dorothy day and gospel norms
 
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchangeInterfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
 

Catholic but not roman

  • 1. Thankfully, THE church is not only larger than Roman Catholicism but larger than Christianity, even. The sickness described applies to its institutional aspects, which, because of our radical finitude, while not otherwise theologically essential, have been practically indispensable in this temporal realm (I’m struggling to avoid using the cliche’ “necessary evil”). The form of church polity is an accidental, not an essential, and this hierarchy, in my view, has not only outlived its usefulness but is more of an obfuscation of the sense of the faithful than an amplification, which is to say that it has been, in a word, unfaithful. The voice of the faithful will emerge from the rocks and stones, if necessary. Pastorally, some form of institution will likely remain necessary but it will less likely be hierarchical and will more likely be more open-sourced and peer-topeer (P2P). And this should suffice to keep alive the voice of self-critical protest in the church’s vital prophetic tradition. For all practical purposes, talking substance over form, a de facto CBNR (catholic but not Roman) cohort has emerged vis a vis Emergent Christianity, re-sourcing our mystical core as John XXIII’s prayer for aggiornamento has been answered by the Spirit, albeit not in the way many would’ve expected! Sadly and ironically, Rome is harvesting the seeds of self-destruction that it has planted, itself, while trying to weed out fruitbearing crops, which will be fine in the long-run as they grow elsewhere! IN RESPONSE TO: “To be restored our sickness must grow worse” Posted on June 6, 2012 by Richard Rohr, OFM I am presently teaching European jail chaplains in Romania, the poorest country in Europe. Seeking some guidance and consolation amidst the historic and present suffering of these people, I had an afternoon of prayer and took to reading T.S.Eliot’s FOUR QUARTETS. In “East Coker” he says that “our only health is the disease” and that “to be restored our sickness must grow worse” and even “the whole world is our hospital”. It gives me some strange direction amidst this tragic communist experiment, the state of politics in the USA, and the daily Vatican meltdown as it continues to try to regain some control and authority by condemning things in every direction. We are clearly in a very strategic period of history where people are grabbing for power because they do not know how to heal, restore, or bring life. You would think the Pope and bishops should know better, yet they only need to look to this part of the world to see what imposed and authoritarian change accomplishes–which is nothing and worse than nothing. The push back, the 1
  • 2. alienation, the cynicism lasts for centuries, as I see here in a former Communist state. I am afraid, as T.S.Eliot says “our sickness must grow worse” to see how sick we are, and “our only health is in the disease” itself–to bring the poison to the surface so none can deny it. The Roman Church and the US Congress are both showing a very sad misuse of their power, which is no longer a power for good or for the common good. The Catholic church has become its own worst enemy and does not need atheists or agnostics to undo its mission. Like St. Peter himself, it is denying and destroying its own message. The sadness I see here in Romania is the sadness of power totally misused in the name of “reform”. I am afraid it is a prophecy for the future of the Roman Catholic Church. 2