1. COUNTER statistics: Three applications of Journal Report 1 Jason S. Price, PhD Libraries of the Claremont Colleges NISO: Managing Electronic Collections: Strategies from Content to User September 28-30, 2006 Magnolia Hotel – Denver, Colorado Caviat Emptor: formatting & animations may barely approximate reality: Download for original content
11. Q2. Which to cancel? A: highest cost per use 7 subs in 10 most used 10 subs in 20 most used 19 subs in 48 most used Subs 37% Lease 63% Lease 24% Subs 76%
12.
13. Q4. Is this collection a good value? A: No for 3? Based on JR1a: ‘ Full text article requests’
14. Price per article use? html to pdf ratios vary widely For more info see: http://bit.ly/alL059 (pdf); JASIST 57(9):1243
Majority of collection comprised of added titles (at small fraction of list price) Simple answer: if not all of them, then the ones we use the most Pre-packed – Bad with the good, problem of breadth, OR you can have all these titles that other institutions subscribed to as of 5 years ago
According to counter Post-analysis pending
Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data
Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data
Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data
Haven’t cancelled yet…
The ScienceDirect article link leads to a page that downloads the html (for those with access rights) and presents a link to the pdf on the sciencedirect site, showing that anyone who accesses sciencedirect content triggers two downloads to get to the PDF (at least with in the Claremont IP range).