SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  33
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
General Guide for Intensive Therapy Intervention 

             Name of Child:·                                                                                             Date: 

             Check the following that apply: 

             Cl Positive history of stuttering in' the family 

                          •
        - DMaJe
                               .
             DOnset after 3.5 years of age
                                      ..
             ClProblem present more than 12-18 months 

             OMultiple part-word or single syllable word repetitions 

             ClThose above done with great frequency, increased length of each moment, & faster speed and 

             rate within the space between each repetition on one syllable or word (Stutter Like Disfluencies) 

             DTension present during speech 

                          .                                                                                                      .

             OCluster disfluencies: more than 2 disfluencies on a word or two or more adjoining disfluent words
                            -                                 -


             D11 or more SLD's on 100 syllables of speech
             o Difficulty initiating phonation or breathing abnormalities associated with speech                                                                ,
             OChiid has demonstrated awareness 

             DChild has demonstrated frustration 

             DOther concomitant ,developmental issues are present 

             [JProblem has continued to persist since onset 

             Note: This guide is intended to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions by considering a/l factors present. Factors are based on 

             research related to genetic faotors, persistenoe, and recovery rates in young children who stutter. (Yairi and colleagues, 1992a~ 1992b, 

             1993, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2004)                                                 .
              Chmela 2004                                                                              This page may be photocopied without permission of the publisher.       12


,

                                                                    Copyright 2004 The Stutterl1)9 Foundation',Allrlghts res6lVed. 1-800-992-9392. 'JIIWW.stutteringhelp.org




.:,:~~~"
Table 2-2.         Continuum of Distluent Speech Behavior
More Usual
                                                                                                                       •
    (1) 7ypical Disftuencies                                                (2) Atypical Disftuencies
    Hesitations (silent pauses) 
                                       ~ Monosyllabic word repefitions (3 or
                                !
                                     .~   more repetitions per instance or
    Interjection of sounds, syllables or                               ~    uneven stress)
    words                                                              ~
                                !
                                                                       ~
                                                                          Part-word syllable repetition (3 or
    Revisions of phrases or sentences                                     more repetitions per instance or
                                                                        ~ uneven stress)
.1 Phrase repetitions !!                                               8
                                                                       6    Sound repetitions
~   Monosyllabic word repetitions. Two or                                                               i
    less repetitions per instance, even                                     .Prolongations
~   stress, no tension                                                                                  i
                                i
~ Part-word syllable repetitions. Two or
                                                                            Blocks
                                                                                                        i
8 less repetitions per instance, even                                        Increased tension noted, e.g.,                tremo~
6   stress, no tension.                                                     .of lips or jaw or vocal tension
                                                                                                                           ......
                                                                                                                                    .

                                                                                                                More Unusual
  ~ypical disflueru:ies in preschool children's speech listed in the order of expected frequency (heSitations the most
frequent~ These disfluencies are relatively relaxed, as, for example, noted by repetitions being even                 in rhythm and
stress; howeve.; if any are noticeably tense, then they are considered atypical.
   (2) Atypical disfluencies that are very infrequent in the speech of children. More characteristic of what listeners
perceive as stuttering. If in a speech sample of 200 syllables or more, there is more than 2% atypical disfluency
(stuttering), this should be a basis for concern, especially if airflow or phonation is disrupted between repetitions
(monosyllable word or part-word syllable) or if a schwa sounding vowel is substituted in the repetilion of a syllable
(for example, muhmuhmuhmana). Blocks and other signs of increased tension and fragmentation of the flow of
speech should be the basis for immediate attention.
    (3) Crossover beillwiors on the continuum, such qualitative features as the number of repetitions per instance, the
stre~s pattern involved, and the presence of tension distinguish typical and atypical disfluendes.
   Total Disflucncy. More than 10% lotal disfluency (nonrepelitious and repetitious) should signal a-L~ason for concern.
These children are very disfluenL Research indicates that highly dislluent children are also likely to show a higher
frequency of atypical dis fluency which is more likely to be noticed by a listener.                                               ...
   Summary Slalemenl: Although most typical dislluendes are characterized by the fragmentation of a sentence or a
phrase unit, most children show some part-word syllable repetition. Crossover behaviors include mare fragmentatiOl)
of the word, and finally, atypical disfluendes .ilcude. more ff'!8!f!enf;ati!l~,!>f t~~ syllal,>lc (the core l,I.nil.of speech) ~ftd
increased tension. Experience indicates thal increased tension is the pri.ncjpal factor leading to more senousdisruplion
of speech.




                                                                                            "
Communication Attitude Test
                                  for           .­
            Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who'Stutter
                    Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten



Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date of Birth: _ _ _ _ _ __ 

Gender: _____ Age: ____ 

Date: ____________ 



Please circle the response given by the child

 1. Do words sometimes get stuck in your mouth?                                      Yes   No
 2. Do you think that you talk right?                                                Yes   No
 3. Do mom and dad like how you talk?                                                Yes   No
 4. Do you think that people need to help you talk?                                  Yes   No
 5. Is talking hard for you?                                                         Yes   No
 6. Do your words come out easily?                                                   Yes   No
 7. Do you talk well with everybody?                                                 Yes   No
 8. Do you think that talking is difficult?                                          Yes   No
 9. Do you like to talk?                                                             Yes   No
10. Do people like how you talk?                                                     Yes   No
11. Are words hard for you to say?                                                   Yes   No
12. Is it hard for you to say your name?                                             Yes   No




                    Copyright © 2007 by Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten 

                                         All rights reserved.
ftJ4 CAT© 

                    Communication Attitude Test for 

            Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who--5tutter 

                    Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten

               Clinician's Instructions to the Child

Prior to giving the KiddyCAT to a child, please familiarize yourself with the
instructions below and the suggestions found in the Test Administration
and Scoring section of the manual. Then, follow the instructions ful!Y in
order to explain to the child being evaluated that you will be asking some
questions about what he or she thinks about his or her talking. The
instructions to the child are in bold tYPe.

Let me explain what we are going to do:
I will ask what ~u think about you!: talking. If what I say about how
you talk is true, (clinician nods. head), you say ... (prompt the child
while you nod your head yes) YES. If what I say is not true, you say ...
(prompt the child while you continue to,shake youIl1ead no) NO ..

Let's try it out:
Do you talk too fast? Yes or No?
Give the child the time to a n s w e r ' _                                    J



If the child says "yes" you say: "Yes, you think that you talk too fast."
If the child says "no" you say: "No, you don't think that you talk too
fast."
In either event, repeat the child's answer in a neutral manner rather than 

in a questioning way so as to confirm his or her answer. 


Let me ask you another question about how you talk. 

Do you talk aswellQs your friends do? Yes or No? 

If the child says "yes," you should say: "Yes, you think you talk as well 

as your friends do." 

If the child says "no," you say: "No, you don't think that you talk as 

well as your friends do."                                           .


Good. You know what to do. I will now ask you a few more questions 

about ho~ you talk. Remember to say "Yes" if what I say about yOU! 

tal!<ing is true. Say "No" if it is not true. 


             Copyright © 2007 by Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten 

                                  All rights reserved. 


                                          17
,   .





             Age 3 to Grade 3


 Stuttering
  ·1 ntervention
Program
           Author: 

    Rebekah Pindzola, Ph.D. 

       Auburn University
Form A

      PROTOCOL FOR DIFFERENTIATING THE 

            INCIPIENT STUTTERER 

                                                                                                         .. 

Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dql~of Birth _ _ _ _ _-,-_ __
Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __                                                               Sex _ _ _ __

                                                                                            Date of
                                                                                            Clinician _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __




 I. AUDITORY BEHAVIORS

   • TYPE OF DISFLUENCY (mark the most typical)

                        Interjections -        Hesitations/Gaps-   Repetitions-   Prolongations- Coexisting Struggle


                    1     Probably
                          Normal




   • SIZE OF SPEECH UNIT AFFECTED (mark the typical level at which disfluencies occur)

                      Sentence/phrase-                     Word                            Syliable-/Sound


                    1     Probably
                          Normal




   • 	 FREQUENCY OF DISFLUENCIES (compute from speech sample and mark values on continuum)
                                                                       2%                     5%

     • Frequency of Repetitions           ~------~------~-----~
                                                1
    Probably 

                                                      Normal

                                                                       1%


     • Frequency of Prolongations         ~-------r-----------~
                                                1
    Probably 

                                                      Normal

                                                              2%                  5% .             10%

                                          ~----+----+----+----~
     • Frequency of Disfluencies, in General                 ,

                                               1    No mal
                                                      r
                                                                   1   Probably
                                                                       Normal
• DURATION OF DISFLUENCIES

  • 	 Typical Number of Reiterations of the Repetition = _ _ _ _ _ __
                             Less than 2                2 to 5                     More than 5


                         1     Probably
                               Normal




  • Average Duration of Prolongations   =   _ _ _ _ _ __ 



                                 less tha n 1 sec.                   One or more seconds 



                                  1         Probably
                                            Normal




• AUDIBLE EFFORT (mark those that apply) 


                              lack of the following:               Presence of the following: 



                                  1         Probably
                                            Normal

                                                                 ha rd glottal attacks

                                                                 disrupted airflow

                                                                 vocal tension

                                                                 pitch rise

                                                                 others:



• RHYTHM/TEMPO/SPEED OF DISFLUENCIES

                            Slow/normal; evenly paced                Fast, perhaps irregular


                         1     Probably
                               Normal




• INTRUSION OF SCHWA VOWEL DURING REPErITlONS

                                Schwa not heard                        Presence of Schwa


                         1     Probably
                               Normal




• AUDIBLE LEARNED BEHAVIORS (mark those that apply) 


                              lack of the following:                Presence of the following: 



                         1     Probably
                               Normal

                                                                 word/phrase substitutions

                                                                 circumlocutions

                                                                 avoidance tactics (starters, postponers, and the like)
II. VISUAL EVIDENCE (list behaviors observed)
                                                     lack of the following:    Presence of the following:
   • FACIAL GRIMACES ARTICULATORY POSTURING:

                                                       1      Probably
                                                              Normal


                                                                               •
                                                     lack of the follo:'ing:   Presence of the following:
   • HEAD MOVEMENTS:

                                                       1      Probably
                                                              Normal




                                                     Lack of the following:    Presence of the following:
   • BODY INVOLVEMENT:

                                                       1      Probably
                                                              Normal




III. 	HISTORICAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL INDICATORS (comment on the following based on client and/or
      parent interviews, observations, and supplemental tests or questionnaires, if any.)


   • AWARENESS AND CONCERN (of child; of parents):




   • LENGTH OF TIME FLUENCY PROBLEM HAS EXISTED:




   • CONSISTENT VERSUS EPISODIC NATURE OF PROBLEM:




   • REACTION TO STRESS:,




   • PHONEME/WORD/SITUATION FEARS AND AVOIDANCES:
CHECKINy IN wi:Iiv Parel1i:s - - - - - - - - - - ­
This form is designed to gather information about your perceptions ofyour child's stuttering (and past therapy
if applicable).It should be completed separately by each parent.

Child's Name __~_~_~ __~____                                    Age                  Grade
Person Completing Form                                                            Date
Relationship to child                    -----~~--~---------~-----~-~---




I have heard that stuttering is caused by (List as many as are applicable.)


I think that stuttering is caused by _____________~__~_~________~

                                        ~--~-~----




Some questions I have about stuttering are                              ---~---~-~-~----




--~----------~-------------------




My child shows awareness of his/her speech difficulties.                  Yes        No 

If yes, please describe what your child has said or done to make you think he/ she is aware? 


                                       ------------------~---~-~~~-~~-----




My child stutters most when (List situations or factors that seem to negatively affect your
child's speech.)


---       -~~--~-~---~




When my child stutters, other people react by




I feel                 ~   ____ w"tten I watch my child struggling with speech, and I want _ _ __




When my child stutters, I try to help by __~ _ _ _ _ __

                                       ~~-~~-~------~~~--~-~~--~----




I think the goal of stuttering therapy should be



Appendix 3C                                            92                    Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc.
The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
CHECKINg IN wit;/v Pareni:s; continued
    My child's teachers have knowledge about stuttering.          Yes         No        I don't know
    My child's teachers have tried to help by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ __

      ------------------------~--------------------~~,------.----------


    The most important thing for someone to know about my child is ___-"---______
J

    I think my child is ready to be in speech therapy.            Yes         No
    If no, please explain. ______________________~ .~______________________________
    My child's level of motivation for working on his/her speech right now is
             High         Medium           Low   I'm not sure   because


    I think I can best help my child by


    My wish for my child in five years is


    If I could do anything about this problem it would be


    Please answer the following questions if your child has received therapy in the past.

    The two most important things I learned from my child's other speech therapists were




    In my child's past therapy, he/she worked on


    The most helpful aspect of my child's past therapy seemed to be


    The least helpful aspect of my child's past therapy seemed to be


    I am satisfied with the level of effort my child has put into speech therapy.         Yes        No
    I am satisfied with the level of involvement my child has had in past therapy.        Yes        No
    because

    Appendix 3C, continued                             93                 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc.
    The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
CHECKINg IN wiHv Teackers
Some students stutter or hesitate when they speak. This may interfere with communication both in and out of the
classroom. This type of speech problem warrants further evaluation. Please help me gain a better overall view of this
student's speech skills by completing the following information and returning to me by _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
Thank you!
Speech·Language Pathologist _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __                                  PhonefRo~m
                                                                                                                  /

   Student ______________                   Birth date                            Age                     Grade _ _ __
   School ______________                    Teacher ___________                   Section _ __            Date
   Follow-up is important, so 1 would like to observe this child in several different situations. Please list when this,
   student:
             Goes to lunch                                      Shares in the classroom
             Attends gym class ___________                      Interacts with peers
   Please let me know the best way to contact you:                          Days/Times
              E-mail                                                        Phone

General Information
  1. 	 Compared t~ his/her peers, this ::;tudent: (Check all that apply.)
                  doesn't mind talking in class
                  tries to avoid speaking in class (does not speak if called upon; asks few questions)
                 speaks with little or no outward signs of frustration or embarrassment
                  sometimes uses gestures to avoid speaking
                  is difficult to understand in class
                  demonstrates frustration when speaking (Please describe.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
                  exhibits academic performance at an avexage or above-average level
  2. This student is disfluent or stutters when he/she: (Check all that apply.)
                 begins the first word of a sentence                         speaks to the class
                 speaks during an entire sentence                 ___        gets upset
                 uses little words                                           shares ideas or tells a story
                 uses mafu words                                             answers questions
                 talks with peers                                            carries on a conversation
                 talks to adults                                             reads aloud
                 other __________________________________________
  3. 	 Check any of the following behaviors you have noticed in this child's speech:
                   revisions (starting and stopping and starting over again)
                   frequent interjections (um, like, you know)
                   word repetitions (we-we-we)
                   phrase repetitions (and then, and then)
                   part-word repetitions (ta-ta-take)
                  ,prolongations (nnnnobody)
                   blocks (vocal tension/no speech comes out)
                   unusual face or body movements (visible tension, head nods, eye movements)
                   abnormal breathing patterns
                   other"".. ~_________.. . ______________________.. ______________


Appendix 31 	                                                 102                        Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc.
The SourceJor Stuttering: Ages 7-18
CHECKIN(j IN wi:tlv Teachers, continued
In the Classroom
   1. 	 I do/do not (circle one) have concerns about this child's speoch because
                                                                                                        .
  2. 	 I observe the most disfluency when                                                   ".~-   ..
  3. 	 When this child has difficulty speaking, he/she reacts by



  4. When this child has difficulty speaking, J respond by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __



Perceptions About Stuttering
  1. 	 I have had prior experience with a child who stutters.       Yes        No
  2. 	 I feel that stuttering is caused by ____________________________
  3. Some questions I have about stuttering are __________________________



  4. Some questions I have about how to help this child communicate effectively in the classroom
       include _____________________________________________



  5. 	 I think the goal of stuttering therapy should be

  6. 	 The amount 6f knowledge I currently have regarding the disorder of stuttering is:
                   nothing 	 ~If-----------------,.... a lot
                              ..
                       1          2         3       456                                7
  7. My confidence level regardmg dealing with stuttering in the classroom would be:
               not confident      ..
                                  ~    If-------------_...)Ioo                 very confident
                       1          2         345                           6            7
  8. 	 My confidence level in identifying stuttering in children who stutter is:
               not confident          If-------------_...)Ioo
                                  ......                                       very confident
                      1           2         345                           6            7
  9. My confidence level in identifying avoidance behaviors in children who stutter is:
               not confident          If-------------_...)Ioo
                                  ......                                       very confident
                       1          2         345                           6            7
 10. My comfort level ~hen communicating with this child is:
                                 If--------------J)Ioo....
              UncQmfortable 	 ......                                          very comfortable
                       1          2         3       456                                7



Appendix 31, continued                                    103                       Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc.
The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
CHECKIN(j IN W~ T~s' continued
Observations about this child
With Peers
 1. How does this student relate with other students the same age? ~________....._ _ _ _ __



   2. Is this student teased or mimicked because of his/her speech?          Yes       No
       If yes, please describe. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~___~_____________

   3. When this child has difficulty speaking, the other children react by



   4. Following a comment or teasing by a peer, how does this child react? _ _~ _ __



In General

   1. 	 Have other students or this students' parent(s) ever mentioryed his/her fluertcy problems?         Yes    No
       If yes, what was discussed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __



   2. Has this student ever talked to you about his/her speech problem?            Yes      No 

       If yes, what was discussed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 




   3. What other information might be helpful in looking at this student's fluenciskills? _ _ _ _ _ _ __




  4. Do you have any other c6'ncerns regarding this child's speech and language, academic, or social skills?




Appendix 31, continued 	                               104                         Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc.
The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
1"".11 lilliE TEST 





Name:                                         Test Date: 

Date of Birth:                                Grade: 

Age:                                          Examiner: 

Gender:                                       Referred by: 





© Copyright 1985 - Revised 2003 by Gene J. Brutten
All rights reserved                          '
Additional copies of this form may be purchased from BAB Associates
832 Bentley Green Circle, Winter Springs, FL 34708
gbrutten@mail.ucf.edu
TEST INSTRUCTIONS * 




       Read each sentence carefully so that you can mark if it is
true or faIse for you. The sentences are about your-.talking. If
you think that the sentence about your talking is tru~, then
circle "true". H you think that the sentence about your talking
is not true, then circle "false". There are no good or bad
answers, only answers that are true or false about your talking.
Remember, circle "true" if you think that the sentence about
your talking is true and "false" if you think that the sentence is
false.
       Don't forget to answer all thirty-five sentences with "true"
or "false".
       Do you understand what you are being asked to do? Do
you have any questions? You can ask for help if you do not
know the meaning of a word or a sentence.


Example:

I don't speak loud enough................. ... True..........•False 


I speak too much ............................... True...........False 





* The child should be asked to follow along silently as the instructions are read aloud
by the clinician. The clinician should emphasize the words that are underlined. Hthe
child needs help understanding a word or a test item, it should be given in a way that
does not suggest the appropriateness of a true or false answer.
It is suggested that the clinician reads the CAT statements aloud to the children in
first and second grade as they follow along. The checklist should not be administered
by the child's parents or completed by them. The view of parents as to their child's
communicative beliefs do not correlate significantly with those of their child.
lell 

1 . I don't talk right ............................................ True......... False 


2. I don't mind asking the teacher a question
   in class......................................................... True......... False 


3 . Sometimes words will stick in my mouth when
   I talk........................................................... True.......... False 


4 • People worry about the way I talk•••...•••••••••••.•••• True•••••••..•.False

5 • It is harder for me to give a report in class than
    it is for most of the other kids ..•••..••••...••••.•.•••••.• True•••.•.••••False

6. My classmates don't think I talk funny ••..••••.••••••••True•••.•.••• False

7 • I like the way I talk..........................................True......... False

8 • People sometimes finish my words for me ••••••••••••••True••••••.••False

9 • My parents like the way I talk••.•••••..•••••••••••••.•••• True••••••••..False

10. I find it easy to talk to almost everyone ••••.••••••••.••True••••••••• False

11. I talk well most of the time ••.•••.••••••.•••••...•••••.••• True••.••.•••. False

12. It is hard for me to talk to people .•••••••.••••.••.•••..• True.••.•••.•• False

13. I don't talk like other children •••.•••••..•••••..•••••.• True••••••.•••False

14. I don't worry about the way I talk. ••••••.••••••••••••. True••••••••••False

15. I don't find it easy to talk•..•••••.••••••.•••...••.....••••True•.••••.••False

16. My words come out easily •••••••••••••••••••.•••••..••••• True•••••.••• False
17. My speech is worse when I talk to strangers
    (people I don't know) ......................................True...    f1' • • • • • •   False 


18. Other kids would like to talk like me..•................ True......•••.FaIse 


                                                                            .
19. Kids make fun of the way I talk.........................True..........False


20. Talking is easy for me .....................................Tr:ue-..........False 


21. Telling someone my name is hard for me .............True......... False 


22. Many words are hard for me to say ................... True......... False 


23. I talk well with almost everyone ........................ True......... False 


24. I often have trouble talking .............................. True......... False 


25. I would rather talk than write........................... True......... False 


26. I like to talk..................................................True......... False 


27. I am not a good talker ..................................... True......... False 


28. I wish I could talk like other children..................True........•False 


29. My words do not com'e out easily....................... True..........False 


30. My friends' speech is better than mine................True......... False 


31. Myspeech is good when I talk on the phone ......... True......... False 


32. My speech is better when I talk with a friend ........True......... False 


33. Many people don't like the way I talk................. True........• False 


34. I let others talk for me ..................................... True......... False 


35. Reading aloud in class is easy for me .................. True........• False
Communication Attitude Test Score Key:

    Student scores 1 point if answers match those below:
       1. T                13. T         25. F
       2. F                14.F          26.F
                                                                            •
       3. T                15. T         27. T
       4. T                16. F         28. T
       5. T                17. T         29. T
       6. F                18.F          30. T
       7. F                19. T         31. F
       8. T                20. F         32. T
       9. F                21. T         33. T
       10.F                22.T          34.T
       11.F                23.F          35.F
       12.T                24.T


                  Mean            Stand. Dev.    +lSD         +1.5SD         +2SD
    Children      7.05            4.69           11.74        14.09         16.43
    who do not                                                (91% score    (98% score
    stutter                                                   below this)   below this)
    Children       17.44*         6.81           24.25        27.66         31.06
i   who stutter

    * Mean exceeds CAT score of more than 98% of children who do not stutter.
Child "3.5r~-
                                CALMS Rating Scale for School-Age Children Who Stutter
This rating scale is designed to evaluate cognitive, affective, linguistic, motor, and social (CALMS) components that are related to stuttering. It is
recommended that clinicians base their clinical judgment on deriving a score for each item using scores and/or data from scales, tests, as well as
documented evidence about the child being evaluated. Take the scores for each rated item and divide by the total number of items scored within each
component to obtain an average score for each component. The average component scores become the data points for plotting the CALMS profile.


COGNITIVE: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment,
Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 =Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern,
Very Poor Ability)
               ,
Recommended items to be rated:

1. Child's ability to identify moments stuttering during reading 	
                                                                            ~ gO'l'       (J.U                                   @         3       4        5
       Measure: % of moments identified from a reading passage 

         or material that is easy for the child to read 


2. 	 Child's ability 10 identify moments ofstuttering in spontaneous speech        (,UlI.lob~~~d ~ .                      I       2      [)       4        5
         Measure: % of moments identified in a short spontaneous speech sample              W.      ~           /
                                                                          0(( -	 Vtp/S                    &r1Cj S
3. Child's knowledge and understanding ofstuttering .
         Measure: Rate child's ability to describe stuttering behaviors, knowledge of 	                                            2     G)        4        5
         his/her stuttering behaviors, and general facts about stuttering (TIF test)

4. 	 Child's knowledge ofpreviously learnedfluency enhancing and/or stuttering modification techniques
         Measure: Assess how well the child can describe, explain, and demonstrate
                                                                                                                           1
                                                                                                                                  ®~               4        5

         any technique he/she has been taught to use in previous therapy.   It. fo J~~
                                                                                ab
                                                                   I&.>    dhlt    .f1)   d~C;r)b e      	
                                                                                                                                    i



                                                                                                                                    .
                                                                                                                                    
Other subjective measures might include child's thoughts about being a person who stutters and reactions to
How others view hislher stuttering8

                                                                                                             Average Cognitive Component Score: 2.., <$

a When  evaluating thoughts and perceptions, a rating of "1" refers to positive thoughts/ no concerns about being a person who stutters and positive perceptions of
how others view stuttering. A rating of "5" reflects extremely negative thoughts, reactions or perceptions. Use ratings 2-4 to reflect varying degrees of
positive/negative thoughts and reactions.
AFFECTIVE: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 =MUd Impairment,
Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5:: Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern,
Very Poor Ability)

Recommended items to be rated:

1. Child's attitudes andfeelings about communication
        Measure:
                                                          a

                 Communication Attitudes Test (CAT or CAT-R)...record score 

                                                                                                         1         2        3   o         5

        and compare to norms.
     CA15~: 2---3
                                        CtW~ V
                                               t:>...r< .... If
                                                        ,'I V   ,..
                                                                      A

                                                                      ",
                                                                           7J 

2. Affectivefeatures ofthe child's stutterinl

        • LaIiels child uses for attitudes/feelings about stuttering                                     1         2       @    4             5
        Measure: "Framing My Speech" (C & R workbook) ... this form could 

       be used to 90unt the number and ~es of words used to describe stuttering 

       dftYl ho..pPq ch;td (slA.Ult) wi.f1tt bu~~!~ slJ.)(~~ ~
       • Child's feelings about stuttering " c.-~ "'('-C4n 'III ~ -,t}-,lolo .,.fo ~                     1         2        3   @I            5
        Measure: "What Pops" andlor "What's True For You?" (C & R workbook) b -h-bt:{-K1 ~""? to
       "What Pops" could be used to determine the % of the 20 items that
       relate to negative comments about stuttering. "What's True ... could rate this item
       based on child's scores on all questions. Hands Oown! ...allows child to list postive                                        "
       and negative attributes about himlhersel~l.it rIA ~ bVUa.. •           ~, :::r--
                                                                                    hAil.    "'~     'Pur?
                                                                                                 Ie.. ~ h... U-                 ~ ._~ --'
         7/"     .sW~ ~ '5~.                                          :.:J'~
                                                                           u 1:
        • Child's feelings and reactions to teasinglbullying about stuttering 

                                                                                    atll!t-   (.,t1'-C , ..... ~   :t:-   net- 'Stv~ ---a'S.
                                                                                                                                        Ow"
                                                                                                                                                  I,



         Measure: Level of concern expressed by child                                            1       2         3       D    5

                as ei-(Jft<nttL      tJ    vhUtL~ ~~
                                                                                                 Average Affective Com~onent Score:-=S~._<i __
                                                                                                                                          _

• Use of the Communication Attitudes Test (CAT or CAT-R) andl or A-19 scales requires comparison of child's score with normative data supplied with each
measure. We recommend that if the child who stutters (CWS) has a score that equals the mean for CWS. then that score would be raed at least a "3" on the
CALMS rating scale. [For CWS the CAT Mean=l 7.3 , SO=7.7 and A-19 Mean=9.07, SO=2.44]. Scores between 1 & 2 standard deviations from the mean score
for CWS would be rated a "4" and a score of more than 2 standard deviations would be rated a "5."                                                       ­

b Several paper-pencil tasks suggested by Kristin Chmela and Nina Reardon (2001) The School-Age Child Who Stutters: Working Effectively With Attitudes and
Emotions ...A Workbook (pp. 22-86) can be used in this section. This workbook is published by the Stuttering Foundation (1-800-992-9392). Child Client Forms in
Crowe's Protocols (T. Crowe, A, Oi Lollo, & B. Crowe (2000) The Psychological Corporation) /llso can be used.
LINGUISTIC: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment,
Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern,
Very Poor Ability)



Recommended items to be rated:

1. 	Overall relationship between stuttering and the length and complexity ofutterances:                      1       2       (J)      4        5
        Measure: Assess level of fluency/stuttering during simple oral reading, naming,
        sentencl! repetition, picture description, and story retelling a

2. 	 Overall language ability
        Measure: Informal or formal assessment)b                                                             1      @         3       4        5

3. 	 Articulation and/or Phonological ability                                                                0)      2        3       4        5
          Measure: 	 Informal or formiassessment)C t~           l d. 

            fv'l.i"'~lb llfh'{--I hb4h-{1'Qf.       ~ 'l'"t<;e W • 


cew::- .. If
    fbltowt~ 1)I~~S·· ~l1       31~ ~'k.                                           

     wo-rl s.~l..-- ~ 211 ~ 3f'( ".tit                                                                       Average Linguistic Component Score: 2 ­

     ! II JA~I        ~fUd~ clA~ H':) db~
    W"t ~ ~c~ ~ i"w~~
      r.t-fo-rMAAl~} ~ ~L ~{-.
                                                                  ••
                                                                                        a.%"   •

                                                                                                         

a See recommended list of speech tasks for measuring the impact of linguistic complexity on frequency of stuttering. Go to www.unl.edultluency/index.shtml for 

list of simple to complex, contextualized and decontextualized speech tasks. The rating for this item will depend on the level of linguistic length and complexity 

where fluency disruptions occur consistently (e.g., a rating of "I " would indicate that stuttering only occurs at the highest level of linguistic difficulty and a "5" 

would be a rating for stuttering consistently at simple linguistic levels or where the child needs considerable contextual support). 

b Select formal language tests for this section. Rate level of impairment. 

C Select a formal test for articulation/phonological process analysis. Rate level of impairment
MOTOR: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment, Some
Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very
Poor Ability)

Recommend Items to be rated:

1. Characteristics ofthe child's stuttering

         Measure: Document number of units per repetition, duration of typical prolongation, etc.                                @         3       4       5
         and rate level of impairment relative to the severity of stuttering
         .2.. i~IN':,              I~ ~
         Measure: Degree of struggle, effort, tension produced during stuttered moments                                   1       2        C'      4       5
         Slv~'r,,: rlt)i1>~ ~..,) "'~t.~ ~IM-~~J
2. Frequency ofstuttering with various communicative partners             ~4 I ~ ~t ~

       . Measure: Sample with classroom teacher                                                                                    2       3       4       5    "'ItA..
         Measure: Sample with peers                                                                                                2       3       4       5   "y A-
         Measure: Sample with clinician"""""                                                                                       2       (j)     4       5


3. Determination ofstuttering severity using the SSI-3 a                                                                           2       3      d)       5

         Measure: Stuttering frequency in oral reading and spontaneous speech, 

         The duration of the three longest stuttered moments, and the presence of physical 

         Concomitants (secondary coping behaviors) . 

                                                                                                                                       ,
       SS:C-3 S~'! 21                             rvwlitfl11.L t&          ~                              Average Motor Componknt Score:--Ioo3~__

• The SSI-3 (Stuttering Severity Instrnment-3, Riley 1994- PRO-ED) should be used to record a rating that reflects the total SSI-3 score: (1= 0-5) (2= 6-10) (3=11­
20) (4=2@ (5= 28+).
    1
SOCIAL: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3::: Mild Impairment, Some
Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very
Poor Ability)                                                                                     .


Recommended items to be rated:

1. Reported avoidance ofspeaking situations
      Measure: Reports from child, parent, teachers about number
      and severity of avoidance of words, people, and speaking situations                   .             1      2      3    @        5
  ~~~,VE)~ ~                             +& ~. ~ 5~l m ~                              l)(Ub,CNlS
2. Level ofstuttering related to various social speaking situations:
      Measure: Child's ability to express him/herself in a variety of speaking
      situations that occur at school, home, with sports teams, at clubs, etc ..
      For example,      child talks freely in most situations ... 5= child limits
      speaking to specific situations                                                                     1      2      3     ~       5
       ~., Jo ~ ~-f; VllAeSj ~ ~ w'~~
3. Impact ofstuttering on peer relationships
      Measure: Report from child and parent about how much
      the child's stuttering is affecting the friendships or interaction with peers.                      1      2     6)     4       5




                                                                                                    Average Social Component Score:   '3. 7
C.A.L.M.S. Profile



Client:                                 Scores: Cognitive:     2..   I   ~

Age:                                             Affective:    3 ,$
Date of Profile:                                 Linguistic:   -"2-'---__
                                                          '3
                                                 Motor: - - - -

                   ~                             Social:       2.J.


5·    ,--.~."--.-"-"-.--.--   . - -.---------.                  ---------------·_--··---·---------'1


4-H                            ~
                                                                                       nr,

3
           ~,.
                                                                         ·.Ir~
                                                                                                        ~~iy'l W't~ ld~-b~~
                                                                                                        ~ oe5eM.c;"fiz.~
2 .J..l    I .,.              1""/          Q.                       1'"/              I"i~
                                                                                                             it
                                                                                     I.;                Mwt ~ yV«,Ltkie~+Lb<
 1

                                                                      ,",
                                                                                                          .vl(,l~ 9lA"1i~ 0. 

                                                                     H;
                                                                     I              j:,.:;:(
                                                                                     ;~>l
                                                                                     ":'' ' ':<,           ~   fJ: - 5lV   .
0'..1
                                                                                                    i




          Cognitive       Affective      Linguistic              M~tor               Social
Quantification of 1-5 Value for the CALMS Rating Scale

1 = Normal: Function is considered within normal limits in terms of behavior, performance, ability, attitude or perception. There are no concerns
about function or performance. Test data are well within normal limits.


2 = Borderline: Slight variation or some concern about behaviors, performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions. Test data show standard score of
.5 to 1.4 SD below normal level


3 = Mild Imp~rment: Clinical judgment suggests a "mild" degree of difficulty or deficit in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors,
performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions are just below expected levels of function. Mild concern about function or performance. Test data
show standard score of 1.5 - 1.9 SD below normal level.


4 =Moderate Impairment: Clinical judgment suggests a "moderate" degree of difficulty in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors,
performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions are consistently below expected levels of function. Test data show standard score of 2.0 - 2.4 SD
below normal level. Significant concern about function and performance.


5 = Severe Impairment: Clinical judgment suggests a "severe" degree of difficulty in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors, performances,
abilities, attitudes or perceptions are substantially below expected levels of function. Exceptional concern about function or performance. Test data
show standard score of> 2.5 SD below normal level.
What Do I know About Stuttering?


1. More boys than girls stutter.                                                Y.es   No

                                                                      ....~--
2. 	 When one person in a family stutters, there are usually others             Yes    No
     in the family that also stutter.


3. 	 About 1,000 people in the US stutter.                                      Yes    No


4. People who stutter are usually nervous people.                               Yes    No


5. 	 Experts know what causes stuttering.                                       Yes    No


6. Most people who stutter start stuttering around age 10.                      Yes    No


7. 	 Most people who stutter are disfluent on about every word                  Yes    No


8. 	 It's very common for people who stutter to avoid speaking in               Yes    No
     in certain situations or with certain people.


9. 	 Stuttering is found all over the world in people
     who speak different languages.                                             Yes    No


10. 	 People who stutter don't stutter when they sing.                          Yes    No
¥ tVht f-~o:t k:V1oW tbtvt-~ik,ft~~" 

   Answer key and rating for CALMS Ratfng Scale 



   l. Yes
   2. Yes
   3. No                                                        ....
                                                                       .- ..~-   ..
   4. No
   5. No
   6. No
   7. No
   8. Yes
   9. Yes
   10. Yes


Number ofCorrect Answers                ~ALMS       Rating   Scal~~alue

      9-10

      7-8                                                2

      5-6                                                3

      3-4                                                4

      2 odes-B.                                          5
I

         A Continuum ofLinguistically Simple to Complex Speech Tasks.

     (The CALMS Rating is the number to the right ofthe category if a high frequency of
                stuttering appears at that level oflinguistic complexity) .


A. Automatic Speech: (5)

   1. Count from 1-10
   2. Say the days of the week.

B. 	Short Phrases: (5)
       (Ask the child to repeat the phrase from a model or read the phrase)

   1. "It's a nice dai"
   2. "I see a dog and a cat."
   3. "Sam bought Bobby a puppy for his birthday."


C. 	Picture Description: (4) Show the child a picture that depicts some type of action and say to
       the child, "Tell what's going on in this picture."


D. 	Picture Sequence: (4) Show the child a series of pictures from a script. Tell the story and
       then with the pictures in front of the child, have the child retell the story he/she just
       heard.

E. 	Ego-Centered Topic Discussion: (3) Have the child talk about hislher most recent birthday
       party or a vacation/event he/she experienced personally.


F. 	De-Centered Topic Discussion: (2) Ask the child to describe in detail the content of a
       familiar movie or a television show they have seen or a game (e.g., board or video
       games) he/she has played recently.

G. 	Relational Topic Discussion: (1) In this task, ask the child to describe how one plays a
        particular sport or activity that the child his familiar with. The clinician could say for
        example, "Let's say that I have never seen a (football, basketball, basebali, soccer) game.
        Explain to me the object of the game, things about the game, how teams score points and
      . how a team wins or loses."

B. 	Complex Oral Discourse: (1) Pick a topic the child would not have very much knowledge
      of but has experienced in the real world (e.g., different types of clouds or how are clouds
      formed- www.wildwildweatheLcom). Read a short explanation of the phenomenon and
      then have the child retell the information they just heard.
Teasing Inventory 



Terribly                                                                      not at all

Who did the teasing? 

Describe the teasing. 


How did you feel? (for example angry, sad, scared, frustrated ... ) 

What did you do? 


How did you feel then? 

Did you need adult help? Ll No LlYes Did you receive help from an adult? Ll No LlYes 





Terribly                                                                      not at all

Who was being teased? 

Who did the teasing? 

Describe the teasing. 


How did you feel? 

What did you do? 


How did you feel then? 

Was adult help needed? D NoD Yes          Was help from an adult received? D NoD Yes 





                                                                              not at all

Who did you tease? 

Describe the teasing. 


Why do you think you teased the other person? 


How did you feel? 


Did you need adult help? D No DYes Did you receive help from an adult? D No DYes
Is there any problem with the person you were teasing now? 0 No DYes
Is there anything you need to do to improve things?



©2004 Constance Dugan
Transcript of FLUENCY SAMPLE:                                                                # syllables: . # disfl #SS 


(parent-child interaction) 


                 WR2 

Yup. /I O.K. o.k. _I I'm hurry.
                   I                                                                               8-          1      1


                              UP [WR + PR 2] 

I'm hurry. I'm coming. /11'11 - /I til I'll be I'll be I'll be                                     9           3      2


              I

here soon. /I Uh //I'm the fire engine. /I Yup. O.K. /11'11 put the                                13         (1 Int) 0 


                                             PR 

fire /I No still on. /I Daddy/ll know what I know what. You got                                    11           3    0


 PR3                       [SR +WR]                 PWR2 

you got you got you got a Iki car car like this. /I U Ii like this                                  6           4     2


   PR                 [UP +R] WR 4                          [SR 2 +WR] 

like this. /I No. /I Ylal - if if if if if you drive the car a a and and you                        9           5     2


               WR2       R [PR+PWR]3 

go around and and and then- and the Ii and the Ii and the Ii and the 7                                          5     4



light says stop and you go. /I Right here.                                                         8            0     0




Total number of syllables: 71 


Total number of disfluent syllables: _--:::2:...!.1__ = _--::3:...::0'---_o.:...:::.Yo

Total number of stuttered syllables: _---=-1--=-1__              =__1:..::::5:...--_o..: .: :.yo
(Total number of interjections: _-'-__ =                        nla          %)
PREDICTIVE CLUTTERING INVENTORY (PCI) 

                                                         David A. Daly (2006) 


                 INSTRUCTIONS: Please respond to each description section below. Circle the number 

                             you believe is most descriptive of this person's cluttering. 



                                 Descriptive Statement
                                                                                  /;/;,/;il!J0%
                                                                                        $
                                                                                       :#
                                                                                                     ~
                                                                                                    4~
                                                                                                         ~
                                                                                                         "{"
                                                                                                               ~


                                                                                                               ","
                                                                                                                   ~
                                                                                                                      ~
                                                                                                                     f:!
                                                                                                                               II

                                                                                                                                     ..t i
                                                                                                                                               ",.,.<1;­
                                                                                                                                              ;s
                                                                                                                                             .:;
                                                                                                                                                      Cb


                                                                                                                                                           ~
                                                                                                                                                       ~I!!'
                                                                                                                                                               ~


                                                                                                                                                                   ;!'
                                                                                                                                                                       ~I;




                                                                                          ~
                                      PRAGMATICS
 1. lack of effective self-monitoring skills                                       6            5              4
2. lack of awareness of own communication errors or problems                       6            5              4                                                   0
3. Compulsive talker; verbose; tangential; word-finding problems                   6            5              4                                                   0
4. Poor planning skills; mis-judges effective use of time                                   i 2                4           3        2                              0
S. Poor social communication skills; inappropriate tum-taking; interruptions       6        12                 4           3        2                  1           0
6   Does not recognize or respond to listener's visual or verbal feedback          6            S              4           3        2                  1           0
7. Does not repair or correct communication breakdowns                             6            5              4           3        2                  1           0
8. little or no excessive effort Qbserved during disfluencies                      6            5              4           3        2                  1           0
9. Uttle or no anxiety regarding speaking; unconcerned
10. Speech better under pressure (improves short-term with concentration)
                                                                                   6            5              4
                                                                                                                           t        2                  1

                                                                                                                                                               ±J
                                                                                                                               W
                                                                                   6            5              4                                   -
                                                                                                                                                       1
                                    SPEECH-MOTOR                                            I
11. Articulation errors                                                                         5              4           3                           1           0
12. Irregular speech rate; speaks in spurts or bursts                              6            5              4           3        2                  1           0
13. Telescopes or condenses words                                                  6            5              4           3        2                  1           0
14. Rapid rate (tachylalia)                                                        6            5              4           3        2.                 1           0
15. Speech rate progreSSively increases (festinating)                              6            S              4           3        2.             1               0
16. Variable prosOdy; irregular melody or stress pattern                           6            S              4           3        2              1               0
17. Initial,loud voice trailing off to unintelligible murmur                       6            5              4                                   1               0
18. ~ck of pauses between words and phrases                                                     5              4                                   1               0
19. Repetition of multi-syllablic words and phrases                                             5              4                                   1               0
2.0. Co-existence of excessive disfluencies and stuttering                         6                           4           3        2              1               0
                                 LANGUAGE-COGNmON                                           1­
2.1. language is disorganized; confused wording; word-finding problems
22.. Poor language formulation; poor story-telling; sequencing problems
2.3. Disorganized language increases as topic becomes more complex
                                                                                   6
                                                                                   6
                                                                                   6
                                                                                             s
                                                                                                S
                                                                                                S
                                                                                                               4
                                                                                                               4
                                                                                                               4
                                                                                                                           3
                                                                                                                           3
                                                                                                                           3
                                                                                                                                    ±=
                                                                                                                                    2.
                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                                                                   0
2.4. Many revisions; interjections; filler words                                   6            5              4           3        2              1               0
2S.   Seems to verbalize before adequate thought formulation                       6            S              4           3        2.             1               0
26.   Inappropriate topic introduction, maintenance, or termination                6            S              4           3        2              1               0
27.   Improper linguistic structure; poor grammar, syntax errors                                                                                                             I
                                                                                                                                    ~=t=i
                                                                                   6            S              4           3                                       0
28.   Distractible; poor concentration; attention span problems                    6            5              4           3                                       0


                                                                                                                           ~
                  MOTOR COORDINATION-WRITING PROBLEMS                                                                                                                        I
~otor control for writing (messy)
           9 includes omission or transposition of letters, syllables, or words
                                                                                  w=
                                                                                   6
                                                                                                5
                                                                                                S
                                                                                                               4
                                                                                                               4           3
                                                                                                                                    2
                                                                                                                                    2
                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                                                                   0
31. 'Oral diadochokinetic coordination below expected normed levels                6            S              4           3        2              1               0
32. Respiratory dysrhythmia; jerky breathing pattern                               6            S              4           3        2              1               0
33. Oumsy and uncoordinated; motor activities accelerated or impulsive             6            S              4           3        2              1               0

      TOTAL SCORE:_ _

      COMMENTS:




      C.   David A. Daly. 2006
Table 9-1.    Weiss' (1967) Comparativ~ Table Showing Various Dj£ferences
                               between Stuttering and Cluttering*
                                             Stuttering                    Cluttering
Interpretation                     Functional; secondary          Hereditary; primary central
Underlying disturbance             Neurovegetative dysfunc-        language imbalance (lack
                                     tional                        of m'ilturation of CNS
                                                                   mostly absent)
Awareness of disorder              Strong                         Mostly absent
Speech characteristics
  Specific symptoms                Clonic and tonic inhibition    Hestitation, repetition
                                                                    (without inhibition) 

  Rate of delivery                 Rather slow                    Mostly quick 

  Sentence structure               Mostly correct                 Often incorrect 

  Fear of specific sounds          Present                        Absent 

  Heightened attention             Worse                          Better 

  Relaxed attention                Better                         Worse 

  Foreign language                 Worse                          Better 

  Gesturing                        Stiff, inhibited               Broad, uninhibited 

Reading aloud
  Well-known text                  Better                         Worse
  Unknown text                     Worse                          Better
Writing characteristics            Compressed; high-pressure      Loose, disorderly
                                     strokes
School performance                 Good to superior               Underachiever
Psychological attitudes            Embarrassed, inhibited         Carefree, sociable
                                   Painstaking, compulsive        Impatient, impulsive
                                   Grudge-bearer                  Easily forgetting
                                   Penetrating                    Superficial
Experimental responses:
  Alcohol                          Better                         Worse
  Lee effect                       Better                         Worse
  EEG                              Borderline normal              Often deviant
  Chlorpromazine                   Worse                          Better
  Dexfenmetrazine                  Better                         Worse
  Course                           Fluctuating; spontaneous       Persistent
                                     improvements and re­
                                     lapses
  Therapy                          Attention should be di-        Concentration on details
                                     verted from details; psy ­
                                     chotherapy
  PrognosiS                        Depends on emotional ad-       Depends on acquiring con­
                                     justment                      centration
'From Weiss.? Reprinted with permission.
From: St: Louis, Kenneth 0., The Atypical Stutterer, 1986, Academic Press"Inc ..

                                                               NANCY HELM-ESTABROOKS

                                              Table 8.1 

         :!TypicaJ" Characteristics'of Stroke-Induced Stutterer (Usually Sudden in Onset) 


      Dysfluencies may be heard on        Initial phonemes (always)
                                          Medial phonemes (often)
                                          Substantive words (always)
                                          Functor words (often)
                                          Conversation (always)
                                          Repetition, automatized sequences, rote para ­
                                            graphs, singing, and tapped speech (usually)
                                    There is no adaptation effect
     Concomitant findings                 Secondary motor signs (rare)
                                          Aphasia (sometimes)
                                          Bucco/facial apraxia (sometimes)
     Often reduced performance in        "Carrying" a tune
                                         Tapping rhythms
                                         Block designs from model
                                         Stick designs from memory
                                         Sequential hand positions
                                         TIuee-Dimensional drawing




                                            Table 8.2 

      "Typical" Characteristics of Stutterer with Head Trauma (May be Gradual in Onset) 


     Dysfluencies may be heard on        Initial phonemes (always)
                                         Medial phonemes (often)
                                         In 'conversation (always)
                                         Substantive words (often)
                                         Functor words (often)
                                         Repetition, automatized sequences and rote para­
                                           graphs, tapped speech and singing (usually)
                                      Adaptation effect is rare
     Concomitant findings                Seizure disorder (sometimes)
                                         Secondary motor signs (sometimes)
                                         Aphasia (sometimes)
     May have reduced performances       "Carrying" a tune
      in                                 Tapping rhythms
                                         Block designs from model
                                         Sticks from memory
                                         Sequential hand position
                                         Three-dimensional drawing




                       .                   Thbk8~
              "Typical" Characteristics of Stutterer ViOl Extrapyramidal Disease
                                 <Usually Gradual in Onset)

     Dysfluencies may be heard on 	   Initial phonemes (always) 

                                      Medial phonemes (often) 

                                      Substantive words (always) 

                                      Functor words (sometimes) 

                                      In conversation (always) 

                                      In repetition, auiomatized sequences, rote para­ 

                                        graphs, tapped speech, and singing (sometimes)
                                Adaptation effect may be seen
    Concomitant findings
                                        No secondary motor signs, aphasia, bucco/facial
                                          apraxia
    Reduced performance in              "Carrying" a tune
                                        Tapping rhythms
                                        Sequential hand positions

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Sample evaluation school age client
Sample evaluation   school age clientSample evaluation   school age client
Sample evaluation school age clientjsbartecchi
 
Csd 210 articulation disorders - fall 2010
Csd 210   articulation disorders - fall 2010Csd 210   articulation disorders - fall 2010
Csd 210 articulation disorders - fall 2010Jake Probst
 
Stuttering modification therapy
Stuttering modification therapyStuttering modification therapy
Stuttering modification therapyiqraIrshad14
 
Dimensions of fluency final
Dimensions of fluency finalDimensions of fluency final
Dimensions of fluency finalMSSumantra
 
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...Soorya Sunil
 
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartrias
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartriasRehabilitacion de las afasias y disartrias
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartriascpcarlos89
 
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.ppt
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.pptHearing aids and psychoacoustics.ppt
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.pptbethfernandezaud
 
Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Childhood Apraxia of SpeechChildhood Apraxia of Speech
Childhood Apraxia of SpeechKaitlinKnutson
 
Augmentative and alternative communication
Augmentative and alternative communicationAugmentative and alternative communication
Augmentative and alternative communicationAlexander Utlang
 
Voice Therapy
Voice TherapyVoice Therapy
Voice Therapysahughes
 
Speech Mechanism
Speech MechanismSpeech Mechanism
Speech Mechanismflattsph
 
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAV
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAVRehabilitación Auditiva y TAV
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAVManuel Monsalve
 

Tendances (20)

Sample evaluation school age client
Sample evaluation   school age clientSample evaluation   school age client
Sample evaluation school age client
 
MSD ASSESSMENT MASLP
MSD ASSESSMENT MASLPMSD ASSESSMENT MASLP
MSD ASSESSMENT MASLP
 
Csd 210 articulation disorders - fall 2010
Csd 210   articulation disorders - fall 2010Csd 210   articulation disorders - fall 2010
Csd 210 articulation disorders - fall 2010
 
Stuttering
StutteringStuttering
Stuttering
 
Stuttering modification therapy
Stuttering modification therapyStuttering modification therapy
Stuttering modification therapy
 
Dimensions of fluency final
Dimensions of fluency finalDimensions of fluency final
Dimensions of fluency final
 
Fluency Overview
Fluency OverviewFluency Overview
Fluency Overview
 
Assistive Listening Devices
Assistive Listening DevicesAssistive Listening Devices
Assistive Listening Devices
 
Dyslexia ppp
Dyslexia pppDyslexia ppp
Dyslexia ppp
 
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...
1. fluency definition.Dys and dis fluency difference.Definition and introduct...
 
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartrias
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartriasRehabilitacion de las afasias y disartrias
Rehabilitacion de las afasias y disartrias
 
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.ppt
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.pptHearing aids and psychoacoustics.ppt
Hearing aids and psychoacoustics.ppt
 
Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Childhood Apraxia of SpeechChildhood Apraxia of Speech
Childhood Apraxia of Speech
 
Augmentative and alternative communication
Augmentative and alternative communicationAugmentative and alternative communication
Augmentative and alternative communication
 
English phonology
English phonologyEnglish phonology
English phonology
 
Errors of articulation
Errors of articulation Errors of articulation
Errors of articulation
 
Voice Therapy
Voice TherapyVoice Therapy
Voice Therapy
 
Speech Mechanism
Speech MechanismSpeech Mechanism
Speech Mechanism
 
PHONOLOGY
PHONOLOGYPHONOLOGY
PHONOLOGY
 
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAV
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAVRehabilitación Auditiva y TAV
Rehabilitación Auditiva y TAV
 

En vedette

Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecer
Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecerFactoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecer
Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecerGermán Lynch Navarro
 
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular Costarricense
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular CostarricenseCharla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular Costarricense
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular CostarricenseCaro Goodfellow
 
Manual de edmodo aula de tecnología
Manual de edmodo   aula de tecnologíaManual de edmodo   aula de tecnología
Manual de edmodo aula de tecnologíaGuisella Jimenez
 
Procedimiento examen de recuperacion
Procedimiento examen de recuperacionProcedimiento examen de recuperacion
Procedimiento examen de recuperacionAngel Barrios
 
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consulting
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consultingTraining iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consulting
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consultingAbu Yazid
 
Configuracion de rockolas 2014
Configuracion de rockolas 2014Configuracion de rockolas 2014
Configuracion de rockolas 2014Yoni Banda
 
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2HOBO Data Loggers
 
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...Gael Hofemeier
 
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocols for Wi...
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocolsfor Wi...Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocolsfor Wi...
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocols for Wi...Torsten Braun, Universität Bern
 
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ students
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ studentsIntroduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ students
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ studentsLulu Pachuau
 
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016jumamudi74
 
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)Endesa Educa
 

En vedette (20)

Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecer
Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecerFactoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecer
Factoring: Liquidez inmediata para crecer
 
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular Costarricense
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular CostarricenseCharla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular Costarricense
Charla Presentacion Libro GRAFITICA: Grafica Popular Costarricense
 
Seminario di web content - Scheda corso LEN
Seminario di web content - Scheda corso LENSeminario di web content - Scheda corso LEN
Seminario di web content - Scheda corso LEN
 
Manual de edmodo aula de tecnología
Manual de edmodo   aula de tecnologíaManual de edmodo   aula de tecnología
Manual de edmodo aula de tecnología
 
Procedimiento examen de recuperacion
Procedimiento examen de recuperacionProcedimiento examen de recuperacion
Procedimiento examen de recuperacion
 
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consulting
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consultingTraining iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consulting
Training iso dan konsultan iso di selenggarakan oleh bmd street consulting
 
Configuracion de rockolas 2014
Configuracion de rockolas 2014Configuracion de rockolas 2014
Configuracion de rockolas 2014
 
IceSpy Demo
IceSpy DemoIceSpy Demo
IceSpy Demo
 
Satelites
SatelitesSatelites
Satelites
 
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2
Choosing a conductivity salinity logger part 2 of 2
 
Disruptive code
Disruptive codeDisruptive code
Disruptive code
 
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...
Play faster and longer: How Square Enix maximized Android* performance and ba...
 
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocols for Wi...
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocolsfor Wi...Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocolsfor Wi...
Development and Evaluation of Energy-Efficient and Adaptive Protocols for Wi...
 
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ students
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ studentsIntroduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ students
Introduction to design specifications to Summer of Code NZ students
 
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016
Horarios y Recorridos Semana Santa Pedro Abad 2016
 
Libro de judit
Libro de juditLibro de judit
Libro de judit
 
T espe-021852
T espe-021852T espe-021852
T espe-021852
 
Ud Judo
Ud JudoUd Judo
Ud Judo
 
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)
Introduciendo el proyecto Endesa E3 (castellano)
 
Lengua vasca
Lengua vascaLengua vasca
Lengua vasca
 

Similaire à Guide for intensive intervention

Stress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationStress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationJoy Celestial
 
Stress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationStress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationJoy Celestial
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationRichard
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationRichard
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationRichard
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationRichard
 
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3Joseph Wong
 
Developmal Dysfluency issues & its Management
Developmal Dysfluency  issues & its ManagementDevelopmal Dysfluency  issues & its Management
Developmal Dysfluency issues & its ManagementImrana Shakoor
 
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 
23_phonological_processes_children.pdf
23_phonological_processes_children.pdf23_phonological_processes_children.pdf
23_phonological_processes_children.pdfSistemadeEstudiosMed
 
Types of Syllables
Types of SyllablesTypes of Syllables
Types of SyllablesSadiq Khan
 
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIR
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIRDisorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIR
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIRRahul SIR
 
Sounds talk 13 may
Sounds talk 13 maySounds talk 13 may
Sounds talk 13 mayMary Hampton
 

Similaire à Guide for intensive intervention (20)

Conceps about vocabulary and pronunciation
Conceps about vocabulary and pronunciationConceps about vocabulary and pronunciation
Conceps about vocabulary and pronunciation
 
Stress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationStress and Intonation
Stress and Intonation
 
Stress and Intonation
Stress and IntonationStress and Intonation
Stress and Intonation
 
stuttering &amp; nnf
stuttering &amp; nnfstuttering &amp; nnf
stuttering &amp; nnf
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
 
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
UnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciationUnderstandingthebasicsofpronunciation
Understandingthebasicsofpronunciation
 
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3
The Fascinating World of Phonetics Lesson 3
 
Developmal Dysfluency issues & its Management
Developmal Dysfluency  issues & its ManagementDevelopmal Dysfluency  issues & its Management
Developmal Dysfluency issues & its Management
 
Pronunciation stress
Pronunciation stressPronunciation stress
Pronunciation stress
 
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx
1Unit ILesson 6 Grammar and StyleAdjectives and Adverbs.docx
 
23_phonological_processes_children.pdf
23_phonological_processes_children.pdf23_phonological_processes_children.pdf
23_phonological_processes_children.pdf
 
Speech
SpeechSpeech
Speech
 
Types of Syllables
Types of SyllablesTypes of Syllables
Types of Syllables
 
Word and sentence stress
Word and sentence stressWord and sentence stress
Word and sentence stress
 
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIR
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIRDisorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIR
Disorders and Speech Therapy - Rahul SIR
 
Sounds talk 13 may
Sounds talk 13 maySounds talk 13 may
Sounds talk 13 may
 
Sp104.milestones.speech.2012
Sp104.milestones.speech.2012Sp104.milestones.speech.2012
Sp104.milestones.speech.2012
 
Wordstress
Wordstress Wordstress
Wordstress
 

Dernier

Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurNavdeep Kaur
 
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseClinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseSreenivasa Reddy Thalla
 
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranMusic Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranTara Rajendran
 
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptx
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptxlow cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptx
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptxdrashraf369
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxdrashraf369
 
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...MehranMouzam
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityHarshChauhan475104
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisGolden Helix
 
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfBasic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfDivya Kanojiya
 
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfPULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience ClassNutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Classmanuelazg2001
 
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfMedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfSasikiranMarri
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfSreeja Cherukuru
 
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxInformed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxSasikiranMarri
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAAjennyeacort
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 

Dernier (20)

Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
 
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseClinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
 
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranMusic Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
 
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptx
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptxlow cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptx
low cost antibiotic cement nail for infected non union.pptx
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
 
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
 
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfBasic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
 
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfPULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience ClassNutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
 
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfMedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
 
Epilepsy
EpilepsyEpilepsy
Epilepsy
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
 
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxInformed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 

Guide for intensive intervention

  • 1. General Guide for Intensive Therapy Intervention Name of Child:· Date: Check the following that apply: Cl Positive history of stuttering in' the family • - DMaJe . DOnset after 3.5 years of age .. ClProblem present more than 12-18 months OMultiple part-word or single syllable word repetitions ClThose above done with great frequency, increased length of each moment, & faster speed and rate within the space between each repetition on one syllable or word (Stutter Like Disfluencies) DTension present during speech . . OCluster disfluencies: more than 2 disfluencies on a word or two or more adjoining disfluent words - - D11 or more SLD's on 100 syllables of speech o Difficulty initiating phonation or breathing abnormalities associated with speech , OChiid has demonstrated awareness DChild has demonstrated frustration DOther concomitant ,developmental issues are present [JProblem has continued to persist since onset Note: This guide is intended to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions by considering a/l factors present. Factors are based on research related to genetic faotors, persistenoe, and recovery rates in young children who stutter. (Yairi and colleagues, 1992a~ 1992b, 1993, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2004) . Chmela 2004 This page may be photocopied without permission of the publisher. 12 , Copyright 2004 The Stutterl1)9 Foundation',Allrlghts res6lVed. 1-800-992-9392. 'JIIWW.stutteringhelp.org .:,:~~~"
  • 2. Table 2-2. Continuum of Distluent Speech Behavior More Usual • (1) 7ypical Disftuencies (2) Atypical Disftuencies Hesitations (silent pauses) ~ Monosyllabic word repefitions (3 or ! .~ more repetitions per instance or Interjection of sounds, syllables or ~ uneven stress) words ~ ! ~ Part-word syllable repetition (3 or Revisions of phrases or sentences more repetitions per instance or ~ uneven stress) .1 Phrase repetitions !! 8 6 Sound repetitions ~ Monosyllabic word repetitions. Two or i less repetitions per instance, even .Prolongations ~ stress, no tension i i ~ Part-word syllable repetitions. Two or Blocks i 8 less repetitions per instance, even Increased tension noted, e.g., tremo~ 6 stress, no tension. .of lips or jaw or vocal tension ...... . More Unusual ~ypical disflueru:ies in preschool children's speech listed in the order of expected frequency (heSitations the most frequent~ These disfluencies are relatively relaxed, as, for example, noted by repetitions being even in rhythm and stress; howeve.; if any are noticeably tense, then they are considered atypical. (2) Atypical disfluencies that are very infrequent in the speech of children. More characteristic of what listeners perceive as stuttering. If in a speech sample of 200 syllables or more, there is more than 2% atypical disfluency (stuttering), this should be a basis for concern, especially if airflow or phonation is disrupted between repetitions (monosyllable word or part-word syllable) or if a schwa sounding vowel is substituted in the repetilion of a syllable (for example, muhmuhmuhmana). Blocks and other signs of increased tension and fragmentation of the flow of speech should be the basis for immediate attention. (3) Crossover beillwiors on the continuum, such qualitative features as the number of repetitions per instance, the stre~s pattern involved, and the presence of tension distinguish typical and atypical disfluendes. Total Disflucncy. More than 10% lotal disfluency (nonrepelitious and repetitious) should signal a-L~ason for concern. These children are very disfluenL Research indicates that highly dislluent children are also likely to show a higher frequency of atypical dis fluency which is more likely to be noticed by a listener. ... Summary Slalemenl: Although most typical dislluendes are characterized by the fragmentation of a sentence or a phrase unit, most children show some part-word syllable repetition. Crossover behaviors include mare fragmentatiOl) of the word, and finally, atypical disfluendes .ilcude. more ff'!8!f!enf;ati!l~,!>f t~~ syllal,>lc (the core l,I.nil.of speech) ~ftd increased tension. Experience indicates thal increased tension is the pri.ncjpal factor leading to more senousdisruplion of speech. "
  • 3. Communication Attitude Test for .­ Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who'Stutter Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten Name: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date of Birth: _ _ _ _ _ __ Gender: _____ Age: ____ Date: ____________ Please circle the response given by the child 1. Do words sometimes get stuck in your mouth? Yes No 2. Do you think that you talk right? Yes No 3. Do mom and dad like how you talk? Yes No 4. Do you think that people need to help you talk? Yes No 5. Is talking hard for you? Yes No 6. Do your words come out easily? Yes No 7. Do you talk well with everybody? Yes No 8. Do you think that talking is difficult? Yes No 9. Do you like to talk? Yes No 10. Do people like how you talk? Yes No 11. Are words hard for you to say? Yes No 12. Is it hard for you to say your name? Yes No Copyright © 2007 by Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten All rights reserved.
  • 4. ftJ4 CAT© Communication Attitude Test for Preschool and Kindergarten Children Who--5tutter Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten Clinician's Instructions to the Child Prior to giving the KiddyCAT to a child, please familiarize yourself with the instructions below and the suggestions found in the Test Administration and Scoring section of the manual. Then, follow the instructions ful!Y in order to explain to the child being evaluated that you will be asking some questions about what he or she thinks about his or her talking. The instructions to the child are in bold tYPe. Let me explain what we are going to do: I will ask what ~u think about you!: talking. If what I say about how you talk is true, (clinician nods. head), you say ... (prompt the child while you nod your head yes) YES. If what I say is not true, you say ... (prompt the child while you continue to,shake youIl1ead no) NO .. Let's try it out: Do you talk too fast? Yes or No? Give the child the time to a n s w e r ' _ J If the child says "yes" you say: "Yes, you think that you talk too fast." If the child says "no" you say: "No, you don't think that you talk too fast." In either event, repeat the child's answer in a neutral manner rather than in a questioning way so as to confirm his or her answer. Let me ask you another question about how you talk. Do you talk aswellQs your friends do? Yes or No? If the child says "yes," you should say: "Yes, you think you talk as well as your friends do." If the child says "no," you say: "No, you don't think that you talk as well as your friends do." . Good. You know what to do. I will now ask you a few more questions about ho~ you talk. Remember to say "Yes" if what I say about yOU! tal!<ing is true. Say "No" if it is not true. Copyright © 2007 by Martine Vanryckeghem and Gene J. Brutten All rights reserved. 17
  • 5. , . Age 3 to Grade 3 Stuttering ·1 ntervention Program Author: Rebekah Pindzola, Ph.D. Auburn University
  • 6. Form A PROTOCOL FOR DIFFERENTIATING THE INCIPIENT STUTTERER .. Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dql~of Birth _ _ _ _ _-,-_ __ Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sex _ _ _ __ Date of Clinician _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I. AUDITORY BEHAVIORS • TYPE OF DISFLUENCY (mark the most typical) Interjections - Hesitations/Gaps- Repetitions- Prolongations- Coexisting Struggle 1 Probably Normal • SIZE OF SPEECH UNIT AFFECTED (mark the typical level at which disfluencies occur) Sentence/phrase- Word Syliable-/Sound 1 Probably Normal • FREQUENCY OF DISFLUENCIES (compute from speech sample and mark values on continuum) 2% 5% • Frequency of Repetitions ~------~------~-----~ 1 Probably Normal 1% • Frequency of Prolongations ~-------r-----------~ 1 Probably Normal 2% 5% . 10% ~----+----+----+----~ • Frequency of Disfluencies, in General , 1 No mal r 1 Probably Normal
  • 7. • DURATION OF DISFLUENCIES • Typical Number of Reiterations of the Repetition = _ _ _ _ _ __ Less than 2 2 to 5 More than 5 1 Probably Normal • Average Duration of Prolongations = _ _ _ _ _ __ less tha n 1 sec. One or more seconds 1 Probably Normal • AUDIBLE EFFORT (mark those that apply) lack of the following: Presence of the following: 1 Probably Normal ha rd glottal attacks disrupted airflow vocal tension pitch rise others: • RHYTHM/TEMPO/SPEED OF DISFLUENCIES Slow/normal; evenly paced Fast, perhaps irregular 1 Probably Normal • INTRUSION OF SCHWA VOWEL DURING REPErITlONS Schwa not heard Presence of Schwa 1 Probably Normal • AUDIBLE LEARNED BEHAVIORS (mark those that apply) lack of the following: Presence of the following: 1 Probably Normal word/phrase substitutions circumlocutions avoidance tactics (starters, postponers, and the like)
  • 8. II. VISUAL EVIDENCE (list behaviors observed) lack of the following: Presence of the following: • FACIAL GRIMACES ARTICULATORY POSTURING: 1 Probably Normal • lack of the follo:'ing: Presence of the following: • HEAD MOVEMENTS: 1 Probably Normal Lack of the following: Presence of the following: • BODY INVOLVEMENT: 1 Probably Normal III. HISTORICAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL INDICATORS (comment on the following based on client and/or parent interviews, observations, and supplemental tests or questionnaires, if any.) • AWARENESS AND CONCERN (of child; of parents): • LENGTH OF TIME FLUENCY PROBLEM HAS EXISTED: • CONSISTENT VERSUS EPISODIC NATURE OF PROBLEM: • REACTION TO STRESS:, • PHONEME/WORD/SITUATION FEARS AND AVOIDANCES:
  • 9. CHECKINy IN wi:Iiv Parel1i:s - - - - - - - - - - ­ This form is designed to gather information about your perceptions ofyour child's stuttering (and past therapy if applicable).It should be completed separately by each parent. Child's Name __~_~_~ __~____ Age Grade Person Completing Form Date Relationship to child -----~~--~---------~-----~-~--- I have heard that stuttering is caused by (List as many as are applicable.) I think that stuttering is caused by _____________~__~_~________~ ~--~-~---- Some questions I have about stuttering are ---~---~-~-~---- --~----------~------------------- My child shows awareness of his/her speech difficulties. Yes No If yes, please describe what your child has said or done to make you think he/ she is aware? ------------------~---~-~~~-~~----- My child stutters most when (List situations or factors that seem to negatively affect your child's speech.) --- -~~--~-~---~ When my child stutters, other people react by I feel ~ ____ w"tten I watch my child struggling with speech, and I want _ _ __ When my child stutters, I try to help by __~ _ _ _ _ __ ~~-~~-~------~~~--~-~~--~---- I think the goal of stuttering therapy should be Appendix 3C 92 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc. The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
  • 10. CHECKINg IN wit;/v Pareni:s; continued My child's teachers have knowledge about stuttering. Yes No I don't know My child's teachers have tried to help by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ __ ------------------------~--------------------~~,------.---------- The most important thing for someone to know about my child is ___-"---______ J I think my child is ready to be in speech therapy. Yes No If no, please explain. ______________________~ .~______________________________ My child's level of motivation for working on his/her speech right now is High Medium Low I'm not sure because I think I can best help my child by My wish for my child in five years is If I could do anything about this problem it would be Please answer the following questions if your child has received therapy in the past. The two most important things I learned from my child's other speech therapists were In my child's past therapy, he/she worked on The most helpful aspect of my child's past therapy seemed to be The least helpful aspect of my child's past therapy seemed to be I am satisfied with the level of effort my child has put into speech therapy. Yes No I am satisfied with the level of involvement my child has had in past therapy. Yes No because Appendix 3C, continued 93 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc. The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
  • 11. CHECKINg IN wiHv Teackers Some students stutter or hesitate when they speak. This may interfere with communication both in and out of the classroom. This type of speech problem warrants further evaluation. Please help me gain a better overall view of this student's speech skills by completing the following information and returning to me by _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Thank you! Speech·Language Pathologist _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ PhonefRo~m / Student ______________ Birth date Age Grade _ _ __ School ______________ Teacher ___________ Section _ __ Date Follow-up is important, so 1 would like to observe this child in several different situations. Please list when this, student: Goes to lunch Shares in the classroom Attends gym class ___________ Interacts with peers Please let me know the best way to contact you: Days/Times E-mail Phone General Information 1. Compared t~ his/her peers, this ::;tudent: (Check all that apply.) doesn't mind talking in class tries to avoid speaking in class (does not speak if called upon; asks few questions) speaks with little or no outward signs of frustration or embarrassment sometimes uses gestures to avoid speaking is difficult to understand in class demonstrates frustration when speaking (Please describe.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ exhibits academic performance at an avexage or above-average level 2. This student is disfluent or stutters when he/she: (Check all that apply.) begins the first word of a sentence speaks to the class speaks during an entire sentence ___ gets upset uses little words shares ideas or tells a story uses mafu words answers questions talks with peers carries on a conversation talks to adults reads aloud other __________________________________________ 3. Check any of the following behaviors you have noticed in this child's speech: revisions (starting and stopping and starting over again) frequent interjections (um, like, you know) word repetitions (we-we-we) phrase repetitions (and then, and then) part-word repetitions (ta-ta-take) ,prolongations (nnnnobody) blocks (vocal tension/no speech comes out) unusual face or body movements (visible tension, head nods, eye movements) abnormal breathing patterns other"".. ~_________.. . ______________________.. ______________ Appendix 31 102 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc. The SourceJor Stuttering: Ages 7-18
  • 12. CHECKIN(j IN wi:tlv Teachers, continued In the Classroom 1. I do/do not (circle one) have concerns about this child's speoch because . 2. I observe the most disfluency when ".~- .. 3. When this child has difficulty speaking, he/she reacts by 4. When this child has difficulty speaking, J respond by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Perceptions About Stuttering 1. I have had prior experience with a child who stutters. Yes No 2. I feel that stuttering is caused by ____________________________ 3. Some questions I have about stuttering are __________________________ 4. Some questions I have about how to help this child communicate effectively in the classroom include _____________________________________________ 5. I think the goal of stuttering therapy should be 6. The amount 6f knowledge I currently have regarding the disorder of stuttering is: nothing ~If-----------------,.... a lot .. 1 2 3 456 7 7. My confidence level regardmg dealing with stuttering in the classroom would be: not confident .. ~ If-------------_...)Ioo very confident 1 2 345 6 7 8. My confidence level in identifying stuttering in children who stutter is: not confident If-------------_...)Ioo ...... very confident 1 2 345 6 7 9. My confidence level in identifying avoidance behaviors in children who stutter is: not confident If-------------_...)Ioo ...... very confident 1 2 345 6 7 10. My comfort level ~hen communicating with this child is: If--------------J)Ioo.... UncQmfortable ...... very comfortable 1 2 3 456 7 Appendix 31, continued 103 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc. The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
  • 13. CHECKIN(j IN W~ T~s' continued Observations about this child With Peers 1. How does this student relate with other students the same age? ~________....._ _ _ _ __ 2. Is this student teased or mimicked because of his/her speech? Yes No If yes, please describe. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~___~_____________ 3. When this child has difficulty speaking, the other children react by 4. Following a comment or teasing by a peer, how does this child react? _ _~ _ __ In General 1. Have other students or this students' parent(s) ever mentioryed his/her fluertcy problems? Yes No If yes, what was discussed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Has this student ever talked to you about his/her speech problem? Yes No If yes, what was discussed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 3. What other information might be helpful in looking at this student's fluenciskills? _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 4. Do you have any other c6'ncerns regarding this child's speech and language, academic, or social skills? Appendix 31, continued 104 Copyright © 2004 LinguiSystems, Inc. The Source for Stuttering: Ages 7-18
  • 14. 1"".11 lilliE TEST Name: Test Date: Date of Birth: Grade: Age: Examiner: Gender: Referred by: © Copyright 1985 - Revised 2003 by Gene J. Brutten All rights reserved ' Additional copies of this form may be purchased from BAB Associates 832 Bentley Green Circle, Winter Springs, FL 34708 gbrutten@mail.ucf.edu
  • 15. TEST INSTRUCTIONS * Read each sentence carefully so that you can mark if it is true or faIse for you. The sentences are about your-.talking. If you think that the sentence about your talking is tru~, then circle "true". H you think that the sentence about your talking is not true, then circle "false". There are no good or bad answers, only answers that are true or false about your talking. Remember, circle "true" if you think that the sentence about your talking is true and "false" if you think that the sentence is false. Don't forget to answer all thirty-five sentences with "true" or "false". Do you understand what you are being asked to do? Do you have any questions? You can ask for help if you do not know the meaning of a word or a sentence. Example: I don't speak loud enough................. ... True..........•False I speak too much ............................... True...........False * The child should be asked to follow along silently as the instructions are read aloud by the clinician. The clinician should emphasize the words that are underlined. Hthe child needs help understanding a word or a test item, it should be given in a way that does not suggest the appropriateness of a true or false answer. It is suggested that the clinician reads the CAT statements aloud to the children in first and second grade as they follow along. The checklist should not be administered by the child's parents or completed by them. The view of parents as to their child's communicative beliefs do not correlate significantly with those of their child.
  • 16. lell 1 . I don't talk right ............................................ True......... False 2. I don't mind asking the teacher a question in class......................................................... True......... False 3 . Sometimes words will stick in my mouth when I talk........................................................... True.......... False 4 • People worry about the way I talk•••...•••••••••••.•••• True•••••••..•.False 5 • It is harder for me to give a report in class than it is for most of the other kids ..•••..••••...••••.•.•••••.• True•••.•.••••False 6. My classmates don't think I talk funny ••..••••.••••••••True•••.•.••• False 7 • I like the way I talk..........................................True......... False 8 • People sometimes finish my words for me ••••••••••••••True••••••.••False 9 • My parents like the way I talk••.•••••..•••••••••••••.•••• True••••••••..False 10. I find it easy to talk to almost everyone ••••.••••••••.••True••••••••• False 11. I talk well most of the time ••.•••.••••••.•••••...•••••.••• True••.••.•••. False 12. It is hard for me to talk to people .•••••••.••••.••.•••..• True.••.•••.•• False 13. I don't talk like other children •••.•••••..•••••..•••••.• True••••••.•••False 14. I don't worry about the way I talk. ••••••.••••••••••••. True••••••••••False 15. I don't find it easy to talk•..•••••.••••••.•••...••.....••••True•.••••.••False 16. My words come out easily •••••••••••••••••••.•••••..••••• True•••••.••• False
  • 17. 17. My speech is worse when I talk to strangers (people I don't know) ......................................True... f1' • • • • • • False 18. Other kids would like to talk like me..•................ True......•••.FaIse . 19. Kids make fun of the way I talk.........................True..........False 20. Talking is easy for me .....................................Tr:ue-..........False 21. Telling someone my name is hard for me .............True......... False 22. Many words are hard for me to say ................... True......... False 23. I talk well with almost everyone ........................ True......... False 24. I often have trouble talking .............................. True......... False 25. I would rather talk than write........................... True......... False 26. I like to talk..................................................True......... False 27. I am not a good talker ..................................... True......... False 28. I wish I could talk like other children..................True........•False 29. My words do not com'e out easily....................... True..........False 30. My friends' speech is better than mine................True......... False 31. Myspeech is good when I talk on the phone ......... True......... False 32. My speech is better when I talk with a friend ........True......... False 33. Many people don't like the way I talk................. True........• False 34. I let others talk for me ..................................... True......... False 35. Reading aloud in class is easy for me .................. True........• False
  • 18. Communication Attitude Test Score Key: Student scores 1 point if answers match those below: 1. T 13. T 25. F 2. F 14.F 26.F • 3. T 15. T 27. T 4. T 16. F 28. T 5. T 17. T 29. T 6. F 18.F 30. T 7. F 19. T 31. F 8. T 20. F 32. T 9. F 21. T 33. T 10.F 22.T 34.T 11.F 23.F 35.F 12.T 24.T Mean Stand. Dev. +lSD +1.5SD +2SD Children 7.05 4.69 11.74 14.09 16.43 who do not (91% score (98% score stutter below this) below this) Children 17.44* 6.81 24.25 27.66 31.06 i who stutter * Mean exceeds CAT score of more than 98% of children who do not stutter.
  • 19. Child "3.5r~- CALMS Rating Scale for School-Age Children Who Stutter This rating scale is designed to evaluate cognitive, affective, linguistic, motor, and social (CALMS) components that are related to stuttering. It is recommended that clinicians base their clinical judgment on deriving a score for each item using scores and/or data from scales, tests, as well as documented evidence about the child being evaluated. Take the scores for each rated item and divide by the total number of items scored within each component to obtain an average score for each component. The average component scores become the data points for plotting the CALMS profile. COGNITIVE: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment, Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 =Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very Poor Ability) , Recommended items to be rated: 1. Child's ability to identify moments stuttering during reading ~ gO'l' (J.U @ 3 4 5 Measure: % of moments identified from a reading passage or material that is easy for the child to read 2. Child's ability 10 identify moments ofstuttering in spontaneous speech (,UlI.lob~~~d ~ . I 2 [) 4 5 Measure: % of moments identified in a short spontaneous speech sample W. ~ / 0(( - Vtp/S &r1Cj S 3. Child's knowledge and understanding ofstuttering . Measure: Rate child's ability to describe stuttering behaviors, knowledge of 2 G) 4 5 his/her stuttering behaviors, and general facts about stuttering (TIF test) 4. Child's knowledge ofpreviously learnedfluency enhancing and/or stuttering modification techniques Measure: Assess how well the child can describe, explain, and demonstrate 1 ®~ 4 5 any technique he/she has been taught to use in previous therapy. It. fo J~~ ab I&.> dhlt .f1) d~C;r)b e i . Other subjective measures might include child's thoughts about being a person who stutters and reactions to How others view hislher stuttering8 Average Cognitive Component Score: 2.., <$ a When evaluating thoughts and perceptions, a rating of "1" refers to positive thoughts/ no concerns about being a person who stutters and positive perceptions of how others view stuttering. A rating of "5" reflects extremely negative thoughts, reactions or perceptions. Use ratings 2-4 to reflect varying degrees of positive/negative thoughts and reactions.
  • 20. AFFECTIVE: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 =MUd Impairment, Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5:: Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very Poor Ability) Recommended items to be rated: 1. Child's attitudes andfeelings about communication Measure: a Communication Attitudes Test (CAT or CAT-R)...record score 1 2 3 o 5 and compare to norms. CA15~: 2---3 CtW~ V t:>...r< .... If ,'I V ,.. A ", 7J 2. Affectivefeatures ofthe child's stutterinl • LaIiels child uses for attitudes/feelings about stuttering 1 2 @ 4 5 Measure: "Framing My Speech" (C & R workbook) ... this form could be used to 90unt the number and ~es of words used to describe stuttering dftYl ho..pPq ch;td (slA.Ult) wi.f1tt bu~~!~ slJ.)(~~ ~ • Child's feelings about stuttering " c.-~ "'('-C4n 'III ~ -,t}-,lolo .,.fo ~ 1 2 3 @I 5 Measure: "What Pops" andlor "What's True For You?" (C & R workbook) b -h-bt:{-K1 ~""? to "What Pops" could be used to determine the % of the 20 items that relate to negative comments about stuttering. "What's True ... could rate this item based on child's scores on all questions. Hands Oown! ...allows child to list postive " and negative attributes about himlhersel~l.it rIA ~ bVUa.. • ~, :::r-- hAil. "'~ 'Pur? Ie.. ~ h... U- ~ ._~ --' 7/" .sW~ ~ '5~. :.:J'~ u 1: • Child's feelings and reactions to teasinglbullying about stuttering atll!t- (.,t1'-C , ..... ~ :t:- net- 'Stv~ ---a'S. Ow" I, Measure: Level of concern expressed by child 1 2 3 D 5 as ei-(Jft<nttL tJ vhUtL~ ~~ Average Affective Com~onent Score:-=S~._<i __ _ • Use of the Communication Attitudes Test (CAT or CAT-R) andl or A-19 scales requires comparison of child's score with normative data supplied with each measure. We recommend that if the child who stutters (CWS) has a score that equals the mean for CWS. then that score would be raed at least a "3" on the CALMS rating scale. [For CWS the CAT Mean=l 7.3 , SO=7.7 and A-19 Mean=9.07, SO=2.44]. Scores between 1 & 2 standard deviations from the mean score for CWS would be rated a "4" and a score of more than 2 standard deviations would be rated a "5." ­ b Several paper-pencil tasks suggested by Kristin Chmela and Nina Reardon (2001) The School-Age Child Who Stutters: Working Effectively With Attitudes and Emotions ...A Workbook (pp. 22-86) can be used in this section. This workbook is published by the Stuttering Foundation (1-800-992-9392). Child Client Forms in Crowe's Protocols (T. Crowe, A, Oi Lollo, & B. Crowe (2000) The Psychological Corporation) /llso can be used.
  • 21. LINGUISTIC: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment, Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very Poor Ability) Recommended items to be rated: 1. Overall relationship between stuttering and the length and complexity ofutterances: 1 2 (J) 4 5 Measure: Assess level of fluency/stuttering during simple oral reading, naming, sentencl! repetition, picture description, and story retelling a 2. Overall language ability Measure: Informal or formal assessment)b 1 @ 3 4 5 3. Articulation and/or Phonological ability 0) 2 3 4 5 Measure: Informal or formiassessment)C t~ l d. fv'l.i"'~lb llfh'{--I hb4h-{1'Qf. ~ 'l'"t<;e W • cew::- .. If fbltowt~ 1)I~~S·· ~l1 31~ ~'k. wo-rl s.~l..-- ~ 211 ~ 3f'( ".tit Average Linguistic Component Score: 2 ­ ! II JA~I ~fUd~ clA~ H':) db~ W"t ~ ~c~ ~ i"w~~ r.t-fo-rMAAl~} ~ ~L ~{-. •• a.%" • a See recommended list of speech tasks for measuring the impact of linguistic complexity on frequency of stuttering. Go to www.unl.edultluency/index.shtml for list of simple to complex, contextualized and decontextualized speech tasks. The rating for this item will depend on the level of linguistic length and complexity where fluency disruptions occur consistently (e.g., a rating of "I " would indicate that stuttering only occurs at the highest level of linguistic difficulty and a "5" would be a rating for stuttering consistently at simple linguistic levels or where the child needs considerable contextual support). b Select formal language tests for this section. Rate level of impairment. C Select a formal test for articulation/phonological process analysis. Rate level of impairment
  • 22. MOTOR: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3 = Mild Impairment, Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very Poor Ability) Recommend Items to be rated: 1. Characteristics ofthe child's stuttering Measure: Document number of units per repetition, duration of typical prolongation, etc. @ 3 4 5 and rate level of impairment relative to the severity of stuttering .2.. i~IN':, I~ ~ Measure: Degree of struggle, effort, tension produced during stuttered moments 1 2 C' 4 5 Slv~'r,,: rlt)i1>~ ~..,) "'~t.~ ~IM-~~J 2. Frequency ofstuttering with various communicative partners ~4 I ~ ~t ~ . Measure: Sample with classroom teacher 2 3 4 5 "'ItA.. Measure: Sample with peers 2 3 4 5 "y A- Measure: Sample with clinician""""" 2 (j) 4 5 3. Determination ofstuttering severity using the SSI-3 a 2 3 d) 5 Measure: Stuttering frequency in oral reading and spontaneous speech, The duration of the three longest stuttered moments, and the presence of physical Concomitants (secondary coping behaviors) . , SS:C-3 S~'! 21 rvwlitfl11.L t& ~ Average Motor Componknt Score:--Ioo3~__ • The SSI-3 (Stuttering Severity Instrnment-3, Riley 1994- PRO-ED) should be used to record a rating that reflects the total SSI-3 score: (1= 0-5) (2= 6-10) (3=11­ 20) (4=2@ (5= 28+). 1
  • 23. SOCIAL: (Rating scale: 1= Normal, No Concern, High Ability 2= Borderline, Slight Concern, Good Ability 3::: Mild Impairment, Some Concern, Variable Ability 4= Moderate Impairment, Significant Concern, Poor Ability 5 = Severe Impairment, Extreme Concern, Very Poor Ability) . Recommended items to be rated: 1. Reported avoidance ofspeaking situations Measure: Reports from child, parent, teachers about number and severity of avoidance of words, people, and speaking situations . 1 2 3 @ 5 ~~~,VE)~ ~ +& ~. ~ 5~l m ~ l)(Ub,CNlS 2. Level ofstuttering related to various social speaking situations: Measure: Child's ability to express him/herself in a variety of speaking situations that occur at school, home, with sports teams, at clubs, etc .. For example, child talks freely in most situations ... 5= child limits speaking to specific situations 1 2 3 ~ 5 ~., Jo ~ ~-f; VllAeSj ~ ~ w'~~ 3. Impact ofstuttering on peer relationships Measure: Report from child and parent about how much the child's stuttering is affecting the friendships or interaction with peers. 1 2 6) 4 5 Average Social Component Score: '3. 7
  • 24. C.A.L.M.S. Profile Client: Scores: Cognitive: 2.. I ~ Age: Affective: 3 ,$ Date of Profile: Linguistic: -"2-'---__ '3 Motor: - - - - ~ Social: 2.J. 5· ,--.~."--.-"-"-.--.-- . - -.---------. ---------------·_--··---·---------'1 4-H ~ nr, 3 ~,. ·.Ir~ ~~iy'l W't~ ld~-b~~ ~ oe5eM.c;"fiz.~ 2 .J..l I .,. 1""/ Q. 1'"/ I"i~ it I.; Mwt ~ yV«,Ltkie~+Lb< 1 ,", .vl(,l~ 9lA"1i~ 0. H; I j:,.:;:( ;~>l ":'' ' ':<, ~ fJ: - 5lV . 0'..1 i Cognitive Affective Linguistic M~tor Social
  • 25. Quantification of 1-5 Value for the CALMS Rating Scale 1 = Normal: Function is considered within normal limits in terms of behavior, performance, ability, attitude or perception. There are no concerns about function or performance. Test data are well within normal limits. 2 = Borderline: Slight variation or some concern about behaviors, performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions. Test data show standard score of .5 to 1.4 SD below normal level 3 = Mild Imp~rment: Clinical judgment suggests a "mild" degree of difficulty or deficit in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors, performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions are just below expected levels of function. Mild concern about function or performance. Test data show standard score of 1.5 - 1.9 SD below normal level. 4 =Moderate Impairment: Clinical judgment suggests a "moderate" degree of difficulty in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors, performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions are consistently below expected levels of function. Test data show standard score of 2.0 - 2.4 SD below normal level. Significant concern about function and performance. 5 = Severe Impairment: Clinical judgment suggests a "severe" degree of difficulty in certain functions. Also suggests that behaviors, performances, abilities, attitudes or perceptions are substantially below expected levels of function. Exceptional concern about function or performance. Test data show standard score of> 2.5 SD below normal level.
  • 26. What Do I know About Stuttering? 1. More boys than girls stutter. Y.es No ....~-- 2. When one person in a family stutters, there are usually others Yes No in the family that also stutter. 3. About 1,000 people in the US stutter. Yes No 4. People who stutter are usually nervous people. Yes No 5. Experts know what causes stuttering. Yes No 6. Most people who stutter start stuttering around age 10. Yes No 7. Most people who stutter are disfluent on about every word Yes No 8. It's very common for people who stutter to avoid speaking in Yes No in certain situations or with certain people. 9. Stuttering is found all over the world in people who speak different languages. Yes No 10. People who stutter don't stutter when they sing. Yes No
  • 27. ¥ tVht f-~o:t k:V1oW tbtvt-~ik,ft~~" Answer key and rating for CALMS Ratfng Scale l. Yes 2. Yes 3. No .... .- ..~- .. 4. No 5. No 6. No 7. No 8. Yes 9. Yes 10. Yes Number ofCorrect Answers ~ALMS Rating Scal~~alue 9-10 7-8 2 5-6 3 3-4 4 2 odes-B. 5
  • 28. I A Continuum ofLinguistically Simple to Complex Speech Tasks. (The CALMS Rating is the number to the right ofthe category if a high frequency of stuttering appears at that level oflinguistic complexity) . A. Automatic Speech: (5) 1. Count from 1-10 2. Say the days of the week. B. Short Phrases: (5) (Ask the child to repeat the phrase from a model or read the phrase) 1. "It's a nice dai" 2. "I see a dog and a cat." 3. "Sam bought Bobby a puppy for his birthday." C. Picture Description: (4) Show the child a picture that depicts some type of action and say to the child, "Tell what's going on in this picture." D. Picture Sequence: (4) Show the child a series of pictures from a script. Tell the story and then with the pictures in front of the child, have the child retell the story he/she just heard. E. Ego-Centered Topic Discussion: (3) Have the child talk about hislher most recent birthday party or a vacation/event he/she experienced personally. F. De-Centered Topic Discussion: (2) Ask the child to describe in detail the content of a familiar movie or a television show they have seen or a game (e.g., board or video games) he/she has played recently. G. Relational Topic Discussion: (1) In this task, ask the child to describe how one plays a particular sport or activity that the child his familiar with. The clinician could say for example, "Let's say that I have never seen a (football, basketball, basebali, soccer) game. Explain to me the object of the game, things about the game, how teams score points and . how a team wins or loses." B. Complex Oral Discourse: (1) Pick a topic the child would not have very much knowledge of but has experienced in the real world (e.g., different types of clouds or how are clouds formed- www.wildwildweatheLcom). Read a short explanation of the phenomenon and then have the child retell the information they just heard.
  • 29. Teasing Inventory Terribly not at all Who did the teasing? Describe the teasing. How did you feel? (for example angry, sad, scared, frustrated ... ) What did you do? How did you feel then? Did you need adult help? Ll No LlYes Did you receive help from an adult? Ll No LlYes Terribly not at all Who was being teased? Who did the teasing? Describe the teasing. How did you feel? What did you do? How did you feel then? Was adult help needed? D NoD Yes Was help from an adult received? D NoD Yes not at all Who did you tease? Describe the teasing. Why do you think you teased the other person? How did you feel? Did you need adult help? D No DYes Did you receive help from an adult? D No DYes Is there any problem with the person you were teasing now? 0 No DYes Is there anything you need to do to improve things? ©2004 Constance Dugan
  • 30. Transcript of FLUENCY SAMPLE: # syllables: . # disfl #SS (parent-child interaction) WR2 Yup. /I O.K. o.k. _I I'm hurry. I 8- 1 1 UP [WR + PR 2] I'm hurry. I'm coming. /11'11 - /I til I'll be I'll be I'll be 9 3 2 I here soon. /I Uh //I'm the fire engine. /I Yup. O.K. /11'11 put the 13 (1 Int) 0 PR fire /I No still on. /I Daddy/ll know what I know what. You got 11 3 0 PR3 [SR +WR] PWR2 you got you got you got a Iki car car like this. /I U Ii like this 6 4 2 PR [UP +R] WR 4 [SR 2 +WR] like this. /I No. /I Ylal - if if if if if you drive the car a a and and you 9 5 2 WR2 R [PR+PWR]3 go around and and and then- and the Ii and the Ii and the Ii and the 7 5 4 light says stop and you go. /I Right here. 8 0 0 Total number of syllables: 71 Total number of disfluent syllables: _--:::2:...!.1__ = _--::3:...::0'---_o.:...:::.Yo Total number of stuttered syllables: _---=-1--=-1__ =__1:..::::5:...--_o..: .: :.yo (Total number of interjections: _-'-__ = nla %)
  • 31. PREDICTIVE CLUTTERING INVENTORY (PCI) David A. Daly (2006) INSTRUCTIONS: Please respond to each description section below. Circle the number you believe is most descriptive of this person's cluttering. Descriptive Statement /;/;,/;il!J0% $ :# ~ 4~ ~ "{" ~ "," ~ ~ f:! II ..t i ",.,.<1;­ ;s .:; Cb ~ ~I!!' ~ ;!' ~I; ~ PRAGMATICS 1. lack of effective self-monitoring skills 6 5 4 2. lack of awareness of own communication errors or problems 6 5 4 0 3. Compulsive talker; verbose; tangential; word-finding problems 6 5 4 0 4. Poor planning skills; mis-judges effective use of time i 2 4 3 2 0 S. Poor social communication skills; inappropriate tum-taking; interruptions 6 12 4 3 2 1 0 6 Does not recognize or respond to listener's visual or verbal feedback 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 7. Does not repair or correct communication breakdowns 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8. little or no excessive effort Qbserved during disfluencies 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9. Uttle or no anxiety regarding speaking; unconcerned 10. Speech better under pressure (improves short-term with concentration) 6 5 4 t 2 1 ±J W 6 5 4 - 1 SPEECH-MOTOR I 11. Articulation errors 5 4 3 1 0 12. Irregular speech rate; speaks in spurts or bursts 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 13. Telescopes or condenses words 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 14. Rapid rate (tachylalia) 6 5 4 3 2. 1 0 15. Speech rate progreSSively increases (festinating) 6 S 4 3 2. 1 0 16. Variable prosOdy; irregular melody or stress pattern 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 17. Initial,loud voice trailing off to unintelligible murmur 6 5 4 1 0 18. ~ck of pauses between words and phrases 5 4 1 0 19. Repetition of multi-syllablic words and phrases 5 4 1 0 2.0. Co-existence of excessive disfluencies and stuttering 6 4 3 2 1 0 LANGUAGE-COGNmON 1­ 2.1. language is disorganized; confused wording; word-finding problems 22.. Poor language formulation; poor story-telling; sequencing problems 2.3. Disorganized language increases as topic becomes more complex 6 6 6 s S S 4 4 4 3 3 3 ±= 2. 1 1 1 0 0 0 2.4. Many revisions; interjections; filler words 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2S. Seems to verbalize before adequate thought formulation 6 S 4 3 2. 1 0 26. Inappropriate topic introduction, maintenance, or termination 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 27. Improper linguistic structure; poor grammar, syntax errors I ~=t=i 6 S 4 3 0 28. Distractible; poor concentration; attention span problems 6 5 4 3 0 ~ MOTOR COORDINATION-WRITING PROBLEMS I ~otor control for writing (messy) 9 includes omission or transposition of letters, syllables, or words w= 6 5 S 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 31. 'Oral diadochokinetic coordination below expected normed levels 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 32. Respiratory dysrhythmia; jerky breathing pattern 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 33. Oumsy and uncoordinated; motor activities accelerated or impulsive 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 TOTAL SCORE:_ _ COMMENTS: C. David A. Daly. 2006
  • 32. Table 9-1. Weiss' (1967) Comparativ~ Table Showing Various Dj£ferences between Stuttering and Cluttering* Stuttering Cluttering Interpretation Functional; secondary Hereditary; primary central Underlying disturbance Neurovegetative dysfunc- language imbalance (lack tional of m'ilturation of CNS mostly absent) Awareness of disorder Strong Mostly absent Speech characteristics Specific symptoms Clonic and tonic inhibition Hestitation, repetition (without inhibition) Rate of delivery Rather slow Mostly quick Sentence structure Mostly correct Often incorrect Fear of specific sounds Present Absent Heightened attention Worse Better Relaxed attention Better Worse Foreign language Worse Better Gesturing Stiff, inhibited Broad, uninhibited Reading aloud Well-known text Better Worse Unknown text Worse Better Writing characteristics Compressed; high-pressure Loose, disorderly strokes School performance Good to superior Underachiever Psychological attitudes Embarrassed, inhibited Carefree, sociable Painstaking, compulsive Impatient, impulsive Grudge-bearer Easily forgetting Penetrating Superficial Experimental responses: Alcohol Better Worse Lee effect Better Worse EEG Borderline normal Often deviant Chlorpromazine Worse Better Dexfenmetrazine Better Worse Course Fluctuating; spontaneous Persistent improvements and re­ lapses Therapy Attention should be di- Concentration on details verted from details; psy ­ chotherapy PrognosiS Depends on emotional ad- Depends on acquiring con­ justment centration 'From Weiss.? Reprinted with permission.
  • 33. From: St: Louis, Kenneth 0., The Atypical Stutterer, 1986, Academic Press"Inc .. NANCY HELM-ESTABROOKS Table 8.1 :!TypicaJ" Characteristics'of Stroke-Induced Stutterer (Usually Sudden in Onset) Dysfluencies may be heard on Initial phonemes (always) Medial phonemes (often) Substantive words (always) Functor words (often) Conversation (always) Repetition, automatized sequences, rote para ­ graphs, singing, and tapped speech (usually) There is no adaptation effect Concomitant findings Secondary motor signs (rare) Aphasia (sometimes) Bucco/facial apraxia (sometimes) Often reduced performance in "Carrying" a tune Tapping rhythms Block designs from model Stick designs from memory Sequential hand positions TIuee-Dimensional drawing Table 8.2 "Typical" Characteristics of Stutterer with Head Trauma (May be Gradual in Onset) Dysfluencies may be heard on Initial phonemes (always) Medial phonemes (often) In 'conversation (always) Substantive words (often) Functor words (often) Repetition, automatized sequences and rote para­ graphs, tapped speech and singing (usually) Adaptation effect is rare Concomitant findings Seizure disorder (sometimes) Secondary motor signs (sometimes) Aphasia (sometimes) May have reduced performances "Carrying" a tune in Tapping rhythms Block designs from model Sticks from memory Sequential hand position Three-dimensional drawing . Thbk8~ "Typical" Characteristics of Stutterer ViOl Extrapyramidal Disease <Usually Gradual in Onset) Dysfluencies may be heard on Initial phonemes (always) Medial phonemes (often) Substantive words (always) Functor words (sometimes) In conversation (always) In repetition, auiomatized sequences, rote para­ graphs, tapped speech, and singing (sometimes) Adaptation effect may be seen Concomitant findings No secondary motor signs, aphasia, bucco/facial apraxia Reduced performance in "Carrying" a tune Tapping rhythms Sequential hand positions