One fine body…
- Irvine, California, United States
- Secteur Legal
- Site Web www.knobbe.com
- À propos With over 300 lawyers and scientists nationwide, Knobbe Martens dedicates its practice to all aspects of intellectual property law including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing, due diligence and litigation. The firm represents companies in medical devices, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, mechanical engineering, software, information technology, physics, optics, electrical and computer engineering, plant biology, chemistry and chemical engineering sectors. Knobbe Martens was founded in 1962 and is based in Irvine, California with additional offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Riverside, Silicon Valley, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.
america invents act best practices biotechnology business copyright federal circuit federal circuit review intellectual property intellectual property law inter partes review ip ip law knobbe martens litigation medical device patent patent litigation patent prosecution patents pharmaceutical ptab technology trade secrets trademark trademark law uspto Plus…
acc aci agreements aia alice v. cls bank america invents act anda apple v. samsung electronics best practices big data bilski v. kappos biologics biology biomedical biosimilars biotechnology biotechnology and pharmaceuticals bottle design bpcia brand management business can dew case summaries case summary chemicals claim drafting cloud computing computers confidentiality copyright data processing defend trade secrets act derivation proceedings design patents diagnostics diamond v. diehr digital media directv due diligence electronics employer engineers evidence false advertising fda federal federal circuit federal circuit review filing strategies financial services food and drug administration foreign patents freedom to operate gtld hardware hatch-waxman hatch-waxman law hershey high-tech icann immunology in re baxter in re bill of lading transmission and processing s in re montgomery in re youman in-house counsel information technology infringement intellectual property intellectual property law inter partes review introduction invention inventorship ip ip law iplaw japan jeff van hoosear jeffrey van hoosear joint infringement joseph re k-dur decision knobbe martens lanham act law law360 leader technologies v. facebook legal licensing life sciences litigation louboutin lululemon marketing marketing and advertising master license mechanical engineering medical device medical devices medtech microsft v. i4i microsoft mintz v. dietz & watson mobile motorola music license myriad nda newsletter nike non-disclosure agreement notice letter otsuka pa paragraph iv disputes parker v. flook patent patent filing patent law patent litigation patent prosecution patents pddrp pharmaceutical post grant review product development products and services professional prometheus protection ptab public performance license public relations puffery rand res judicata research rrdrp sabpa san diego san francisco bay area sandoz shoes social media sof software sports startups strategy subject matter supplemental examination susan natland synch license technology therasense tld top level domain name top-level domain trade secrets trademark trademark law trademark litigation trademark review ttab twitter uci udrp unfair competition united states united states patent and trademark office university urs uspto womeninleadership wspla …moins