These slides were delivered in a workshop led by Leah D. Gordon for the Nigeria National Agency for the Control of AIDS February 12, 2012.
The objectives of this workshop were to: 1.) gain a fundamental understanding of knowledge management principles and discover ways to integrate knowledge management into everyday work routines; 2.) Develop a clear structure for disseminating and promoting the use of information generated from research and evaluation studies.
2. Objectives
To gain a fundamental understanding of knowledge
management principles and discover ways to
integrate knowledge management into routine
operations.
Develop a clear structure for disseminating and
promoting the use of information generated from
research and evaluation studies.
Appreciate difference between knowledge and
information.
Common tools and approaches to knowledge
management of M&E systems.
5. What is knowledge management?
“Getting the right information, to the right people at
the right time.”
“Linking what we do with what we need to know.”
11. Explicit & Tacit Knowledge
Explicit Tacit
Articulated and codified Knowledge that is difficult
knowledge stored in to transfer by means of
media. writing or codifying.
13. NACA Mission
To provide an enabling policy environment and
stable ongoing facilitation of proactive multi
sectoral planning, coordinated implementation,
monitoring and evaluation of all HIV/AIDS
prevention and impact mitigation activities in
Nigeria.
14. Turning Research into Action
Types of learning –
1.Cognitive involves comprehension, critical skills,
procedural patterns and concepts.
2.Affective involves the way people react
emotionally, values, empathy, motivation and
attitude.
3.Psychomotor involves change or development
in behavior or skills.
18. Citing References
1. Use proper titles, names
2. Citing helps readers and users reference
source
3. Helps establish your credibility as an
information source
20. Knowledge Audit
In order to solve the targeted problem, what
knowledge do I have, what knowledge is missing,
who needs this knowledge an d how will they use
the knowledge?
22. Knowledge Audit
Step 1: Identify what knowledge currently exists.
Step 2: Identify and locate explicit and tacit
knowledge in the targeted area.
23. Knowledge Audit
Step 1: Identify what knowledge currently exists.
Step 2: Identify and locate explicit and tacit
knowledge in the targeted area.
Step 3: Provide recommendations from the
knowledge audit to management – address status
quo and possible improvements to the KM activities
in the targeted area.
24. Knowledge Cycle
Knowledge Knowledge
Generation Capture
Mission: To provide an enabling policy
environment and stable ongoing
facilitation of proactive multi sectoral
planning, coordinated implementation,
monitoring and evaluation of all HIV/AIDS
prevention and impact mitigation activities
in Nigeria.
Knowledge Knowledge
Application Sharing
26. What is a Community of Practice?
A community of practice is a group of people who
share a concern or a passion for something they
do and learn how to do it better as they interact
regularly.
Etienne Wenger
27. What is a community of practice?
A central principle of Knowledge Management is
that organizations can best foster the capture
and exchange of knowledge through CoPs –
networks of people that identify issues, share
approaches and make the results available to
others.
28.
29. What CoPs Do
Problem solving
Requests for information
Seeking experience
Reusing assets
Coordination and synergy
Discussing developments
Documentation projects
Visits
Mapping knowledge and identifying gaps
Wenger, Home
page
31. Ways that COPs Create Value
Immediate value:
Activities and interactions
Potential value:
Knowledge capital
Applied value:
Changes in practice
Realized value:
Performance improvement
Reframing value:
Redefining success
Wenger, Trayner and de Latt,
32. Measuring Value of COPs
Immediate value: What happened?
Potential value: What was produced?
Applied value: What difference did it make?
Realized value: Did it change our ability to
achieve what matters?
Reframing value: Has it changed the
understanding of what matters?
33. Functional CoP Roles
Executive sponsor: Nurture and provide top-level recognition for
the community while insuring its exposure, support, and
strategic importance in the organizations.
Leader/facilitator/moderator: Provide the overall guidance and
management needed to build and maintain the community, its
relevance and strategic importance in the organization, and its
level of visibility among stakeholders.
Content manager: Search, retrieve and respond to direct
requests for the community’s knowledge and content.
34. Functional CoP Roles
Events coordinator: coordinate, organize and plan community events or
activities.
Communications: Developing the communications and outreach plan
and lead in providing the ongoing unidirectional communication with the
CoP.
Reporter: identifying, capturing, and editing relevant knowledge, best
practices, new approaches and lessons learned into documents
Education and skill development: The lead on coordinating the
education and skill development activities, workshops, and content.
35. Types of Leadership in COPs
inspirational
day-to-day
classificatory
interpersonal
institutional
cutting-edge
Wenger, COPS: Learning as a Social System
49. Characteristics of a Best Practice
1. Innovative and/or an improvement and/or set a
precedent.
2. Makes a difference and there is evidence of
positive impact.
3. Has a sustainable effect on the intended
audience.
4. Has potential for replication.
50. How to find best practices
Ask the following to identify best practices
1.What did we set out to do?
2.What did we actually achieve?
3.What went well?
4.What could have gone better?
59. MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) and implemented by the
Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International,
ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for
Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this
presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the
U.S. government.
MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's
primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and
evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.
Editor's Notes
Data - facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis Information - facts provided or learned about something or someone Knowledge - facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject For one to translate into the other, we much explicitly define the process…
People – Who has the knowledge? Process – HOW is knowledge collected, archived and shared? Technology – Which platform is used to collect, share and archive the knowledge?
Explicit – found in reports, journal articles, books, magazines. Tacit – shared in workshops, presentations, conferences Three type of media…
Process driven mission. Providing an environment – How? Who does it involve? Facilitating planning, coordination, implementation and M&E – How? Who does it involve? Who are the people? What is the process? What technology is used?
KM for Data Use and Decision Making, Section 2.5 Benjamin Bloom developed a classification of different types of learning. Cognitive domain most relevant to sharing knowledge, building skills and promoting data use in public health.
Learners must pass through the knowledge and comprehension stages to arrive at application. It is at the application stage where skills are developed and/or policy is created.
Three types of media… Two types of knowledge…
What is a community? What is a practice?
I could spend some time unpacking this very succinct description but what I what to focus on today is the phrase “concern or passion” . I think that it is this passion that is the key to organizing and sustaining active, vital communities of practice Leah asked me to say something about the important role of COPs play in the project. The main value COPs have to the project (and remember that is a little different than the value to the members of the communities) is vehicles for communication and interaction among people who share a concern or passion for improving health projects. The domain: A community of practice is not merely a club of friends or a network of connections between people. It has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership therefore implies a commitment to the domain, and therefore a shared competence that distinguishes members from other people The community: In pursuing their interest in their domain, members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each other, and share information. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other. The practice: A community of practice is not merely a community of interest--people who like certain kinds of movies, for instance. Members of a community of practice develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing recurring problems. This takes time and sustained interaction. It may be more or less self-conscious.
Problem solving "Can we work on this design and brainstorm some ideas; I’m stuck.“ Requests for information "Where can I find the code to connect to the server?“ Seeking experience "Has anyone dealt with a customer in this situation?“ Reusing assets "I have a proposal for a local area network I wrote for a client last year. I can send it to you and you can easily tweak it for this new client.“ Coordination and synergy "Can we combine our purchases of solvent to achieve bulk discounts?“ Discussing developments "What do you think of the new CAD system? Does it really help?“ Documentation projects "We have faced this problem five times now. Let us write it down once and for all.“ Visits "Can we come and see your after-school program? We need to establish one in our city.“ Mapping knowledge and identifying gaps "Who knows what, and what are we missing? What other groups should we connect with?"
CoP Start Up Kit page 5
Another thing Leah asked me to address was the question “What value that can be gained from COPS?” Cycle 1. Immediate value: the activities and interactions between members have value in and of themselves Cycle 2. Potential value: the activities and interactions of cycle 1 may not be realized immediately, but rather be saved up as knowledge capital whose value is in its potential to be realized later. Cycle 3. Applied value: knowledge capital may or may not be put into use. Leveraging capital requires adapting and applying it to a specific situation. Cycle 4. Realized value: even applied new practices or tools are not enough. A change in practice does not necessarily lead to improved performance, so it is important to find out what effects the application of knowledge capital is having on the achievement of what matters to stakeholders … EVALUATION Cycle 5. Reframing value: this happens when learning causes a reconsideration of how success is defined. It includes reframing strategies, goals and values…
So how do you know when value is being created? Again I could spend a long time unpacking the answer to this question but for this talk all I want to do is point out that evaluating what we do is an important endeavor, not only for the improvement of the COPs but also for being able to turn our collective experience with COPs into something others that informs the global learning agenda. What this slide shows are some principal questions an evaluator might ask at each stage of COP development.
there are lots of different ways that people can incorporate leadership into the moderator’s role. The inspirational leadership provided by thought leaders and recognized experts The day-to-day leadership provided by those who organize activities The classificatory leadership provided by those who collect and organize information in order to document practices The interpersonal leadership provided by those who weave the community's social fabric The boundary leadership provided by those who connect the community to other communities The institutional leadership provided by those who maintain links with other organizational constituencies, in particular the official hierarchy The cutting-edge leadership provided by those who shepherd "out-of-the-box" initiatives. How exactly you choose to incorporate leadership into your COP-related activities will of course depend on a variety of thing including your personal style, the characteristics of the COP you’re working with and the aspirations of that COP. But regardless, for each person there are ways demonstrate leadership in your role as moderator and I encourage you to reflect on this and then act on the ways that seem best to you.
“ A Tool for Sharing Internal Best Practices”
Difficulty is proven through experience, for example too much time, money spent. Suggestions should come from credible sources and experienced professionals.