SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez nos Conditions d’utilisation et notre Politique de confidentialité.
SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez notre Politique de confidentialité et nos Conditions d’utilisation pour en savoir plus.
I’m interested in two problems I’ve encounteredin the English classroom. And when I say the English classroom, I mean any class, writing, literature, undergraduate, and graduate.
Students don’t read what I assign them to read.
Students don’t read what I assign them in a critical way
How can we create more engaged and critical readers?
Some teachers give pop quizzes.
Some teachers give participation grades.
Some teachershave students write daily responses about what they read. I do this.
Some teachers have students draw their responses. I also do this.
My ideas about using “handmade thinking” in English began after I read Dan Roam’s The Back of the Napkin. Dan Roam argues that drawing can be a powerful tool for problem-solving and presenting one’s ideas to others.
Here they are in five groups.
The first group included those similar to Dan Roam’s portraits and maps. We could also think of these as the “noun” group.
The next group includes images in pairs.
This a comic panel with two people in dialogue.
Some images indicate the growth of and relationship between ideas.
Like a tree.
The common web for brainstorming and mindmapping.
The organizational chart.
Which becomes a genealogical chart if you flip it.
There are images that show, like Dan Roam says, quantities or how much.
And multivariable charts. Roam puts this in the “why?” category.
And finally, some images show a progression over time.
Before and after. Also, could fit in the “pairs” category.
A flow chart.
Freytag’s pyramid plot line
This is another multivariable chart or +/- plot line that shows progression up and down and left to right. I learned about this from my friend Austin Kleon who learned it from Kurt Vonnegut’s book Palm Sunday. I don’t know where Kurt Vonnegut learned it.
This image is sediment, layers moving from bottom to top.
Here they are again.
Mary Karr’s CHERRY
“A Clean Well-Lighted Place” by Ernest Hemingway
from “The Population Bomb” by Paul Ehrlich
from THE END OF NATURE by Bill McKibben
“Heat” by Joyce Carol Oates
“The Journey” by Edith Wharton
“A Journey” by Edith Wharton
from SAND COUNTY ALMANAC by Aldo Leopold
Handmade Thinking Class Presentation
“In fact, without visualization, studentscannot comprehend, and reading cannotbe said to be reading.” Reading is Seeing, Jeffrey Wilhelm
Handmade Thinking: Drawing Out Reading Laurence Musgrove Professor and ChairDepartment of English and Modern Languages Angelo State University