Library Roles in Research Information Management: some emerging trends
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
7 j'aime•3,036 vues
Keynote presentation at Keio University Library Forum on Research Support and Administration
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (19)
En vedette
En vedette (12)
Similaire à Library Roles in Research Information Management: some emerging trends
Similaire à Library Roles in Research Information Management: some emerging trends (20)
Plus de Constance Malpas
Plus de Constance Malpas (16)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Library Roles in Research Information Management: some emerging trends
- 1. Keio Forum | 26 February 2016 Library Support for Research Information Management some emerging trends Constance Malpas OCLC Research
- 2. Research Scientist, OCLC Research San Mateo, California Constance MALPAS @ConstanceM malpasc@oclc.org よろしく お願いします こんにちは私の名前はマルパスコンスタンスです
- 3. Library roles in research information management 2 Research management in context and practice Today Perceptions and sources of library value
- 5. Source: Inside Higher Ed. 2016 Survey of College and University Chief Academic Officers More than half of Chief Academic Officers think the library is “very effective” 43% think the library is not very effective –and dissatisfaction is greatest at research universities 2016 Survey of Chief Academic Officers in US Universities How would you rate the effectiveness of your institution’s technology resources and services in the following areas? LIBRARY RESOURCES AND SERVICES CAO = University Provost, Vice-Chancellor, Vice President for Research etc.
- 6. THEN: NOW: Library value related to managing collections to support research , teaching. Value relates to support for process and productivity of research and learning. Credit: Lorcan Dempsey From Curation to Creation The value the CAO is looking for is increased research productivity and student success
- 7. Source: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics; SRI International; Science-Metrix; Elsevier, Scopus abstract and citation database (www.scopus.com) NSF Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 (Figure 5-23). International Rank in Scientific Production (publications) Research assessment at international scale drives economic and education policy
- 8. Sources of R&D Funding at US Universities Public funding accounts for ~60% of investment • compliance with funder mandates is a top priority • institutions focused on maximizing productivity $37B
- 9. Source: http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Japan-2015-overview.pdf … universities account for a smaller part of national R&D activity (13.5%), and are less reliant on performance-based government funding (54.1%) In Japan:
- 10. Managing institutional assets: stocks and flows Symplectic White Paper: The Wealth of Institutions Source: http://symplectic.co.uk/products/elements/
- 13. 20151985 1995 2005 UK Research Assessment Exercise (1986-2008) Research assessment regimes are on the rise . . .
- 14. 20151985 1995 2005 Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol (1990s-)USA electronic Research Administration (1990s-) UK Hong Kong Research Assessment Exercise (1994-) Research Assessment Exercise (1986-2008)
- 15. New Zealand USA 20151985 1995 2005 Performance-Based Research Fund (2003-) Australia Hong Kong UK Research Assessment Exercise (1986-2008) Research Quality Framework (2003-2008) Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol (1990s-) electronic Research Administration (1990s-) Research Assessment Exercise (1994-)
- 16. New Zealand Research Assessment Exercise (1986-2008) Research Excellence Framework (2009-) 20151985 1995 2005 Performance-Based Research Fund (2003-) USA Australia Research Quality Framework (2003-2008) Excellence in Research for Australia (2009-) UK Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol (1990s-) Hong Kong Research Assessment Exercise (1994-) electronic Research Administration (1990s-) Plus: • Italy (2012-) • Portugal (2014) • Japan (in development)
- 17. Source: http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/sonota/openscience/150330_openscience_summary_en.pdf University libraries have a key role in supporting national innovation agenda, managing institutional research outputs
- 21. Source: http://www.kura.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ …clearly associates mandate of KURA with institutional and researcher priorities
- 22. “We are used to thinking about the user in the library environment … a major part of our challenge moving forward is thinking about the library in the user environment.” THEN: NOW: L. Dempsey The Network Reshapes the Library (2014), Chapter 3. Library support for research management includes closer engagement with evolving workflows of institutional researchers And libraries? into the flow
- 23. Source: https://101innovations.wordpress.com/tag/updates-insights/ The environment in which scholarship is produced is changing fast
- 25. What does student/faculty use of research support tools look like at your university?
- 26. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Keio_University Individual and institutional reputation curated externally
- 27. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Keio_University Virtual institutional repository? Collaboration networks
- 28. Other PURE implementations: Kumamoto University Waseda University Yokohama National University Source: https://keio.pure.elsevier.com/ Substantially better coverage than Research Gate… but fewer profiles
- 29. Source: https://keio.academia.edu/ KBS represents only a part of Keio University Metadata matters! managing organizational identity is critical to institutional visibility on the web
- 30. Source: http://researchmap.jp/ Nationally-provisioned research networking platform with nearly 250,000 members
- 31. Keio Pure Academia. .edu Researchers 1,235 684 1,645 ? 4,214 Departments 174 110 ? ? ? Publications 48,816 <1000 25,393 50,676 ? A fragmented view of research activity Institutional performance National visibility Professional reputation Library can help address gaps by managing IR/CRIS boundary, assisting with author identifiers etc.
- 33. Library Roles in Research Information Management University: manage knowledge ‘stocks and flows’ to maximize institutional success Researcher: support for evolving workflows, personal reputation management Library supports both through • Managing boundary of institutional repository and CRIS • Managing institutional metadata for discovery & impact • Closer engagement with research process, e.g. RDM
- 34. University Libraries and ‘New Knowledge Work’ • Manage author, object and organizational identifiers for the semantic web • Manage in- and outbound metadata flows to maximize visibility of institutional output • Manage researcher activity data to inform institutional research assessment • Maximize visibility and impact of institutional research in social networks • Advance role of the library as publisher Source: Arlitsch et al. “Demonstrating Library Value at Network Scale” (2014)
- 35. http://oc.lc/esr http://oc.lc/esr-stewardship Framework for understanding the changing nature of scientific and scholarly publications: workflow is the new content Exploration of how library stewardship will change as scholarly practices evolve: greater reliance on conscious coordination Evolving Scholarly Record: implications for libraries
- 36. oc.lc/researcherids coming soon Overview of researcher identifier landscape with functional requirements and recommendations for providing authoritative researcher identifiers Examines use cases, functional requirements and recommendations for managers of organizational identifiers Challenges of Organizational Identifiers Metadata Management: emerging library roles
- 37. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 38. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 39. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 40. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 41. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 42. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 43. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 44. Individual and institutional research assets managed externally Range of scientific publication types / units is expanding: Documents plus… Data Figures Images Posters/presentations Collections of things Source: https://figshare.com/search?q=kyoto+university EVOLVING SCHOLARLY RECORD
- 46. Suzuki-sensei has a prominent ‘footprint’ in the global scholarly record Source: http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n85355188 METADATA MANAGEMENT
- 47. Source: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/d/r/10126279.ja.html Suzuki-sensei is ‘well identified’ in Japanese research information infrastructure METADATA MANAGEMENT
- 48. Economist at Yokohama NU Unclaimed profile .. but (as yet) his local identifiers have not been linked to a global identifier.
- 49. Source: http://www.library.cmu.edu/orcidkickoffmar2015 A library-led initiative to register university researchers with ORCID, link institutional ID to global ID
- 50. Source: http://rns.nii.ac.jp/callback/orcid/ Kakenhi ID researchmap ID RNR ID ORCID ResearcherID SCOPUS Author ID National identifiers Global identifiers A national-scale initiative to disambiguate researcher identities
- 51. • There is a clear trend toward more systematic assessment of university research performance and productivity • Organizations and institutions with ‘well-controlled’ metadata about authors and outputs will manage better • Libraries can play a vital role in research and reputation management: – Metadata expertise and ‘new knowledge work’ – Stewardship mandate (Collections + faculty outputs) – Deepening engagement in research process Summary
- 52. National scale: • Extend identifier resolution for authors and organizations • leverage ‘system-wide’ view of Japanese research outputs in JAIRO Institution scale: • increase linkages between library and research administration for improved entity/asset management • educate CRIS/profiling vendors about metadata sources to represent full range of institutional research output • elevate faculty awareness about online reputation management, research data management (RDM) etc. Opportunities?
- 53. SM Together we make breakthroughs possible. Constance Malpas Research Scientist malpasc@oclc.org ご清聴ありがとうございました Thank you for your kind attention.
- 54. 2016 Inside Higher Ed Survey of College and University Chief Academic Officers. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/system/files/media/2016%20Inside%20Higher%20Ed%20CAO%2 0Survey.pdf Kenning Arlitsch, Patrick Obrien, Jason A. Clark, Scott W. H. Young & Doralyn Rossmann (2014) “Demonstrating Library Value at Network Scale: Leveraging the Semantic Web With New Knowledge Work”, Journal of Library Administration, 54:5, 413-425. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.946778 Lorcan Dempsey (26 October 2014) “Research Information Management Systems: A New Service Category?” Retrieved from: : http://orweblog.oclc.org/research-information-management- systems-a-new-service-category Lorcan Dempsey and Kenneth J. Varnum (2014). The network reshapes the library: Lorcan Dempsey on libraries, services and networks. Chicago: ALA Editions, an imprint of the American Library Association. Michiel Schotten and M’hamed el Aisati “The rise of national research assessments – and the tools and data that make them work“. Retrieved from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-rise-of-national-research-assessments-and-the-tools-and- data-that-make-them-work Symplectic. The Wealth of Institutions: Understanding Research Information. Retrieved from: http://symplectic.co.uk/products/elements/ Selected sources
Notes de l'éditeur
- Over the last few years, OCLC Research has been examining some of the changes in scientific and scholarly practice and exploring their implications for libraries. One area of research has focused on changes in scientific and scholarly publication. Specifically, we have been interested to look at how the range of research outputs is expanding and diversifying. In the past, books and articles were the primary forms of scientific communication and these formats were generally well managed by libraries. Today, the documentation of research processes and outputs is much richer. This is sometimes described as “workflow is the new content” – meaning that supporting the research process is at least as important as capturing the final published outputs. This makes the work of university libraries much more challenging. For example, the traditional library responsibility for collecting and preserving the products of research is now distributed across a wider range of stakeholders. We characterize this growing reliance on partnerships as a trend toward more deliberate or conscious coordination of curation.
- Another area of research has focused on the changing landscape of metadata management. Traditionally, library metadata practices have focused on descriptive cataloging and authority control for a limited range of publication types. Today, the work of capturing and organizing the output of scientific research demands much greater attention to identifiers – unique, persistent and authoritative global identifiers for publications, authors and organizations. Our work has focused primarily on managing identifiers for individual researchers or authors, and managing identifiers for organizations (including universities and their sub-units). Rather than reviewing the findings of this research, which is publicly available, I want to look at some examples of how it relates to the Japanese university environment.
- One issue we have explored in our research on the Evolving Scholarly Record is the increasing reliance of researchers on new publishing and repository infrastructure. This is a screen capture from the Figshare research repository. Figshare is a commercial company that offers individual researchers free access to a platform for publishing non-traditional research outputs. This page features some of the material deposited by researchers at Kyoto University.
- Now let’s look at the issue of identifiers and their growing importance in managing metadata about research activity. This is a page from the NII researchmap, featuring a profile of Professor Masataka SUZUKI. Suzuki-sensei is a prominent cultural anthropologist who has worked at Keio University for many years. As you can see, the researchmap page provides an identifier for Suzuki-sensei, his Kakenhi ID. [
- In closing, I want to reiterate the key themes of this presentation. First, there is a clear trend toward more systematic assessment of university research performance and this is tied not only to institutional performance measures but to national research innovation goals. Second, there is evidence that metadata management and the management of identifiers in particular, is a critical component in successful research management at any scale. Finally, university libraries can play a key role in supporting institutional research administration goals by leveraging their distinctive expertise in metadata management, their responsibility to preservation of the scientific record, and their growing engagement with the research process itself.
- And finally, I want to suggest that there are some important opportunities for Japanese libraries to contribute to national and institutional research goals. At the national scale, there are opportunities to extend the existing NII Researcher Name Resolution service to integrate national identifier schemes with global identifiers like ORCID and ISNI. There are also opportunities to leverage the system-wide view of Japanese research outputs represented in JAIRO, which provides a much more comprehensive view of Japanese research activity than is visible in citation databases such as SCOPUS or Web of Science. At the scale of individual universities, there are opportunities to increase collaboration between university libraries and university research administration departments, particularly in the area of metadata management; to support the implementation of Research Information Management systems by ensuring that an appropriate range of metadata sources are included; and to elevate faculty awareness of the importance of participation in global researcher identification schemes, research data management and other services the library can provide.