SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Selection of evidence on the adoption of siblings and the need
sometimes to separate brothers and sisters in their interests


Kosonen (1994) identified several factors in the birth family which
can negatively influence the relationship between siblings. These
include:


     poor attachments to parents which can result in intense
     sibling conflict;
     a conflictual relationship between parents which can result
     in poor sibling relationships with boys particularly affected;
     neglect and parental absence resulting in strong
     compensatory sibling relationships, often where an older
     sibling provides some parenting of a younger child. Such
     bonds can become abusive.




Burnell, Vaughan and Williams (2007) argue that, in their
experience, children who have suffered very poor attachments
need to develop a secure attachment to a safe adult or adults. That
sometimes requires the separation of siblings because, if placed
together they may inhibit the formation of healthy adult
attachments.


Gerrilyn Smith, has identified six indicators of where keeping
siblings together may be damaging for them
when there is intense rivalry and jealousy between children;
     where there is child on child exploitation often with boys
     dominating and exploiting girls;
     when there is chronic scapegoating of one child by others;
     where there are unhelpful hierarchical positions with one
     child stuck in the role of victim or bully;
     where there is highly sexualized behavior between children;
     and
     where children can trigger trauma in one another, often
     unconsciously.


Lord and Borthwick(„Together or Apart‟ 2001) listed the following
conditions which may indicate that siblings should be placed
separately:
  • intense rivalry and jealousy, with each child totally pre-
  occupied with, and unable to tolerate the attention their
  sibling(s) may be getting;
  • exploitation, often based on gender, e.g. boys may have been
  seen and see themselves as inherently superior to their sisters,
  with a right to dominate and exploit them;
  • chronic scapegoating of one child;
  • maintaining unhelpful alliances in a sibling group and family
  of origin. Sibling patterns of behaviour may be strongly
  entrenched and may prevent re-parenting or learning new
  cultural norms;
• maintaining unhelpful hierarchical positions e.g. the child
   may be stuck in the role of victim or bully;
   • highlysexualised behaviour with each other;
   • acting as triggers to each others traumatic material potentially
   re-traumatising each other. The triggers may well be
   unconscious, unintentional and mundane.




Quotes:


FAMILY FUTURES:
“Children placed for adoption today have in the vast majority of
cases been removed from birth parents by the courts because of
„significant harm‟. The „significant harm‟ leaves these children
developmentally traumatised with all aspects of their
development impacted by the early poor parenting. Therefore the
task of adoptive parents of „developmentally re-parenting‟ these
children is more demanding than normal parenting. Having to do
this with a sibling group makes the task extremely difficult.



We need to change custom and practice from a presumption that
siblings should be kept together at all costs to prioritising the
potential for children to form a secure attachment to adoptive
parents which may require them to be parented as „onlys‟ rather
than siblings.”
BARNARDO‟S
“Children, particularly young children have an overwhelming
need for stable secure loving homes if they are to grow into
healthy resilient adults. This need must be allowed to take
precedence over a desire to have contact or to be placed with their
siblings. If they can be placed together, well and good, but if the
needs of the sibling group are too great for any one set of adoptive
parents to realistically meet them, or the search for such „super
adopters‟ delays their placement, then the individual needs of each
child must come first.


BAAF:
The decision whether or not to place siblings together or apart for
adoption is one of the most profound decisions that a local
authority can take. It is a decision that will impact upon a child
and their siblings for the rest of their life… For some children we
agree that separate placements will be the right decision. It is a
decision that must always be taken with great care and on the
basis of sound assessment evidence.

Contenu connexe

Plus de Sir Martin Narey

Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentIcpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentSir Martin Narey
 
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Sir Martin Narey
 
Joining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsJoining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsSir Martin Narey
 
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc22903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc2Sir Martin Narey
 
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Sir Martin Narey
 
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresAdoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresSir Martin Narey
 
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstAdoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstSir Martin Narey
 
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Sir Martin Narey
 
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Sir Martin Narey
 
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novMythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novSir Martin Narey
 
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationPractice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationSir Martin Narey
 
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times  the Adoption Leadership BoardThe Times  the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times the Adoption Leadership BoardSir Martin Narey
 
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSection 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSir Martin Narey
 
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)Sir Martin Narey
 
Fathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsFathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsSir Martin Narey
 

Plus de Sir Martin Narey (20)

Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentIcpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
 
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
 
Joining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsJoining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflections
 
1966
19661966
1966
 
Adcs speech july 2015
Adcs speech july 2015Adcs speech july 2015
Adcs speech july 2015
 
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc22903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
 
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
 
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresAdoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
 
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstAdoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
 
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
 
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
 
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
 
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
 
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novMythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
 
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
 
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationPractice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
 
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times  the Adoption Leadership BoardThe Times  the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
 
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSection 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
 
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
 
Fathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsFathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courts
 

Adoption selection of evidence on sibling and the need sometimes to separate them in their interests

  • 1. Selection of evidence on the adoption of siblings and the need sometimes to separate brothers and sisters in their interests Kosonen (1994) identified several factors in the birth family which can negatively influence the relationship between siblings. These include: poor attachments to parents which can result in intense sibling conflict; a conflictual relationship between parents which can result in poor sibling relationships with boys particularly affected; neglect and parental absence resulting in strong compensatory sibling relationships, often where an older sibling provides some parenting of a younger child. Such bonds can become abusive. Burnell, Vaughan and Williams (2007) argue that, in their experience, children who have suffered very poor attachments need to develop a secure attachment to a safe adult or adults. That sometimes requires the separation of siblings because, if placed together they may inhibit the formation of healthy adult attachments. Gerrilyn Smith, has identified six indicators of where keeping siblings together may be damaging for them
  • 2. when there is intense rivalry and jealousy between children; where there is child on child exploitation often with boys dominating and exploiting girls; when there is chronic scapegoating of one child by others; where there are unhelpful hierarchical positions with one child stuck in the role of victim or bully; where there is highly sexualized behavior between children; and where children can trigger trauma in one another, often unconsciously. Lord and Borthwick(„Together or Apart‟ 2001) listed the following conditions which may indicate that siblings should be placed separately: • intense rivalry and jealousy, with each child totally pre- occupied with, and unable to tolerate the attention their sibling(s) may be getting; • exploitation, often based on gender, e.g. boys may have been seen and see themselves as inherently superior to their sisters, with a right to dominate and exploit them; • chronic scapegoating of one child; • maintaining unhelpful alliances in a sibling group and family of origin. Sibling patterns of behaviour may be strongly entrenched and may prevent re-parenting or learning new cultural norms;
  • 3. • maintaining unhelpful hierarchical positions e.g. the child may be stuck in the role of victim or bully; • highlysexualised behaviour with each other; • acting as triggers to each others traumatic material potentially re-traumatising each other. The triggers may well be unconscious, unintentional and mundane. Quotes: FAMILY FUTURES: “Children placed for adoption today have in the vast majority of cases been removed from birth parents by the courts because of „significant harm‟. The „significant harm‟ leaves these children developmentally traumatised with all aspects of their development impacted by the early poor parenting. Therefore the task of adoptive parents of „developmentally re-parenting‟ these children is more demanding than normal parenting. Having to do this with a sibling group makes the task extremely difficult. We need to change custom and practice from a presumption that siblings should be kept together at all costs to prioritising the potential for children to form a secure attachment to adoptive parents which may require them to be parented as „onlys‟ rather than siblings.”
  • 4. BARNARDO‟S “Children, particularly young children have an overwhelming need for stable secure loving homes if they are to grow into healthy resilient adults. This need must be allowed to take precedence over a desire to have contact or to be placed with their siblings. If they can be placed together, well and good, but if the needs of the sibling group are too great for any one set of adoptive parents to realistically meet them, or the search for such „super adopters‟ delays their placement, then the individual needs of each child must come first. BAAF: The decision whether or not to place siblings together or apart for adoption is one of the most profound decisions that a local authority can take. It is a decision that will impact upon a child and their siblings for the rest of their life… For some children we agree that separate placements will be the right decision. It is a decision that must always be taken with great care and on the basis of sound assessment evidence.