Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

Geospatial Targeting for HIV Programs Using Modelbuilder

This presentation was shared by John Spencer at the June 2016 MEASURE Evaluation GIS Working Group Meeting.

  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

Geospatial Targeting for HIV Programs Using Modelbuilder

  1. 1. Geospatial Targeting for HIV Programs using Modelbuilder John Spencer MEASURE Evaluation University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill June 28, 2016 2016 ESRI User Conference
  2. 2. Where are the people in need of HIV care?
  3. 3. Where are the places that provide care? Photo credit: Flickr user KYM54
  4. 4. What are important contextual factors of the epidemic?
  5. 5. Alternative site #1 Alternative site #4 Alternative site #5 Alternative site #3 Alternative site #2 Low volume facility One approach Nearest site (Euclidean) Optimal alternate site
  6. 6. Alternative site #1 Alternative site #4 Alternative site #5 Alternative site #3 Alternative site #2 Low volume facility Overcrowding River Barrier Mountain Barrier Travel-time Barrier Optimal alternate site Geography matters!
  7. 7. Balance between closing low volume site? What are the relevant questions?
  8. 8. How do you reach the people in need most effectively and efficiently? Which site to prioritize?
  9. 9. 246810 2 – 10 KM buffers around a facility
  10. 10. 23 Km Difference between Euclidean distance and road network distance
  11. 11. MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) under terms of Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004 and implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, Palladium Group, and Tulane University. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org

×