1. Engineering on Human Anatomy
Presented by David Flynn
Materialise USA
Committed to innovations for a
better and healthier world
Inside 3D Printing
San Jose, CA
09/18/13
10. Medical Models
• Separate conjoined twins
• Arteries could not be tracked with X-rays
• Operation time reduced from 97 to 22 hours
10
Kenneth E. Salyer, M.D. and Objet Geometries Ltd., 2002
11. Medical Models
• 3D ultrasound with tomographic output
11
Jorge Santos et al. 2009, Royal College of Art, UK
16. Outcomes
• No intervention possible
• Model revealed multiple leakage paths in need of
repair
• Location of leakage paths closer to neck arteries
than originally thought
• Comorbidity risks too high
• Gave tangible view on leakage paths and relation
to connecting anatomy
• Modeling software and 3D printed model helped
identify new risks
18. Case: Congenital Cardiac Malformation
• Irregular Anatomy
• No two cases are the same
• Provides guidance for the
surgeon
• Benefits
• Anatomically accurate
• Capture arrangement of
chambers and GV
• Model characteristics
• Flexible to mimic soft tissue
• Ability to bend and cut
Emory University Hospital
27. CMF Software & Surgical Guides
Upload CT
data
Perform Planning
session online with
Materialise
Printing of planning
outcome: Models
and/or guides
Synthes to deliver
models, guides and /
or implants
28. Case presented by Daniel Buchbinder, MD DMD, Beth Israel New York
CMF Software & Surgical Guides
29. Guide Benefits
• Increase collaboration between doctors
• Reduced cost and complexity of procedure
• Decrease the number of surgical instruments to sterilize
• Potential to decrease OR time
• Expedite patient recovery
• Increase longevity of implants
• Allow surgeon to try different approaches before lifting a scalpel
• Avoid making critical decisions on the spot
30. Guide Production
• 5 dedicated LS machines in Belgium
• Started USA Production 2010
• Key partners in USA
• Surgeons predominently in USA
• 3 LS Machines 6 by end of 2011 in Plymouth, MI
• Room to grow to 24 machines!
• Medical Production Focus in USA (growth)
34. Patient specific implant design
• Increasing demand
for revision total hip arthroplasty
• Growing number primary implants
• 15% require revision
• >50% involve acetabular component
• Extensive bone loss
• Complex defects
• Patient-specific surgical planning
• Custom implant design
34
Mechanical loosening
Hip instability
Infection
Fracture
35. Patient-Specific Acetabular Cup Implant
35
Segmentation/reconstruction
of anatomy Custom fit implant designed Automated screw placement
based on bone thickness
Mesh refinement of bone and
implant assembly
CourtesyofBartelsetal.KULeuven
CT-derived material properties Patient-specific MSM
36. Patient specific implant design using FEA
• Model results
• Manufacturing (selective laser melting)
36
Implant integrity Bone loading
38. Where do we go from here?
• Future of healthcare is customization
• Key to better patent care lies in patient specific solutions
tailored to individual anatomy