Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

21st Century Research Landscape

782 vues

Publié le

The needs of researchers in key disciplines are changing rapidly and this has important implications for the library’s role in enhancing research productivity and impact.

Librarians can build a roadmap for supporting 21st Century research needs that draws on both published research sources and institution-specific user research. Several key trends from recent studies and ideas for institution-specific user research tools are highlighted within.

Publié dans : Technologie
  • Check the source ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ This site is really helped me out gave me relief from headaches. Good luck!
    Voulez-vous vraiment ?  Oui  Non
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
  • There is a useful site for you that will help you to write a perfect and valuable essay and so on. Check out, please ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐
    Voulez-vous vraiment ?  Oui  Non
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

21st Century Research Landscape

  1. 1. Understanding the 21st Century Research Landscape: Emerging Trends and Needs Within and Across Disciplines Charleston Conference 2011 Mike Diaz, Executive Director, Marketing
  2. 2. Session Objectives  Spark a conversation that surfaces current and emerging research needs across disciplines  Identify strategies for translating this insight into better support for research-intensive users.
  3. 3. Agenda  Studies and key themes relating to researcher needs  Specific insights on research needs from our expert panel  Trends in research needs across disciplines  Broad subject area and discipline-specific trends  Recommendations for librarians  Q&A
  4. 4. Related Research
  5. 5. Research Information Network  Patterns of Information Use and Exchange Across Disciplines (Presentation From Fiesole Collection Devt Retreat)  Reinventing Research – Information Practices in the Humanities  Case Studies of Researchers in the Life Sciences (In conjunction with British Library)
  6. 6. Ithaka  Faculty Survey  Discipline Reports  Education  Economics  History  Biosciences  New Discipline Studies/Reports Just Announced  Chemistry with JISC  History with NEH
  7. 7. Other Notable Reports  OCLC/JISC/RIN – The Digital Information Seeker (key insights from 12 separate user studies)  OCLC - Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment  CIBER/UCL/Emerald - Social Media and Research Workflow
  8. 8. Trends in Research Needs
  9. 9. Assessment and the Research Process Assessment demands drive a heavy emphasis on journal citation metrics which are easily accessible Faculty incentives favor traditional channels for dissemination of findings and use of journal citation chains remains critical for research Implications for humanities scholars – metrics do not offer comprehensive coverage for academic monographs and other modes of research E-books could start to play a more important role in scholarship with e-delivery and greater accessibility via large indexes
  10. 10. Central Role of Data/Data Management Data has been critical for serving researcher needs for a long time New applications mean that researchers aren’t just crunching numbers (eg. datamining, visualization) Demand for external data sources and support for selecting, accessing, and using the data Researchers need better tools for managing their own data. Value of open data for society – think Genomics Openness constrained by competitive concerns in some disciplines and legal/privacy considerations
  11. 11. Range of Digital Source Types is Important  Video  Audio  Datasets  Primary sources  Documents  Manuscripts  Historical News  Text becomes a dataset via text mining
  12. 12. Emerging Modes of Collaboration Key external factors driving need for continued expansion of academic collaboration Academic collaboration often involves email and does not fully leverage latest technologies and tools Very little incentive for communication beyond traditional channels (journals, conf proceedings) Sciences more advanced in collaboration than the humanities. Long tradition of multi-author articles in life sciences and physics and use of social media in computer science
  13. 13. Need for simple and fast access Researchers looking for a few convenient, trusted tools with 24x7 access Gateway services play critical role as a starting place (esp. Google/Scholar and cross-discipline indexes) Often researchers want their research experience to be familiar - like tools they use outside of work – Yahoo, YouTube, Amazon, Kayak Excellent opportunity for publishers, technology providers and libraries to work together.
  14. 14. Significant Variations by Institution, Department… Combine trends information with “local” insight  LibQual  Zoomerang/Survey Monkey  Focus Groups  Interviews  Website Survey Tools such as ForeSee Results
  15. 15. Some Questions for Interviews/Focus Groups  What key factors come into play for your research productivity reporting?  How are requirements of funders changing in your field?  How can the library help you to be more effective with your research?  What types of information sources are most critical for your research and how do you access them today?  Tell me about how you use datasets, multimedia, etc…?  To what extent do you collaborate with other researchers?  If so, what approaches and tools are you using to ensure that you can manage these collaborations effectively?  How do you stay organized and manage your research efforts?
  16. 16. Panel of Experts  Audrey Powers, Collection Development and Research Librarian for College of the Arts, University of South Florida  Jason B. Phillips, Librarian for Sociology, Psychology, Gender & Sexuality Studies and American Studies and Coordinator, Data Service Studio, New York University Library  Corey Seeman, Director, Kresge Business Administration Library, University of Michigan  Dennis Brunning, Humanities Development Librarian and Librarian for the Herberger Institute Arizona State University