Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
my court case food files state vs ragu paswan c
1. THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BARNALA
���������
�������������������� State Through
Govt. Food Inspector
����������������������������������
����������������������������������
���� ����� Complainant
����������������������������������
������������ Versus
Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager � of Dabha ) Neem
Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road,
Barnala������������������������������
����������������
����������������������������������
����������������������������������
������������� �� . ��� Accused
Complaint u/s 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.I.954 and U/
r 24 & 50 of the PFA. Act .Rules 1.955.
Respectefully it is submitted
1. That I Manjinder Singh Dhillon ,the Complainant has been appointed
as Government Food Inspector and also notified through Punjab
Government vide Gazette notification � o.FD(2)PB,98/14766 dated
15/10/1998 to seize samples under Prevention of Food Adulteration
Act,1954 in the state of Punjab.
Notification photo copy Annexure as
I�������������������
2. That I am also authorized to launch prosecution under the Prevention
of Food Adulteration Act,1954 in the state of Punjab and notified
through Punjab Government Gazette notification no.10/10/89-4 HB-
lV/34197 dated
3/10/1999.����������������������������
���������������������������
����������������������������������
������������Notification photo copy Annexure as
II�������������������������������
3. That on 1/5/2008 I the complainant inspected the premises
of���������������������������������
��������������
2. Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager � of Dabha ) Neem
Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, and was found keeping approx.
10 Kg of curd (Dahi) in silver pateela to sale the public for human
consumption. �
4.That I disclosed my Identity to the accused � as Government Food Inspector
and asked him to show the valid License for sale of milk and milk products as
required under provisions of law under Rule 24 of P.F.A Rules,1955 but he failed
to show the
same�����������������������������������
������������������
5 That accused was found carrying approx. 10Kg of cow milk in a silver�����
pateela. �� f That a request was made to the persons present � for joining the
proceedings of food sampling procedure as public witness,but none
agreed�����������������������������������
��������������������
��������������������������������������
��������������������������������������
�����������������
6. That I served the notice on Form VI in writing to take sample of cow Milk
which. was signed by me and also signed by � the accused
Orignal Form six(VI) is Annexured as III
7. That I purchased 600 gm of curd from the silver patella containing approx.
10Kg of Curd by cutting vertically and the � entire component was taken and
churned �� then added preservative into the churned curd � and made a
payment of Rs.12/- and a payment receipt was prepared at the spot which was
signed by me and by the
accused������������������������������
����
����������������������������������
������������� original receipt is Annexure as IV
8 . That the 600 gm of churned curd divided into three equal parts approx. 200gm
each into three neat clean & dry glass bottles. A spot memo was prepared which
was signed by me and by � the accused
original spot memo is Annexure as
V���������������������������������
��������������������
9 .That each sample bottle was labeled, fastened and wrapped in a strong thick
paper .The edges of paper were pasted on the sides of each sample portions and
affixed with the help of
3. Gum������������������������������������
��������������������������������������
��
10.That three paper slip issued by the State Health Authority �� having same
serial slip no.20927 duly signed by Local Health Authority , Barnala along with
his code no. BS/ 90/ 08 written on the slip itself. Each slip were pasted on the
each sample portions with the help of gum covering the mouth of each sample
and were further secured by means of strong thread. The all the sample portions
were sealed at the spot on the five distinct places bearing the seal impression
MSD ����������������������������������
11.That the signature of the accused were taken on the each sample portion in a
manner that half the signature appears on wrappers of the sample portions and
half on the paper slip wrapped on the same sample portions � too signed in
similar
manner����������������������������������
������������������������
12.That on reaching the office of LHA, Barnala on the same day I prepared � five
copies of Memorandum � Form VII � and � three seal impressions of the Seal
used to seal sample portions were affixed upon form VII � original copy is
Annexure as VII�
����������������������������������
���������������������������������
13 .That one sealed sample portion along with the copy of Form VII Bearing the
three seal Impressions were sent to Public Analyst Punjab Chandlgarh through
special messenger Sh.Manjil Singh, of Civil Surgeon office , Barnala In the same
day
evening����������������������������������
����������������������������������
14 That a sealed envelop containing one copy of Form VII bearing the seal
impression of the seal used to seal the samples was sent separately through
same special messenger
15. That the remaining sample portions and Form VII were deposited at the office
ol LHA. Barnala on the same day evening, which were seals intact
16. That on receiving the Report of the Public Analyst on Form III ,ln which the
Public Analyst Punjab Chandlgarh is of the opinion that
the content of the sample contains 7.3% milk-solid- not-Fat
��� �
against the minimum prescribe standard of � �� 9.0 % The
contents of the sample are therefore Adulterated .
4. Original Report is Annexure as VII
17. . That � the accused � � Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan
(Manager � of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road,
Barnala � according to law is fully responsible � day to day, sale, work and
conduct of business of the selling curd � for human consumption.
18. That accused � Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager�
of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, Barnala�
� has committed offence under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954
,action may kindly be taken against him under section 7/16 of PFA,Act,1954.and
under rule 50 of PFA,Rules 1955 by stocking � cow Milk for sale to public for
human consumption without any valid license It is further prayed that since this
offence facts under section 16 which shall be tried In summary trial procedure as
said under section 262-265 of Cr.PC.1973
That the Complaint is submitted for disposal In accordance with law,please
LIST OF WITNESSES
1.ManJinder Singh Dhillon, Govt. Food Inspector,Barnala
2.Sh.Harbajan Singh .Dealing Food Clerk O/o Civil Surgeon Barnala
3.Dr.BaIbIr Singh Local Health Athourity ,Barnala
4.Sh.yuvraj Singh, PubIic Analyst Punjab.Chandlgarh
5 Sh. Manjlt Singh .Special messenger/o Civil Surgeon Barnala
ANNEXURES
Complaint in two copies
1. Photocopy of Notification of seizing samples Annexure as -
2. Photocopy of Notification of launching prosecution Annexure II
3. Original copy of Form Six is Annexure as -Ill
4 .Original copy of receipt is Annexure as -IV
5. Original copy of spot memo is Annexure as - V
6Orignal copy of Form seven is Annexure as - VI
7.Orignal Report of Public Analyst is Annexure as -
VII�������������������������������������
��������������������������������������
��������������������������������������
������������� . �������������������������
��������������������������������������
��������������� COMPLAINANT
��������������������������������������
��������������������������������������
5. ��������������������������������������
�����������������������������������
������������������� . �������������������
��������������������������������������
����������������� Manjinder Singh Dhillon
��������������������������������������
������������������������������������
(Government Food Inspector)
�������������������������������
��������������������������������������
�������������������� Barnala
That Complainant being a Public Servant have to Perform multifarious duties and
Is unable to attend this Hon � Court on each and every date of hearing of this
case ,hence my presence on each and every date of hearing of this case may
kindly be exempted and APP attached with this Hon � Court may be allowed to
appear on my behalf. However I may be summoned as when so required
������������������������������
��������������������������������������
�������������������������������
���������������� COMPLAINANT
��������������������������������������
�����������������������������������
Manjinder Singh DhilIon
��������������������������������������
�������������������������������� (Government
Food Inspector)
�������������������������
��������������������������������������
������������������������ Barnala