Publicité
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité

Root Cause Analysis

  1. BY TALHA USMANI ( T A L H A U S M A N I @ H O T M A I L . C O M ) ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
  2. What is Failure?  Failure refers to the state or condition of not meeting a desirable or intended objective, and may be viewed as the opposite of compliance.  Failure investigation is the process of collecting and analyzing data to determine the cause of a failure.  An Investigation is set by an event —either a laboratory investigation, a manufacturing inconsistency, a regulatory or internal audit, or a customer complaint. “Any of these investigation records are entered into a CAPA system.
  3. Cost of Failures
  4. OBJECTIVES OF INVESTIGATION  Corrective Action: Eliminate detected nonconformity and avoid recurrence  Preventive Action: Prevent nonconformity occurrence  To identify other similar situations and take preventive actions  Regulatory Requirement (ICHQ10)
  5. QUALITY OF INVESTIGATION  The investigation should be thorough, timely, unbiased, well-documented, and scientifically sound (ref: Guidance for industry, Investigating OOS).  Investigation team members: Investigator (QA) – Who will insure implementation of corrective and preventive action Process owner – Who performs the process Quality Control - Who test the product Subject matter expert – Who knows the process Any relevant person
  6. Often the Stated Root Cause is the Quick, but Incorrect Answer For example, a normal response is: Equipment Failure Human Error Initial response is usually the symptom / outcome, not the root cause of the problem. This is why Root Cause Analysis is an essential and productive tool.
  7. HOW TO START RCA  1. Growth Mindset Everything can be changed or improved, it just needs effort and practice.  2. Positive Attitude Be optimistic and expect favorable outcomes
  8. The Shoes Story  Many years ago two salesmen were sent by a British shoe manufacturer to Africa to investigate and report back on market potential.  The first salesman reported back, "There is no potential here - nobody wears shoes."  The second salesman reported back, "There is massive potential here - nobody wears shoes."  This simple short story provides one of the best examples of how a single situation may be viewed in two quite different ways - negatively or positively.
  9. HOW TO START RCA
  10. Most Important  The most important thing in any root cause analysis is to avoid intentional or unintentional bias otherwise the actual problem will remain unidentified and lead to reoccurrence in future.  Make sure all ideas are considered without criticism  The investigation team should be fully aware of the standard process and must have sound knowledge.
  11. NO BLAMING
  12. FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION
  13. 3Rs OF TEAM WORK
  14. UNSOUND TEAM WORK
  15. SOUND TEAMWORK & SYNERGY
  16. Steps in Investigation 1. Identification 2. Impact of the problem / Risk Assessment: 3. Immediate Action 4. Root Cause Investigation 5. Action plan 6. Implementation and follow up
  17. 1. Identification Define the problem. For efficient investigation, the problem should be clearly defined. 2. Impact of the problem / Risk Assessment Risk to its customers and/or the company (i.e. risk to the patient related to the quality, efficacy or safety of the product; risk for the reputation of the company; risk of adverse regulatory actions; financial risk) Steps in Investigation and CAPA
  18. Steps in Investigation  3. Immediate Action: First preference is to protect the customer / Consumer / patient. Immediate action is necessary when the quality, efficacy or safety my be comprised by the problem. Immediate action may be:  Product recall  Blockage of the stock of a product  Rejection of a batch  Interruption of the production (i.e. until problem is assessed and fixed)
  19. Steps in Investigation 4. Root Cause Investigation A systematic approach should be applied to ensure that no potential root cause is lost through focusing only on a few set of assumed root causes. Conduct brainstorming session with a group of experts with different background using Ishikawa diagram to collect potential root causes. Finding the primary root cause is essential for determining appropriate corrective and/or preventive actions.
  20. Brainstorming  Write the topic / problem statement on flip chart / board.  Encourage idea generation.  Give equal opportunity to participate According to studies, 60-75% of the talking in traditional brainstorms is done by a few people. Prevent this „Uneven Communication Effect‟.  All ideas / suggestions / opinions are recorded  There should be no evaluation or discussion when ideas are given. (Write first, talk second)
  21. Field Trip – The three “ACTUALS”  Go where the work is actually done  Talk to the people who actually do the work. (involve them rather than investigate them)  See what actually happens
  22. 5 Why‟s Approach A simple tool for drilling down on the problem statement until the root cause is identified by asking “WHY” 5 times. It is applicable in cases when looking at one major cause and needs drill-down to arrive at one root cause. Find the right person who can answer the 5 Why‟s. Use other RCA tools if you are getting misleading answers
  23. Example: 5 Why‟s Approach
  24. Ishikawa Approach  Fish Bone Diagram / Cause and effect diagram (6Ms approach): It is applicable when looking at numerous major causes and needs drill-down probing to arrive at numerous root causes based on their cause and effect relationships  Cause and effect diagram is designed keeping the process flow chart in consideration.
  25. How to apply Ishikawa Approach  Process flow chart / diagram is drawn  Brain storming is done on process flow diagram and all probable root causes are written by dragging a line from the fish bone.  Evaluating each probable root cause by performing different test / activities.
  26. Ishikawa Diagram
  27. 6Ms definition  Material: incorrect, degradation, packaging, storage.  Man (People): training, verbal miscommunication, staff changed, attitude problem.  Machine: Defective, not maintained, rusty, operating parameters.  Method: deviations in execution, incomplete instruction in SOPs, frequent changes without intimation.  Measurement: equipment calibration, lab error, supervision, in-process tests.  Environment: temperature, humidity, work area.
  28. Steps in Investigation 5. Action plan / CAPA: What is CAPA? A system for implementing… 1. Corrective actions resulting from the investigation of complaints, product rejections, non-conformances, recalls deviations, audits, regulatory inspections and findings (ICHQ10) 2. Preventive actions resulting from trends from process performance and product quality monitoring (ICHQ10)  The plan assigns responsibilities and due dates for implementation.  Enough detail must be included regarding the required action and the expected outcome.
  29. Difference b/w correction, corrective action and preventive action
  30. 6. Implementation and follow up  Implement corrective and preventive actions and verify their effectiveness.  The actions that were taken are documented.  Have all recommended changes been completed and verified?  Did the actions correct or prevent the problem with adequate assurance that the same situation will not happen again?  Have all objectives been met?  Has training been performed to ensure that all affected employees understand the changes that have been made?  Was an assessment made that the actions taken have not had an adverse effect on other properties or aspects of a product or process. Steps in Investigation
  31. THANK YOU!
Publicité