Essay On The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method
The scientific method is an organized way that helps anyone answer a question or begin to solve a
problem. It is used in all types of Sciences such as Chemistry, Physics, Geology, and Psychology.
For psychologists it offers a standardized way to test a hypothesis, build on theories, and gain
knowledge about the mind. There are several steps to The Scientific Method and each step serves its
own purpose. By using the Scientific Method, you can understand better what psychologists go
through to arrive at conclusions about human behavior.
The first step in the Scientific Method is to formulate a specific question that can be tested. Once
you have identified the question, you can formulate a hypothesis. The hypothesis explains the
association between
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

I have used the scientific method in my case study to prove my hypothesis, if a plant is grown in
light it will grow faster than a plant grown in the dark. To conduct my experiment, you will need
lima beans, potting soil, and styrofoam cups. First, put three inches of potting soil into each
styrofoam cup. Then plant the lima bean seed about one inch below the surface of the soil. Next add
three tablespoons of water to each cup. Put one cup in a window seal or where there will be bright
light. Place the other cup in a closet or in a box sealed off from light. Keep a daily diary on how
each plant is growing. Each day should be recorded by height, number of leaves, and by the color
of the leaves each day. This experiment will probably involve...show more content...
A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and
the formulation and testing of hypotheses. Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to
another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge.
Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental
studies to test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable in order to dependably predict any
future results. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many hypotheses
together in a coherent structure. This in turn may help form new hypotheses or place groups of
hypotheses into context. Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the
conviction that the process be objective to reduce a biased interpretation of the results. Another basic
expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for
careful scrutiny by other scientists, thereby allowing other researchers the opportunity to verify
results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical
measures of the reliability of these data to be established.
References:
Axia College of University of Phoenix. (2008)
Retrieved July 24, 2008, from Axia College, Appendix B reading, aXcess, SCI 230–

Essay On Scientific Method
In the article understanding "Science and How it Really Works", It becomes apparent that the
Scientific Method is much more involved and dynamic than simply forming a Hypothesis, making
observations, conducting an experiment and forming a conclusion based on the data collected.
While these processes are the backbone they don't necessarily always follow one another in a
sequence and there is much more involved in each step than one may perceive from the simple list.
Generally speaking the Scientific Method begins with an observation that allows you to form a
hypothesis. In order to come up with a well informed hypothesis one can look through scientific
journals that may lend some light onto the subject your thinking of investigating. Sometimes talking
with peers or discovering new tools on the market that allow you to look at things differently than
before can be inspirational and lead to observations that then allow you to form a hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a...show more content...
Good experiments that produce reliable data generally have some factors to consider. The sample
size and whether it is a good representation of the "universe" you are considering. Are there any
biases in the way in which the samples are selected? In other words is it random and does everything
within your "universe" have an equal chance of being selected in your sample? If you are testing the
effects of certain drugs for example is there a control group that is not receiving the treatment? Last
but not least, can the experiment be repeated by others? Conducting a good experiment may be the
most difficult part of the scientific method. Often times there are constraints that don't allow you to
perform the perfect experiment. This may include budget limits, ethical considerations, of the
inability to control other factors that may influence your

Scientific Method
Science is an objective method used explain the natural phenomena of the universe. The practice of a
scientific method provides a detailed outline that contributes to expressing how to determine if a
theory is scientific. A continual cycle that emphasizes the techniques of observations, questions,
hypothesis, prediction, experiment, and conclusion. The complications that arise when applying the
scientific method to all theories is that science is subject to change; therefore, it is hard to modify
extensive ideas to a few simplified steps. A scientific explanation depends on existing experimental
theories to validate or disprove present and future logical arguments. This is because previous
observations support abstract methods that may not be testable and the continual change is
dependent on specific predictions and discoveries.
Many aspects of scientific knowledge are hypothetical ideas, however, they contribute the same level
of importance compared to a logical fact. A scientific explanation is shaped from existing
intelligence to develop future studies and...show more content...
Science is revised constantly; progressive observations that support and expand on existing ideas are
documented. When new knowledge is interpreted by scientists, they must perform a series of
experimental trials. These observations can either confirm or contradict the analysis, both are
beneficial to resolving the experiment. Scientific explanations are dependent of proof. For example,
when a new theory is published, the scientific method for the examination is accessible for others to
review. The public has the capacity to acquire the experiment's reports and contribute that data to
their own hypothesis. Science is justified through the combination of solutions. Current ideas are
continually challenged by others attempting to modify and simplify them into a universal

Essay History of the Scientific Method
Scientific method is the way scientists learn and study the world around them. It is the process by
which scientists work over a period of time to construct an accurate (i.e. reliable, consistent and
non–arbitrary) representation of the world. In the study of natural phenomenon, personal and
cultural beliefs strongly influence our interpretations and perceptions. Scientific method relies on
standard procedures to minimize these influences when developing a theory.
Scientific method consists of four steps:
(1)– Making an observation of a phenomenon.
(2)– Formulating a hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.
(3)– Proving the hypotheses correct by a series of experiments and tests. If the experiments do not
bear out the hypotheses,...show more content...
Almost 2000 years later Galileo challenged Aristotle's s work on mechanics and cosmology. Galileo
did not ridicule Aristotle, but simply showed that he had jumped to the wrong conclusions and
derived at inadequate answers because of his physics being not very mathematical. Errors in
Aristotle's work were rectified through direct observation and by the availability of new instruments
and experimentation techniques in the 17th century. Amongst other contributions, Galileo
contradicted Aristotle's view that bodies naturally returned to their natural place. It is believed that
Galileo demonstrated by throwing different weights from the Leaning Tower of Pisa that the weight
of the bodies was irrelevant to their speed of falling and only the density of the medium counted.
Lavoisier interpreted facts discovered by others and corrected them for errors. He is considered the
father of chemistry although he discovered no new chemical substances apart from a few new
chemical facts. Lavoiser used to carry out a lot of experiments, quantify their results and take various
precautionary measures. He studied Stahl`s theory on combustion and found errors in reasoning.
Stahl had given the concept 'phlogiston' for combustion but Lavoiser proved that no such thing
existed. Lavoisier repeated Boyle`s experiments which had showed an increase in the weight of cal
of tin when

Scientific Method In Psychology
The lesson that is perhaps the most important one we learned this week is the scientific method. The
scientific method is not only used in particularly every subsection in science, but allows
psychologists to test different ideas about behavior. Pastorino and Doyle–Portillo in the General
Psychology textbook describes the scientific method as " a set of rules for gathering and analyzing
information that enables you to test an idea or hypothesis". (8) All scientists adhere to these standard
set of rules in order to be able to better analyze the data and share the results throughout the scientific
community. The scientific method consists of a few distinct parts: allow for observation, make a
prediction, form a hypothesis, choose a research method/ design an...show more content...
The next step is to form a testable hypothesis, or educated guess. A hypothesis must phrased in a way
that in which another person can test the same hypothesis to verify or discredit it. After the
hypothesis is formed, the experimenter must choose and appropriate research study. For example, if
a scientist want to do a study about the behaviors of a particular person, like in the case Phineas
Gage and the psychological affects of the iron rod that shot through his head, than the scientist may
want to conduct a case study. Once the research method is established and the study has been
planned out, then it is time to conduct the experiment and collect the data. The final step is to
analyze the data to see if it supports or rejects the hypothesis. If the results do not support the
hypothesis, then one should revise their hypothesis. If the results do support the hypothesis, then the
study should be replicated to validate this study. Sharing the results of the experiment with other
members of the scientific community is also an important part is advancing one's understanding of
the particular

Scientific Method Research Paper
Scientific method is used to solve empirical problems and discover empirical truth in an empirical
pattern. The scientific method involves several steps, the first step is observing or asking question,
second step is forming a hypothesis, third step is testing the hypothesis or experimenting, fourth step
is confirm or disconfirm the hypothesis. In the simplest terms, scientific method is a process of trial
and error. To give a concise example considervehicle repair. Every weekend handyman, or every
high school student with a passing interest in autos knows about the method of trial and error. If
your car is starting to run poorly, and you take matters into your own hands in an attempt to fix it.
The first step is to guess the nature of the problem for example faulty emission or low brake fluid.
Acting on your instinct, you proceed to exchange a part, adjust a setting, or replace a fluid, and
then see if the car runs better. If your initial guess is incorrect and the car is not improved, you
revise your guess, make another adjustment, and once again test the car. With patience and enough
guesses, this process will often result in an operable car. However, depending on one's...show more
content...
You may be hesitant to think that the clumsy process of trial and error is identical to the scientific
method, if only because science is so often masked in complexity and jargon. Yet there is no
fundamental difference. It might seem that scientists start with a more detailed understanding of
their problem than the weekend car mechanic, but in fact most scientific inquiries have humble and
ignorant beginnings. Progress can occur just as assuredly via trial and error as in traditional science,
and the scientist isn't guaranteed of success any more than is the handyman: witness the failure to
develop a vaccine for

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on
a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the
scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is
related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is measured by its ability to make
falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable,
rigorous, and comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more
content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief
that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories
can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or
special cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed
hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both scientific laws and scientific theories
are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can
predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and
experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how nature will behave
under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations
of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from
many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation
and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well
supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

The scientific method, a long debated question to weather or not it accurately proves and aids in
human knowledge or not. In order to have unquestionable and accurate findings, the scientific
method is essential in guaranteeing accuracy. The scientific method includes imperative steps that
help scientists prove whether or not a hypothesis is correct. To begin,thescientific method does
indeed help scientists prove if their hypothesis is correct. Experimentation, one of the main steps in
the scientific method helps scientists prove if their hypothesis is supported or not. Experimentation
helps test the hypothesis and prove whether or not the hypothesis is correct. According to "The
Scientific Method" scientists make predictions based off the

Scientific Method
Science is part of everyone's everyday life, and the scientific method is used in a variety of day to
day tasks, whether we are consciously aware of it or not. The scientific method is a process by
which problems are approached in order to solve that problem by making observations and
performing experiments. This paper will look at two problems that could be encountered in daily
life, and using the scientific method to solve the problem.
Daily Use of the Scientific Method
Science is part of daily life, from the alarm clock that wakes a person up in the morning to the
vehicle that is used to transport them throughout their day. Even down to the body a person lives in,
there is science that can be applied to a person's...show more content...
Mom has heard that there is a flu going around at daycare, and is also aware that her husband took
the child out the night before for fast food that the child typically is not allowed to have as a
special treat. Mom goes to the internet and looks up symptoms of the flu as well as the effects of
a change in diet. She goes to WebMD and looks up symptoms of the flu, and asks her child
questions based on what she finds out about the flu. The child says he has muscle aches, is tired
has already reported a headache, and the mother checks his temperature, he is running a mildly
elevated temperature which has risen a full degree when checked an hour later. The mother could
not find any credible information about the change in her son's diet for a single meal to test that
theory. Because of the elevated temperature she gives her son a children's fever reducer, which
also helps to relieve her child's headache. She puts the child back to bed and checks on him every
few hours, his temperature is still elevated but lower than it was initially she estimates by touch, in
the morning she confirms by taking the child's temperature again, it is closer to the level it had
been the night before causing her to provide another dose of fever reducer and call the doctor's
office, the doctor's office confirms that the symptoms are likely the flu, and tell her to keep her son
home until he has been

Scientific Method
Utilizing The Scientific Method
SCI110, Introduction to Science
May 1, 2015
The Scientific method is a process that scientists use to solve a problem. It generally involves four
distinct steps that constitute the "Scientific Method". This paper describes the steps of the scientific
method, and its application in a real–world scenario we experienced.
Step 1: Formulating a Problem
Formulating a problem can range from simple to difficult solutions to a problem. In order to solve a
problem, you must first know what the problem is. To begin with we can determine what the
problem is not, just based on facts known by yourself, coworkers, friends or family. By asking a
question, eliminating...show more content...
When the water level in the sump pit rises, this switch turns on the pump. This pumps the water out
of the pit and into a pipe which ejects the drainage water out of the house and (hopefully) far away
from the house."
With the sump pump installed, we waited for severe rainstorms to hit before observing the results.
After one light storm, there was no flooding. But after a second, more severe storm, the floor
continued to take on water, which led us to the Conclusion that either the flooding was not due to the
rising water table, or the sump pump was ineffective at stopping the rising water table.
At that point we decided to observe the flow of water outside during the next big storm. When it
finally hit, we went outside and observed a significant amount of water flowing straight down the
wall just outside the walkway, from the top of the walkway under the deck. Once again, the
walkway floor took on water. We revised ourHypothesis to state that the basement walkway was
flooding due to water flowing directly down the exterior wall, underground, where it entered gaps in
the wall to the walkway.
Our solution to test the Hypothesis was to install a gutter under the deck, under the flashing which
separated the walkway roof to the walkway exterior wall. This would catch rain water and funnel it
away from the wall, therefore preventing water from flowing directly down the wall where it could
enter the walkway

Scientific Method Essay
Scientific method what comes to mind? Do we start thinking of some type of formal process that
will answer all our scientific questions or problems? When I was in school many years ago, we
were taught that scientists go through a series of steps to find a solution to a problem or find
evidence to support or disprove a theory. It all seemed rather cold, and formal. Going back to school,
school has taught me that science has undergone significant changes and has moved away from the
rigidity of a fixed series of steps in what was formerly called the scientific method. I think the best
way to describe what helps me understand scientific method, is trying to shed some light on the
uncertainties through...show more content...
What I have found is that a lot of research on adult learner has been done only performed recently.
If we go back to the first half of the twenty first century, organization theory was dominated by
classicists who viewed organizations as rational systems and valued efficient operations above all.
They promoted the idea that management is a process of planning, organization, command,
coordination n, and control and that design of an organization should be like that of a machine.
This concept spawned the modern bureaucracy. (Morgan, 1997a) Morgan's points out those
organizations could be considered cold and dehumanizing, so we are suppose to think of
organizations as machines? As we interact everyday with many organizations that are bureaucracies
such the schools we attend, the bank we keep our money. Bureaucracies have been a very
successful because they work and they are efficient. They have been consistence and persisted
because this gives the manager control over the people. This concept was ingrained in managers.
This theory was scientificly management was developed by Fredrick Taylor during the early

Essay Scientific Method
Unit 9 Final Project (Science Meets Real Life)
SC300
July 16, 2013
Tarah Wells
Each and every day, you are faced with having to make split–second decisions, and the need to solve
random problems that you encounter. To reach those decisions and work those problems out you are
subconsciously using the scientific method. Apply the steps of the Scientific Method to two
situations that could occur in your everyday life. Use the scientific method in the first scenario
provided by your instructor to solve the problem at hand. Scenario 1: An overflowing or clogged
toiletMy youngest son has recently been potty trained, so I took him to use the "big boy" potty. He
used the toilet right away, wipe, and then (his...show more content...
Pieces of tissue with glitter along with pink and blue color on them. The water and tissue then
began going down the toilet rapidly. So I gave it an extra flush and everything went flowing down
the toilet like it was supposed to. My hypothesis was true. This problem has been solved correctly.
Come to find out, my daughter was enjoying polishing her nails. She was trying different colors
and designs. She used plenty or more than enough tissue to clean her nails and change the site of
them. Instead of putting the tissue in the trash can, she decided to put the tissue in the toilet. She
was able to flush the toilet being that there was no previous clog up. The water just flowed down
and the tissue lingered around which caused the toilet to become clogged. Scenario 2: A problem
with an appliance at your home. My family and I just moved into a new home. One morning not
long after moving there and eating picnic food and/or fast food we decided it was time to go
grocery shopping. We went to the grocery store, came home, unload the trunk full of groceries,
and load it into the freezer. Later on I went into the freezer to grab some ice cream for the kids to eat
and it was soft. It did not become soft during the ride home from the grocery store. I am sure of
that because we carry a cooler filled with ice when we go grocery shopping. I stuck the ice cream
back into the freezer. Ask Question: Why was the ice cream soft when I removed it from the freezer?

The Scientific Method is represented by a reasonable order of steps used to come across a
conclusion obtained by an experiment or attentive observations. There are five orderly steps which
are the following; asking a question or stating the problem, creating a hypothesis, conduct an
experiment, evaluate the results, and create a conclusion. A method used by scientists to find an
answer a question or the solution to a problem. Now, let's take a closer look of what each of these
five steps consist of. Asking a question or stating the problem is very important to clearly avoid any
misunderstand later in the scientific method process. It is the statement as to why you will be
performing that experiment. Creating a hypothesis, is making an educated

Essay On Scientific Method
The Usefulness of the Scientific Method The development of the scientific method in the late 1500's
to the early 1600's was a crucial stepping–stone in the science community. The scientific method is
based upon observations, hypotheses and experimentation. The concept is rather simple, and can be
applied to many areas of study. Once an observation is made, the observer can make a hypothesis as
to why that phenomenon occurs and can then design an experiment to prove whether or not that
hypotheses is valid. Although the scientific method has been extremely useful in the discovery of
various things from usages of medications to studying animal behavior, there are still those who
question the usage of this tool. These critics claim that since...show more content...
There are several disease that are we still do not know much about despite copious amounts of
research. Cancer and Alzheimer's are two major examples of these mysterious diseases. Although
the scientific method is useful in the development and research on various medications and
treatments, there are still limitations. Patients react to treatments in various ways, because bodies
and systems vary from person to person. There is simply too many variable to be able to pinpoint
the exact reaction a patient may have. Clinical trials and studies can narrow down these reactions
down to a list of possible side effects, but doctors can never know for sure how a patient will
respond. There are many unknowns and treating actual patients is much different that conducting an
experiment investigating how two medications will effect an experimental unit. During a designed
experiment, the experimenter can control all the variables except for the experimental variable and
get clear straightforward results. On the other hand, when treating a real patient with a severe
illness, such as cancer, the physician has to keep an eye on all body systems. They cannot simple
give all of their attention to the area of the body that is currently affected. In these practical settings,
there is simply too many variables for the scientific method to be as useful as it normally

The Scientific Method Essay
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when
conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a reliable, consistent, and non–arbitrary
representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order
of experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist
must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the experiments will be based around. Then, through
repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the
hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with
another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins again. This...show more content...
Furthermore, flies were observed laying eggs where the maggots formed. Thus, he concluded that
maggots are the result of flies, not spontaneous generation. He then called the principles behind his
experiment "Metodo Scientifico" or The Scientific Method.
The first cases of what would be considered properly using the Scientific Method can be found
earlier, though, back in the studies of Galileo, early in the 17th century. He first observed that
heavy objects gain speed as they fall. He then proposed, or hypothesized, that the rate of falling of
massive objects was proportional to the distance that the object has fallen. Following the Scientific
Method, he tested his hypothesis and found it to be false, since objects falling unequal distances do
not fall in the same amount of time, as his hypothesis led to. Since his hypothesis failed, he made a
new one, which proposed that the rate at which an object falls is directly proportional to the time the
object has spent falling. This was tested by rolling balls down an inclined plane and calculating the
speed and time values from those observations. Later, these experiments led to the discovery of the
gravitational constant g, and a better understanding of the Scientific Method.
The Method has been used many times since Galileo conducted his experiments, and it has been
considered a valid way of conducting experiments since

The Scientific Method is the approach that scientists use to investigate some phenomena. It's a
standard technique to find cause and effect of a particular problem.
I am going to introduce how the scientific method works using interesting research paper "Racial and
Ethnic Residential Segregation, the Neighborhood Socioeconomic Environment, and Obesity among
Blacks and Mexican Americans". There are a series of steps that scientists used to understand the
problem.
The first step of the scientific method is observation of phenomena. The authors of article observed a
high rate of obesity. In such a case they began their investigation with making a number of different
observations concerning obesity.
So once they decided what to investigate, the...show more content...
Goal of the experiment was to determine the effect of racial and ethnic residential segregation, the
neighborhood socioeconomic environment on level of obesity. So to know if our hypothesis is
correct was used cross–sectional data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on
approximately 5000 black and Mexican–American adult participants who was living in
disadvantaged segregated neighborhoods (1999–2006). These areas were chosen for the experiment
because they implied as poor with limited access to health–promoting resources. Segregation could
impact the obesity level, which had increased for blacks and Mexican Americans. So to prove the
hypothesis was conducted experiment which determines the impact of racial/ethnic segregation with
limiting opportunities on the level of obesity.
During the experiment were calculated obesity body mass index and were identified participants
who were obese in areas of black and Mexican American segregations. Having carefully recorded
data is very important during the experiment because it could lead to more correct conclusion. So for
accurate recording of observation some of participants were excluded from the experiment because
was missing the information about their height or weight, educational level, income, or because
some of them were

Essay scientific method
LAB 1 – THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
*Adapted from LabPaq CK–GCC
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to learn about and use the Scientific Method. The
discussion of physical properties such as density, color, texture, smell, and solubility will take place.
Observations and Experimental Data:
Table 1: Making Observations
Procedure
Observation
A. Torn paper
Vertical tear: easier to tear, more visible fibers, more jagged edges and uneven tear.
Horizontal tear: harder to tear, less fibers visible, less jagged edges and more of a straight line tear.
B. Appearance of rock salt crystals
Before crushing: Jagged edges, very few smooth surfaces, size was 9mm x 6mm, cubic crystal shape
with ridge like features. Color was...show more content...
After about two to three minutes the re–observation showed that some of the crystal has completely
been absorbed by water.
3. In light of your previous response, what can you conclude about salt? In light of my previous
response I can conclude that salt is formed from the evaporation of water and that a chemical
reaction occurs.
C. Do all the grains of sand look like they are made out of the same material?
All the grains of sand do not look like they are made out of the same material.
1. Propose a hypothesis to explain your observations on the appearance of sand.
If I add water to all the grains of sand equally the shape of the grains will change.
2. Describe what was initially observed when several drops of water were added to several granules
of sand initially, and in 2–3 minutes? When drops of water were initially added to sand the water
didn't move of absorb the sand. After about two to three minutes the sand shifted to the outer areas
of the water capsule and remained unchanged. 3. In light of your previous response, what can you
conclude about sand? That sand even with its different appearances were made from the same
particles and water had no effect on their physical properties.
D.Water and oil act differently on the small–scale reaction surface. Propose a

Reflection Paper
Name: ___Greg Russell________ Chapter __1___Date: __8/24/16_____
In the space below, please write a short summary of what you read, new information you learned,
your impression of the material viewed, how you may use this information in the future, and any
additional thoughts you may have.
This assignment should be single spaced.
1) Chapter title: Introduction, Acquiring Knowledge, and the Scientific Method
Short summary of the chapter:
In short, chapter 1 was about learning how research methodology can be useful in everyday life.
Through the scientific method, the methods of tenacity, intuition, authority, rationalism, and
empiricism we can develop a better understanding of information obtained. The scientific method,
however, is the most acceptable way to answer questions because it allows us to find the most
accurate answer. Through the scientific method our study is shown to be empirical, public and
objective. When researching qualitative studies, you can expect narrative reports while quantitative
studies will show numerical data....show more content...
The method of tenacity was a new method of acquiring knowledge that I learned, which stems from
information that is accepted as true because it has always been believed to be or because superstition
supports it. I also became educated on the five steps of the scientific method that consist of observing
behavior, forming a hypothesis, making a predictable prediction, making systematic, planned
observations, as well as supporting, refuting or refining the original hypothesis.
My

Five Step Scientific Method
The scientific method is a five step processes that is observation and research, hypothesis,
prediction, experimentation, and conclusion. In the observation and research stage it is the first
step to understanding a problem, this would require research. The hypothesis is having a possible
answer to a problem or outcome. The prediction is the answer based on if the hypothesis is true or
not and if it is true than an assumed prediction can be made. Finally when all the guess work is done
it is time to experiment to find the answer. The experiment stage can answer the problem or answer
an unattended problem. The conclusion is the answer that the conclusion gives but this doesn't mean
there is am solution for the problem ("Scientific Method," n.d.)....show more content...
Every genuine test of a scientific theory, then, is logically an attempt to refute or to falsify it, and one
genuine counter–instance falsifies the whole theory. In...theory of demarcation is based upon ...
perception of the logical asymmetry which holds between verification and falsification: it is
logically impossible to conclusively verify a universal proposition by reference to experience ..., but
a single counter–instance conclusively falsifies the corresponding universal law. In a word, an
exception, far from 'proving' a rule, conclusively refutes it (Thornton,

Essay On The Scientific Method

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Essay On The Scientific Method

Similar to Essay On The Scientific Method (9)

More from Paper Writer Services

More from Paper Writer Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On The Scientific Method