Research Associate à Mergermarket India Private Limited
12 Mar 2016•0 j'aime•556 vues
1 sur 21
Public Private Patnership
12 Mar 2016•0 j'aime•556 vues
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Signaler
Formation
This ppt covers about public private partnerships in india and brics nations .The ppt covers in depth analysis of PPP in india and how ppp is done in brazil,russia,china,south africa .also laws and changes in fdi and rules for PP
5. SECTORWISE PPP PROJECTS APPROVED BY
PPAC AND THEIR STATUS
SECTOR PROJECTS
APPROVED BY
PPAC
OF WHICH
AWARDED
IMPLEMENTATION STATUS
COMPLETED UNDER
IMPEMENTATION
No Cost
No
Cost No Cost No Cost
ROADS 232 255 158 163 18 10 140
(>85%)
153
PORTS 32 38 22 21 6 3 16 16
OTHERS 17 16 2 1 - - 2 1
TOTAL 281 309 182 185 24 13 158 170
*Source: Department of Economic Affairs/NITI
Since January 2006, PPPAC has approved 281 PPP projects in Central sector
involving investment of Rs.3.09 lakh crore. Out of these, 182 projects with an
investment of Rs.1.85 lakh crore have been awarded
(Cost in thousand crores)
6. STATE NO COST OF WHICH
ROAD PROJECTS OTHER PROJECTS
No Cost
(Rs in Crs)
No Cost
ANDHRA
PRADESH
4 14962 3 3148 1 11814
BIHAR 2 2420 2 2420 - -
HARYANA 1 383 - - 1 382
KARNATAKA 3 707 3 707 - -
MADHYA PRADESH 29 4468 20 3945 9 523
MAHARASHTRA 9 2334 9 2334 - -
ODISHA 1 1293 1 1293 - -
RAJASTHAN 3 1066 3 1066 - -
UTTARPRADESH 3 3285 3 3285 - -
TOTAL 55 30917 44 18198 11 12719
*Other projects include 8 food grain silo projects, 2 Transmission
projects and 1 Metro Rail project
7. PPP Eco-system in India
GoI has a progressive financial support system for PPP projects.
Some of the key initiatives include:
A. Setting up of India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd. (IIFCL)
as quasi-equity.
B. VGF scheme (Viability Gap funding scheme)
The GoI is expected to undertake capacity building interventions to
develop organizational and individual capacities for the purpose of
identification, procurement and managing of PPPs.
The PPP Cell in the Department of Economic Affairs will have
professionals who provide technical support to the ministries and
other authorities developing PPPs
8. Why is urgent for India to get Infra
PPPs right?
India’s infrastructure is a key factor in
constraining rapid, competitive
economic growth and job creation and
thereby imposing huge costs on society
can India become rich before it
becomes old? In other words, will
India accumulate enough wealth to
afford a decent quality of life for its
young and its old in the decades
ahead?
Over the period 2013-30, India is
currently projected to have the world’s
largest need for infrastructure
investment, and the second largest
infrastructure deficit based on its
average spending during 1992-2011
*Source: WSJ Article
10. PROJECT
STRUCTURING
MULTIPLE CHALLENGES
PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT STAGE
PROJECT AWARD AND
EXECUTION STAGE
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT &
MONITORING STAGE
1 LAND ACQUISITION
LACK OF
INFORMATION
3
2 GREEN CLEARANCES4
DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
7
FINANCIAL ISSUES5
CAPACITY OF PRIVATE PLAYERS6
MULTIPLE APPROVAL AGENCIES6
LACK OF INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY6
11. FINANCING ISSUES
Bank appraisal of projects has in many cases suffered from lack of
adequate diligence, sometimes due to inadequate appraisal skills.
This has affected the quality of lending
There is a shortfall in equity capital with local sponsors.
Delays in execution of projects further leads to equity getting
trapped in ongoing projects, thus not being available for newer
projects.
Balance sheets of most prominent developers in the country are
stressed and over leveraged.
Underdeveloped debt markets
12. Multiplicity of institutions and overlap
in roles
Governments at all levels(ULB, State agencies etc) by and large
unable to create steady pipeline of projects due to Institutional
capacity constraints
Multiple agencies involved in Project implementation and overlap in
functions cause inordinate delays
Inadequate capacity in authorities, consultants, financiers,
developers, statutory audit and vigilance in the PPP context has
given rise to misinformation
Lack of urban planning, and clear laws, regulations and procedures
has resulted in a slowdown of urban infrastructure projects
13. INFRA SLOWDOWN
INFRA POWER ROAD
June 13 19.1 29.8 21.5
June 14 11 14.4 14.6
Jan 15 10.4 14.7 7.9
Feb 15 10 13.9 7.5
March 15 10.1 14.2 6.7
April 10.6 15.4 5
May 15 8.6 13.6 4.6
June 15 9.2 13.1 3.4
July15 8.3 11.5 6.2
Aug 15 8.2 10.6 6.3
Sep 15 8.7 12.1 4.6
Oct 15 8.3 10.6 7.2
Nov15 8.7 10.4 7.5
Dec 15 8.4 10 7.9
CREDIT GROWTH DATA All fig in %
Road Sector emerged as the only
silver lining , Infra continues to
be on downward spiral
Credit demand is growing for the
road sector as a result of the
awarding of new projects and
feel
large portion of this decline in
credit growth is also being linked
to the high number of stalled
projects in the infrastructure
space and their contribution to
the rising non-performing assets
(NPAs)
Infra accounts for 50% of the
stalled projects and revival is the
key
Source: RBI Databank
14. Private sector problems
Over-aggressive bidding with inadequate due diligence by bidders has
sometimes led to unviable offers
Myopic assessment of risk factors and a failure to build in mitigation measures
(Due to mistaken belief that economy was growing at rapid pace at second half
of 2000)
The quality of consultancy services in PPPs has not kept pace with the growing
need for such services in the country. This is reflected in inconsistent quality of
some advisory service
Private sector developers, who were mainly construction experts, found they had
no appetite for long-term operations and maintenance (O&M) of infrastructure
assets
The DCCO(Date of commencement of commercial operations) based asset
classification norm may have resulted in many projects getting classified as
NPAs
16. Brazil
Federal laws provide an enabling framework for PPPs, there is no need for state
specific legislation
Broad political consensus to maintain favourable frameworks and to be proactive on
concession projects
Technical capacity has been the main bottleneck for PPPs, as the government has
been working to build institutional knowledge and to ensure that projects are
properly structured and launched
Successful execution of projects (Road, Urban mobility &Airports), but problems
such as inordinate delays and fewer bidders than anticipated still persist
uncompetitive and opaque bidding process, courts have further confounded the
process by issuing contradictory rulings in key areas
The government has been criticised for limiting internal rates of return; however, the
private sector is still interested and willing to compete under these terms
17. RUSSIA
Project selection regulations are solid, and transparency and fairness
requirements are in place
Broad Political support for PPPs
Country sovereign risk has been stable as public-sector external debt is low
Conducive Investment climate
Institutional actors involved in PPPs are not efficiently co-ordinated, which
undermines the impact of their activity
Limited technical capacity
Risk-allocation practices have not been implemented so as to facilitate private
participation
18. CHINA
China has approved and implemented a new regulation for PPPs in June 2015
Regulation aims to consolidate and refresh the various existing rules and
regulations on concessions
It encourage private sector participation in the financing, construction and
operation of infrastructure and utility project
Public sector is allowed to enter into concession contracts with foreign entities,
but there might be difficulties for non-PRC concessionaire to acquire the land
rights, import equipment and goods and handle taxation
procedures of dealing with various government entities to develop projects is
complex in China
State dominance which sometimes impairs the powers of Private players
Uncertainties for private players as government sometimes does not fully
respect the agreement
19. SOUTH AFRICA
SA has a strong business infrastructure, a sophisticated financial sector, and
comparatively high standards in accounting, regulatory structures and law
Government, plays a lead role in identifying the need for a PPP, developing a
business case, designing the project, procuring a private party, ensuring that
procedures are complied with, and monitoring performance
Risk allocation is generally assigned to the party best able to bear it
Score card rating system for bidders
Investors claim that the procurement process disproportionately favours
government
Biggest challenge is the broader macroeconomic and political volatility including
labour unrest and currency volatility
20. ‘PPP’ Resetting in Union Budget 2016-17
proposed Public Utilities Resolution of
Disputes Bill
renegotiation of PPP projects
new credit-rating mechanism for private
infrastructure projects
Dividends will no longer be taxed in the
hands of the recipients (Key issue in
operationalization of REIT)
Proposed far more practical structure for
Asset Reconstruction Companies
IMPLEMENTATION
OF KELKAR
COMMMITTEE
REPORT
(PPAC- Public–Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC) consisting of the Secretary, Department of Economic Affairs, as Chairman, and Secretaries of the erstwhile Planning Commission, Department of Expenditure, Department of Legal Affairs and the Administrative Department concerned, as Members was constituted for approval of PPP projects. The project proposals were appraised in the erstwhile Planning Commission and approved by the PPPAC. Further, Empowered Institution (EI) 5 and Empowered Committee (EC) were also set up in January 2006 to approve Viability Gap Funding (VGF) to the PPP projects)
Financial Support Framework for PPPs in india
2.2.1 Setting up of India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd. (IIFCL) In 2006 the Government established the IIFCL to provide long-term debt up to 20 per cent of the project costs to infrastructure projects. Upto one-half of the lending by IIFCL can also be in the form of subordinated debt, which often serves as quasi-equity.
2.2.2 Viability Gap Funding (VGF) The VGF Scheme was notified in 2006 to enhance the financial viability of competitively bid infrastructure projects. Under the Scheme, grant assistance upto 20 per cent of project cost is provided by the Central Government to PPP projects undertaken by the Central Ministry, State Government, statutory entity or local body, thus leveraging budgetary resources to access a large pool of private capital. The sponsoring Ministry, State Government or the project authority, if it so decides, can provide additional grant up to 20 per cent of the project cost from its own budget.
2.3 Model Bid Documents, Guidelines and Manuals for PPPs Standardised guidelines and model documents that incorporate key principles and best practices relating to bidding and award of PPP projects have been developed. These include: (a) Model Concession Agreements (MCAs) in various sectors that are based on international best practices and spell out the policy and regulatory framework that is necessary for addressing the complexities of PPPs and for balancing the interests of users and investors; (b) Model Bidding Documents pertaining to pre-qualification and selection of bidders and for selection of technical, financial and legal consultants for PPP projects; (c) Guidelines for formulation, appraisal and approval, financial support, and monitoring of PPP projects; and (d) Manual of Specifications and Standards for 2-lane and 4-lane highway projects.
Further, the Empowered Institution (EI) has approved 183 project proposals of States seeking VGF from Central Government and involve investment of Rs..
95,127 crore. Of these, 55 projects with an investment of Rs.30,917 crore have been awarded so far.
Besides the above, 43 projects in electricity generation sector totalling about 45,000 MW have been awarded to private power producers since 2005 on Design, Build, Finance, Own & Operate (DBFOO) and Design, Build, 7 Finance, Operate & Transfer (DBFOT) models. However, they are not captured in the PPPAC and EI database as these are undertaken by state companies and do not involve VGF