Reservoir Induced Seismicity-2

1. Department of Earth Sciences KFUPM Introduction to Seismology Reservoir Induced Seismicity ( Reading Assignment: pp.384-386 ) Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM Ali Oncel [email_address]

3. Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

4. • Dam Completed 1965 • M 6.2 seven months later , after rapid filling to 80m Kremasta Dam, Greece Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

6. Monticello seismicity concentrated under reservoir Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

7. Monticello: Filling vs. seismicity Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

8. Filling curves & Seismicity Rate Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

9. Filling curves & large earthquakes Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

10. • Earthquakes are associated with change in water level: with large scale filling of the dam, possibly with emptying • Seismicity often tapers off within ten years of water level stabilization • Variable time delays may occur between dam filling and earthquakes General characteristics of reservoir triggered seismicity Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

12. • Gas extraction greatly decreases pore pressure • Subsidence/earthquakes occur • Many small earthquakes in the Lacq Gas Field, France • Gazli gas field, Uzbekistan. Gas withdrawal started 1966; max production 1968-71. 2. M 7earthquakes in 1976, one in 1984. Were they induced?? • Some people have wondered about 1983 M 6.5 Coalinga earthquake, M 5.8 Does oil and gas extraction cause earthquakes? Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

13. http://www.orfeus-eu.org/newsletter/vol3no2/ekofisk.html Mw=4.1-4.4 The May 7, 2001 Earthquake in the Ekofisk Oil Field Area, North Sea Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

14. The seismic event was induced owing to stress changes caused by water injection (Ottemo¨ ller, et al., 2005, JGR, Vol.110). . Conclusion for 2001 EQ(M=4.4) Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

15. Induced Event: M max : 4.3-1984 Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

16. British Columbia Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

17. M max =4.3 Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM Injection rate Seismicity

18. Location of the Valhall and Ekofisk oil fields are shown in a map of the southern Norwegian North Sea (a). A profile along line AA' illustrates the dome structure of the Valhall oil field (b). Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM A B

19. Microseismicity of Valhall Oil Area Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

20. Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

21. Seismicity Induced by Petroleum and Geothermal Activities Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

22. Carthage Gas Field, East Texas Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

23. Two event sub-clusters each delineating the intersection of two planes. Looking along line of intersection (top) and face-on views (bottom). Linear trends can be seen along fracture faces (bottom). The event sequences indicate early fluid invasion along linear trends.

24. Event rate changes correlate with production rate changes. Seismic response lags production by 2–3 weeks. Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

25. Fracture planes are delineated by production-induced events occuring over a 6-month monitor period. Composite fault plane solutions indicate thrust displacement along the mapped, low-angle fractures. Induced stress changes are very small (<0.1 MPa). Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

26. Small magnitude events were detected above the reservoir by placing a downhole receiver array within the upper 800 feet of an abandoned well. Event occurrence terminates near the base of the serpentine unit. WELL-BORE DEFORMATION The Geysers, California Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM

27. Both the above reservoir and the deeper reservoir seismicity show correlations with reservoir injection activity in the study area. WELL-BORE DEFORMATION The Geysers, California Introduction to Seismology-KFUPM