Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Mysticism- Part 4 Our Common Inheritance

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
Balancing twin needs
Balancing twin needs
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 5 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Similaire à Mysticism- Part 4 Our Common Inheritance (20)

Plus par Peter Creagh (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

Mysticism- Part 4 Our Common Inheritance

  1. 1. ONLY THE MYSTICS WILL SURVIVE CASSETTE 3 - Side A : Talk4 : – Our Common Inheritance. ‘To have seen me is to have seen the Father ( The Source of all life)’ In this talk, Ishpriya addresses some of the issues concerning why so many Christians have turned to the East when searching for a spiritual path. She begins by re-examining our common ( Christian) Western spiritual inheritance, an inheritance which is very often unknown or forgotten. She provides a ‘sketch’ of the growth in western spirituality and reminds us that (initially) it grew out of its Palestinian context, where ideas from both Eastern and Middle Eastern mysticism were well known. However, after 2 or 3 centuries the scriptures of the Christian Tradition were settled and closed and the community had grown into a recognisable ‘Church’ with its sacraments and rituals. This has led to 2 reasonably unique aspects which underpin the Christian approach to mysticism. These aspects are its heavy reliance on Scripture and its ecclesiastic tradition, one of structure, sacraments and rituals. These were seen as the almost exclusive means of accessing the mystical and other approaches were frowned upon or discouraged. This differs from the Eastern Tradition, with its emphasis on Guru and disciples and the experiential nature of mysticism. In the Christian Tradition access to the immediate experience of God is through the 2 main doors of Scripture and the Ecclesiastical . In addition, Christianity has always been cautious and wary of individual’s ‘ mystical experiences’ and frowned upon individuals experimenting in mysticism. It has in a way blocked this avenue of access , albeit at times unconsciously. Therefore, unlike the East, we have not developed a tradition of spiritual guides and gurus and this may explain why westerners who are seeking guidance look to the Eastern Faith Traditions. Many from the East feel that Christianity is merely involved and pre-occupied with ‘Sin and Social Work’ and less interested in how individuals can be guided and supported on and in their own unique spiritual journey. Increasingly, with the growth in our multi cultural society, Christians are being both challenged and enriched by their contact with other traditions. Part of this challenge is to find the roots of our own Christian mysticism and its tradition. This requires us to revisit Scripture and to realise that ‘ We find God in the life of Jesus the Christ’ Ishpriya suggested that we could begin this by examining three texts from Scripture. These were from the New testament and St John’s Gospel, namely John !0:30, John 14:9 and John 16:7. These , she contended, were ‘great sentences’ similar to the great sentences and sutras of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. Sentences that required study, reflection and contemplation, because they contained great truths and were examples of a mystical experience.. Each one of these were then examined. In John’s Gospel the Source is referred to as Abba the Father. ‘I and the Father ( The Source of all life) are one’ Jn 10:30 ‘To have seen me is to have seen the Father ( The Source of all life)’ Jn 14:9 ‘I must go (disappear) otherwise the Spirit will not come to you’ Jn 16:7 Ishpriya explored these and suggested that they were deep and great mystical sayings. They demonstrated the mystical experiences of Jesus the Christ who felt a oneness with the Source (Abba – the Father). A potential problem for Christians is that they could be so ‘blown away’ by Jesus that they failed to see through his life and realise that this life is the medium through which we can see the Source. What the world needed was people of compassion, hope, joy and understanding. It did not need re- organising or more resources etc. We all need to develop our holiness (wholeness) and mystical awareness.
  2. 2. SOME QUESTIONS TO AID OUR REFLECTION AND SHARING How aware am I of my own spiritual inheritance and do or could I make use of this? How helpful could I find spiritual inheritance from other Traditions i.e. Universal Wisdom ? What else struck me about the concept/idea of the phrase ‘Our Common Inheritance’? If I could only do one thing different in my spiritual practice, what ONE THING would I choose? CASSETTE 2 - Side 2B : Talk 3 : – Signs of Mysticism. ‘We need to remember that the mystical moments happen every day’ What does the experience of the Mystery do? Ishpriya suggested we might look at some ‘signs’ of being the mystic’. These signs were to be found in all of us. So we needed to relax , listen and reflect on how these apply to myself as . She then reflected on up to six areas or signs. The first of these was sense of harmony at certain moments, a sense of union, wholeness or completion. Experiences of this begin in childhood. This is a ‘sense of being at home with my source’ It demands that we ‘get rid of our sense of separateness’ She quoted the great Christian Mystic, Lady Juliana of Norwich ‘ Between God and me there is no between’ ‘ and also the Hindu saying ‘God is closer to me than myself ‘ Both of these speak of a sense of oneness, union and completion. She then went on to look at experiences of permanence. She reminded us that we needed to avoid the mistake of ‘looking for the permanent amongst the non-permanent’ . Then there is the experience of relaxing into loving others This was an ability of true love which led us to bond with others but NOT try to possess them. A further sign was a keen awareness of the inter-dependence of all things . Buddhism calls this compassion ( karuna) and points to the Buddhi Satva ( one who has achieved enlightenment but remains to help others on their way) as an excellent example of this sense. This led to the realisation that my choices effect others. What is my life of 85 years compared to the 20 billion or so years of this Universe . And yet in this vastness of creation and time-space , each of us are unique. All this should ‘reduce us to silence’. She quoted Theresa of Avila, who in commenting upon her mystical experiences merely said ‘I can’t describe this’. Theresa also used the ‘butterfly’ as the symbol of mysticism, this is also used in other Traditions. All the above leads us to a realisation that ‘ Silence is the fullness of all, it is Not the emptiness’ . These signs are always full of paradox and this is a comment often made by those mystics who have entered into the Mystery. She then recounted the story of Swami s Chidananda & Abishtiktananda , the first Hindu, the second Christian. At their infrequent meetings, they would look in silence at each other and there they could sense ‘the Joy which mystics have encountered’ . This led to them both laughing with
  3. 3. each other. Both had tasted the silence, the unity, the compassion of that Face-to-Face encounter with the Mystery and this led to pure joy, or the ananda , which is bliss. Mystics are not at war with anybody, they live in peace, justice and respect for others. They are prophets, who do not set about forecasting the future, but can read the ‘signs of the times’ They have humility. Ishpriya reminded us that ,’there is a tendency ( certainly in Christianity) to be more concerned with the doing than the being’ … and also ‘Its not what I have done but how I have lived’ . Zen Buddhists have an approach which starts with ; Its A mistake is to try to do something with our life instead of living it. ‘Life is for living’ is a Zen saying. Pannikar suggests that some signs of the mystic are ‘ they are people who make ineffective administrators, impossible ecclesiastics, unpredictable leaders and unreliable followers’ In conclusion, if we can recognise any of the above in us then we have reached the beginning of wisdom SOME QUESTIONS TO AID OUR REFLECTION AND SHARING How alive have I been minute by minute in my life? How do I respond to the idea that mystics are counter-culture and are willing to take responsibility for their choices? Which are and were the mystical moments of my life & do I recognise them? What are the experiences in my life that I never have to make an effort to remember? CASSETTE 2 - Side 2A : - Talk 2 – Face to Face Tagore’s Poem :- ‘ Day after Day , I will stand before you, face to face’ ‘At the moment humanity is searching for its soul’ Ishpriya opened this part of her presentation with Tagore’s poem and then the quotation above. She then went on to address the fact that many people hunger for the direct experience ( of Mystery) that is mysticism. The modern search through Meditation began in the 1960s. People outside the mainstream Religions sought out the Gurus in India. Like us, they had the desire for that ‘Face-to-Face ‘encounter with a Friend , which Tagore reflects on in his poem. She reminds us that the word ‘GOD’ can be a block in this search, as we have become too used to it. There is a lovely Canadian Children’s Prayer Book with a title ‘WHAT IS GOD?’ This question in the title is the first and most important one to ask on our Journey towards being human. So, as we journey and mature the answer to that 1st question will keep changing. Many feel challenged and threatened as this happens but it’s a sign of genuine growth. Everything else changes in this dynamic world and dynamic life and so too must our understanding of what is God and who ( for
  4. 4. me) is God ? In this way we can each re-assess our understanding of our relationship with God, who is Truth and Mystery.. Ishpriya suggested, that it could be helpful if we were to go for one year WITHOUT the word GOD. This could force us to get to grips with What or Who it is we want to come Face to Face with. For example we might be guided by Meister Eckhart . He doubtlessly shocked his congregation when he exhorted them ‘ You must discover God as God is. You must come upon him naked in His dressing Room’! Whether God is He, She or It., our 1st challenge is to ‘ drop the language and images of God ‘ and be opened up afresh to the experience of Reality. This is to have an unmediated, direct encounter with this Absolute whose various names are Truth, Reality, the One without a second, the Source of All Life etc. Daoism, manages this as it calls ‘The Dao, - a word for what we cannot name’. Therefore anything we can name cannot be the Absolute Experience’. But, she reminds us, that there is a SOURCE, an Unchanging Reality – a Mystery at the heart of everything.. This ( Mystery) is something ‘we cannot know’. The question for us is; ‘Do I have a conviction of the existence of this Source?’ And yet, the paradox is that I can experience it even if it is Mystery. She reminded us of St Paul’s prayer that we may be ‘ Filled with the absolute fullness of God’ . However, we can be assured that the Mystery will reveal ITSELF to us, in other words the self-revelation of God at a soul-to-soul, spirit-to –spirit can come to us and can be known at some level.. But this IS NOT an intellectual knowing, it is experiential revelation of ‘The Mystery’. Try telling your children ‘that God is that’. , whatever ‘that’ is. You cannot define God! God IS NOT a ‘super person hidden in the skies’. God cannot be defined at either the intellectual, emotional or imaginative levels. The Absolute Reality IS! All Traditions have great respect for those who experience the Mystery and all Faith Traditions accept the existence of this Absolute Reality, this Source, this Mystery. How can we know of this experience of the Mystery – mystics of different Traditions can tell us about this and all have common aspects. They all seem to talk about the same thing – One Source- Mystery, God and the Face – to Face encounter . How do we know about this and not just as an intellectual idea? Being a Mystic does not mean having visions. The mystics, even those who had visions will tell us that visions are not the thing. That is not living in the mystery ( to be continued in Talk 3 : - Signs of Mysticism ) SOME QUESTIONS TO AID OUR REFLECTION AND SHARING I could take a look at my picture(s) and name(s) for God. What are these? How many of these have I ever looked at and/or challenged, particularly since childhood? How can or might some of these get in my way of encountering the Reality ‘Face-to- Face’?
  5. 5. Cassette ONE: - Talk 1: Listen to the Spirit: A movement into Mystical Consciousness. Only the Mystics will survive: A statement for our current situation. Only the Mystics will survive: A statement for our current situation. ( recorded in Ireland in late 1999) A statement made by several modern theologians e.g. Karl Rahner, Matthew Fox, Raymundo Pannikar Ishpriya reminded us that ‘We hear what we are listening for’. So she encouraged us to be open to ‘listening to the Spirit’. What is it that Only the Mystics will survive? She talked about the recent changes in our understanding of the Cosmos and of Planet Earth. We had now 'moved off the Planet' and this was a big change in our collective and individual consciousnes. It faced us with new challenges. We first need to acknowledge and recognise the challenge and risk facing our human family & world. Will we survive the global change – the quantum leap? Physically the quantum leap has happened. We, as a species, have left this planet and looked back. We have left our house and walked out into the garden of space. We are watching creation unfold as science discovers more about our cosmos. This challenges our Theology - understanding of God. When we thought the world was a flat plate, then God was in the heavens above and hell was below. Then we found out that our world was a globe & not the centre of our Universe. This led to a change in our concept of God. Now we had a concept of an ever-expanding Cosmos. This too challenges our concept of God. It requires us to re-think the nature of The Source and our relationship with God, by whatever name we call it. Only the Mystics could survive this challenge and chart a course through these changes. We all have the capacity to be mystics. She suggested that the lines in Ps 8 'Who am I that you should create & care about me?' Should create and convey awe and that this 'awe' was a mystical experience. Our theology is influenced by our Cosmology. This affects all cultures, civilisations and all on our planet. Mystics are people who are ‘wide awake’, discerning and willing to accept responsibility to respond to the challenge and change. Our planet is like a small boat in the vast seas of the Cosmos. We are all in this small boat and only the Mystics can help chart a course for the crew and passengers. We then reflected and used the following questions to guide oursharing:- What is it that causes me to get that sense of awe? How wide awake, discerning and responsive am I to the challenges that face our human family ? Where do or could I feel uncomfortable in all this? P.S. Our understanding of who or what ‘God’ by whatever name we call it; is extremely important in our efforts to make sense of ourselves, our environment, creation and the cosmos. This then effects how we relate to ourselves, others and our environment.

×