AMD Ryzen Threadripper in Techday with Jim Anderson

1. RYZEN THREADRIPPER:
HEDT LEADERSHIP
JIM ANDERSON
SVP AND GM, COMPUTING AND GRAPHICS
UNDER EMBARGO TO JULY 30, 2017, 7:30 PM PDT

2. Increased
R&D
Faster Rate of
Innovation
Injecting Excitement
Back in PCs
A RETURN TO INNOVATION
FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE PCs

3. RYZEN™ ROLL-OUT
Premium
Desktop
Premium
Mobile
Consumer
Commercial
Consumer
Commercial
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1H18
MOBILE APU
MOBILE
RYZEN RYZEN RYZEN
Launched Q1 Launched Q2
Extreme THREADRIPPER
Launched July 27
OEM Systems Q3
Early August
Roadmap subject to change

4. HEDT CUSTOMERS
▪ Video Editors
▪ Photo Editors
▪ 3D Content Developers
▪ Musicians and Producers
PROSUMERS &
CREATORS
DEVELOPERS &
RESEARCHERS
▪ Data Scientists
▪ Software Developers
▪ Engineers
MULTI-TASKING
GAMERS
▪ Gaming and Streaming
▪ Gaming while Creating
▪ Multi-GPU 4K and
1440p Ultrawide Gaming

5. HIGH END DESKTOP
USER REQUIREMENTS
Large Memory
Footprint
More
Compute
More GPUs and
PCIe® Lanes
More I/O and
Storage
HEDT CUSTOMERS
DESERVE INNOVATION AND COMPETITION

6. RYZEN EFFECT: HEDT MARKET
$999.00
$1,089.00
$1,723
$599.00
$999.00
Intel 8-Core and 10-Core SEP Pricing
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER IS CHANGING THE LANDSCAPE
RYZEN
Launch Q1 2017
THREADRIPPER
Announced May 2017
i7 5960X
August 2014
i7 6900K
May 2016
i7 6950X
May 2016
i9 7900X
June 2017
i7 7820X
June 2017
8-Core 10-Core
* See Footnote 1

7. IS HERE

8. 3.4 GHz Base
4.0 GHz Boost
16-Cores,
32-Threads
Unlocked & Built
for Overclocking
64 PCIe® Lanes
& 4 Channel DDR4
1950X
* See Footnote 6

9. HIGHEST PERFORMANCE
HEDT PROCESSOR EVER
THREADRIPPER 1950X
Core i9 7900X THREADRIPPER 1950X
Cinebench nT
Up to 38% More
Performance
$999$999
* See Footnote 2

10. 3.5 GHz Base
4.0 GHz Boost
12-Cores,
24-Threads
Unlocked & Built
for Overclocking
64 PCIe® Lanes
& 4 Channel DDR4
1920X
* See Footnote 6

11. Core i9 7900X THREADRIPPER 1920X
Cinebench nT
Up to 11%
More Performance
WINNING CPU PERFORMANCE
FOR LESS
THREADRIPPER 1920X
$999 $799
* See Footnote 2

12. HEAVY WORKLOADS
PRICE-PERFORMANCE
RYZEN
1950X
Core i9
7900X VS.
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+55%
Veracrypt
$999 $999
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+14%
Premiere Pro
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+31%
POVRay 3.7
nT
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+21%
Handbrake
(HEVC/1080p Apple TV)
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+27%
7-Zip 16.02
(Benchmark)
* See Footnote 3

13. HEAVY WORKLOADS
PRICE-PERFORMANCE
RYZEN
1920X
Core i9
7900X VS.
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1920X
+19%
Veracrypt
$999 $799
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1920X
-5%
Premiere Pro
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1920X
+6%
POVRay 3.7
nT
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1920X
+3%
Handbrake
(HEVC/1080p Apple TV)
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1920X
+3%
7-Zip 16.02
(Benchmark)
* See Footnote 3

14. 3.8 GHz Base
4.0 GHz Boost
8-Cores,
16-Threads
Unlocked & Built
for Overclocking
64 PCIe® Lanes
& 4 Channel DDR4
1900X
* See Footnote 6

15. $549
1900X
8-Cores,
16-Threads
3.8 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR
$799
1920X
12-Cores,
24-Threads
3.5 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR
$999
1950X
16-Cores,
32-Threads
3.4 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR
Pricing USD SEP at launch
RYZEN THREADRIPPER LINEUP

16. RYZEN THREADRIPPER
DELIVERS HEDT LEADERSHIP
Cores Cache (MB)
DDR4 Memory
Channels
PCIe®
Lanes SEP Price
Threadripper 1950X
vs. i9 7900X
+60% +68% Even +36% Even
Threadripper 1920X
vs. i9 7900X
+20% +60% Even +36% - 20%
Threadripper 1900X
vs. i7 7820X
Even +5% Even +114% - 8%
*4 Ryzen Threadripper Lanes reserved for chipset
Superior Cores, Threads, Cache, and PCIe® Lanes
* See Footnote 4

17. Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
-2%
Avg. Power (Wall)
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+24%
Performance
(Blender Ryzen
Threadripper Image)
Core i9
7900X
RYZEN
1950X
+29%
Performance /
Watt
RYZEN THREADRIPPER
PERFORMANCE-PER-WATT ADVANTAGE
* See Footnote 5

18. FULL ECOSYSTEM OF X399 PLATFORMS AT LAUNCH
* See Footnote 6

19. 20 Liquid Cooler Options
Arctic, Corsair, EKWB, NZXT
Thermaltake, Cryorig, EVGA
5 Air Cooler Options
Artic, Noctua, Coolermaster
FULL ECOSYSTEM OF 180W LIQUID & AIR COOLING

21. RYZEN THREADRIPPER
AVAILABILITY
Aug. 31st
$549
1900X
8-Cores,
16-Threads
3.8 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR
Aug. 10th
$999
1950X
16-Cores,
32-Threads
3.4 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR
$799
1920X
12-Cores,
24-Threads
3.5 GHz /
4.0 GHz
TR

22. 1950X AND 1920X
PRE-ORDERS
FROM 90 RETAILERS AND BOUTIQUE OEMS
July31ST
All pre-orders are subject to the retailer’s terms and conditions as set forth on the respective retailer website.

23. UNLOCKED. UNRESTRAINED.
UNCOMPROMISING.
* See Footnote 6

25. FOOTNOTES
1. The launch price of the 8-core Core i7-5960X was $999; the launch price of the 8-core Core i7-6900K was $1089.00; the launch price of the 8-core Core i7-7820X is $599. RZN-71the launch price of the 10-core Core i7-6950X was $1723.00; the launch
price of the 10-Core i9-7900X is $999. RZN-71
2. Cinebench R15 nT is used to simulate multi-threaded CPU performance; the AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X scored 3042, while the Intel Core i9-7900X Extreme (Intel’s fastest consumer desktop processor) scored 2212 for a benchmark score
comparison of 3042/2212 = 1.38× or 38% more on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X; the AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X scored 2451 for a benchmark score comparison of 2451/2212 = 1.11× or 11% more on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Cinebench R15 1T is used to simulate single-threaded CPU performance; the AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X scored 167, while the Intel Core i9-7900X Extreme (Intel’s fastest consumer desktop processor) scored 197 for a benchmark score
comparison of 167/197 = 0.85× or 15% less on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X; the AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X scored 167 for a benchmark score comparison of 167/197 = 0.85× or 15% less on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. The AMD
Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X scored 3042, while the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (AMD’s fastest consumer desktop processor prior to Threadripper) scored 1601 for a benchmark score comparison of 3042/1601 = 1.90× or 90% more on AMD Ryzen
Threadripper 1950X. RZN-45
3. Testing by AMD Performance labs as of July 22, 2017 on the following systems. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used.
System Configurations: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X processors on an ASUS ROG X399 Zenith Extreme motherboard, Intel Core i9-7900X processor on an X299 AORUS Gaming9 motherboard. All systems equipped with 32GB (4 x 8GB)
DDR4-3200 RAM, Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD, Windows 10 RS2 operating system, Geforce TX 1080 Ti graphics adapter, Graphics driver 384.76 :: 7/22/2017. Testing by AMD Performance labs as of July 22, 2017 on the following systems. PC
manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. System Configurations: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X processors on an ASUS ROG X399 Zenith Extreme motherboard,
Intel Core i9-7900X processor on an X299 AORUS Gaming9 motherboard. All systems equipped with 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 RAM, Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD, Windows 10 RS2 operating system, Geforce TX 1080 Ti graphics adapter, Graphics
driver 384.76 :: 7/22/2017. The Core i9-7900X achieved a score of 4565.5 in POVRay 3.7, rendered a video in 546.7 seconds in Adobe Premiere PRO, encoded a video in 415 second in Handbrake, achieved a score of 5789.3 MIPS in 7-Zip, and achieved
15.6 GB/s in Veracrypt. The Threadripper 1950X achieved a score of 5971.1 in POVRay 3.7 (5789.3/4565.5=1.27, or 27% faster than the 7900X), rendered a video in 468.9 seconds in Adobe Premiere PRO (546.7/468.9=1.17, or 17% faster than the
7900X), encoded a video in 343.3 second in Handbrake (415/343.3=1.21, or 21% faster than the 7900X), achieved a score of 73444 MIPS in 7-Zip (73444/57893=1.27, or 27% faster than the 7900X), and achieved 24.2 GB/s in Veracrypt
(24.2/15.6=1.55, or 55% faster than the 7900X). The Threadripper 1950X achieved a score of 4845.4 in POVRay 3.7 (4845.4/4565.5=1.06, or 6% faster than the 7900X), rendered a video in 574.8 seconds in Adobe Premiere PRO (546.7/574.8=0.95, or
5% slower than the 7900X), encoded a video in 395 second in Handbrake (415/395=1.05, or 5% faster than the 7900X), achieved a score of 59899 MIPS in 7-Zip (59899/57893=1.03, or 3% faster than the 7900X), and achieved 18.5 GB/s in Veracrypt
(18.5/15.6=1.19, or 19% faster than the 7900X). RZN-73
4. Release MSRP’s listed below current as of July 27th, 2017: The Core i9-7900X has the following specifications: 10 cores, 23.75 L2+L3 cache, 4 memory channels, 44 PCIe lanes, and a release MSRP of $999. The Threadripper 1950X has the following
specifications: 16 cores (60% more than the 7900X (16/10=1.6), 40MB L2+L3 cache (68% more cache than the 7900X,40/23.75=1.68), 4 memory channels, 64 PCIe lanes (45% more than the 7900X, 64/44=1.45), and a release MSRP of $999 (equal to
that of the 7900X). The Threadripper 1920X has the following specifications: 12 cores (20% more than the 7900X (12/10=1.2), 38MB L2+L3 cache (60% more cache than the 7900X, 38/23.75=1.6), 4 memory channels, 64 PCIe lanes (45% more than the
7900X, 64/44=1.45), and a release MSRP of $799 (20% less than the 7900X, $799/$999=0.8)
The Core i9-7820X has the following specifications: 8 cores, 19MB L2+L3 cache, 4 memory channels, 28 PCIe lanes, and a release MSRP of $599. The Threadripper 1900X has the following specifications: 8 cores, 20MB L2+L3 cache (5% more cache than
the 7900X, 20/19=1.05), 4 memory channels, 64 PCIe lanes (128% more than the 7900X, 64/28=2.28), and a release MSRP of $549 (8% less than the 7900X, $549/$599=0.92). RZN-72
5. Ryzen Threadripper Testing by AMD Performance labs on an engineering sample of AMD Ryzen Threadripper as of 4/28/2017. AMD Ryzen™ ThreadRipper: Whitehaven Motherboard, Ryzen™ ThreadRipper engineering sample processor (16c/32t),
with Radeon RX480 8GB graphics adapter, 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4-2667 RAM, Windows 10 operating system, Graphics driver 16.5 :: 4/28/2017. Core i9-7900X testing and data by PCWorld, representing the view of a third party at
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3201187/computers/intel-core-i9-review.html?page=2 for Cinebench R15 nt. These third party results have not been verified by AMD. AMD has no obligation to update third party information and will under no
circumstances be liable for any damages resulting from your reliance on this third party content. Cinebench R15 nT is used to simulate multi-threaded CPU performance; the AMD Ryzen™ ThreadRipper engineering sample scored 3033, while the
Intel Core i9-7900X Extreme (Intel’s fastest consumer desktop processor) scored 2180 for a benchmark score comparison of 3033/2180 = 1.39× or 39% more on AMD Ryzen Threadripper. The AMD Ryzen™ ThreadRipper engineering sample scored
3033, while the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (AMD’s fastest consumer desktop processor prior to ThreadRipper) scored 1601 for a benchmark score comparison of 3033/1601 = 1.89× or 89% more on AMD Ryzen Threadripper. PC manufacturers may vary
configurations yielding different results. Results are estimates only. Performance may vary based on the use of the latest driver, and on final processor configurations. RZN-46
6. AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ processors with 180W TDP require the type of robust cooling solutions provided by premium liquid cooling*. Please see this page for more details: [insert our cooling solution page]

26. FOOTNOTES
5. Testing by AMD Performance labs as of July 22, 2017 on the following systems. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used.
System Configurations: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X processors on an ASUS ROG X399 Zenith Extreme motherboard, Intel Core i9-7900X processor on an X299 AORUS Gaming9 motherboard. All systems
equipped with 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 RAM, Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD, Windows 10 RS2 operating system, Geforce TX 1080 Ti graphics adapter, Graphics driver 384.76 :: 7/22/2017.
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X completed the 150-sample Blender test in 12.94 seconds and used an average power of 254.96 watts, resulting in a power usage of (254.96/16 = 16) watts per core, a performance of
(150/12.94=11.59) samples-per-second, and a performance-per-watt of (11.59/254.96=0.0455). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X achieved a Cinebench 1t score of 167 and used an average power of 108.15 watts, resulting in a
power usage of (108.15/16 = 7) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X achieved a Cinebench nt score of 3036 and used an average power of 257.9 watts, resulting in a power usage of (257.9/16 = 16) watts per core;
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X achieved a Deus Ex: Mankind Divided avg and 99th percentile frame rates of 83 and 62.5, respectively, and used an average power of 353.51 watts, resulting in a power usage of (353.91/16 =
22) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X completed the Handbrake (1080p to appleTV) encode in 152 seconds and used an average power of 257.49 watts, resulting in a power usage of (257.49/16 = 16) watts per
core, and of (152x257.9=39200) second-watts.; The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X achieved a PCMark10 score of 8104.5 and used an average power of 162.7 watts, resulting in a power usage of (162.7/16 = 10) watts per core;
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X completed the Blender test in 16.87 seconds and used an average power of 250.7 watts, resulting in a power usage of (250.7/12 = 21) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X achieved a
Cinebench 1t score of 167 and used an average power of 108.4 watts, resulting in a power usage of (108.4/12 = 7) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X achieved a Cinebench nt score of 2450.5 and used an average
power of 253.8 watts, resulting in a power usage of (253.8/12 = 21) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X achieved a Deus Ex: Mankind Divided avg and 99th percentile frame rates of 84.7 and 62.9, respectively, and
used an average power of 346.64 watts, resulting in a power usage of (346.64/12 = 29) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X completed the Handbrake encode (1080p to appleTV) in 178 seconds and used an
average power of 251.97 watts, resulting in a power usage of (251.97/12 = 21) watts per core; The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X achieved a PCMark10 score of 7921.5 and used an average power of 162.19 watts, resulting in a
power usage of (162.19/12 = 14) watts per core; The Core i9-7900X completed the 150-sample Blender test in 16.33 seconds (24% slower than the Threadripper 1950X which completed it in 12.4 seconds, 16.33/12.4=0.76)
and used an average power of 260.1 watts (2% more than the Threadripper X1950X which drew 254.96 watts, 254.96/260.1=0.98), a performance of (150/16.33=9.18) samples-per-second, and a performance-per-watt of
(9.18/260.1=0.0353), resulting in a performance-per-watt advantage for the Threadripper 1950X of 29% (0.0455/0.0353=1.29). 1950X (12.4/250.7=0.0496 seconds/watt for the 1950X, 16.33/260.1=0.0627 seconds/watt for
the Core i9-7900X, resulting in 26% better perf/W for the Threadripper 1950X (0.0496/0.0627=1.26) ; The Core i9-7900X achieved a Cinebench 1t score of 198 and used an average power of 112.2 watts, resulting in a power
usage of (112.2 /10 = 11) watts per core; The Core i9-7900X achieved a Cinebench nt score of 2203 and used an average power of 239.7 watts, resulting in a power usage of (239.7 /10 = 24) watts per core; The Core i9-
7900X achieved a Deus Ex: Mankind Divided avg and 99th percentile frame rates of 104.7 and 77.8, respectively, and used an average power of 375.77 watts, resulting in a power usage of (375.77/10 = 38) watts per core;
The Core i9-7900X completed the Handbrake encode (1080p to appleTV) in 183.5 seconds and used an average power of 253.44 watts, resulting in a power usage of (253.44/10 = 25) watts per core, and of
(185.3x253.44=46506) second-watts of power, 16% more than the Threadripper 1950X (39200/46506=0.84). The Core i9-7900X achieved a PCMark10 score of 8601.5 and used an average power of 152.85 watts, resulting in
a power usage of (152.85/10 = 15) watts per core. RZN-67
6. AMD’s product warranty does not cover damages caused by overclocking, even when overclocking is enabled via AMD hardware and/or software. GD-26