The Role of Aromatase Inhibitors in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Repro protocology 101
1. The Evolution and Implementation of Reproductive Synchronization ProtocolsRepro Protocology 101 Paul M. Fricke, Ph.D. Professor of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison
4. Mechanism of Luteolysis in Cattle 1956Hysterectomy was shown to extend luteal lifespan in cattle (Wiltbank and Casida, J AnimSci 15:134-140)
5. 1967– Removal of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL prevented luteal regression, whereas regression occurred normally when the uterine horn contralateral to the CL was removed (Ginther et al., J ReprodFertil 14:225-229)
6. Conclusions: 1) The luteolytic substance originates from the uterus 2) Luteolysis is a local rather than a systemic process
7. A Brief History of Prostaglandin 1979– Lutalyse approved for use in cattle by the FDA DinoprostTromethamine Naturally occurring PGF2 in the form of the tromethamine salt Lutalyse® – Pfizer Cloprostenol Sodium Synthetic analog of PGF2 Estrumate® – Intervet
8. PGF2 PGF2 PGF2 TAI (80h) Targeted Breeding SystemUpjohn - 1980 46% CR 46% CR 4% CR Estrus Estrus 14 Days 14 Days
9. 1979 Lutalyse approved for use in cattle 1980 Targeted breeding system SynchTimeline 1980 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
25. Pre-Synch Ovsynch PGF2α TAI GnRH GnRH PGF2α PGF2α EDAI 10 to 12 days 16 h 7 days 56 h 14 days
26. Frequency of AI Relative to the Second PGF Injection of Presynch
27.
28. 1979 Lutalyse approved for use in cattle 1986 Follicular waves discovered 1995 Ovsynch protocol published 2001 Presynch Ovsynch protocol published 1980 Targeted breeding system Synch Timeline 1980 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
29. PGF2 GnRH GnRH PGF2 PGF2 Compliance –Presynch/Ovsynch On any given day, 95% of your cows get the correct injection 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 =77% 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 =59%
32. G US+P G+TAI 23% (28/120) 19 26 28 T T R US+G G+TAI P 34% (41/121) 26 33 35 T T R US+G G+TAI P 38% (54/143) 33 40 42 T T R n=711 G+TAI 0 R Fricke et al., J. Dairy Sci. 86:3941-3950; 2003
33. G P G TAI T T R F 32 39 41 42 Synch and Resynch Presynch/ Ovsynch for first TAI G TAI P G P P R T T R R F 0 Resynch for nonpregnant cows
34. 1979 Lutalyse approved for use in cattle 1986 Follicular waves discovered 1995 Ovsynch protocol published 2001 Presynch Ovsynch protocol published 1980 Targeted breeding system 2003 Resynch protocol comparison published Synch Timeline 1980 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
35. GnRH PGF GnRH +TAI 48 h 7 Days GnRH PGF TAI GnRH GnRH PGF GnRH +TAI 7Days 56 h 16 h 7 Days 72 h Comparison among Cosynch and Ovsynch 56 protocolsBrusveen et al., 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-1052. Cows were submitted for TAI after Presynch or as Resynch treatment 1507 TAI in 927 lactating Holstein cows
36. Effect of Treatment on conception rate and pregnancy loss Brusveen et al., 2008. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-1052.
37. 1979 Lutalyse approved for use in cattle 1986 Follicular waves discovered 1995 Ovsynch protocol published 2001 Presynch Ovsynch protocol published 1980 Targeted breeding system 2003 Resynch protocol comparison published 2008 Ovsynch56 protocol published Synch Timeline 1980 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
48. Effect of synchronization protocol on pregnancies per AI, DIM, lactation number, BCS and locomotion score in lactating dairy cowsSouza et al., Theriogenology 2009
49. Effect of treatment onfertility 39 to 45 d after TAISouza et al., 2009 n=88 n=107 n=69 n=73
50. 1979 Lutalyse approved for use in cattle 1986 Follicular waves discovered 1990 GnRH + PGF protocol published 1995 Ovsynch protocol published 2001 Presynch Ovsynch protocol published 1980 Targeted breeding system 2003 Resynch protocol comparison published 2008 Ovsynch56 protocol published 2009 Double Ovsynch protocol published Synch Timeline 1980 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
54. Comparison among Resynch protocolsGiordano et al., unpublished. GnRH PGF TAI GnRH 25% n=375 7Days 56 h 16 h GnRH PGF GnRH TAI GnRH 31% n=361 7Days 56 h 16 h GnRH PGF hCG TAI GnRH 33% n=346 7Days 56 h 16 h d 18 d 25 d 32 d 34 d 35