The document discusses high-performing teams and how to build leadership quotient. It provides an agenda for a meeting that will cover topics like ideal team size, diversity versus good chemistry, the importance of pairs, how brain structure relates to teams, managing change and maneuverability, and team lifecycles. The document advocates that team design must work with brain structures and provide the support needed for teams to reach their full potential. It also notes that teams must be capable of surviving significant changes in today's economy and that humans adapt more slowly than technology.
15. • Publisher of Forbes magazine
• Featured column, Innovation
Rules, covering business and
leadership issues
• Accomplished entrepreneur as
well as a journalist and speaker
• Author of Life 2.0 and The Soft
Edge: Where Great Companies
Find Lasting Success.
Rich Karlgaard
16. • Veteran newspaper reporter
and columnist, magazine
editor, and entrepreneur
• Author /Coauthor of nearly
twenty award-winning books
• The Intel Trinity, was named
the Best Book of 2014 by
800CEOread.com.
Michael S. Malone
30. Discussion Topics
1. Ideal Team Size
2. ‘Diversity’ vs. ‘Good Chemistry’
3. The importance of “Pairs”
4. Brain Structure and teams
5. Change & Maneouverabiliy
6. Team Life Cycle Turn over vs. Tenure
33. Talk amongst yourselves...
Describe the best team you ever worked within (or led).
How many people served on that team?
What ingredients combined to make it a great team?
What did you accomplish?
39. “The figure of 150 seems to represent the maximum number of individuals
with whom we can have a genuinely social relationship, the kind of
relationship that goes with knowing who they are and how you relate to each
other.”
41. Impossible Connectivity
2 members =
1 connection
3 members =
3 connections
4 members =
6 connections
6 members =
15
connections
16 members
= 120
connections
32 members
= 496
connections
42. “Big teams usually wind up
just wasting everybody’s
time. That’s why having a
huge senior leadership
team—say, one that includes
all the CEO’s direct reports—
may be worse than having no
team at all.”
~ J. Richard Hackman
Harvard Psychologist
43. Problems with Increasing Team Size
Can impair
performance
Networking
Problem
Integration
Costs
Free riding
Relational
losses
58. What you can do?
Know your own preferences, weaknesses, strengths, and understand how they effect
your team’s performance
Help your team learn, acknowledge and value, their own preferences, and how they
complement the team
Keep project goals front and center, and schedule time for :
1) divergent thinking (generating multiple options)
2) convergent thinking (focusing on a single option and implementation)
59. What is your best
example of positive
‘cognitive diversity” at
work on a team you
were serving on?
60. Diversity works if …
The team
1. has a compelling direction: the team task is clear, challenging and consequential
2. is bound (it is clear who is and who is not on the team) and stable (membership is not
constantly fluctuating), and its members are interdependent
3. is set up with the right mix of members, who have norms of conduct that guide their
behavior
4. is diverse but not so different that they cannot work with each other
5. have the right set of skills and expertise for the team task
6. has a supportive organizational context that provides team members with access to
resources to help accomplish their task
7. receives coaching from experts, peers and leaders
70. Your teams must be
given the support they
need to reach their full
potential.
71. Alex Pentland, the director of
MIT’s Human Dynamics
Laboratory, and his team use
sociometers” to generate data
on communication patterns
and productivity of teams in
real organizations.
72. Sociometrics: How Teams Best Communicate
communicate
frequently —
about 12
exchanges per
hour.
talk and listen
in equal
measure
talk informally
(outside formal
meetings)
look for ideas
and information
outside the
group
adjust their
patterns of
communication
84. Making Pairs Work
Identify the
Need
Prepare the
Pair
Determine the
Goal
Establish
Metrics
Manage with
the Right
Intensity
Stay Observant
Create
Opportunities
Keep Records
Manage
Transitions
93. “Here is the uncomfortable truth: Humans run to a much slower
evolutionary clock than our inventions. To use an engineering
term, we are the “gating factor” that keeps a process from
running faster. It is people, not scale or technology, who
determine how well an organization adapts to change.”
94. The exponential forces at work in today’s culture and economy
reward winners quickly and punish losers mercilessly.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99. “And it almost never happens unless a small, cohesive team is found at the
center or top of that organization and is endowed with two other crucial
factors: the power to execute its decisions across the entire organization and
the trust of its players in the periphery around that team.”