SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Ch 6.6: The Convolution Integral
Sometimes it is possible to write a Laplace transform H(s) as
H(s) = F(s)G(s), where F(s) and G(s) are the transforms of
known functions f and g, respectively.
In this case we might expect H(s) to be the transform of the
product of f and g. That is, does
H(s) = F(s)G(s) = L{f }L{g} = L{f g}?
On the next slide we give an example that shows that this
equality does not hold, and hence the Laplace transform
cannot in general be commuted with ordinary multiplication.
In this section we examine the convolution of f and g, which
can be viewed as a generalized product, and one for which the
Laplace transform does commute.
Example 1
Let f (t) = 1 and g(t) = sin(t). Recall that the Laplace
Transforms of f and g are
Thus
and
Therefore for these functions it follows that
{ } { }
1
1
sin)()( 2
+
==
s
tLtgtfL
{ } { } { } { }
1
1
sin)(,
1
1)( 2
+
====
s
tLtgL
s
LtfL
{ } { } { })()()()( tgLtfLtgtfL ≠
{ } { }
( )1
1
)()( 2
+
=
ss
tgLtfL
Theorem 6.6.1
Suppose F(s) = L{f (t)} and G(s) = L{g(t)} both exist for
s > a ≥ 0. Then H(s) = F(s)G(s) = L{h(t)} for s > a, where
The function h(t) is known as the convolution of f and g and
the integrals above are known as convolution integrals.
Note that the equality of the two convolution integrals can be
seen by making the substitution u = t - τ.
The convolution integral defines a “generalized product” and
can be written as h(t) = ( f *g)(t). See text for more details.
∫∫ −=−=
tt
dtgtfdgtfth
00
)()()()()( τττττ
Theorem 6.6.1 Proof Outline
{ })(
)()(
)()(
)()(
)()()(
)()(
)()()()(
00
0 0
0
0
0 0
)(
0 0
thL
dtdgtfe
dtdgtfe
ddttfge
utdttfedg
duufedg
dgeduufesGsF
t
st
t
st
st
st
us
ssu
=



 −=
−=
−=
+=−=
=
=
∫∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∫ ∫
∞
−
∞
−
∞ ∞
−
∞ ∞
−
∞ ∞
+−
∞ ∞
−−
τττ
τττ
τττ
ττττ
ττ
ττ
τ
τ
τ
τ
Example 2
Find the Laplace Transform of the function h given below.
Solution: Note that f (t) = t and g(t) = sin2t, with
Thus by Theorem 6.6.1,
4
2
}2{sin)}({)(
1
}{)}({)(
2
2
+
===
===
s
tLtgLsG
s
tLtfLsF
∫ −=
t
tdtth
0
2sin)()( ττ
{ }
( )4
2
)()()()( 22
+
===
ss
sGsFsHthL
Example 3: Find Inverse Transform (1 of 2)
Find the inverse Laplace Transform of H(s), given below.
Solution: Let F(s) = 2/s2
and G(s) = 1/(s - 2), with
Thus by Theorem 6.6.1,
{ }
{ } t
esGLtg
tsFLtf
21
1
)()(
2)()(
==
==
−
−
)2(
2
)( 2
−
=
ss
sH
{ } ∫ −==−
t
detthsHL
0
21
)(2)()( ττ τ
Example 3: Solution h(t) (2 of 2)
We can integrate to simplify h(t), as follows.
[ ] [ ]
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
22)(2)(
2
222
222
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
−−=
−+−−=




−−−−=



 −−=
−=−=
∫
∫∫∫
te
eettte
eetet
deete
dedetdetth
t
ttt
ttt
ttt
ttt
ττ
τττττ
τττ
τττ
Find the solution to the initial value problem
Solution:
or
Letting Y(s) = L{y}, and substituting in initial conditions,
Thus
)}({}{4}{ tgLyLyL =+′′
[ ] )(}{4)0()0(}{2
sGyLysyyLs =+′−−
Example 4: Initial Value Problem (1 of 4)
( ) )(13)(42
sGssYs +−=+
4
)(
4
13
)( 22
+
+
+
−
=
s
sG
s
s
sY
1)0(,3)0(),(4 −=′==+′′ yytgyy
We have
Thus
Note that if g(t) is given, then the convolution integral can
be evaluated.
τττ dgtttty
t
)()(2sin
2
1
2sin
2
1
2cos3)(
0∫ −+−=
Example 4: Solution (2 of 4)
)(
4
2
2
1
4
2
2
1
4
3
4
)(
4
13
)(
222
22
sG
sss
s
s
sG
s
s
sY






+
+





+
−





+
=
+
+
+
−
=
Recall that the Laplace Transform of the solution y is
Note Φ(s) depends only on system coefficients and initial
conditions, while Ψ(s) depends only on system coefficients
and forcing function g(t).
Further, φ(t) = L-1
{Φ(s)} solves the homogeneous IVP
while ψ(t) = L-1
{Ψ(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous IVP
Example 4:
Laplace Transform of Solution (3 of 4)
)()(
4
)(
4
13
)( 22
sΨsΦ
s
sG
s
s
sY +=
+
+
+
−
=
1)0(,3)0(),(4 −=′==+′′ yytgyy
1)0(,3)0(,04 −=′==+′′ yyyy
0)0(,0)0(),(4 =′==+′′ yytgyy
Examining Ψ(s) more closely,
The function H(s) is known as the transfer function, and
depends only on system coefficients.
The function G(s) depends only on external excitation g(t)
applied to system.
If G(s) = 1, then g(t) = δ(t) and hence h(t) = L-1
{H(s)} solves
the nonhomogeneous initial value problem
Thus h(t) is response of system to unit impulse applied at t = 0,
and hence h(t) is called the impulse response of system.
Example 4: Transfer Function (4 of 4)
4
1
)(where),()(
4
)(
)( 22
+
==
+
=
s
sHsGsH
s
sG
sΨ
0)0(,0)0(),(4 =′==+′′ yytyy δ
Consider the general initial value problem
This IVP is often called an input-output problem. The
coefficients a, b, c describe properties of physical system,
and g(t) is the input to system. The values y0 and y0' describe
initial state, and solution y is the output at time t.
Using the Laplace transform, we obtain
or
Input-Output Problem (1 of 3)
00 )0(,)0(),( yyyytgcyybya ′=′==+′+′′
[ ] [ ] )()()0()()0()0()(2
sGscYyssYbysysYsa =+−+′−−
)()(
)()(
)( 22
00
sΨsΦ
cbsas
sG
cbsas
yaybas
sY +=
++
+
++
′++
=
We have
As before, Φ(s) depends only on system coefficients and
initial conditions, while Ψ(s) depends only on system
coefficients and forcing function g(t).
Further, φ(t) = L-1
{Φ(s)} solves the homogeneous IVP
while ψ(t) = L-1
{Ψ(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous IVP
Laplace Transform of Solution (2 of 3)
00 )0(,)0(,0 yyyycyybya ′=′==+′+′′
0)0(,0)0(),( =′==+′+′′ yytgcyybya
00 )0(,)0(),( yyyytgcyybya ′=′==+′+′′
)()(
)()(
)( 22
00
sΨsΦ
cbsas
sG
cbsas
yaybas
sY +=
++
+
++
′++
=
Examining Ψ(s) more closely,
As before, H(s) is the transfer function, and depends only on
system coefficients, while G(s) depends only on external
excitation g(t) applied to system.
Thus if G(s) = 1, then g(t) = δ(t) and hence h(t) = L-1
{H(s)}
solves the nonhomogeneous IVP
Thus h(t) is response of system to unit impulse applied at t = 0,
and hence h(t) is called the impulse response of system, with
Transfer Function (3 of 3)
0)0(,0)0(),( =′==+′+′′ yytcyybya δ
cbsas
sHsGsH
cbsas
sG
sΨ
++
==
++
= 22
1
)(where),()(
)(
)(
{ } τττψ dgthsGsHLt
t
)()()()()(
0
1
∫ −== −

More Related Content

What's hot

Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?
Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?
Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures? Alessandro Palmeri
 
Stochastic Schrödinger equations
Stochastic Schrödinger equationsStochastic Schrödinger equations
Stochastic Schrödinger equationsIlya Gikhman
 
Fourier series Introduction
Fourier series IntroductionFourier series Introduction
Fourier series IntroductionRizwan Kazi
 
Machine learning (9)
Machine learning (9)Machine learning (9)
Machine learning (9)NYversity
 
Admission in india
Admission in indiaAdmission in india
Admission in indiaEdhole.com
 
6. graphs of trig functions x
6. graphs of trig functions x6. graphs of trig functions x
6. graphs of trig functions xharbormath240
 
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2S.Shayan Daneshvar
 
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
2 integration and the substitution methods x
2 integration and the substitution methods x2 integration and the substitution methods x
2 integration and the substitution methods xmath266
 
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習Masahiro Suzuki
 
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet Series
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet SeriesOn Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet Series
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet SeriesIOSR Journals
 

What's hot (20)

residue
residueresidue
residue
 
Ch08 3
Ch08 3Ch08 3
Ch08 3
 
Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?
Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?
Using blurred images to assess damage in bridge structures?
 
Stochastic Schrödinger equations
Stochastic Schrödinger equationsStochastic Schrödinger equations
Stochastic Schrödinger equations
 
Fourier series Introduction
Fourier series IntroductionFourier series Introduction
Fourier series Introduction
 
Gamma function
Gamma functionGamma function
Gamma function
 
Ma2002 1.14 rm
Ma2002 1.14 rmMa2002 1.14 rm
Ma2002 1.14 rm
 
Machine learning (9)
Machine learning (9)Machine learning (9)
Machine learning (9)
 
Admission in india
Admission in indiaAdmission in india
Admission in india
 
Bohmian
BohmianBohmian
Bohmian
 
6. graphs of trig functions x
6. graphs of trig functions x6. graphs of trig functions x
6. graphs of trig functions x
 
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2
P, NP and NP-Complete, Theory of NP-Completeness V2
 
Ch08 1
Ch08 1Ch08 1
Ch08 1
 
Limits of functions
Limits of functionsLimits of functions
Limits of functions
 
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...
On Hilbert Space Operator Deformation Analysis in Application to Some Element...
 
MSR
MSRMSR
MSR
 
2 integration and the substitution methods x
2 integration and the substitution methods x2 integration and the substitution methods x
2 integration and the substitution methods x
 
Analysis of algorithms
Analysis of algorithmsAnalysis of algorithms
Analysis of algorithms
 
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習
深層生成モデルを用いたマルチモーダルデータの半教師あり学習
 
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet Series
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet SeriesOn Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet Series
On Spaces of Entire Functions Having Slow Growth Represented By Dirichlet Series
 

Similar to Ch06 6

Top ranking colleges in india
Top ranking colleges in indiaTop ranking colleges in india
Top ranking colleges in indiaEdhole.com
 
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remy
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remyPaper finance hosseinkhan_remy
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remyRémy Hosseinkhan
 
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2IJEMM
 
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997JOAQUIN REA
 
Laplace transform
Laplace transformLaplace transform
Laplace transformjoni joy
 
Free Ebooks Download
Free Ebooks Download Free Ebooks Download
Free Ebooks Download Edhole.com
 
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...saahil kshatriya
 
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systems
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systemsRedundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systems
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systemsSpringer
 
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming ProblemsAn Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming ProblemsMary Montoya
 

Similar to Ch06 6 (20)

Ch06 3
Ch06 3Ch06 3
Ch06 3
 
TLT
TLTTLT
TLT
 
Top ranking colleges in india
Top ranking colleges in indiaTop ranking colleges in india
Top ranking colleges in india
 
Laplace transformation
Laplace transformationLaplace transformation
Laplace transformation
 
Inverse Laplace Transform
Inverse Laplace TransformInverse Laplace Transform
Inverse Laplace Transform
 
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remy
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remyPaper finance hosseinkhan_remy
Paper finance hosseinkhan_remy
 
lec04.pdf
lec04.pdflec04.pdf
lec04.pdf
 
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2
International journal of engineering and mathematical modelling vol2 no3_2015_2
 
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997
Computer Controlled Systems (solutions manual). Astrom. 3rd edition 1997
 
Laplace transform
Laplace transformLaplace transform
Laplace transform
 
Ch06 2
Ch06 2Ch06 2
Ch06 2
 
14210111030
1421011103014210111030
14210111030
 
NotesLaplace.pdf
NotesLaplace.pdfNotesLaplace.pdf
NotesLaplace.pdf
 
Signal Processing Homework Help
Signal Processing Homework HelpSignal Processing Homework Help
Signal Processing Homework Help
 
Free Ebooks Download
Free Ebooks Download Free Ebooks Download
Free Ebooks Download
 
QMC: Operator Splitting Workshop, Thresholdings, Robustness, and Generalized ...
QMC: Operator Splitting Workshop, Thresholdings, Robustness, and Generalized ...QMC: Operator Splitting Workshop, Thresholdings, Robustness, and Generalized ...
QMC: Operator Splitting Workshop, Thresholdings, Robustness, and Generalized ...
 
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...
Laplace transform: UNIT STEP FUNCTION, SECOND SHIFTING THEOREM, DIRAC DELTA F...
 
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systems
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systemsRedundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systems
Redundancy in robot manipulators and multi robot systems
 
Lect4-LTI-signal-processing1.pdf
Lect4-LTI-signal-processing1.pdfLect4-LTI-signal-processing1.pdf
Lect4-LTI-signal-processing1.pdf
 
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming ProblemsAn Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems
An Approach For Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems
 

More from Rendy Robert (20)

Ch07 9
Ch07 9Ch07 9
Ch07 9
 
Ch07 8
Ch07 8Ch07 8
Ch07 8
 
Ch07 7
Ch07 7Ch07 7
Ch07 7
 
Ch07 6
Ch07 6Ch07 6
Ch07 6
 
Ch07 5
Ch07 5Ch07 5
Ch07 5
 
Ch07 4
Ch07 4Ch07 4
Ch07 4
 
Ch07 3
Ch07 3Ch07 3
Ch07 3
 
Ch07 2
Ch07 2Ch07 2
Ch07 2
 
Ch07 1
Ch07 1Ch07 1
Ch07 1
 
Ch06 5
Ch06 5Ch06 5
Ch06 5
 
Ch05 8
Ch05 8Ch05 8
Ch05 8
 
Ch05 7
Ch05 7Ch05 7
Ch05 7
 
Ch05 6
Ch05 6Ch05 6
Ch05 6
 
Ch05 5
Ch05 5Ch05 5
Ch05 5
 
Ch05 4
Ch05 4Ch05 4
Ch05 4
 
Ch05 3
Ch05 3Ch05 3
Ch05 3
 
Ch05 2
Ch05 2Ch05 2
Ch05 2
 
Ch05 1
Ch05 1Ch05 1
Ch05 1
 
Ch04 4
Ch04 4Ch04 4
Ch04 4
 
Ch04 3
Ch04 3Ch04 3
Ch04 3
 

Ch06 6

  • 1. Ch 6.6: The Convolution Integral Sometimes it is possible to write a Laplace transform H(s) as H(s) = F(s)G(s), where F(s) and G(s) are the transforms of known functions f and g, respectively. In this case we might expect H(s) to be the transform of the product of f and g. That is, does H(s) = F(s)G(s) = L{f }L{g} = L{f g}? On the next slide we give an example that shows that this equality does not hold, and hence the Laplace transform cannot in general be commuted with ordinary multiplication. In this section we examine the convolution of f and g, which can be viewed as a generalized product, and one for which the Laplace transform does commute.
  • 2. Example 1 Let f (t) = 1 and g(t) = sin(t). Recall that the Laplace Transforms of f and g are Thus and Therefore for these functions it follows that { } { } 1 1 sin)()( 2 + == s tLtgtfL { } { } { } { } 1 1 sin)(, 1 1)( 2 + ==== s tLtgL s LtfL { } { } { })()()()( tgLtfLtgtfL ≠ { } { } ( )1 1 )()( 2 + = ss tgLtfL
  • 3. Theorem 6.6.1 Suppose F(s) = L{f (t)} and G(s) = L{g(t)} both exist for s > a ≥ 0. Then H(s) = F(s)G(s) = L{h(t)} for s > a, where The function h(t) is known as the convolution of f and g and the integrals above are known as convolution integrals. Note that the equality of the two convolution integrals can be seen by making the substitution u = t - τ. The convolution integral defines a “generalized product” and can be written as h(t) = ( f *g)(t). See text for more details. ∫∫ −=−= tt dtgtfdgtfth 00 )()()()()( τττττ
  • 4. Theorem 6.6.1 Proof Outline { })( )()( )()( )()( )()()( )()( )()()()( 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 )( 0 0 thL dtdgtfe dtdgtfe ddttfge utdttfedg duufedg dgeduufesGsF t st t st st st us ssu =     −= −= −= +=−= = = ∫∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∞ − ∞ − ∞ ∞ − ∞ ∞ − ∞ ∞ +− ∞ ∞ −− τττ τττ τττ ττττ ττ ττ τ τ τ τ
  • 5. Example 2 Find the Laplace Transform of the function h given below. Solution: Note that f (t) = t and g(t) = sin2t, with Thus by Theorem 6.6.1, 4 2 }2{sin)}({)( 1 }{)}({)( 2 2 + === === s tLtgLsG s tLtfLsF ∫ −= t tdtth 0 2sin)()( ττ { } ( )4 2 )()()()( 22 + === ss sGsFsHthL
  • 6. Example 3: Find Inverse Transform (1 of 2) Find the inverse Laplace Transform of H(s), given below. Solution: Let F(s) = 2/s2 and G(s) = 1/(s - 2), with Thus by Theorem 6.6.1, { } { } t esGLtg tsFLtf 21 1 )()( 2)()( == == − − )2( 2 )( 2 − = ss sH { } ∫ −==− t detthsHL 0 21 )(2)()( ττ τ
  • 7. Example 3: Solution h(t) (2 of 2) We can integrate to simplify h(t), as follows. [ ] [ ] 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 22)(2)( 2 222 222 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 −−= −+−−=     −−−−=     −−= −=−= ∫ ∫∫∫ te eettte eetet deete dedetdetth t ttt ttt ttt ttt ττ τττττ τττ τττ
  • 8. Find the solution to the initial value problem Solution: or Letting Y(s) = L{y}, and substituting in initial conditions, Thus )}({}{4}{ tgLyLyL =+′′ [ ] )(}{4)0()0(}{2 sGyLysyyLs =+′−− Example 4: Initial Value Problem (1 of 4) ( ) )(13)(42 sGssYs +−=+ 4 )( 4 13 )( 22 + + + − = s sG s s sY 1)0(,3)0(),(4 −=′==+′′ yytgyy
  • 9. We have Thus Note that if g(t) is given, then the convolution integral can be evaluated. τττ dgtttty t )()(2sin 2 1 2sin 2 1 2cos3)( 0∫ −+−= Example 4: Solution (2 of 4) )( 4 2 2 1 4 2 2 1 4 3 4 )( 4 13 )( 222 22 sG sss s s sG s s sY       + +      + −      + = + + + − =
  • 10. Recall that the Laplace Transform of the solution y is Note Φ(s) depends only on system coefficients and initial conditions, while Ψ(s) depends only on system coefficients and forcing function g(t). Further, φ(t) = L-1 {Φ(s)} solves the homogeneous IVP while ψ(t) = L-1 {Ψ(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous IVP Example 4: Laplace Transform of Solution (3 of 4) )()( 4 )( 4 13 )( 22 sΨsΦ s sG s s sY += + + + − = 1)0(,3)0(),(4 −=′==+′′ yytgyy 1)0(,3)0(,04 −=′==+′′ yyyy 0)0(,0)0(),(4 =′==+′′ yytgyy
  • 11. Examining Ψ(s) more closely, The function H(s) is known as the transfer function, and depends only on system coefficients. The function G(s) depends only on external excitation g(t) applied to system. If G(s) = 1, then g(t) = δ(t) and hence h(t) = L-1 {H(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous initial value problem Thus h(t) is response of system to unit impulse applied at t = 0, and hence h(t) is called the impulse response of system. Example 4: Transfer Function (4 of 4) 4 1 )(where),()( 4 )( )( 22 + == + = s sHsGsH s sG sΨ 0)0(,0)0(),(4 =′==+′′ yytyy δ
  • 12. Consider the general initial value problem This IVP is often called an input-output problem. The coefficients a, b, c describe properties of physical system, and g(t) is the input to system. The values y0 and y0' describe initial state, and solution y is the output at time t. Using the Laplace transform, we obtain or Input-Output Problem (1 of 3) 00 )0(,)0(),( yyyytgcyybya ′=′==+′+′′ [ ] [ ] )()()0()()0()0()(2 sGscYyssYbysysYsa =+−+′−− )()( )()( )( 22 00 sΨsΦ cbsas sG cbsas yaybas sY += ++ + ++ ′++ =
  • 13. We have As before, Φ(s) depends only on system coefficients and initial conditions, while Ψ(s) depends only on system coefficients and forcing function g(t). Further, φ(t) = L-1 {Φ(s)} solves the homogeneous IVP while ψ(t) = L-1 {Ψ(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous IVP Laplace Transform of Solution (2 of 3) 00 )0(,)0(,0 yyyycyybya ′=′==+′+′′ 0)0(,0)0(),( =′==+′+′′ yytgcyybya 00 )0(,)0(),( yyyytgcyybya ′=′==+′+′′ )()( )()( )( 22 00 sΨsΦ cbsas sG cbsas yaybas sY += ++ + ++ ′++ =
  • 14. Examining Ψ(s) more closely, As before, H(s) is the transfer function, and depends only on system coefficients, while G(s) depends only on external excitation g(t) applied to system. Thus if G(s) = 1, then g(t) = δ(t) and hence h(t) = L-1 {H(s)} solves the nonhomogeneous IVP Thus h(t) is response of system to unit impulse applied at t = 0, and hence h(t) is called the impulse response of system, with Transfer Function (3 of 3) 0)0(,0)0(),( =′==+′+′′ yytcyybya δ cbsas sHsGsH cbsas sG sΨ ++ == ++ = 22 1 )(where),()( )( )( { } τττψ dgthsGsHLt t )()()()()( 0 1 ∫ −== −