Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Â
Prri apsa 2013 v4 rpj
1. Public
Religion
Research
Institute
Dr. Robert P. Jones, CEO
Daniel Cox, Director of Research
Juhem Navarro-Rivera, Research Associate
THREATS AND VALUES: FACTORS
INFLUENCING SUPPORT FOR A PATH TO
CITIZENSHIP
How Economic Threat, Cultural Threat, Social Contact,
and Religiosity Influence Support for a Path to
Citizenship
2. Context: Immigration Debate in the United
States
• Major issue in 2012 campaign.
• Two racial/ethnic groups with large numbers of immigrants overwhelmingly
supported Barack Obama over Mitt Romney.
• Hispanic American vote: 71% Obama; 27% Romney
• Asian American vote: 73% Obama; 26% Romney
• Major policy issue of 2013. Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill
introduced by a bipartisan group of senators:
• Includes a path to citizenship for immigrants living in the country illegally;
• Pending debated in the U.S. House of Representatives.
• Strong involvement of two religious groups: Catholics and white
evangelical Protestants.
• Religious messaging heavily focused on “welcoming the stranger.”
• Data in this presentation comes from the PRRI/Brookings’ Religion,
Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465).
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 2
3. Dependent Variable:
Support for Path to Citizenship
63
14
21
2
Which statement comes closest to your view about how the
immigration system should deal with immigrants who are currently
living in the U.S. illegally?
Allow them a way to become
citizens provided they meet certain
requirements
Allow them to become permanent
legal residents, but not citizens
Identify and deport them
None of these/Don't
know/Refused
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 3
4. Support for Path to Citizenship
White Evangelicals and White Catholics
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 4
74
71
70
67
64
63
62
61
56
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Hispanic Catholic
Hispanic Protestant
Black Protestant
Jewish
Unaffiliated
Mormon
White Catholic
White Mainline
White Evangelical
Support for Path to Citizenship
By Religious Affiliation
5. FACTORS INFLUENCING SUPPORT FOR
PATH TO CITIZENSHIP
1. Economic Threat
2. Cultural Threat
3. Social Contact
4. Religious Attendance
5. Welcoming the Stranger
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 5
6. Hypotheses
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 6
Hypothesis Relationship to Support
for Path to Citizenship
1. Economic Threat
Thinking that immigrants are taking jobs away from
American citizens
Negative
2. Culture Threat
Thinking that newcomers from other countries threaten
American values
Negative
3. Social Contact
Having a friend or family member born outside the U.S.
Positive
4. Religious Attendance
Attending religious services weekly or more
Positive
5. Religious Values
Believing that biblical message of “welcoming the
stranger” is an extremely important value
Positive
7. Economic Threat: Immigrants take jobs
away from American citizens
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013
(N=4,465)
7
64
27
4
5
Immigrants coming to this country today mostly...
Take jobs Americans don't want
Take jobs away from American
citizens
Both
Don't know/Refused
8. Support for Path to Citizenship
by Perception of Economic Threat
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013
(N=4,465)
8
34 32 34
68
61
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Immigrants coming to the country today mostly…
Take jobs away from Americans Take unwanted jobs
9. Cultural Threat: Newcomers from Other
Countries Threaten American Values
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 9
40
54
3 3
Growing Number of Newcomers from Other Countries…
Threatens traditional American
customs and values
Strenghten American society
Neither/Both equally
Don't know/Refused
10. Support for Path to Citizenship
by Perception of Cultural Threat
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013
(N=4,465)
10
50
47
52
73
68
73
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Growing number of newcomers to the country...
Threatens American Values Strenghtens American society
11. Social Contact: Foreign-Born Close Friends
or Relatives
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 11
61
39
Do you have any close friends or relatives who were born
outside the U.S.?
Yes
No
12. Support for Path to Citizenship
by Social Contact
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013
(N=4,465)
12
59
53
61
66
59
67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Do you have any close friends or relatives who were born outside the
U.S.?
No Yes
13. Support for Path to Citizenship
By Religious Attendance
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 13
63
41
65
62
58
6564
58
66
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Support for Path to Citizenship
By Religious Attendance
Seldom or never A few times a month/year Weekly or more
14. Welcoming the Stranger, Values as
Important Guides to Immigration Reform
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 14
50
52
69
77
77
82
84
84
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Following the biblical example of welcoming the stranger
Continuing America's heritage as a nation of immigrants
Following the Golden Rule, providing immigrants the same
opportunities I would want if my family was immigrating to the…
Enforcing the rule of law
Enuring fairness to taxpayers
Protecting the dignity of every person
Keeping families together
Promoting national security
Source: PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465)
Values as Moral Guides to Immigration Reform
Extremely important Very important
15. Welcoming the Stranger
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 15
17
25
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Following the biblical example of welcoming the stranger as guide to
immigration policy
Percent saying Extremely Important
16. Support for Path to Citizenship
By Importance of “welcoming the stranger”
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 16
64
55
66
59
66
58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
All Americans White Evangelicals White Catholics
Importance of biblical value of "welcoming the stranger" as guide to
immigration policy
Less Important Extremely Important
17. INFLUENCES ON SUPPORT FOR A PATH TO
CITIZENSHIP
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 17
18. Model #1: General Population with
Religious Attendance
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 18
Among General Population
Variable Coefficient Significance Odds Ratio
Hispanic 0.379 0.000 1.462
Tea Party -0.585 0.000 0.557
Democrat 0.296 0.000 1.345
Republican -0.366 0.000 0.693
College education 0.265 0.001 1.303
Millennial (18-33) 0.244 0.003 1.277
Senior (65+) 0.203 0.024 1.225
Attend weekly or more 0.161 0.037 1.174
19. Model #5: GP with Economic Threat,
Cultural Threat, and Social Contact
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 19
Among General Population
Variable Coefficient Significance Odds Ratio
Hispanic 0.397 0.007 1.487
Tea Party -0.510 0.003 0.601
Democrat 0.298 0.007 1.348
Republican -0.278 0.024 0.757
Millennial (18-33) 0.265 0.026 1.303
Senior (65+) 0.362 0.006 1.436
Newcomers are a threat -0.875 0.000 0.417
Immigrants take U.S. jobs -0.936 0.000 0.392
20. Model #7: White Evangelicals with Economic Threat,
Cultural Threat, Social Contact, Attendance, Welcoming
Stranger
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 20
Among White Evangelicals
Variable Coefficient Significance Odds Ratio
Millennial (18-33) .886 .014 2.425
Attend seldom or never -1.178 .009 .308
Newcomers are a threat -1.355 .000 .258
Immigrants take U.S. jobs -.894 .000 .409
Welcoming the stranger 1.091 .000 2.978
21. Model #9: White Catholics with Economic Threat,
Cultural Threat, Social Contact, & Welcoming the
Stranger
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 21
Among White Catholics
Variable Coefficient Significance Odds Ratio
Senior (65+) .617 .049 1.853
Newcomers are a threat -1.148 .000 .317
Immigrants take U.S. jobs -1.209 .000 .317
22. Conclusion I: Economic Threat, Cultural
Threat, Social Contact
• Hypotheses that economic threat and cultural threat are negatively
associated with support for a path to citizenship were confirmed.
• Among the general population and among white Catholics, perceptions of economic
threat have slightly stronger negative associations with a path to citizenship than
perceptions of cultural threat do.
• However, among white evangelical Protestants, perceptions of economic threat hold
weaker negative associations with a path to citizenship, compared to perceptions of
cultural threat.
• Our expectations that close social contact with immigrants would have a
positive association with support for a path to citizenship was not
confirmed.
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 22
23. Conclusion II: Religious Attendance and
Religious Values
• Our expectation that higher levels of religious attendance would be
associated with positive support for a path to citizenship was conditionally
confirmed.
• Among white evangelical Protestants, when controlling for economic and cultural threat
(Model 7) attending religious services infrequently (seldom or never) was negatively
associated with support for a path to citizenship.
• Finally, our expectation that thinking that the biblical concept of
“welcoming the stranger” is an extremely important moral guide to
immigration reform would be positively associated with support for a path
to citizenship was not confirmed among either the general population or
among white Catholics, but it was confirmed among white evangelical
Protestants.
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 23
24. Survey Methodology
2013 Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey
• Designed and conducted by Public Religion Research Institute in partnership
with The Brookings Institution
• One of largest surveys ever conducted on immigration (N=4,465 Americans)
• MOE = +/- 1.7 percentage points at the 95% confidence interval for total
sample
• Conducted by telephone (1,774 contacted by cell phone) between January 28
and February 24, 2013
• Bilingual (English and Spanish) interviews
• Funded by The Ford Foundation, with additional support from The Nathan
Cummings Foundation and Four Freedoms Fund/Public Interest Projects
PRRI/Brookings, Religion, Values, and Immigration Reform Survey, March 2013 (N=4,465) 24
Editor's Notes
White evangelical 3-way:56% path to citizenship11% permanent legal residents30% identity and deport3% DK/Ref
Both WEP and WC are 8 points above GP on economic threat
A strong majority (59%) of Americans believe that immigrants today see themselves as part of the American community, much like immigrants from previous eras, while 36% disagree. WEP 58% say threaten traditional American valuesWC similar to GP
A strong majority (59%) of Americans believe that immigrants today see themselves as part of the American community, much like immigrants from previous eras, while 36% disagree.
White evangelical 3-way:56% path to citizenship11% permanent legal residents30% identity and deport3% DK/RefNote that only 9% of white evangelicals in the seldom/never category.
Even fewer Americans favor a policy colloquially known as “self-deportation,” in which conditions are made so difficult for illegal immigrants that they return to their home country on their own. More than one-third (34%) of Americans agree that this is the best way to solve the country’s illegal immigration problem, while nearly two-thirds (64%) disagree. The largest difference between Democrats and Republicans, for example, is 13 percentage points. Republicans rank the pragmatic-legal values of promoting national security, enforcing the rule of law, and ensuring fairness to taxpayers consistently higher than Democrats by double-digit margins. The largest (13 points) pragmatic-legal values gaps occur on the values of promoting national security (Republicans 94%, Democrats 81%) and enforcing the rule of law (Republicans 86%, Democrats 73%)Democrats, by contrast, rate many of the cultural-religious values higher (12-13 points) than Republicans. The largest cultural-religious values gaps occur on the values of following the Golden Rule (Democrats 75%, Republicans 62%) and continuing America’s heritage as a nation of immigrants (Democrats 59%, Republicans 47%).
WEP on welcoming the stranger: 25% extremely important, 40% very important.WC on welcoming the stranger: 13% extremely important, 27% very important.
White evangelical 3-way:56% path to citizenship11% permanent legal residents30% identity and deport3% DK/Ref
Other controls included:*male*low income (<$30k)*high income ($100k+)*unemployed (significant at p<0.1)*attend seldom or neverOther controls tried and dropped:*region*urban/rural
Social contact drops out hereUnemployed drops out here.Attendance drops out
The following are significant at p<0.1:Low income
At p<0.1, the following are significant:MaleTea Party