SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  35
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
98
TOTAL
POPULATION
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS
ACTIVE MOBILE
SOCIAL USERS
URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION:
JAN
2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS
SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG;
FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING;
TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES).
DIGITAL IN PORTUGAL
10.31 7.73 6.60 8.11 5.70
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
65% 75% 64% 79% 55%
99
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS
ACTIVE MOBILE
SOCIAL USERS
JAN
2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS
ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH
SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017
SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG;
FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING;
TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT.
+7% +8% +6% +10%
+533 THOUSAND +500 THOUSAND +451 THOUSAND +500 THOUSAND
100
TOTAL
POPULATION
FEMALE
POPULATION
MALE
POPULATION
MEDIAN
AGE
JAN
2018
POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS
ANNUAL CHANGE IN
POPULATION SIZE
POPULATION LIVING
IN URBAN AREAS
GDP PER
CAPITA
LITERACY
(TOTAL)
MALE
LITERACY
FEMALE
LITERACY
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK.
10.31 52.7% 47.3% -0.4% 42.6
MILLION YEARS OLD
65% $30,665 95% 94% 97%
101
MOBILE PHONE
(ANY TYPE)
SMART
PHONE
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
TABLET
COMPUTER
JAN
2018
DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED]
TELEVISION
(ANY KIND)
DEVICE FOR STREAMING
INTERNET CONTENT TO TV
E-READER
DEVICE
WEARABLE
TECH DEVICE
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
94% 67% 63% 32%
96% 7% 1% 4%
102
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT USING THE
INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT USING SOCIAL
MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE
AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME
(BROADCAST, STREAMING
AND VIDEO ON DEMAND)
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT LISTENING TO
STREAMING MUSIC
JAN
2018
TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS.
6H 31M 2H 10M 2H 34M 0H 41M
103
BELIEVE THAT NEW
TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE
OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS
PREFER TO COMPLETE
TASKS DIGITALLY
WHENEVER POSSIBLE
BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY
AND PROTECTION ARE
VERY IMPORTANT
DELETE COOKIES FROM
INTERNET BROWSER
TO PROTECT PRIVACY
JAN
2018
ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES
USE AN AD-BLOCKING
TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS
BEING DISPLAYED
SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT
INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX
FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS.
52% 54% 94% 51% 42%
104
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE
INTERNET USERS
INTERNET USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF THE
TOTAL POPULATION
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE MOBILE
INTERNET USERS
MOBILE INTERNET USERS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE
SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES;
REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW
TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU.
7.73 75% 6.72 65%
MILLION MILLION
105
INTERNET
WORLD STATS
ITU (INTERNATIONAL
TELECOMMUNICATION UNION)
INTERNET
LIVE STATS
JAN
2018
INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS
CIA WORLD
FACTBOOK
SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018.
7.43 7.26 6.93 7.26
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
106
EVERY
DAY
AT LEAST ONCE
PER WEEK
AT LEAST ONCE
PER MONTH
LESS THAN ONCE
PER MONTH
JAN
2018
FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE)
1 7 31 ?
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA.
85% 10% 4% 1%
107
AVERAGE INTERNET
SPEED VIA FIXED
CONNECTIONS
AVERAGE INTERNET
SPEED VIA MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
ACCESS THE INTERNET
MOST OFTEN VIA A
COMPUTER OR TABLET
ACCESS EQUALLY VIA
A SMARTPHONE AND
COMPUTER OR TABLET
JAN
2018
INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
ACCESS THE INTERNET
MOST OFTEN VIA A
SMARTPHONE
SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY.
NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS.
54.53 24.05 25% 34% 34%
MBPS MBPS
108
LAPTOPS &
DESKTOPS
MOBILE
PHONES
TABLET
DEVICES
OTHER
DEVICES
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
JAN
2018
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017.
77% 19% 4% 0.24%
-8% +54% +4% [N/A]
109
JAN
2018
SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017
SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS.
DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES
REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
# WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
GOOGLE.PT SEARCH 313,200,000 9M 18S 7.4
FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 166,400,000 14M 26S 13.8
GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 131,100,000 7M 56S 9.6
YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 120,500,000 22M 47S 10.5
SAPO.PT NEWS & MEDIA 58,100,000 6M 42S 6.2
LIVE.COM EMAIL 29,600,000 6M 19S 8.0
WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 25,600,000 3M 41S 3.1
OLX.PT SHOPPING 21,100,000 8M 47S 12.2
NOS.PT TELCO 16,300,000 4M 28S 3.4
ABOLA.PT NEWS & MEDIA 16,300,000 10M 25S 5.5
110
JAN
2018
ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT
# WEBSITE TIME PAGES
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
# WEBSITE TIME PAGES
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE
DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME
WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
GOOGLE.PT 6M 15S 10.46
YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79
GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56
FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00
SAPO.PT 6M 59S 3.56
LIVE.COM 4M 03S 3.41
REDDIT.COM 15M 46S 10.05
WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31
OLX.PT 10M 41S 9.45
INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34
TWITTER.COM 6M 21S 3.21
ABOLA.PT 12M 12S 4.33
GEARBEST.COM 5M 05S 4.75
IMDB.COM 3M 30S 4.14
CGD.PT 6M 58S 6.00
BET.PT 1M 55S 1.62
RECORD.PT 9M 56S 3.12
YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61
LINKEDIN.COM 5M 19S 4.19
BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03
111
USE A SEARCH
ENGINE
VISIT A SOCIAL
NETWORK
PLAY
GAMES
WATCH
VIDEOS
JAN
2018
WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED]
LOOK FOR PRODUCT
INFORMATION
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY
RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
41% 47% 9% 35% 17%
45% 40% 11% 32% 20%
112
JAN
2018
TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017
# QUERY INDEX
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
# QUERY INDEX
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY
COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY).
FACEBOOK 100
YOUTUBE 43
PORTUGAL 40
GOOGLE 38
PORTO 32
TRADUTOR 30
METEOROLOGIA 29
HOTMAIL 28
SAPO 26
OLX 25
GMAIL 24
TEMPO 20
NOTICIAS 15
FINANÇAS 12
BENFICA 11
NOS 11
MAPS 11
RECORD 11
ABOLA 10
JOGOS 9
113
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY DAY
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY WEEK
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY MONTH
WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS
LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH
JAN
2018
FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE)
NEVER WATCH
ONLINE VIDEOS
1 7 31 365 X
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
49% 23% 9% 1% 17%
114
REGULAR
TELEVISION
ON A TV SET
RECORDED
CONTENT
ON A TV SET
CATCH-UP /
ON-DEMAND
SERVICE ON TV SET
ONLINE CONTENT
STREAMED ON
A TV SET
JAN
2018
HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT
ONLINE CONTENT
STREAMED ON
ANOTHER DEVICE
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
92% 50% 41% 16% 19%
115
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL POPULATION
TOTAL NUMBER
OF SOCIAL USERS
ACCESSING VIA MOBILE
ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL
USERS AS A PERCENTAGE
OF THE TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY
SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS
NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
6.60 64% 5.70 55%
MILLION MILLION
116
JAN
2018
MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY
SOCIAL NETWORK
MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART
OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES
TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT.
66%
65%
51%
40%
39%
27%
27%
24%
24%
23%
17%
11%
YOUTUBE
FACEBOOK
FB MESSENGER
WHATSAPP
INSTAGRAM
SKYPE
GOOGLE+
PINTEREST
LINKEDIN
TWITTER
SNAPCHAT
TUMBLR
117
TOTAL NUMBER OF
MONTHLY ACTIVE
FACEBOOK USERS
ANNUAL CHANGE IN
FACEBOOK USERS
vs. JANUARY 2017
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK USERS
ACCESSING VIA MOBILE
JAN
2018
FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018.
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK PROFILES
DECLARED AS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK PROFILES
DECLARED AS MALE
6.60 +8% 86% 51% 49%
MILLION
118
AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE
TOTAL
13 – 17
18 – 24
25 – 34
35 – 44
45 – 54
55 – 64
65+
FEMALE
MALE
PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS
JAN
2018
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES,
WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S
SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA.
13 – 17
YEARS OLD
65+
YEARS OLD
25 – 34
YEARS OLD
35 – 44
YEARS OLD
45 – 54
YEARS OLD
55 – 64
YEARS OLD
18 – 24
YEARS OLD
AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE
TOTAL 6,600,000 51% 49%
13 – 17 250,000 2% 2%
18 – 24 1,200,000 9% 10%
25 – 34 1,500,000 11% 11%
35 – 44 1,500,000 12% 11%
45 – 54 1,100,000 8% 8%
55 – 64 640,000 5% 4%
65+ 410,000 3% 3%
132
601
713
794
560
356
194
122
630
751 741
508
284
213
119
JAN
2018
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH
AVERAGE MONTHLY
CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES
AVERAGE POST REACH
vs. PAGE LIKES
AVERAGE ORGANIC
REACH vs. PAGE LIKES
PERCENTAGE OF PAGES
USING PAID MEDIA
AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA
AVERAGE PAID REACH
vs. TOTAL REACH
SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A
POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED.
+0.06% 15.2% 7.5% 47.9% 22.1%
120
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES)
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE VIDEO POSTS
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE PHOTO POSTS
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE LINK POSTS
JAN
2018
AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE STATUS POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED
WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME.
4.76% 6.78% 4.46% 7.04% 4.22%
121
TOTAL NUMBER OF
MONTHLY ACTIVE
INSTAGRAM USERS
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM
USERS AS A PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL POPULATION
FEMALE USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF ALL
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS
MALE USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF ALL
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS
JAN
2018
INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
3.10 30% 53% 47%
MILLION
122
NUMBER OF UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS (ANY
TYPE OF HANDSET)
MOBILE PENETRATION
(UNIQUE USERS vs.
TOTAL POPULATION)
TOTAL NUMBER
OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
CONNECTIONS PER
UNIQUE MOBILE USER
SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018;
MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
8.11 79% 15.10 146% 1.86
MILLION MILLION
123
TOTAL NUMBER
OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
PERCENTAGE OF
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
THAT ARE PRE-PAID
PERCENTAGE OF
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
THAT ARE POST-PAID
PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS THAT ARE
BROADBAND (3G & 4G)
JAN
2018
MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
15.10 146% 53% 47% 87%
MILLION
124
OVERALL COUNTRY
INDEX SCORE
MOBILE NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
AFFORDABILITY OF
DEVICES & SERVICES
CONSUMER
READINESS
JAN
2018
MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT
CONTENT & SERVICES
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/
77.12 72.07 74.45 82.45 79.94
125
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION USING
MOBILE MESSENGERS
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION WATCHING
VIDEOS ON MOBILE
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION PLAYING
GAMES ON MOBILE
PERCENTAGE
OF THE POPULATION
USING MOBILE BANKING
JAN
2018
MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION USING
MOBILE MAP SERVICES
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
59% 52% 39% 25% 48%
126
USE THE ALARM
CLOCK FUNCTION
MANAGE DIARY
OR APPOINTMENTS
CHECK THE
WEATHER
TRACK HEALTH, DIET,
OR ACTIVITY LEVELS
JAN
2018
SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED]
TAKE PHOTOS
OR VIDEOS
CHECK
THE NEWS
READ E-BOOKS
OR E-MAGAZINES
MANAGE LISTS
(E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS)
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY
RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
52% 23% 26% 2%
50% 20% 4% 10%
127
HAS A BANK
ACCOUNT
HAS A
CREDIT CARD
MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES
MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA
MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES
AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE
JAN
2018
FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE
PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN
WITH A CREDIT CARD
PERCENTAGE OF MEN
WITH A CREDIT CARD
PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN
MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS
PERCENTAGE OF MEN
MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS
SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION.
87% 29% [N/A] 25%
25% 33% 22% 28%
128
SEARCHED ONLINE
FOR A PRODUCT
OR SERVICE TO BUY
VISITED
AN ONLINE
RETAIL STORE
PURCHASED A
PRODUCT OR
SERVICE ONLINE
MADE AN ONLINE
PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP COMPUTER
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
MADE AN ONLINE
PURCHASE VIA A
MOBILE DEVICE
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
63% 58% 39% 16% 16%
129
FASHION
& BEAUTY
ELECTRONICS &
PHYSICAL MEDIA
FOOD &
PERSONAL CARE
FURNITURE &
APPLIANCES
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
TOYS, DIY
& HOBBIES
TRAVEL (INCLUDING
ACCOMMODATION)
DIGITAL
MUSIC
VIDEO
GAMES
SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018.
NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND.
$808.0 $644.3 $252.0 $456.9
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
$807.8 $395.2 $14.3 $105.3
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
130
FASHION
& BEAUTY
ELECTRONICS &
PHYSICAL MEDIA
FOOD &
PERSONAL CARE
FURNITURE &
APPLIANCES
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
TOYS, DIY
& HOBBIES
TRAVEL (INCLUDING
ACCOMMODATION)
DIGITAL
MUSIC
VIDEO
GAMES
SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018.
NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND.
+15% +10% +12% +18%
+13% +20% +8% +9%
131
TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE
PURCHASING CONSUMER
GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE
PENETRATION OF CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE
(TOTAL POPULATION)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE
PER USER OF CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS
ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED
GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
VALUE OF THE CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET
(TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE)
5.51 53% $2.969 $539
MILLION BILLION
+8% +14% +5%
132
JAN
2018
ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE
NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
35%
21%
14%
11%
7%
3%
3%
3%
2%
TELEVISION
ONLINE
IN-STORE
PRESS
DIRECT MAIL
POSTER
EMAIL
OTHER
RADIO

Contenu connexe

Tendances

The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...
The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...
The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...Kepios
 
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017 Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017 Fátima Martinez López
 
Digital In San Marino
Digital In San MarinoDigital In San Marino
Digital In San MarinoLinda Zavoli
 
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019Joseba U
 
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)mResearcher
 
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of Social
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of SocialENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of Social
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of SocialJan Rezab
 
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communication
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communicationGlobal Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communication
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communicationWorld Federation of Advertisers (WFA)
 
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011Resource/Ammirati
 
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255Sergey Shershen
 
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)Digital 2015 India (August 2015)
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)DataReportal
 
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.Bertrand Jonquois
 
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)DataReportal
 
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysis
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysisGUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysis
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysisDilupa Wickramasinghe
 
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every Business
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every BusinessPowerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every Business
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every BusinessAdRoll
 
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?How to beat micro attention with interactivity?
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?Votemo
 

Tendances (19)

The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...
The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...
The New Normal: How To Integrate Your Digital Marketing (Forward Thinking EP0...
 
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017 Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017
Datos uso de Internet y redes sociales en España y en mundo 2017
 
Digital In San Marino
Digital In San MarinoDigital In San Marino
Digital In San Marino
 
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019
Digital Landscape in Vietnam - January 2019
 
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)
Digital 2018 Q4 Global Digital Statshot (October 2018)
 
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of Social
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of SocialENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of Social
ENGAGE 2017 Prague - The Changing World of Social
 
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communication
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communicationGlobal Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communication
Global Intelligence - Data & insights for the new age of communication
 
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011
The OPEN Brand: Digital Trends for 2011
 
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255
We are-social-digital-yearkbook-2017 data-for_all_countries-128-255
 
2017 digital yearbook
2017 digital yearbook2017 digital yearbook
2017 digital yearbook
 
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)Digital 2015 India (August 2015)
Digital 2015 India (August 2015)
 
2018 Digital Yearbook
2018 Digital Yearbook2018 Digital Yearbook
2018 Digital Yearbook
 
Liczba użytkowników Facebooka w Polsce Q4 2016 / 2017
Liczba użytkowników Facebooka w Polsce Q4 2016 / 2017Liczba użytkowników Facebooka w Polsce Q4 2016 / 2017
Liczba użytkowników Facebooka w Polsce Q4 2016 / 2017
 
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.
Etude "Global Mobile Media Consumption" réalisée par le InMobi.
 
Digital in 2017 Global Overview
Digital in 2017 Global OverviewDigital in 2017 Global Overview
Digital in 2017 Global Overview
 
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)
Digital 2015 Global Overview (January 2015)
 
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysis
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysisGUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysis
GUM category in Sri Lanka - Digital media analysis
 
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every Business
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every BusinessPowerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every Business
Powerful Statistics - Top 50 Megatrends Affecting Every Business
 
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?How to beat micro attention with interactivity?
How to beat micro attention with interactivity?
 

Similaire à Digital em Portugal 2018

Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Every Leader
 
Indonesia digital landscape 2018
Indonesia digital landscape 2018Indonesia digital landscape 2018
Indonesia digital landscape 2018burhan sholihin
 
Indonesia digital in 2018
Indonesia digital in 2018Indonesia digital in 2018
Indonesia digital in 2018Emry Sagita
 
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018 Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018 Ridho Fitrah Hyzkia
 
Indonesia Digital Landcsape
Indonesia Digital LandcsapeIndonesia Digital Landcsape
Indonesia Digital Landcsapesewaledscreen.id
 
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018bijakbersosmed
 
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Every Leader
 
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018Đức Lê
 
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeDigital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesDigital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesWe Are Social
 
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Leonardo Diogo Silva
 
Digital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaDigital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoDigital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaDigital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaWe Are Social
 
Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018HYPE Digital
 
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Tú Cao
 
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)DataReportal
 
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot Casey Ordoña
 

Similaire à Digital em Portugal 2018 (20)

Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018
 
Indonesia digital landscape 2018
Indonesia digital landscape 2018Indonesia digital landscape 2018
Indonesia digital landscape 2018
 
Indonesia digital in 2018
Indonesia digital in 2018Indonesia digital in 2018
Indonesia digital in 2018
 
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018 Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Landscape 2018
 
Indonesia Digital Landcsape
Indonesia Digital LandcsapeIndonesia Digital Landcsape
Indonesia Digital Landcsape
 
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018
Indonesia Digital Lanscape 2018
 
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
 
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
 
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeDigital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
 
Digital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesDigital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United States
 
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
 
Digital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaDigital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in China
 
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoDigital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
 
Digital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaDigital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in Australia
 
Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018
 
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
 
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
 
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
 
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
 
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot
Digital in 2018: Q3 Global Digital Statshot
 

Dernier

Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptx
Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptxBio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptx
Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptxnaveenithkrishnan
 
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024Shubham Pant
 
Zero-day Vulnerabilities
Zero-day VulnerabilitiesZero-day Vulnerabilities
Zero-day Vulnerabilitiesalihassaah1994
 
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024Jan Löffler
 
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a Website
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a WebsiteComputer 10 Lesson 8: Building a Website
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a WebsiteMavein
 
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...APNIC
 
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASS
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASSLESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASS
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASSlesteraporado16
 
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdf
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program  by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdfIntroduction to ICANN and Fellowship program  by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdf
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdfShreedeep Rayamajhi
 
Presentation2.pptx - JoyPress Wordpress
Presentation2.pptx -  JoyPress WordpressPresentation2.pptx -  JoyPress Wordpress
Presentation2.pptx - JoyPress Wordpressssuser166378
 
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDS
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDSTYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDS
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDSedrianrheine
 
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdf
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdfLESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdf
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdfmchristianalwyn
 
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced Horizons
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced HorizonsVision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced Horizons
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced HorizonsRoxana Stingu
 

Dernier (12)

Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptx
Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptxBio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptx
Bio Medical Waste Management Guideliness 2023 ppt.pptx
 
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024
Check out the Free Landing Page Hosting in 2024
 
Zero-day Vulnerabilities
Zero-day VulnerabilitiesZero-day Vulnerabilities
Zero-day Vulnerabilities
 
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024
WordPress by the numbers - Jan Loeffler, CTO WebPros, CloudFest 2024
 
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a Website
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a WebsiteComputer 10 Lesson 8: Building a Website
Computer 10 Lesson 8: Building a Website
 
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...
Benefits of doing Internet peering and running an Internet Exchange (IX) pres...
 
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASS
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASSLESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASS
LESSON 10/ GROUP 10/ ST. THOMAS AQUINASS
 
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdf
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program  by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdfIntroduction to ICANN and Fellowship program  by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdf
Introduction to ICANN and Fellowship program by Shreedeep Rayamajhi.pdf
 
Presentation2.pptx - JoyPress Wordpress
Presentation2.pptx -  JoyPress WordpressPresentation2.pptx -  JoyPress Wordpress
Presentation2.pptx - JoyPress Wordpress
 
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDS
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDSTYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDS
TYPES AND DEFINITION OF ONLINE CRIMES AND HAZARDS
 
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdf
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdfLESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdf
LESSON 5 GROUP 10 ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.pdf
 
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced Horizons
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced HorizonsVision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced Horizons
Vision Forward: Tracing Image Search SEO From Its Roots To AI-Enhanced Horizons
 

Digital em Portugal 2018

  • 1. 98 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN PORTUGAL 10.31 7.73 6.60 8.11 5.70 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 65% 75% 64% 79% 55%
  • 2. 99 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +7% +8% +6% +10% +533 THOUSAND +500 THOUSAND +451 THOUSAND +500 THOUSAND
  • 3. 100 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 10.31 52.7% 47.3% -0.4% 42.6 MILLION YEARS OLD 65% $30,665 95% 94% 97%
  • 4. 101 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 94% 67% 63% 32% 96% 7% 1% 4%
  • 5. 102 AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME (BROADCAST, STREAMING AND VIDEO ON DEMAND) AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT LISTENING TO STREAMING MUSIC JAN 2018 TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS. 6H 31M 2H 10M 2H 34M 0H 41M
  • 6. 103 BELIEVE THAT NEW TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS PREFER TO COMPLETE TASKS DIGITALLY WHENEVER POSSIBLE BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY AND PROTECTION ARE VERY IMPORTANT DELETE COOKIES FROM INTERNET BROWSER TO PROTECT PRIVACY JAN 2018 ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES USE AN AD-BLOCKING TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS BEING DISPLAYED SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS. 52% 54% 94% 51% 42%
  • 7. 104 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 7.73 75% 6.72 65% MILLION MILLION
  • 8. 105 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 7.43 7.26 6.93 7.26 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  • 9. 106 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 85% 10% 4% 1%
  • 10. 107 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 54.53 24.05 25% 34% 34% MBPS MBPS
  • 11. 108 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 77% 19% 4% 0.24% -8% +54% +4% [N/A]
  • 12. 109 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.PT SEARCH 313,200,000 9M 18S 7.4 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 166,400,000 14M 26S 13.8 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 131,100,000 7M 56S 9.6 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 120,500,000 22M 47S 10.5 SAPO.PT NEWS & MEDIA 58,100,000 6M 42S 6.2 LIVE.COM EMAIL 29,600,000 6M 19S 8.0 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 25,600,000 3M 41S 3.1 OLX.PT SHOPPING 21,100,000 8M 47S 12.2 NOS.PT TELCO 16,300,000 4M 28S 3.4 ABOLA.PT NEWS & MEDIA 16,300,000 10M 25S 5.5
  • 13. 110 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.PT 6M 15S 10.46 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 SAPO.PT 6M 59S 3.56 LIVE.COM 4M 03S 3.41 REDDIT.COM 15M 46S 10.05 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 OLX.PT 10M 41S 9.45 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 TWITTER.COM 6M 21S 3.21 ABOLA.PT 12M 12S 4.33 GEARBEST.COM 5M 05S 4.75 IMDB.COM 3M 30S 4.14 CGD.PT 6M 58S 6.00 BET.PT 1M 55S 1.62 RECORD.PT 9M 56S 3.12 YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61 LINKEDIN.COM 5M 19S 4.19 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03
  • 14. 111 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 41% 47% 9% 35% 17% 45% 40% 11% 32% 20%
  • 15. 112 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 43 PORTUGAL 40 GOOGLE 38 PORTO 32 TRADUTOR 30 METEOROLOGIA 29 HOTMAIL 28 SAPO 26 OLX 25 GMAIL 24 TEMPO 20 NOTICIAS 15 FINANÇAS 12 BENFICA 11 NOS 11 MAPS 11 RECORD 11 ABOLA 10 JOGOS 9
  • 16. 113 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 49% 23% 9% 1% 17%
  • 17. 114 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 92% 50% 41% 16% 19%
  • 18. 115 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 6.60 64% 5.70 55% MILLION MILLION
  • 19. 116 JAN 2018 MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT. 66% 65% 51% 40% 39% 27% 27% 24% 24% 23% 17% 11% YOUTUBE FACEBOOK FB MESSENGER WHATSAPP INSTAGRAM SKYPE GOOGLE+ PINTEREST LINKEDIN TWITTER SNAPCHAT TUMBLR
  • 20. 117 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 6.60 +8% 86% 51% 49% MILLION
  • 21. 118 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 6,600,000 51% 49% 13 – 17 250,000 2% 2% 18 – 24 1,200,000 9% 10% 25 – 34 1,500,000 11% 11% 35 – 44 1,500,000 12% 11% 45 – 54 1,100,000 8% 8% 55 – 64 640,000 5% 4% 65+ 410,000 3% 3% 132 601 713 794 560 356 194 122 630 751 741 508 284 213
  • 22. 119 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.06% 15.2% 7.5% 47.9% 22.1%
  • 23. 120 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 4.76% 6.78% 4.46% 7.04% 4.22%
  • 24. 121 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 3.10 30% 53% 47% MILLION
  • 25. 122 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 8.11 79% 15.10 146% 1.86 MILLION MILLION
  • 26. 123 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 15.10 146% 53% 47% 87% MILLION
  • 27. 124 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 77.12 72.07 74.45 82.45 79.94
  • 28. 125 PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MESSENGERS PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION WATCHING VIDEOS ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION PLAYING GAMES ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE BANKING JAN 2018 MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MAP SERVICES SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 59% 52% 39% 25% 48%
  • 29. 126 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 52% 23% 26% 2% 50% 20% 4% 10%
  • 30. 127 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 87% 29% [N/A] 25% 25% 33% 22% 28%
  • 31. 128 SEARCHED ONLINE FOR A PRODUCT OR SERVICE TO BUY VISITED AN ONLINE RETAIL STORE PURCHASED A PRODUCT OR SERVICE ONLINE MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A MOBILE DEVICE SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 63% 58% 39% 16% 16%
  • 32. 129 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $808.0 $644.3 $252.0 $456.9 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $807.8 $395.2 $14.3 $105.3 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  • 33. 130 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +15% +10% +12% +18% +13% +20% +8% +9%
  • 34. 131 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 5.51 53% $2.969 $539 MILLION BILLION +8% +14% +5%
  • 35. 132 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 35% 21% 14% 11% 7% 3% 3% 3% 2% TELEVISION ONLINE IN-STORE PRESS DIRECT MAIL POSTER EMAIL OTHER RADIO