SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  104
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Team Sentinel
112 Interviews
Jared Dunnmon Darren Hau Atsu Kobashi Rachel Moore
Problem: Intelligence,
surveillance, reconnaissance
is difficult for 7th Fleet in
contested areas
Solution: Navy needs cheap,
distributed sensors
Problem: Navy is hindered by
outdated, cumbersome
maritime domain awareness
tools
Solution: Navy actually
needs enhanced data fusion,
analytics, and sharing
4 Site Visits
Week 0 Week 9
Jared Dunnmon Darren Hau Atsu Kobashi Rachel Moore
Degree
Program &
Department
PhD
Mechanical
Engineering
BS
Electrical Engineering
MS
Electrical Engineering
Joint Degree MBA
and E-IPER MS
GSB
Expertise Experience in
mechanical design,
distributed energy
harvesting,
computational
modeling, machine
learning, and data
analytics, MBA and
previous work
experience at energy
startup Offgrid Electric.
Co-founder of Dragonfly
Systems, a solar
company acquired by
SunPower. Experience in
renewable energy,
power electronics,
reliability, and
manufacturing. Inventor
of multiple U.S. patents.
Record of translating
market needs into viable
product.
Industry experience
as a software
engineer for Nissan's
Autonomous Vehicle
team and experience
in the defense sector
working for
Lockheed Martin.
Academic experience
with machine
learning and data
analytics.
Rachel (Caltech ‘13)
worked extensively
with hardware as
an engineer and
project manager at
a defense
contractor prior to
the GSB.
Team Sentinel
Interview Breakdown Over 10 Weeks
Emotional Journey
So many
problems, so
little time...
Classified.
Illegal
Fishing
Analog
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
- Identify key geographic areas of
interest
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate ML algorithms
Scaling
- Develop fabrication /
procurement strategy
- Primary: 7th Fleet
decision makers,
ONI intelligence
officers, and
operators
- Secondary: Dual-
use entities such as
Coast Guard,
environmental monitoring,
research
- Tertiary: State Department
Lower cost sensor
solution
Improved coverage
- Persistent presence over
enlarged area
- Design reliability & robustness
via distributed architecture
Actionable
intelligence
- Cross-domain analysis
techniques to integrate multiple
data sources
- Improved UI increases decision
quality and speed
- Provide insights to identify
potential hot spots
Flexible platform
- open architecture
- plug-and-play
- disposable/low-maintenance
- back/forward compatibility
Reduce manpower burden:
- Remove tedious/manual tasks
through automation
- More efficiently use existing
analysts
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Decreased time to ID & differentiate threats
- Increased area coverage + persistence
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
- Prototype initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects)
and derive useful insights from analysis tools
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing analysis software tools
- AWS
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated
sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir,
Google)
- Advanced manufacturing
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Week 0 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing
- Lower cost sensor
solution
- Actionable
intelligence
- Flexible platform
- Primary: 7th
Fleet decision
makers, ONI
intelligence
officers, and
operators
- Secondary: Dual-
use entities such as
Coast Guard
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
- Identify key geographic areas of
interest
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate ML algorithms
Scaling
- Develop fabrication /
procurement strategy
- Primary: 7th Fleet
decision makers,
ONI intelligence
officers, and
operators
- Secondary: Dual-
use entities such as
Coast Guard,
environmental monitoring,
research
- Tertiary: State Department
Lower cost sensor
solution
Improved coverage
- Persistent presence over
enlarged area
- Design reliability & robustness
via distributed architecture
Actionable
intelligence
- Cross-domain analysis
techniques to integrate multiple
data sources
- Improved UI increases decision
quality and speed
- Provide insights to identify
potential hot spots
Flexible platform
- open architecture
- plug-and-play
- disposable/low-maintenance
- back/forward compatibility
Reduce manpower burden:
- Remove tedious/manual tasks
through automation
- More efficiently use existing
analysts
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Decreased time to ID & differentiate threats
- Increased area coverage + persistence
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
- Prototype initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects)
and derive useful insights from analysis tools
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing analysis software tools
- AWS
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated
sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir,
Google)
- Advanced manufacturing
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Week 0 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing
- Lower cost sensor
solution
- Actionable
intelligence
- Flexible platform
- Primary: 7th
Fleet decision
makers, ONI
intelligence
officers, and
operators
- Secondary: Dual-
use entities such as
Coast Guard
Value Proposition
- Lower cost sensor
solution
- Actionable intelligence
- Flexible platform
Beneficiaries
- Primary: 7th Fleet
decision makers, ONI
intelligence officers, and
operators
- Secondary: Dual-use
entities such as Coast
Guard
Value
Proposition
Boiling the ocean?
Learning Progression: Week 1
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
Number of Interviews: 14
Hypothesis:
- Insufficient sensing
capabilities
Learning Progression: Week 1
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
Number of Interviews: 14
Experiments:
- Interviews, site
visits...
Learning Progression: Week 1
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
Number of Interviews: 14
Learnings:
- Sensors largely exist
- Information sharing is a big
problem
- Gov overwhelmed by sheer bulk
of data
Learning Progression: Week 1
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
Number of Interviews: 14
We pivoted in Week 1!
Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem?
High-level Thinkers
Defense Contractors
Week 1
Information sharing, data
aggregation
Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem?
INTELLIGENCE
(N2)
High-level Thinkers
Defense Contractors
Week 1
Information sharing, data
aggregation
Week 2
Sensors and deployment?
Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem?
INTELLIGENCE
(N2)
OPERATIONS
(N3)
High-level Thinkers
Defense Contractors
Week 1
Information sharing, data
aggregation
Week 2
Sensors and deployment?
Week 3
Nope, it really is a data
problem
Weeks 1 - 3: Cognitive Dissonance
INTELLIGENCE
(N2)
OPERATIONS
(N3)
High-level Thinkers
Defense Contractors
Week 1
Information sharing, data
aggregation
Week 2
Sensor deployment?
Week 3
Nope, it really is a data
problem
BIG IDEAS:
1. Everyone is right, but priorities are
influenced by their roles.
1. Sensors are great but Navy wouldn’t
know what to do with it.
Weeks 1 - 3: Cognitive Dissonance
INTELLIGENCE
(N2)
OPERATIONS
(N3)
High-level Thinkers
Defense Contractors
Week 1
Information sharing, data
aggregation
Week 2
Sensor deployment?
Week 3
Nope, it really is a data
problem
BIG IDEAS:
1. Everyone is right, but priorities are
influenced by their roles.
1. Sensors are great but Navy wouldn’t
be able to effectively use the data.
Getting out of the building!
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
Prototype
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate relevant ML
algorithms
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
E.g. CPT, VADM, ADM
(PACFLT), ADM (PACOM)
Analysts (N2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Operators (N3)
Scheduled this week
Planners (N5)
Need to find these people
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Hardware
- Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Design deployment strategy + platform
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Software
- Determine most useful data interface for analysts
- Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers
- Develop ML and visualization algorithms
- Build, Test, and Deploy Product
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Acquisition Personnel
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Week 3 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing/Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Predictive Intel through
Machine Learning
Additional Sensing Capability
BETTER DECISION
MAKING:
(1) Improved
Reporting
(2) Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) Searchable,
Visualizable Data
Integration
BETTER
UTILIZATION OF
DATA:
(1) Improved
Collection of Existing
Data Streams
(2) Predictive Intel
through Machine
Learning
- Strategic
Decision Makers
(e.g. Admirals)
- Intel Analysts
- Operators
- Planners
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
Prototype
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate relevant ML
algorithms
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
E.g. CPT, VADM, ADM
(PACFLT), ADM (PACOM)
Analysts (N2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Operators (N3)
Scheduled this week
Planners (N5)
Need to find these people
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Hardware
- Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Design deployment strategy + platform
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Software
- Determine most useful data interface for analysts
- Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers
- Develop ML and visualization algorithms
- Build, Test, and Deploy Product
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Acquisition Personnel
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Week 3 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing/Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Predictive Intel through
Machine Learning
Additional Sensing Capability
BETTER DECISION
MAKING:
(1) Improved
Reporting
(2) Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) Searchable,
Visualizable Data
Integration
BETTER
UTILIZATION OF
DATA:
(1) Improved
Collection of Existing
Data Streams
(2) Predictive Intel
through Machine
Learning
- Strategic
Decision Makers
(e.g. Admirals)
- Intel Analysts
- Operators
- Planners
Value Proposition
- More Educated
Decision-Making
(improved reporting, info
sharing, and
visualization)
- Better Utilization of
Data (fusing disparate
data sources and
predictive models)
Beneficiaries
- Strategic Decision
Makers (e.g. Admirals)
- Intel Analysts (monitor
enemy ships)
- Operators (control US
Navy ships; decisions
based on intel reports)
Weeks 4 - 5: This is a REALLY BIG problem
“I’ve been using GCCS for
7 years and I still don’t
know how to filter with it.”
- Surface Warfare Officer
Week 4:
There isn’t really a
Common Operational
Picture...
“Pacific Command, Pacific
Fleet, and 7th Fleet see the
same ship in different
places.”
- PACOM officer
Weeks 4 - 5: This is a REALLY BIG problem
“I’ve been using GCCS for
7 years and I still don’t
know how to filter with it.”
- Surface Warfare Officer
Week 4:
There isn’t really a
Common Operational
Picture...
“PACOM, Pac Fleet, and
7th Fleet see the same ship
in different places.”
- PACOM officer
Week 5:
Outdated technology
due to procurement
processes
“Navy acquisition: using
yesterday’s technology...
tomorrow.”
- 7th Fleet N2
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Hey Max, why is the
ship still in port? This
info isn’t up-to-date.
Can you ask them to
update this?
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Yeah, hold on...
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
PacFleet unit
manager
Hey Lauren, can you
tell them to update this
ship’s location?
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
7th Fleet
Hey Phil, can you get
the new position for
these guys?
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Sure!
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
*Brrring*
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Okay, the OS put in a new
latitude and longitude.
Ah, there it is.
Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
Weeks 6-7: Other Programs Trying to Address Gaps
● DARPA Insight
● SRI International Cooperative Situational Information Integration
● Maritime Tactical Command and Control (MTC2)
● Global Command and Control System (GCCS-M)
● Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC)
● Distributed Common Ground System - Navy (DCGS-N)
● ONI Sealink Advanced Analysis
● Resilient Command and Control
Weeks 6-7: Other Programs Trying to Address Gaps
● DARPA Insight
● SRI International Cooperative Situational Information Integration
● Maritime Tactical Command and Control (MTC2)
● Global Command and Control System (GCCS-M)
● Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC)
● Distributed Common Ground System - Navy (DCGS-N)
● ONI Sealink Advanced Analysis
● Resilient Command and Control
Lots of existing programs...
Week 7: Classification Wall
You should talk with the program
manager! I’ll send an intro email.
Great, thanks!
Week 7: Classification Wall
Hi, can you share anything
about this tool?
Actually...no...
Sorry.
Week 7: Found an Analogous Problem
Illegal Fishing
All the same problems and needs…
But without the classification issues!
Data & Analytics
- Compile existing data
resources/scope out future ones
- Develop flexible data
fusion/analytics algorithms
Defining C2-F
- Brainstorming what “Command
and Control of the Future” (C2-F or
“MTC2-F”) would be
- Interviewing (customer discovery)
for younger sailors
Software Development
Prototype Testing/Acquisitions
Pursue Information Assurance
Certification
USN Strategic Decision
Makers
USN Analysts (N/J2)
USN Operators (N/J3)
Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers
(USCG, Partner Nations,
etc.)
Anti-IUU Fishing
Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal
Fishing)
(Commercial entities that
use/would benefit from
enhanced C2-type systems)
USN
- Timely, accurate operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors
- Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment
Anti-IUU Fishing
- Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence
- Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources
- Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public
USN
- Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list
- Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge
personnel to talk with key decision makers
- Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution
- Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational
deployment & update pathways
Anti IUU Fishing
- Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find
key influencers/stakeholders
- Deploy solution where possible,
Fixed
- Existing Software tools/APIs
- Evaluation of commercial products
- Information assurance process
steps
Data & Analytics
- APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for
Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$
needed to access this
Defining C2-F
-Ideas/feedback from young sailors
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and
O- who use current C2 tools)
- Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150)
- Information Assurance Personnel
- NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2,
C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG,
OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing)
Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Data/Software/Algorithms
- Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing
Watch, Capella, TerraSAR
-Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG,
NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout
-Algorithms: Universities (e.g.
Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs
Software Development
-AWS, programmers, $$$ for both,
subject matter expertise on
phenomenology of ships, activities
Prototype Testing/Acquisition
- Military Sealift Command ships, 7th
Fleet experimentation ships and
personnel
Information Assurance Certification
-Access to personnel to provide
certification / approval
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots,
interviews with sailors
- R&D personnel
- Development
- Data and APIs
- AWS & Distributed Computing
IMPROVE USN DECISIONS &
OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED
DATA HANDLING, UI/UX,
COMMS, AND HARDWARE
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting, Coordination, Visibility
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable, Source-
Flexible Data Integration
(Layering & Filtering)
(4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth
via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g.
Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data
(5) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams
(6) Increasing Morale &
Engagement for Millenial Sailors
ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING
CAPABILITIES
(1) Improved Detection Using
Data Fusion/Analytics
(2) Enhanced Enforcement via
Improved Communication
(3) Lower Barriers to Engaging
Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing
Activities
Week 7 Mission: Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data - Pivot to Proxy
Data & Analytics
- Compile existing data
resources/scope out future ones
- Develop flexible data
fusion/analytics algorithms
Defining C2-F
- Brainstorming what “Command
and Control of the Future” (C2-F or
“MTC2-F”) would be
- Interviewing (customer discovery)
for younger sailors
Software Development
Prototype Testing/Acquisitions
Pursue Information Assurance
Certification
USN Strategic Decision
Makers
USN Analysts (N/J2)
USN Operators (N/J3)
Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers
(USCG, Partner Nations,
etc.)
Anti-IUU Fishing
Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal
Fishing)
(Commercial entities that
use/would benefit from
enhanced C2-type systems)
USN
- Timely, accurate operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors
- Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment
Anti-IUU Fishing
- Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence
- Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources
- Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public
USN
- Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list
- Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge
personnel to talk with key decision makers
- Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution
- Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational
deployment & update pathways
Anti IUU Fishing
- Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find
key influencers/stakeholders
- Deploy solution where possible,
Fixed
- Existing Software tools/APIs
- Evaluation of commercial products
- Information assurance process
steps
Data & Analytics
- APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for
Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$
needed to access this
Defining C2-F
-Ideas/feedback from young sailors
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and
O- who use current C2 tools)
- Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150)
- Information Assurance Personnel
- NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2,
C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG,
OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing)
Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Data/Software/Algorithms
- Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing
Watch, Capella, TerraSAR
-Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG,
NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout
-Algorithms: Universities (e.g.
Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs
Week 7 Mission: Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data - Pivot to Proxy
Software Development
-AWS, programmers, $$$ for both,
subject matter expertise on
phenomenology of ships, activities
Prototype Testing/Acquisition
- Military Sealift Command ships, 7th
Fleet experimentation ships and
personnel
Information Assurance Certification
-Access to personnel to provide
certification / approval
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots,
interviews with sailors
- R&D personnel
- Development
- Data and APIs
- AWS & Distributed Computing
IMPROVE USN DECISIONS &
OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED
DATA HANDLING, UI/UX,
COMMS, AND HARDWARE
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting, Coordination, Visibility
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable, Source-
Flexible Data Integration
(Layering & Filtering)
(4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth
via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g.
Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data
(5) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams
(6) Increasing Morale &
Engagement for Millenial Sailors
ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING
CAPABILITIES
(1) Improved Detection Using
Data Fusion/Analytics
(2) Enhanced Enforcement via
Improved Communication
(3) Lower Barriers to Engaging
Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing
Activities
Value Proposition
- Data fusion & analytics
with multiple sensor feeds
- Intuitive, easy-to-use UI
Beneficiaries
- …
- anti-IUU fishing enforcers
& stakeholders (i.e. Coast
Guard, NGOs, legal fishers)
Week 8: Redefined our Approach/Visit to San Diego
- Procurement +
deployment tricks
- How to fit with
existing tools?
Access to tools,
datasets
IUU Fishing
Navy 7th Fleet, 3rd Fleet
Visit to San Diego!
Weeks 8: Visit to San Diego
Weeks 8 - 9: Towards the Future
Week 8:
Command &
Control of the
Future (C2-F)
“If I had you four working
for me, I’d have you work
on C2 for your generation.”
- 3rd Fleet
Weeks 8 - 9: Towards the Future
Week 8:
Command &
Control of the
Future (C2-F)
“If I had you four working
for me, I’d have you work
on C2 for your generation.”
- 3rd Fleet
Week 9:
Sponsor is excited
about C2-F
“You guys have grasped
what very few people
understand.”
- Sponsor, 7th Fleet
“I’d like to stay involved in
what you are doing moving
forward!”
- Sponsor, 7th Fleet
Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future
CIC PACOM
Surface radar contact
but no AIS… This is
odd. Let me ALERT
others.
Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future
CIC PACOM
Surface radar contact
but no AIS… This is
odd. Let me ALERT
others.
I see an ALERT from
DDG102. Lets share
the C2 screen and
take a look
Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future
CIC PACOM
Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future
CIC PACOM
Data & Analytics
- Compile existing data
resources/scope out future ones
- Develop flexible data
fusion/analytics algorithms
Defining C2-F
- Brainstorming what “Command
and Control of the Future” (C2-F or
“MTC2-F”) would be
- Interviewing (customer discovery)
for younger sailors
Software Development
Prototype Testing/Acquisitions
Pursue Information Assurance
Certification
USN Strategic Decision
Makers
USN Analysts (N/J2)
USN Operators (N/J3)
Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers
(USCG, Partner Nations,
etc.)
Anti-IUU Fishing
Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal
Fishing)
(Commercial entities that
use/would benefit from
enhanced C2-type systems)
USN
- Timely, accurate operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors
- Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment
Anti-IUU Fishing
- Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence
- Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources
- Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public
USN
- Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list
- Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge
personnel to talk with key decision makers
- Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution
- Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational
deployment & update pathways
Anti IUU Fishing
- Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find
key influencers/stakeholders
- Deploy solution where possible,
Fixed
- Existing Software tools/APIs
- Evaluation of commercial products
- Information assurance process
steps
Data & Analytics
- APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for
Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$
needed to access this
Defining C2-F
-Ideas/feedback from young sailors
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and
O- who use current C2 tools)
- Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150)
- Information Assurance Personnel
- NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2,
C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG,
OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing)
Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Data/Software/Algorithms
- Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing
Watch, Capella, TerraSAR
-Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG,
NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout
-Algorithms: Universities (e.g.
Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs
Week 9 Mission: Creating C2-F - Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Software Development
-AWS, programmers, $$$ for both,
subject matter expertise on
phenomenology of ships, activities
Prototype Testing/Acquisition
- Military Sealift Command ships, 7th
Fleet experimentation ships and
personnel
Information Assurance Certification
-Access to personnel to provide
certification / approval
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots,
interviews with sailors
- R&D personnel
- Development
- Data and APIs
- AWS & Distributed Computing
IMPROVE USN DECISIONS &
OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED
DATA HANDLING, UI/UX,
COMMS, AND HARDWARE
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting, Coordination, Visibility
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable, Source-
Flexible Data Integration
(Layering & Filtering)
(4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth
via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g.
Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data
(5) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams
(6) Increasing Morale &
Engagement for Millenial Sailors
ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING
CAPABILITIES
(1) Improved Detection Using
Data Fusion/Analytics
(2) Enhanced Enforcement via
Improved Communication
(3) Lower Barriers to Engaging
Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing
Activities
Next Steps
Goal: Develop dual-use “Command & Control Tool of the
Future” based on collaborative data aggregation tool for the
IUU fishing use case
We’re going to continue working on this
Navy and sponsor interested
IUU Fishing folks are interested
IRL 1
IRL 4
IRL 3
IRL 2
IRL 7
IRL 6
IRL 5
IRL 8
IRL 9
First pass on MMC w/Problem Sponsor
Complete ecosystem analysis petal diagram
Validate mission achievement (Right side of canvas)
Problem validated through initial interviews
Prototype low-fidelity Minimum Viable Product
Value proposition/mission fit (Value Proposition Canvas)
Validate resource strategy (Left side of canvas)
Prototype high-fidelity Minimum Viable Product
Establish mission achievement metrics that matterTeam Assessment :
IRL 5
Post H4D Course
Actions
Team Sentinel intends to
pursue funding to create a
dual use solution for IUU
fishing, with the eventual
goal of getting a variant
adopted by the Navy.
Investment Readiness Level
Thank You!
We could not have survived this journey without the support from these outstanding
individuals (and many more!):
Sponsor
● LT Jason Knudson
Military Liaisons
● COL John Chu
● CDR Todd “Chimi” Cimicata
PACOM/Pac Fleet/7th Fleet/3rd Fleet
● CAPTs Andy Hertel, Greg
Hussman, ...
● CDR Rich LeBron, ...
● CAPT Yvette Davids, ...
● LT Kevin Walter, LTJG Vince
Fontana
Coast Guard
● CAPT Chris Conley
● LCDR Jed Raskie
NPS
● CDR Pablo Breuer
● CAPT Scot Miller
Others
● Dean Moon
● Rick Rikoski
● Chuck Wolf
● Richard D'Alessandro
(OGSystems)
● Graham Gilmer (BAH)
DIUx
● Steve Butow, Lauren
Schmidt
Thanks for listening!
Questions?
Appendix
Mission Model Canvii
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
- Identify key geographic areas of
interest
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate ML algorithms
Scaling
- Develop fabrication /
procurement strategy
- Develop tactical deployment
strategy
Strategic Decision Makers
E.g. CPT Greg Hussman,
VADM Joseph Aucoin
Acquisition Personnel
We need to find + talk with
these people
Analysts
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie
Deployers
We need to find + talk with
these people
Primary: 7th Fleet decision
makers, ONI intelligence
officers, and operators
Secondary: Dual-use entities
such as Coast Guard,
environmental monitoring,
research
Tertiary: State Department
Actionable intelligence
- Predictive vs reactionary intel
through machine learning -
identify potential hot spots
- Simplifying to reduce data
overload
- Improved UI increases decision
quality and speed
Information Sharing
- Open architecture
- Improved information sharing
with differential permissions
- Cross-domain analysis
techniques to integrate multiple
data sources
- Plug-and-play data sources
- Back/forward compatibility
Deployment strategy
- i.e. deploy disposable sensors
off of waveglider
- modularity + distributed
architecture
- deployable from multiple
platforms
Lower cost sensor solution
- disposable/low-maintenance
Improved coverage
- Persistent presence over
enlarged area
- Design reliability & robustness
via distributed architecture
Episodic persistence
- Persistent coverage of a
chokepoint area for a limited time
Reduce manpower burden:
- Remove tedious/manual tasks
through automation
- More efficiently use existing
analysts
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Increased area coverage + persistence
- Episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Hardware
- Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects)
and derive useful insights from analysis tools
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Software
- Build data aggregation backend + analytic engine + user-friendly UI
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing analysis software tools
- AWS
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
- Advanced manufacturing
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
- Identify key geographic areas of
interest
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate ML algorithms
Scaling
- Develop fabrication /
procurement strategy
- Develop tactical deployment
strategy
Strategic Decision Makers
E.g. CPT Greg Hussman,
VADM Joseph Aucoin
Analysts (N2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Deployers (N3)
We need to find + talk with
these people
ACQUIRING READY-TO-USE
DATA
Episodic persistence
- Persistent coverage of a
chokepoint area for a limited time
(days - 1 mo)
Timely deployment strategy
- i.e. deploy disposable sensors
off of waveglider
- sub-2 hr latency (TBD)
- deployable from multiple
platforms
Lower cost sensor solution
- disposable/low-maintenance
- modularity + distributed
architecture
Open Architecture
- Improved information sharing
with differential permissions
- Object-oriented database that is
easily searchable
- Cross-domain analysis
techniques to integrate multiple
data sources
- Compatible data format (.kmz)
Actionable intelligence
- Predictive vs reactionary intel
through machine learning -
identify potential hot spots
- Simplifying to reduce data
overload
- Improved UI increases decision
quality and speed
Reduce manpower burden:
- Remove tedious/manual tasks
through automation
- More efficiently use existing
analysts
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Hardware
- Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects)
and derive useful insights from analysis tools
- Design deployment strategy + platform
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Software
- Determine most useful data interface for analysts
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Existing deployment platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Acquisition Personnel
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
- Advanced manufacturing
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
- Identify key geographic areas of
interest
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor(s) of interest into
partner product
- Compile existing data resources
- Evaluate relevant ML
algorithms
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
E.g. CPT Greg Hussman,
VADM Joseph Aucoin
ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet)
ADM Harry Harris (PACOM)
Analysts (N2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Deployers (N3)
Scheduled this week
Planners (N5)
Need to find these people
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Good UI for operators, decision-makers
- Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system
- Cost savings with respect to existing solutions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Hardware
- Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability
- Design deployment strategy + platform
- Deploy pilot in operational environment
- Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling
Software
- Determine most useful data interface for analysts
- Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers
- Develop ML and visualization algorithms
- Build, Test, and Deploy Product
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms
- Existing deployment platforms
- Academic research
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need demand from operators and
deployment personnel in 7th Fleet
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of
insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Acquisition Personnel
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
- Advanced manufacturing
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing/Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Predictive Intel through
Machine Learning
Additional Sensing Capability
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
-Understanding current workflow
Prototype
- Evaluate existing sensor
platforms with commercial partners
- Integrate sensor feeds of interest
into prototype platform
- Compile existing data resources
- Create representative “fake”
datasets
- Evaluate relevant ML
algorithms for prediction and
rules for push alerts
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
VADM Joseph Aucoin
ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet)
ADM Harry Harris (PACOM)
Analysts (N/J2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Operators (N/J3)
CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet)
Planners (N/J5)
Need to find these people
- Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR)
- Timely operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software (THIS SECTION IS A
WORK IN PROGRESS!)
- Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS)
- Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal
funding/dissemination avenues
- Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features
- Scale deployment, improve product as necessary
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Hardware evaluation + prototyping
equipment
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms and feeds
- Existing deployment platforms
- Academic research
- Existing data fusion platforms
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR)
- Acquisition Personnel
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
- Disaster relief agencies
Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface
- Access to sample incoming sensor
feeds
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
- Manufacturing/Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Enhanced
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration
(4) Predictive Intel and Alerts
(e.g. Machine Learning)
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Painless Incorporation of
Multiple New Sensing
Modalities
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
-Understanding current workflow
Prototype
- Integrate sensor feeds of interest
into prototype platform
- Compile existing data resources
- Create representative “fake”
datasets
- Evaluate relevant ML algorithms
for prediction and rules for push
alerts
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
VADM Joseph Aucoin
ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet)
ADM Harry Harris (PACOM)
Analysts (N/J2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Operators (N/J3)
CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet)
Planners (N/J5)
Jose Lepesuastegui (N25)
- Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR)
- Timely operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software (THIS SECTION IS A
WORK IN PROGRESS!)
- Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS,
QUELLFIRE, FOBM)
- Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal
funding/dissemination avenues
- Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features
- Scale deployment, improve product as necessary
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms and feeds
- Academic research
- Existing data fusion platforms
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing PMOs
to make sure we’re not
duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- NPS/ONR
- Acquisition Personnel
- Existing PORs (Insight, PMW-150,
Quellfire, SeaVision, FOBM)
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
- Disaster relief agencies
Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface
- Access to sample incoming sensor
feeds
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
-Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting and Coordination
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration (Layering &
Filtering)
(4) Predictive Intel and Alerts
(e.g. Machine Learning)
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Painless Incorporation of
Multiple New Sensing
Modalities
(3 Integration of Incoming Data
Streams with Existing Object-
Oriented Database
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
-Understanding current workflow
Connecting People and
Programs
- Ensuring tool developers and
users are aware of one another
- Finding functional gaps to fill
Prototype
- Compile existing data resources
- Create representative “fake”
datasets
- Evaluate relevant ML algorithms
for prediction/rules for push alerts
- Iterate on human-machine
interaction
Strategic Decision Makers
VADM Joseph Aucoin
ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet)
ADM Harry Harris (PACOM)
Analysts (N/J2)
E.g. Jason Knudson, John
Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba
Operators (N/J3)
CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet)
Planners (N/J5)
Jose Lepesuastegui (N25)
- Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR)
- Timely operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software
- Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS,
QUELLFIRE, FOBM, EWBM, INSIGHT)
- Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal
funding/dissemination avenues and integration with current tool
pipeline
- Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features
- Scale deployment, improve product as necessary
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms and feeds
- Academic research
- Existing data fusion platforms
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make
sure we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- NPS/ONR
- Acquisition Personnel
- Existing PMOs/PORs
- Other Fleets
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
- Disaster relief agencies
Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface and in-development tools
- Access to sample incoming sensor
feeds
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
-Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting and Coordination
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable Data
Integration (Layering &
Filtering)
(4) Predictive Intel and Alerts
(e.g. Machine Learning)
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Painless Incorporation of
Multiple New Sensing
Modalities
(3 Integration of Incoming Data
Streams with Existing Object-
Oriented Database
Research
- Interviews to assess needs,
organizational dynamics,
procurement strategy
- Site visits to see current practices
-Understanding current workflow
Connecting People and
Programs
- Ensuring tool developers and
users are aware of one another
- Finding functional gaps to fill
Prototype
- Compile existing data resources
- Create representative “fake”
datasets
- Evaluate relevant ML algorithms
for prediction/rules for push alerts
-Create demo of flexible data
fusion/analytics for IUU fishing
Strategic Decision Makers
Analysts (N/J2)
Operators (N/J3)
Planners (N/J5)
- Timely operational decisions
-Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR)
=Flexible integration of new feeds into COP and analytics
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions
- Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability
Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software
- Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS,
QUELLFIRE, FOBM, EWBM, INSIGHT)
- Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal
funding/dissemination avenues and integration with current tool
pipeline
- Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features
- Scale deployment, improve product as necessary
Fixed
- Buying proprietary data
- Software tools
- Evaluation of commercial products
Prototyping
- Existing sensor platforms and feeds
- Academic research
- Existing data fusion platforms
Scaling
- Available commercial + military data
- Existing database tools (Palantir,
AWS)
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- 7th Fleet + designated sponsor
- NPS/ONR
- Acquisition Personnel
- Existing PMOs/PORs
- Other Fleets
Commercial
- Distributed sensor platform
companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS)
- Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google)
Academic
- Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii)
- National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia)
Other
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
- Disaster relief agencies
Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Testing
- 7th Fleet assets for pilot
- Research barge
- Access to model analyst data
interface and in-development tools
- Access to sample incoming sensor
feeds
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots
- R&D personnel
-Development
IMPROVE TACTICAL AND
STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING VIA BETTER DATA
HANDLING
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting and Coordination
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate,
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable,
Source-Flexible Data
Integration (Layering &
Filtering)
(4) Predictive Intel and Alerts
(e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data and
Rapidly Updateable to Account
for New Sources
ENHANCE INCOMING DATA
STREAMS
(1) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams (e.g.
Fishing Broadcasts)
(2) Painless Incorporation of
Multiple New Sensing
Modalities
(3 Integration of Incoming Data
Streams with Existing Object-
Oriented Database
Data & Analytics
- Compile existing data
resources/scope out future ones
- Develop flexible data
fusion/analytics algorithms
Defining C2-F
- Brainstorming what “Command
and Control of the Future” (C2-F or
“MTC2-F”) would be
- Interviewing (customer discovery)
for younger sailors
Software Development
Prototype Testing/Acquisitions
Pursue Information Assurance
Certification
USN Strategic Decision
Makers
USN Analysts (N/J2)
USN Operators (N/J3)
Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers
(USCG, Partner Nations,
etc.)
Anti-IUU Fishing
Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal
Fishing)
(Commercial entities that
use/would benefit from
enhanced C2-type systems)
USN
- Timely, accurate operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors
- Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment
Anti-IUU Fishing
- Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence
- Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources
- Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public
USN
- Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list
- Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge
personnel to talk with key decision makers
- Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution
- Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational
deployment & update pathways
Anti IUU Fishing
- Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find
key influencers/stakeholders
- Deploy solution where possible,
Fixed
- Existing Software tools/APIs
- Evaluation of commercial products
- Information assurance process
steps
Data & Analytics
- APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for
Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$
needed to access this
Defining C2-F
-Ideas/feedback from young sailors
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Military
- PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and
O- who use current C2 tools)
- Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150)
- Information Assurance Personnel
- NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2,
C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG,
OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing)
Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders
- IUU fishing + anti-smuggling
stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA)
Data/Software/Algorithms
- Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing
Watch, Capella, TerraSAR
-Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG,
NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout
-Algorithms: Universities (e.g.
Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs
Mission: Creating C2-F--Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Software Development
-AWS, programmers, $$$ for both,
subject matter expertise on
phenomenology of ships, activities
Prototype Testing/Acquisition
- Military Sealift Command ships, 7th
Fleet experimentation ships and
personnel
Information Assurance Certification
-Access to personnel to provide
certification / approval
Variable
- Travel for site visits, pilots,
interviews with sailors
- R&D personnel
- Development
- Data and APIs
- AWS & Distributed Computing
IMPROVE USN DECISIONS &
OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED
DATA HANDLING, UI/UX,
COMMS, AND HARDWARE
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting, Coordination, Visibility
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable, Source-
Flexible Data Integration
(Layering & Filtering)
(4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth
via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g.
Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data
(5) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams
(6) Increasing Morale &
Engagement for Millenial Sailors
ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING
CAPABILITIES
(1) Improved Detection Using
Data Fusion/Analytics
(2) Enhanced Enforcement via
Improved Communication
(3) Lower Barriers to Engaging
Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing
Activities
Data
- Compile existing data
resources/scope out future ones
Defining C2-F
- Brainstorming what “Command
and Control of the Future” would
be by interviewing younger sailors
Software Development
- Develop flexible data
fusion/analytics algorithms, and an
intuitive UI for millennials
Information Assurance
Prototype Testing/Procurement
Contracting, Acquisitions
Maintenance and Support
USN Strategic Decision
Makers
USN Analysts (N/J2)
USN Operators (N/J3)
Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers
(USCG, Partner Nations,
etc.)
Anti-IUU Fishing
Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal
Fishing)
(Commercial entities that
use/would benefit from
enhanced C2-type systems)
USN
- Timely, accurate operational decisions
- Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats
- Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors
- Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment
Anti-IUU Fishing
- Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence
- Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources
- Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public
USN
- Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list
- Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMS database, engage S&T bridge
personnel to talk with key decision makers
- Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution
- Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational
deployment & update pathways
Anti IUU Fishing
- Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find
key influencers/stakeholders
- Deploy solution where possible,
Fixed
- Existing Software tools/APIs, Data
- IA process steps
- Travel for site visits, pilots,
interviews with sailors
- R&D personnel
- AWS & Distributed Computing
- Overhead
Data & Analytics
APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for
Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$
needed to access this
Defining C2-F
Ideas/feedback from young sailors
Hackathon w/ Navy and DIUx support
Software Development
AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, SME
on phenomenology of ships, activities
- Need commanding officer to
confirm decision-making benefits
- Need intelligence officers from
ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to
confirm effectiveness of insights
- Need IT approvals to integrate into
systems
- Need support of commercial
partners if we want to leverage their
platforms
-Need support of existing
PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure
we’re not duplicating work
Beneficiaries
Mission Achievement
Mission Budget/Costs
Buy-In
Deployment
Value
Proposition
Key Activities
Key Resources
Key Partners
Data
Skytruth, Pew, GFW, TerraSAR
Defining C2-F
7th,3rd Fleet junior officers, sailors
Software development
Palantir Skytruth, NPS/ONR,
SeaVision, Sea Scout, Universities (e.g.
Vanderbilt), NGOs
Information Assurance
GSA, NWDC
Prototype Testing/Procurement
USFF (NWDC), NAVSEA, SPAWAR,
C7F CIG, PACFLT CSIG, IA contact
Contracting, Acquisitions
-IP Lawyer, subs with gov experience
-DIUx, C3F N8/9, PACFLT N8/N9
Mission: Creating C2-F--Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data
Information Assurance
Access to personnel to provide
certification / approval
Prototype Testing/Acquisition
Navy testing venue and exercise
(e.g. Trident Warrior), Military Sealift
Command ships, 7th Fleet
experimentation ships and
personnel
Contracting, Acquisitions
Domain knowledge of software
contracting and IP from lawyers,
subs
Variable
- Maintenance and Support
- Integration with existing
systems and processes
IMPROVE USN DECISIONS &
OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED
DATA HANDLING, UI/UX,
COMMS, AND HARDWARE
(1) Rapid Strategic
Decisionmaking via Improved
Reporting, Coordination, Visibility
(2) Improved Tactical Decision
Making via Timely, Accurate
Information Sharing
(3) More Effective Analysis via
Searchable, Visualizable, Source-
Flexible Data Integration
(Layering & Filtering)
(4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth
via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g.
Machine Learning) Flexibly
Applied to Available Data
(5) Improved Collection of
Existing Data Streams
(6) Increasing Morale &
Engagement for Millenial Sailors
ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING
CAPABILITIES
(1) Improved Detection Using
Data Fusion/Analytics
(2) Enhanced Enforcement via
Improved Communication
(3) Lower Barriers to Engaging
Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing
Activities
Learning Progression
Learning Progression: Week 1
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
Learning Progression: Week 2
● Week 2
○ Hypotheses
■ Information sharing is a core problem
■ Predictive analytics for hotspots will add value
■ Sensor platforms for our needs exist
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with C7F N2: MOC description (reservist), data fusion skepticism/deployment
emphasis (N2 Chief C7F), maybe use partner nation radar (IUU fishing operator)
○ Learning:
■ 7th Fleet wants details about surface ships--A2/AD is a problem because they can’t deploy
normal sensor packages
■ Predicting hotspots is not useful--they know where these are!
■ Information sharing within the Maritime Operations Center (MOC) is not optimal
■ Sensors exist, but cannot be deployed in timely fashion!
Learning Progression: Week 3
● Week 3
○ Hypotheses
■ Sensor deployment is the major issue
○ Experiments:
■ Visit to NPS
○ Learning:
■ N3 (Ops) owns N2 and N6--we had only been speaking to N2
■ Pete: what decisions are people actually trying to make?
■ Ship-based radar is all that’s automated--data fusion is very manual!
■ Our problem came from PACOM->PACFLT->7th Fleet...affects how we think about it
■ Lots of single-purpose data fusion tools exist--don’t fall into that trap--how do you do modular
updates without creating single-use tools?
■ There are specific systems (GCCS) that we should be thinking about learning more about
Learning Progression: Week 4
● Week 4
○ Hypotheses
■ Data fusion/aggregation is the problem--need to find out more about specific needs
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with variety of stakeholders (N0, N2, N3, N6, J5, J8, etc.)
○ Learning:
■ PACOM, PACFLT, 7th Flt see different things--COP is not really a COP
■ Analysts do data layering manualy on GCCS, and there’s usually too much there to be useful
■ Automation would be helpful (and our own algorithms could be useful)
■ Common, easily searchable database would be desirable
■ Don’t actually care that much about A2/AD! Subset of a bigger problem!
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Updated previous MVP--now we include automated push alerts and clickable vessel-specific
Learning Progression: Week 5
● Week 5
○ Hypotheses
■ We have identified a clear problem with data fusion, interaction--need to understand exactly
where the biggest pain points are, map customer workflow precisely, think about acquisiton
paths
○ Experiments:
■ Visit to USCG ops center
■ Acquisition discussions with C7F sponsor
■ Interviews with GCS users/operators and GCCS support contractors
○ Learning:
■ Customer workflow nailed down (JIOC SWO)
■ Functional org chart nailed down
■ Navy POR acquisition path laid out
■ POR-POR interaction within C2 system mapped Proposed solution (MVP)
Learning Progression: Week 6
● Week 6
○ Hypotheses
■ The overall C2 system needs to be modernized--there are programs in existence to do this
○ Experiments:
■ Send out spreadsheet to contact list, get understanding of awareness of current programs
■ Speak with ONR research staff about existing programs
○ Learning:
■ Intel is not the same as COP
■ Most users do not have a good sense of which programs already exist for modernizing various
parts of the C2 system (Quellfire, EWBM, ADAPT, etc.)
■ Very difficult to get UNCLASS-level details on C2 programs
■ anti-IUU Fishing (Illegal, Unregulated, Unreported) is a great analog use case for desirable Navy
C2 functionality
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
Learning Progression: Week 7
● Week 7
○ Hypotheses
■ Flexible integration of heterogeneous new sensor feeds into COP would be useful
■ IUU problem is a good analog for Navy COP
○ Experiments:
■ Interviews with PACOM COP/GCCS experts, IUU fishing stakeholders
○ Learning:
■ Wide variety of sensor feeds (drones, social media, etc.) exist that cannot be effectively
integrated into GCCS/COP
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ MarineTraffic.com/Global Fishing Watch--would capabilities like this be of use to the Navy?
○ Key Takeaways:
Learning Progression: Week 8
● Week 8
○ Hypotheses
■ New COP product is a worthwhile direction to go--acquisition and testing will be best done
through 3rd Fleet
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with C3F
○ Learning:
■ Trident Warrior/NWDC are the best organizations to engage for testing/evaluation
■ Information assurance is an important step in the deployment process
■ Requirements are sourced from the fleets, acquisition occurs via SecDef budget
■ Substantial demand for IUU fishing-type technology in CIC--clickable order of battle for different
ships
■ They want our week 4 MVP!
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
Learning Progression: Week 9
● Week 1
○ Hypotheses
■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing
○ Experiments:
■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts
○ Learning:
■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high
■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data
■ Internal information sharing is a big problem
■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required
○ Proposed solution (MVP)
■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation
○ Key Takeaways:
MVPs
Analytics Engine Improved UI/UXBroadly-Accessible Database
Week 1 MVP: Distributed Sensing Architecture
Data Acquisition
Contextualized
Database
Week 2 MVP: Sensor Deployment System
Deployment
Last Month
Today
Object-oriented
Database
Query
- What data is most useful to capture?
- What sensor modalities can capture?
- What products exist?
- What deployment options exist?
- What is easiest to deploy?
- What is “good-enough” time to data
acquisition?
- What is the deployment process?
- Is .kmz format all that is necessary for
compatibility?
- What do companies like Palantir do
today?
Week 3 MVP
AIS Weather
Week 4 MVP: Layering
Week 4 MVP: Push Alerts
Week 4 MVP: Vessel-Level Info & Predictive Analytics
Week 5 MVP
Modular Device
● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better
pattern recognition, alerts
GCCS /
ADS
Week 6 - MVP: “Software Domain Awareness”
Program POC Organization
Function &
Goals
To be used
by whom?
Security
Level Status Contract History Inputs
Technical
Details
CSII
Insight
MTC2
Quellfire
DCGS-N
Increment 2
C2PC
HAMDD
SeaVision
GCCS
EWBM
RC2
(Resilient
C2)
Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics
CIC PACOM
Surface radar contact
but no AIS… This is
odd. Let me ALERT
others.
Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics
CIC PACOM
Surface radar contact
but no AIS… This is
odd. Let me ALERT
others.
I see an ALERT from
DDG102. Lets share
the C2 screen and
take a look
Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics
CIC PACOM
Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics
CIC PACOM
Key Diagrams
Customer Workflow
N2
N3
N2
(“owns”
the
intel)
N3
(“owns”
the
assets)
Contextualized DataDeployment
Data
Acquisition
Data
Analysis
Data
Order/Decision
MVP
JIOC
J1 J2 J3
J4 J5
J7
J6
J8 J9
N1 N4 N7N6 N8 N9
VADM Joe Aucoin
ADM Scott Swift
ADM Harry Harris Jr
N2/N39
Intel and Info Ops
N3
Operations
N5
Planning
N22
Op/Intel Overwatch
N23
Collection Operations
N391
Fleet Cryptology &
Information Operations
N31
Current Operations
N32
Fleet Oceanographer
N33
Future Operations
N34
AT/CIP/NWS
N52
Fleet Doctrine Strategy
N53
Deliberate Plans
Division
N54
Maritime Assessments
N55
Functional Plans
Division
Director (CPT Greg
Husmann)
Deputy Director
(CDR Silas Ahn)
Director (CPT Wes
Bannister)
Deputy Director
(CDR Chris Adams)
Director
Deputy Director
LT Jason Knudson
Directorate
(N/J/A/G)
Description
1 Manpower and Personnel
2 Intelligence
3 Operations
4 Logistics, Engineering, Security &
Cooperation
5 Planning
6 C4: Command, Control,
Communication, Cyber
7 Training & Exercises
8 Resources & Assessments
9 Civil, Military Cooperation
Customer Workflow
N2
Analysis
Strategic Decisions
CUB
Task Forces
Data Acquisition (among other things)N3
Operational
Decisions
Information aggregation
+ analysis platform
Core Navy Procurement Process
PACOM
To win a war, we need to have awareness of potential adversary's
disposition of forces within the area we intend to operate and be able
to maintain that through all phases of the conflict (Joint Intelligence
Preparation of the Environment)
PACFLT Use the Navy in 3rd and 7th Fleet to conduct JIPOE
7th Fleet Direct ships, aircraft, submarines, marines, and other sensors to
conduct JIPOE
7th Fleet
N2
Task, Collect, Process, Exploit, and Disseminate and maintain JIPOE
for C7F
7th Fleet
N2, LT
Knudson
Identify potential operational gaps and determine possible ways to fill
those gaps
1. Operational Requirements flow down from PACOM and is interpreted at each level:
Operational
Requirements
USFF
PACFLT
7th Fleet Do I have the tools to accomplish my Operational Requirement?
Yes No
YAY, Done
Does PACFLT have the money and/or resources to fund it?
Send Acquisitions Requirement to PACFLT
Yes No
YAY. Validated and resourced.
Done.
PACFLT “endorses” requirement, sends to US Fleet
Forces Command
Is USFF able to fund or resource this requirement?
Yes No
YAY. Validated and resourced.
Done.
Send to OPNAV
OPNAV Is there an existing Program of Record?
No
YAY. Done
Make new POR and include in Navy’s budget via
SECNAV, SECDEF.. Send to Congress.
Congress Budget approved?
Yes
Acquisition
Requirements
Congress Budget approved?
Yes
OPNAV
PMO
USFF
Force
Commands
PACFLT
7th FLEET
Money flows from SECDEF to SECNAV to CNO/OPNAV
Primes/ NAC
Program Management Office decides who to tap for production/development
A government contractor (Boeing, Lockheed, etc.) or Naval Acquisition Command
(SPAWAR, NAVSEA, etc.) builds this system
Product made available to US Fleet Forces Command to issue to Navy units
SURFFOR, SUBFOR, and IFOR man, train, and equip using 2-year money
No GG
PACFLT receives resources from the appropriate force command
7th FLEET GETS SOMETHING!!!! …. Many YEARS later…. YAY!!!!
Program
Execution
Customer Discovery - Get/Keep/Grow Diagram
Awareness Interest Consideration Purchase Keep Unbundling Up-sell Cross-sell Referral
Activity
&
People
- Evangelist &
advocate from
originator Flt
- ???
Corey
Hesselberg,
CDR Jason
Schwarzkopf,
MIOC watch
standers
- Buy-in from
flag officers
- ADM Swift,
VADM Aucoin,
RADM Piersey
- N8/9
- Dave
Yoshihara
(PacFlt N9)
- 7th Fleet ???
- Maintainers
(N6)
- Bob Stevenson
(PacFlt N6)
- 7th Fleet ???
N/A Expanding
COP & intel
extensions /
functionality
within 7th
Fleet
Expanding
user base
within 7th
Fleet
Expanding
tool set to
other fleets
Metrics % people who
have heard of
program
before vs after
*how to
reassess?
# people who
say “we want
this”
Seems
binary… any
recommendati
ons?
# Systems
outfitted
?? ?? ?? # users within
7th Fleet using
tool
# fleets using
tool
Map of System Functions and Needs
QUELLFIRE
GCCS (1)
FOBM
STORAGE/
COMMS
CST
GCCS (3)GCCS (2)
STORAGE/
COMMS
STORAGE/
COMMS
Sensors Sensors Sensors
.oth-.json Translator
Visualization
Analytics
Ship-to-Ship Sharing
Long-Term Storage
KEY NEEDS
FUNCTIONS
&
PROGRAMS
SHIP 2 SHIP 3SHIP 1
Week 8 - MVP?
Modular Device
● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better
pattern recognition, alerts
GCCS /
ADS
Week 8 - MVP? Deployment Method!
Modular Device
● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better
pattern recognition, alerts
“C2-F”
Cost Flows
Database ($80k)
Analytics Engine
($120k)
Translation (ETLs) ($100k)
AIS VMS Radar SAR Sat
UI ($80k)
Information
Assurance
($240k)
Testing
($480k)
Maintenance
and Support
(VC)
Assume 10 data streams, need
cost validation on streams
$380K $240K $480K $???
Total: $1.1 MM + Var Costs
Customer Discovery DeploymentProduct Development Navy
Testing
Initial
Testing
Information
Assurance
Maintenance
& Support
Key Activities, Resources, and Partners
TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9
3 Year Financial/Ops/Funding Timeline
2016 2017 2018 2019
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Cash
Reserves
Phase
ProductGov’tCom’l
Milestones
Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4
TRL
1
TRL
2
TR
L 3
TRL 4
TRL 5
TRL 6
TRL 7
TRL 8
TRL 9
POC
Wireframe
Prototype
Beta
Prototype
Marketable
Product
Beta
Prototype
Released to first
customers (<3)
Commercial
Product Launch;
2 contracts
Test in Navy env Navy-wide Deployment Maintenance and Support
V2.0 Commercial
Product Launch;
5 contracts
signed
Initialize
System Development/
Customer Relationship Development Launch at scale
Head
count
4
10
20
50
15
customers;
V2.5 launch
CONTRACT
SIGNED CONTRACT
RENEWED
SBIR/
DIUx
Series A
(In-Q-Tel,
Impact
Investor(s))
2 com’l
contracts
$250k
$0
$1.25M DoD Contract
$2M
$5M
3 Year Financial/Ops/Funding Timeline
2016 2017 2018 2019
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Cash
Reserves
Phase
ProductGov’tCom’l
Milestones
Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4
TRL
1
TRL
2
TR
L 3
TRL 4
TRL 5
TRL 6
TRL 7
TRL 8
TRL 9
POC
Wireframe
Prototype
Beta
Prototype
Marketable
Product
Beta
Prototype
Released to first
customers (<3)
Commercial
Product Launch;
2 contracts
Test in Navy env Navy-wide Deployment Maintenance and Support
V2.0 Commercial
Product Launch;
5 contracts
signed
Initialize
System Development/
Customer Relationship Development Launch at scale
Head
count
4
10
20
50
15
customers;
V2.5 launch
CONTRACT
SIGNED CONTRACT
RENEWED
SBIR/
DIUx
Series A
(In-Q-Tel,
Impact
Investor(s))
2 com’l
contracts
$250k
$0
$1.25M DoD Contract
$2M
$5M
CAVEAT:
This is what the timeline would look like if we
worked on the project full time.

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationGivemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationCloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford University
 
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Stanford University
 
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationTranscence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationStanford University
 
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalFarm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalStanford University
 
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Stanford University
 
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Stanford University
 

En vedette (20)

Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Skynet Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final PresentationGivemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
Givemodo Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final PresentationCloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
Cloudslate Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
Stanford E245 Lean LaunchPad winter 10 session 01 course overview rev 4
 
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Space Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Aqualink Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Right of Boom Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Guardian Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Omg e245 march 2014 final
Omg e245 march 2014 finalOmg e245 march 2014 final
Omg e245 march 2014 final
 
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Fishreel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016
 
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final PresentationTranscence Berkeley Final Presentation
Transcence Berkeley Final Presentation
 
Pesticide id Final Presentation
Pesticide id Final PresentationPesticide id Final Presentation
Pesticide id Final Presentation
 
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 finalFarm sense e245 march 2014 final
Farm sense e245 march 2014 final
 
Delphi Berkeley 2016
Delphi Berkeley 2016Delphi Berkeley 2016
Delphi Berkeley 2016
 
SalesStash Berkeley 2016
SalesStash Berkeley 2016SalesStash Berkeley 2016
SalesStash Berkeley 2016
 
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
Exit strategy Berkeley 2016
 
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
HomeSlice Berkeley 2016
 
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Team 621 Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
 
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
Space Evaders Hacking for Diplomacy week 8
 

Similaire à Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016

Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...Splunk
 
Big data beyond the hype may 2014
Big data beyond the hype may 2014Big data beyond the hype may 2014
Big data beyond the hype may 2014bigdatagurus_meetup
 
Technology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionTechnology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionH4Diadmin
 
Smd aug13 d_vbrief
Smd aug13 d_vbriefSmd aug13 d_vbrief
Smd aug13 d_vbriefLsquirrel
 
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...Databricks
 
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...Karthik Murugesan
 
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makers
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makersBig data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makers
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makersRuhollah Farchtchi
 
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309DrVictorFang
 
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016Stanford University
 
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...heila1
 
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons Learned
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons LearnedHelmsman H4D 2020 Lessons Learned
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015Splunk
 
Data as a Strategic Asset
Data as a Strategic AssetData as a Strategic Asset
Data as a Strategic AssetTamrMarketing
 
Scientific Software Challenges and Community Responses
Scientific Software Challenges and Community ResponsesScientific Software Challenges and Community Responses
Scientific Software Challenges and Community ResponsesDaniel S. Katz
 
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FS
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FSBitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FS
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FSPhilip Filleul
 
Harnessing Big Data_UCLA
Harnessing Big Data_UCLAHarnessing Big Data_UCLA
Harnessing Big Data_UCLAPaul Barsch
 

Similaire à Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016 (20)

Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 2 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 3 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 7 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...
Virtual Gov Day - IT Operations Breakout - Jennifer Green, R&D Scientist, Los...
 
Big data beyond the hype may 2014
Big data beyond the hype may 2014Big data beyond the hype may 2014
Big data beyond the hype may 2014
 
Technology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat PredictionTechnology Threat Prediction
Technology Threat Prediction
 
Smd aug13 d_vbrief
Smd aug13 d_vbriefSmd aug13 d_vbrief
Smd aug13 d_vbrief
 
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...
Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Science W...
 
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...
Uber - Building Intelligent Applications, Experimental ML with Uber’s Data Sc...
 
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makers
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makersBig data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makers
Big data analytics presented at meetup big data for decision makers
 
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309
Video Analytics on Hadoop webinar victor fang-201309
 
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Sentinel Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...
Criteria and evaluation of research data repository platforms @ the Universit...
 
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons Learned
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons LearnedHelmsman H4D 2020 Lessons Learned
Helmsman H4D 2020 Lessons Learned
 
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015
Exxon - SplunkLive! São Paulo 2015
 
Data as a Strategic Asset
Data as a Strategic AssetData as a Strategic Asset
Data as a Strategic Asset
 
Scientific Software Challenges and Community Responses
Scientific Software Challenges and Community ResponsesScientific Software Challenges and Community Responses
Scientific Software Challenges and Community Responses
 
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FS
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FSBitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FS
Bitkom Cray presentation - on HPC affecting big data analytics in FS
 
Harnessing Big Data_UCLA
Harnessing Big Data_UCLAHarnessing Big Data_UCLA
Harnessing Big Data_UCLA
 

Plus de Stanford University

Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
 
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
 
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedAltuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedInvisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learnedānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedStanford University
 
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Stanford University
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
 
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
 
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Stanford University
 
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberLecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberStanford University
 

Plus de Stanford University (20)

Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Networks  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam LiOn Batteries  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Quantum  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Disinformation  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Wargames  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Acquistion  - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedAltuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Altuna Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons LearnedInvisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
Invisa Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learnedānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
ānanda Engr245 2022 Lessons Learned
 
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
Gordian Knot Center Roundtable w/Depty SecDef
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
 
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...
 
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionTeam Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition
 
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...
 
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberLecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Cyber
 

Dernier

Power System electrical and electronics .pptx
Power System electrical and electronics .pptxPower System electrical and electronics .pptx
Power System electrical and electronics .pptxMUKULKUMAR210
 
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovations
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovationsModelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovations
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovationsYusuf Yıldız
 
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part A
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part Ame3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part A
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part Akarthi keyan
 
Engineering Mechanics Chapter 5 Equilibrium of a Rigid Body
Engineering Mechanics  Chapter 5  Equilibrium of a Rigid BodyEngineering Mechanics  Chapter 5  Equilibrium of a Rigid Body
Engineering Mechanics Chapter 5 Equilibrium of a Rigid BodyAhmadHajasad2
 
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptx
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptxTest of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptx
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptxHome
 
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)Bahzad5
 
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & Logging
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & LoggingDev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & Logging
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & LoggingMarian Marinov
 
Graphics Primitives and CG Display Devices
Graphics Primitives and CG Display DevicesGraphics Primitives and CG Display Devices
Graphics Primitives and CG Display DevicesDIPIKA83
 
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software Simulation
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software SimulationA Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software Simulation
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software SimulationMohsinKhanA
 
Phase noise transfer functions.pptx
Phase noise transfer      functions.pptxPhase noise transfer      functions.pptx
Phase noise transfer functions.pptxSaiGouthamSunkara
 
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdf
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdfsdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdf
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdfJulia Kaye
 
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...amrabdallah9
 
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docx
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docxSUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docx
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docxNaveenVerma126
 
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratoryدليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide LaboratoryBahzad5
 
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...Amil baba
 
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptx
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptxDesign of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptx
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptxYogeshKumarKJMIT
 
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptx
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptxEPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptx
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptxJoseeMusabyimana
 
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptx
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptxUNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptx
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptxrealme6igamerr
 
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdf
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdfHow to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdf
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdfRedhwan Qasem Shaddad
 

Dernier (20)

Power System electrical and electronics .pptx
Power System electrical and electronics .pptxPower System electrical and electronics .pptx
Power System electrical and electronics .pptx
 
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovations
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovationsModelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovations
Modelling Guide for Timber Structures - FPInnovations
 
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part A
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part Ame3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part A
me3493 manufacturing technology unit 1 Part A
 
Engineering Mechanics Chapter 5 Equilibrium of a Rigid Body
Engineering Mechanics  Chapter 5  Equilibrium of a Rigid BodyEngineering Mechanics  Chapter 5  Equilibrium of a Rigid Body
Engineering Mechanics Chapter 5 Equilibrium of a Rigid Body
 
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptx
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptxTest of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptx
Test of Significance of Large Samples for Mean = µ.pptx
 
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)
Lecture 1: Basics of trigonometry (surveying)
 
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & Logging
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & LoggingDev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & Logging
Dev.bg DevOps March 2024 Monitoring & Logging
 
Graphics Primitives and CG Display Devices
Graphics Primitives and CG Display DevicesGraphics Primitives and CG Display Devices
Graphics Primitives and CG Display Devices
 
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software Simulation
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software SimulationA Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software Simulation
A Seminar on Electric Vehicle Software Simulation
 
Phase noise transfer functions.pptx
Phase noise transfer      functions.pptxPhase noise transfer      functions.pptx
Phase noise transfer functions.pptx
 
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdf
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdfsdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdf
sdfsadopkjpiosufoiasdoifjasldkjfl a asldkjflaskdjflkjsdsdf
 
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...
Strategies of Urban Morphologyfor Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Susta...
 
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docx
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docxSUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docx
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.docx
 
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratoryدليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
دليل تجارب الاسفلت المختبرية - Asphalt Experiments Guide Laboratory
 
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...
Popular-NO1 Kala Jadu Expert Specialist In Germany Kala Jadu Expert Specialis...
 
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptx
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptxDesign of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptx
Design of Clutches and Brakes in Design of Machine Elements.pptx
 
Lecture 4 .pdf
Lecture 4                              .pdfLecture 4                              .pdf
Lecture 4 .pdf
 
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptx
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptxEPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptx
EPE3163_Hydro power stations_Unit2_Lect2.pptx
 
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptx
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptxUNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptx
UNIT4_ESD_wfffffggggggggggggith_ARM.pptx
 
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdf
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdfHow to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdf
How to Write a Good Scientific Paper.pdf
 

Sentinel Lessons Learned H4D Stanford 2016

  • 1. Team Sentinel 112 Interviews Jared Dunnmon Darren Hau Atsu Kobashi Rachel Moore Problem: Intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance is difficult for 7th Fleet in contested areas Solution: Navy needs cheap, distributed sensors Problem: Navy is hindered by outdated, cumbersome maritime domain awareness tools Solution: Navy actually needs enhanced data fusion, analytics, and sharing 4 Site Visits Week 0 Week 9
  • 2. Jared Dunnmon Darren Hau Atsu Kobashi Rachel Moore Degree Program & Department PhD Mechanical Engineering BS Electrical Engineering MS Electrical Engineering Joint Degree MBA and E-IPER MS GSB Expertise Experience in mechanical design, distributed energy harvesting, computational modeling, machine learning, and data analytics, MBA and previous work experience at energy startup Offgrid Electric. Co-founder of Dragonfly Systems, a solar company acquired by SunPower. Experience in renewable energy, power electronics, reliability, and manufacturing. Inventor of multiple U.S. patents. Record of translating market needs into viable product. Industry experience as a software engineer for Nissan's Autonomous Vehicle team and experience in the defense sector working for Lockheed Martin. Academic experience with machine learning and data analytics. Rachel (Caltech ‘13) worked extensively with hardware as an engineer and project manager at a defense contractor prior to the GSB. Team Sentinel
  • 4. Emotional Journey So many problems, so little time... Classified. Illegal Fishing Analog
  • 5. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices - Identify key geographic areas of interest Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate ML algorithms Scaling - Develop fabrication / procurement strategy - Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators - Secondary: Dual- use entities such as Coast Guard, environmental monitoring, research - Tertiary: State Department Lower cost sensor solution Improved coverage - Persistent presence over enlarged area - Design reliability & robustness via distributed architecture Actionable intelligence - Cross-domain analysis techniques to integrate multiple data sources - Improved UI increases decision quality and speed - Provide insights to identify potential hot spots Flexible platform - open architecture - plug-and-play - disposable/low-maintenance - back/forward compatibility Reduce manpower burden: - Remove tedious/manual tasks through automation - More efficiently use existing analysts - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Decreased time to ID & differentiate threats - Increased area coverage + persistence - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability - Prototype initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects) and derive useful insights from analysis tools - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing analysis software tools - AWS - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) - Advanced manufacturing Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Week 0 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing - Lower cost sensor solution - Actionable intelligence - Flexible platform - Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators - Secondary: Dual- use entities such as Coast Guard
  • 6. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices - Identify key geographic areas of interest Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate ML algorithms Scaling - Develop fabrication / procurement strategy - Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators - Secondary: Dual- use entities such as Coast Guard, environmental monitoring, research - Tertiary: State Department Lower cost sensor solution Improved coverage - Persistent presence over enlarged area - Design reliability & robustness via distributed architecture Actionable intelligence - Cross-domain analysis techniques to integrate multiple data sources - Improved UI increases decision quality and speed - Provide insights to identify potential hot spots Flexible platform - open architecture - plug-and-play - disposable/low-maintenance - back/forward compatibility Reduce manpower burden: - Remove tedious/manual tasks through automation - More efficiently use existing analysts - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Decreased time to ID & differentiate threats - Increased area coverage + persistence - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability - Prototype initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects) and derive useful insights from analysis tools - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing analysis software tools - AWS - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) - Advanced manufacturing Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Week 0 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing - Lower cost sensor solution - Actionable intelligence - Flexible platform - Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators - Secondary: Dual- use entities such as Coast Guard Value Proposition - Lower cost sensor solution - Actionable intelligence - Flexible platform Beneficiaries - Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators - Secondary: Dual-use entities such as Coast Guard Value Proposition
  • 8. Learning Progression: Week 1 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways: Number of Interviews: 14 Hypothesis: - Insufficient sensing capabilities
  • 9. Learning Progression: Week 1 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways: Number of Interviews: 14 Experiments: - Interviews, site visits...
  • 10. Learning Progression: Week 1 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways: Number of Interviews: 14 Learnings: - Sensors largely exist - Information sharing is a big problem - Gov overwhelmed by sheer bulk of data
  • 11. Learning Progression: Week 1 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways: Number of Interviews: 14 We pivoted in Week 1!
  • 12. Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem? High-level Thinkers Defense Contractors Week 1 Information sharing, data aggregation
  • 13. Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem? INTELLIGENCE (N2) High-level Thinkers Defense Contractors Week 1 Information sharing, data aggregation Week 2 Sensors and deployment?
  • 14. Weeks 1 - 3: What’s the problem? INTELLIGENCE (N2) OPERATIONS (N3) High-level Thinkers Defense Contractors Week 1 Information sharing, data aggregation Week 2 Sensors and deployment? Week 3 Nope, it really is a data problem
  • 15. Weeks 1 - 3: Cognitive Dissonance INTELLIGENCE (N2) OPERATIONS (N3) High-level Thinkers Defense Contractors Week 1 Information sharing, data aggregation Week 2 Sensor deployment? Week 3 Nope, it really is a data problem BIG IDEAS: 1. Everyone is right, but priorities are influenced by their roles. 1. Sensors are great but Navy wouldn’t know what to do with it.
  • 16. Weeks 1 - 3: Cognitive Dissonance INTELLIGENCE (N2) OPERATIONS (N3) High-level Thinkers Defense Contractors Week 1 Information sharing, data aggregation Week 2 Sensor deployment? Week 3 Nope, it really is a data problem BIG IDEAS: 1. Everyone is right, but priorities are influenced by their roles. 1. Sensors are great but Navy wouldn’t be able to effectively use the data.
  • 17. Getting out of the building!
  • 18. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices Prototype - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers E.g. CPT, VADM, ADM (PACFLT), ADM (PACOM) Analysts (N2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Operators (N3) Scheduled this week Planners (N5) Need to find these people - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Hardware - Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Design deployment strategy + platform - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Software - Determine most useful data interface for analysts - Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers - Develop ML and visualization algorithms - Build, Test, and Deploy Product Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) - Acquisition Personnel Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Week 3 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing/Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Enhanced Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Predictive Intel through Machine Learning Additional Sensing Capability BETTER DECISION MAKING: (1) Improved Reporting (2) Enhanced Information Sharing (3) Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration BETTER UTILIZATION OF DATA: (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (2) Predictive Intel through Machine Learning - Strategic Decision Makers (e.g. Admirals) - Intel Analysts - Operators - Planners
  • 19. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices Prototype - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers E.g. CPT, VADM, ADM (PACFLT), ADM (PACOM) Analysts (N2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Operators (N3) Scheduled this week Planners (N5) Need to find these people - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Hardware - Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Design deployment strategy + platform - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Software - Determine most useful data interface for analysts - Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers - Develop ML and visualization algorithms - Build, Test, and Deploy Product Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) - Acquisition Personnel Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Week 3 Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing/Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Enhanced Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Predictive Intel through Machine Learning Additional Sensing Capability BETTER DECISION MAKING: (1) Improved Reporting (2) Enhanced Information Sharing (3) Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration BETTER UTILIZATION OF DATA: (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (2) Predictive Intel through Machine Learning - Strategic Decision Makers (e.g. Admirals) - Intel Analysts - Operators - Planners Value Proposition - More Educated Decision-Making (improved reporting, info sharing, and visualization) - Better Utilization of Data (fusing disparate data sources and predictive models) Beneficiaries - Strategic Decision Makers (e.g. Admirals) - Intel Analysts (monitor enemy ships) - Operators (control US Navy ships; decisions based on intel reports)
  • 20. Weeks 4 - 5: This is a REALLY BIG problem “I’ve been using GCCS for 7 years and I still don’t know how to filter with it.” - Surface Warfare Officer Week 4: There isn’t really a Common Operational Picture... “Pacific Command, Pacific Fleet, and 7th Fleet see the same ship in different places.” - PACOM officer
  • 21. Weeks 4 - 5: This is a REALLY BIG problem “I’ve been using GCCS for 7 years and I still don’t know how to filter with it.” - Surface Warfare Officer Week 4: There isn’t really a Common Operational Picture... “PACOM, Pac Fleet, and 7th Fleet see the same ship in different places.” - PACOM officer Week 5: Outdated technology due to procurement processes “Navy acquisition: using yesterday’s technology... tomorrow.” - 7th Fleet N2
  • 22. Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow Hey Max, why is the ship still in port? This info isn’t up-to-date.
  • 23. Can you ask them to update this? Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 24. Yeah, hold on... Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 25. Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 26. PacFleet unit manager Hey Lauren, can you tell them to update this ship’s location? Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 27. 7th Fleet Hey Phil, can you get the new position for these guys? Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 28. Sure! Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 29. *Brrring* Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 30. Okay, the OS put in a new latitude and longitude. Ah, there it is. Customer Discovery - Operations Center Workflow
  • 31. Weeks 6-7: Other Programs Trying to Address Gaps ● DARPA Insight ● SRI International Cooperative Situational Information Integration ● Maritime Tactical Command and Control (MTC2) ● Global Command and Control System (GCCS-M) ● Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC) ● Distributed Common Ground System - Navy (DCGS-N) ● ONI Sealink Advanced Analysis ● Resilient Command and Control
  • 32. Weeks 6-7: Other Programs Trying to Address Gaps ● DARPA Insight ● SRI International Cooperative Situational Information Integration ● Maritime Tactical Command and Control (MTC2) ● Global Command and Control System (GCCS-M) ● Command and Control Personal Computer (C2PC) ● Distributed Common Ground System - Navy (DCGS-N) ● ONI Sealink Advanced Analysis ● Resilient Command and Control Lots of existing programs...
  • 33. Week 7: Classification Wall You should talk with the program manager! I’ll send an intro email. Great, thanks!
  • 34. Week 7: Classification Wall Hi, can you share anything about this tool? Actually...no... Sorry.
  • 35. Week 7: Found an Analogous Problem Illegal Fishing All the same problems and needs… But without the classification issues!
  • 36. Data & Analytics - Compile existing data resources/scope out future ones - Develop flexible data fusion/analytics algorithms Defining C2-F - Brainstorming what “Command and Control of the Future” (C2-F or “MTC2-F”) would be - Interviewing (customer discovery) for younger sailors Software Development Prototype Testing/Acquisitions Pursue Information Assurance Certification USN Strategic Decision Makers USN Analysts (N/J2) USN Operators (N/J3) Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers (USCG, Partner Nations, etc.) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal Fishing) (Commercial entities that use/would benefit from enhanced C2-type systems) USN - Timely, accurate operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors - Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment Anti-IUU Fishing - Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence - Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources - Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public USN - Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list - Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge personnel to talk with key decision makers - Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution - Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational deployment & update pathways Anti IUU Fishing - Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find key influencers/stakeholders - Deploy solution where possible, Fixed - Existing Software tools/APIs - Evaluation of commercial products - Information assurance process steps Data & Analytics - APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$ needed to access this Defining C2-F -Ideas/feedback from young sailors - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and O- who use current C2 tools) - Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150) - Information Assurance Personnel - NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2, C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG, OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Data/Software/Algorithms - Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing Watch, Capella, TerraSAR -Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG, NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout -Algorithms: Universities (e.g. Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs Software Development -AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, subject matter expertise on phenomenology of ships, activities Prototype Testing/Acquisition - Military Sealift Command ships, 7th Fleet experimentation ships and personnel Information Assurance Certification -Access to personnel to provide certification / approval Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots, interviews with sailors - R&D personnel - Development - Data and APIs - AWS & Distributed Computing IMPROVE USN DECISIONS & OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED DATA HANDLING, UI/UX, COMMS, AND HARDWARE (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting, Coordination, Visibility (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source- Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data (5) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (6) Increasing Morale & Engagement for Millenial Sailors ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING CAPABILITIES (1) Improved Detection Using Data Fusion/Analytics (2) Enhanced Enforcement via Improved Communication (3) Lower Barriers to Engaging Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing Activities Week 7 Mission: Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data - Pivot to Proxy
  • 37. Data & Analytics - Compile existing data resources/scope out future ones - Develop flexible data fusion/analytics algorithms Defining C2-F - Brainstorming what “Command and Control of the Future” (C2-F or “MTC2-F”) would be - Interviewing (customer discovery) for younger sailors Software Development Prototype Testing/Acquisitions Pursue Information Assurance Certification USN Strategic Decision Makers USN Analysts (N/J2) USN Operators (N/J3) Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers (USCG, Partner Nations, etc.) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal Fishing) (Commercial entities that use/would benefit from enhanced C2-type systems) USN - Timely, accurate operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors - Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment Anti-IUU Fishing - Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence - Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources - Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public USN - Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list - Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge personnel to talk with key decision makers - Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution - Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational deployment & update pathways Anti IUU Fishing - Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find key influencers/stakeholders - Deploy solution where possible, Fixed - Existing Software tools/APIs - Evaluation of commercial products - Information assurance process steps Data & Analytics - APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$ needed to access this Defining C2-F -Ideas/feedback from young sailors - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and O- who use current C2 tools) - Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150) - Information Assurance Personnel - NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2, C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG, OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Data/Software/Algorithms - Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing Watch, Capella, TerraSAR -Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG, NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout -Algorithms: Universities (e.g. Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs Week 7 Mission: Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data - Pivot to Proxy Software Development -AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, subject matter expertise on phenomenology of ships, activities Prototype Testing/Acquisition - Military Sealift Command ships, 7th Fleet experimentation ships and personnel Information Assurance Certification -Access to personnel to provide certification / approval Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots, interviews with sailors - R&D personnel - Development - Data and APIs - AWS & Distributed Computing IMPROVE USN DECISIONS & OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED DATA HANDLING, UI/UX, COMMS, AND HARDWARE (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting, Coordination, Visibility (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source- Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data (5) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (6) Increasing Morale & Engagement for Millenial Sailors ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING CAPABILITIES (1) Improved Detection Using Data Fusion/Analytics (2) Enhanced Enforcement via Improved Communication (3) Lower Barriers to Engaging Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing Activities Value Proposition - Data fusion & analytics with multiple sensor feeds - Intuitive, easy-to-use UI Beneficiaries - … - anti-IUU fishing enforcers & stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, NGOs, legal fishers)
  • 38. Week 8: Redefined our Approach/Visit to San Diego - Procurement + deployment tricks - How to fit with existing tools? Access to tools, datasets IUU Fishing Navy 7th Fleet, 3rd Fleet Visit to San Diego!
  • 39. Weeks 8: Visit to San Diego
  • 40. Weeks 8 - 9: Towards the Future Week 8: Command & Control of the Future (C2-F) “If I had you four working for me, I’d have you work on C2 for your generation.” - 3rd Fleet
  • 41. Weeks 8 - 9: Towards the Future Week 8: Command & Control of the Future (C2-F) “If I had you four working for me, I’d have you work on C2 for your generation.” - 3rd Fleet Week 9: Sponsor is excited about C2-F “You guys have grasped what very few people understand.” - Sponsor, 7th Fleet “I’d like to stay involved in what you are doing moving forward!” - Sponsor, 7th Fleet
  • 42. Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future CIC PACOM Surface radar contact but no AIS… This is odd. Let me ALERT others.
  • 43. Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future CIC PACOM Surface radar contact but no AIS… This is odd. Let me ALERT others. I see an ALERT from DDG102. Lets share the C2 screen and take a look
  • 44. Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future CIC PACOM
  • 45. Final MVP - Command & Control of the Future CIC PACOM
  • 46. Data & Analytics - Compile existing data resources/scope out future ones - Develop flexible data fusion/analytics algorithms Defining C2-F - Brainstorming what “Command and Control of the Future” (C2-F or “MTC2-F”) would be - Interviewing (customer discovery) for younger sailors Software Development Prototype Testing/Acquisitions Pursue Information Assurance Certification USN Strategic Decision Makers USN Analysts (N/J2) USN Operators (N/J3) Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers (USCG, Partner Nations, etc.) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal Fishing) (Commercial entities that use/would benefit from enhanced C2-type systems) USN - Timely, accurate operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors - Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment Anti-IUU Fishing - Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence - Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources - Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public USN - Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list - Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge personnel to talk with key decision makers - Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution - Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational deployment & update pathways Anti IUU Fishing - Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find key influencers/stakeholders - Deploy solution where possible, Fixed - Existing Software tools/APIs - Evaluation of commercial products - Information assurance process steps Data & Analytics - APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$ needed to access this Defining C2-F -Ideas/feedback from young sailors - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and O- who use current C2 tools) - Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150) - Information Assurance Personnel - NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2, C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG, OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Data/Software/Algorithms - Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing Watch, Capella, TerraSAR -Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG, NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout -Algorithms: Universities (e.g. Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs Week 9 Mission: Creating C2-F - Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Software Development -AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, subject matter expertise on phenomenology of ships, activities Prototype Testing/Acquisition - Military Sealift Command ships, 7th Fleet experimentation ships and personnel Information Assurance Certification -Access to personnel to provide certification / approval Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots, interviews with sailors - R&D personnel - Development - Data and APIs - AWS & Distributed Computing IMPROVE USN DECISIONS & OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED DATA HANDLING, UI/UX, COMMS, AND HARDWARE (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting, Coordination, Visibility (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source- Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data (5) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (6) Increasing Morale & Engagement for Millenial Sailors ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING CAPABILITIES (1) Improved Detection Using Data Fusion/Analytics (2) Enhanced Enforcement via Improved Communication (3) Lower Barriers to Engaging Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing Activities
  • 47. Next Steps Goal: Develop dual-use “Command & Control Tool of the Future” based on collaborative data aggregation tool for the IUU fishing use case We’re going to continue working on this Navy and sponsor interested IUU Fishing folks are interested
  • 48. IRL 1 IRL 4 IRL 3 IRL 2 IRL 7 IRL 6 IRL 5 IRL 8 IRL 9 First pass on MMC w/Problem Sponsor Complete ecosystem analysis petal diagram Validate mission achievement (Right side of canvas) Problem validated through initial interviews Prototype low-fidelity Minimum Viable Product Value proposition/mission fit (Value Proposition Canvas) Validate resource strategy (Left side of canvas) Prototype high-fidelity Minimum Viable Product Establish mission achievement metrics that matterTeam Assessment : IRL 5 Post H4D Course Actions Team Sentinel intends to pursue funding to create a dual use solution for IUU fishing, with the eventual goal of getting a variant adopted by the Navy. Investment Readiness Level
  • 49. Thank You! We could not have survived this journey without the support from these outstanding individuals (and many more!): Sponsor ● LT Jason Knudson Military Liaisons ● COL John Chu ● CDR Todd “Chimi” Cimicata PACOM/Pac Fleet/7th Fleet/3rd Fleet ● CAPTs Andy Hertel, Greg Hussman, ... ● CDR Rich LeBron, ... ● CAPT Yvette Davids, ... ● LT Kevin Walter, LTJG Vince Fontana Coast Guard ● CAPT Chris Conley ● LCDR Jed Raskie NPS ● CDR Pablo Breuer ● CAPT Scot Miller Others ● Dean Moon ● Rick Rikoski ● Chuck Wolf ● Richard D'Alessandro (OGSystems) ● Graham Gilmer (BAH) DIUx ● Steve Butow, Lauren Schmidt
  • 53. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices - Identify key geographic areas of interest Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate ML algorithms Scaling - Develop fabrication / procurement strategy - Develop tactical deployment strategy Strategic Decision Makers E.g. CPT Greg Hussman, VADM Joseph Aucoin Acquisition Personnel We need to find + talk with these people Analysts E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie Deployers We need to find + talk with these people Primary: 7th Fleet decision makers, ONI intelligence officers, and operators Secondary: Dual-use entities such as Coast Guard, environmental monitoring, research Tertiary: State Department Actionable intelligence - Predictive vs reactionary intel through machine learning - identify potential hot spots - Simplifying to reduce data overload - Improved UI increases decision quality and speed Information Sharing - Open architecture - Improved information sharing with differential permissions - Cross-domain analysis techniques to integrate multiple data sources - Plug-and-play data sources - Back/forward compatibility Deployment strategy - i.e. deploy disposable sensors off of waveglider - modularity + distributed architecture - deployable from multiple platforms Lower cost sensor solution - disposable/low-maintenance Improved coverage - Persistent presence over enlarged area - Design reliability & robustness via distributed architecture Episodic persistence - Persistent coverage of a chokepoint area for a limited time Reduce manpower burden: - Remove tedious/manual tasks through automation - More efficiently use existing analysts - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Increased area coverage + persistence - Episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Hardware - Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects) and derive useful insights from analysis tools - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Software - Build data aggregation backend + analytic engine + user-friendly UI Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing analysis software tools - AWS - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) - Advanced manufacturing Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing
  • 54. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices - Identify key geographic areas of interest Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate ML algorithms Scaling - Develop fabrication / procurement strategy - Develop tactical deployment strategy Strategic Decision Makers E.g. CPT Greg Hussman, VADM Joseph Aucoin Analysts (N2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Deployers (N3) We need to find + talk with these people ACQUIRING READY-TO-USE DATA Episodic persistence - Persistent coverage of a chokepoint area for a limited time (days - 1 mo) Timely deployment strategy - i.e. deploy disposable sensors off of waveglider - sub-2 hr latency (TBD) - deployable from multiple platforms Lower cost sensor solution - disposable/low-maintenance - modularity + distributed architecture Open Architecture - Improved information sharing with differential permissions - Object-oriented database that is easily searchable - Cross-domain analysis techniques to integrate multiple data sources - Compatible data format (.kmz) Actionable intelligence - Predictive vs reactionary intel through machine learning - identify potential hot spots - Simplifying to reduce data overload - Improved UI increases decision quality and speed Reduce manpower burden: - Remove tedious/manual tasks through automation - More efficiently use existing analysts - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Hardware - Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Build multiple units pursuing the same threat group (network effects) and derive useful insights from analysis tools - Design deployment strategy + platform - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Software - Determine most useful data interface for analysts Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Existing deployment platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) - Acquisition Personnel Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) - Advanced manufacturing Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing
  • 55. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices - Identify key geographic areas of interest Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor(s) of interest into partner product - Compile existing data resources - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers E.g. CPT Greg Hussman, VADM Joseph Aucoin ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet) ADM Harry Harris (PACOM) Analysts (N2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Deployers (N3) Scheduled this week Planners (N5) Need to find these people - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Good UI for operators, decision-makers - Timely, episodic persistent coverage with easily-deployed system - Cost savings with respect to existing solutions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Hardware - Acquire initial sensor platform with single desired capability - Design deployment strategy + platform - Deploy pilot in operational environment - Develop fabrication/procurement pipeline + cost models for scaling Software - Determine most useful data interface for analysts - Determine optimal information flow to strategic decision makers - Develop ML and visualization algorithms - Build, Test, and Deploy Product Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms - Existing deployment platforms - Academic research Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need demand from operators and deployment personnel in 7th Fleet - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) - Acquisition Personnel Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) - Advanced manufacturing Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Mission: Provide Cost-Effective, Actionable Intelligence at All Times Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing/Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Enhanced Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Predictive Intel through Machine Learning Additional Sensing Capability
  • 56. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices -Understanding current workflow Prototype - Evaluate existing sensor platforms with commercial partners - Integrate sensor feeds of interest into prototype platform - Compile existing data resources - Create representative “fake” datasets - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms for prediction and rules for push alerts - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers VADM Joseph Aucoin ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet) ADM Harry Harris (PACOM) Analysts (N/J2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Operators (N/J3) CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet) Planners (N/J5) Need to find these people - Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR) - Timely operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software (THIS SECTION IS A WORK IN PROGRESS!) - Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS) - Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal funding/dissemination avenues - Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features - Scale deployment, improve product as necessary Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Hardware evaluation + prototyping equipment - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms and feeds - Existing deployment platforms - Academic research - Existing data fusion platforms Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) - Office of Naval Research (ONR) - Acquisition Personnel Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) - Disaster relief agencies Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface - Access to sample incoming sensor feeds Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel - Manufacturing/Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Enhanced Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration (4) Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Painless Incorporation of Multiple New Sensing Modalities
  • 57. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices -Understanding current workflow Prototype - Integrate sensor feeds of interest into prototype platform - Compile existing data resources - Create representative “fake” datasets - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms for prediction and rules for push alerts - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers VADM Joseph Aucoin ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet) ADM Harry Harris (PACOM) Analysts (N/J2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Operators (N/J3) CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet) Planners (N/J5) Jose Lepesuastegui (N25) - Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR) - Timely operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software (THIS SECTION IS A WORK IN PROGRESS!) - Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS, QUELLFIRE, FOBM) - Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal funding/dissemination avenues - Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features - Scale deployment, improve product as necessary Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms and feeds - Academic research - Existing data fusion platforms Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - NPS/ONR - Acquisition Personnel - Existing PORs (Insight, PMW-150, Quellfire, SeaVision, FOBM) Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) - Disaster relief agencies Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface - Access to sample incoming sensor feeds Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel -Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting and Coordination (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Painless Incorporation of Multiple New Sensing Modalities (3 Integration of Incoming Data Streams with Existing Object- Oriented Database
  • 58. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices -Understanding current workflow Connecting People and Programs - Ensuring tool developers and users are aware of one another - Finding functional gaps to fill Prototype - Compile existing data resources - Create representative “fake” datasets - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms for prediction/rules for push alerts - Iterate on human-machine interaction Strategic Decision Makers VADM Joseph Aucoin ADM Scott Swift (PacFleet) ADM Harry Harris (PACOM) Analysts (N/J2) E.g. Jason Knudson, John Chu, Jed Raskie, Joseph Baba Operators (N/J3) CDR Chris Adams (7th Fleet) Planners (N/J5) Jose Lepesuastegui (N25) - Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR) - Timely operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software - Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS, QUELLFIRE, FOBM, EWBM, INSIGHT) - Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal funding/dissemination avenues and integration with current tool pipeline - Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features - Scale deployment, improve product as necessary Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms and feeds - Academic research - Existing data fusion platforms Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - NPS/ONR - Acquisition Personnel - Existing PMOs/PORs - Other Fleets Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) - Disaster relief agencies Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface and in-development tools - Access to sample incoming sensor feeds Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel -Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting and Coordination (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Painless Incorporation of Multiple New Sensing Modalities (3 Integration of Incoming Data Streams with Existing Object- Oriented Database
  • 59. Research - Interviews to assess needs, organizational dynamics, procurement strategy - Site visits to see current practices -Understanding current workflow Connecting People and Programs - Ensuring tool developers and users are aware of one another - Finding functional gaps to fill Prototype - Compile existing data resources - Create representative “fake” datasets - Evaluate relevant ML algorithms for prediction/rules for push alerts -Create demo of flexible data fusion/analytics for IUU fishing Strategic Decision Makers Analysts (N/J2) Operators (N/J3) Planners (N/J5) - Timely operational decisions -Common and consistent view of the Area of Responsibility (AOR) =Flexible integration of new feeds into COP and analytics - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Reduced time for analysts to find information and draw conclusions - Prototype operability + demonstrated scalability Data Fusion/Sensor Integration Software - Build solution that integrates with current systems (e.g. GCCS, QUELLFIRE, FOBM, EWBM, INSIGHT) - Work with PMs and key influencers to determine optimal funding/dissemination avenues and integration with current tool pipeline - Deploy prototype, confirm buy-in and update features - Scale deployment, improve product as necessary Fixed - Buying proprietary data - Software tools - Evaluation of commercial products Prototyping - Existing sensor platforms and feeds - Academic research - Existing data fusion platforms Scaling - Available commercial + military data - Existing database tools (Palantir, AWS) - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - 7th Fleet + designated sponsor - NPS/ONR - Acquisition Personnel - Existing PMOs/PORs - Other Fleets Commercial - Distributed sensor platform companies (i.e. Saildrone, AMS) - Data analytics (i.e. Palantir, Google) Academic - Universities (i.e. University of Hawaii) - National Labs (Lincoln Labs, Sandia) Other - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) - Disaster relief agencies Mission: Enabling Rapid, Well-Informed Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Testing - 7th Fleet assets for pilot - Research barge - Access to model analyst data interface and in-development tools - Access to sample incoming sensor feeds Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots - R&D personnel -Development IMPROVE TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING VIA BETTER DATA HANDLING (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting and Coordination (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate, Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source-Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data and Rapidly Updateable to Account for New Sources ENHANCE INCOMING DATA STREAMS (1) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (e.g. Fishing Broadcasts) (2) Painless Incorporation of Multiple New Sensing Modalities (3 Integration of Incoming Data Streams with Existing Object- Oriented Database
  • 60. Data & Analytics - Compile existing data resources/scope out future ones - Develop flexible data fusion/analytics algorithms Defining C2-F - Brainstorming what “Command and Control of the Future” (C2-F or “MTC2-F”) would be - Interviewing (customer discovery) for younger sailors Software Development Prototype Testing/Acquisitions Pursue Information Assurance Certification USN Strategic Decision Makers USN Analysts (N/J2) USN Operators (N/J3) Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers (USCG, Partner Nations, etc.) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal Fishing) (Commercial entities that use/would benefit from enhanced C2-type systems) USN - Timely, accurate operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors - Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment Anti-IUU Fishing - Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence - Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources - Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public USN - Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list - Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMES database, engage S&T bridge personnel to talk with key decision makers - Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution - Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational deployment & update pathways Anti IUU Fishing - Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find key influencers/stakeholders - Deploy solution where possible, Fixed - Existing Software tools/APIs - Evaluation of commercial products - Information assurance process steps Data & Analytics - APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$ needed to access this Defining C2-F -Ideas/feedback from young sailors - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Military - PACFLT (7th/3rd Fleet, young E- and O- who use current C2 tools) - Program Office for MCT2 (PMW 150) - Information Assurance Personnel - NWDC, ONR S&T Advisors, C7F N2, C7F CIG, C3F N8/9, PACOM CSIG, OPNAV N2/N6 (Acquisition/Testing) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders - IUU fishing + anti-smuggling stakeholders (i.e. Coast Guard, PNA) Data/Software/Algorithms - Data: Skytruth, Pew, Global Fishing Watch, Capella, TerraSAR -Software: Palantir Skytruth, USCG, NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout -Algorithms: Universities (e.g. Vanderbilt), NPS/ONR, NGOs Mission: Creating C2-F--Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Software Development -AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, subject matter expertise on phenomenology of ships, activities Prototype Testing/Acquisition - Military Sealift Command ships, 7th Fleet experimentation ships and personnel Information Assurance Certification -Access to personnel to provide certification / approval Variable - Travel for site visits, pilots, interviews with sailors - R&D personnel - Development - Data and APIs - AWS & Distributed Computing IMPROVE USN DECISIONS & OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED DATA HANDLING, UI/UX, COMMS, AND HARDWARE (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting, Coordination, Visibility (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source- Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data (5) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (6) Increasing Morale & Engagement for Millenial Sailors ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING CAPABILITIES (1) Improved Detection Using Data Fusion/Analytics (2) Enhanced Enforcement via Improved Communication (3) Lower Barriers to Engaging Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing Activities
  • 61. Data - Compile existing data resources/scope out future ones Defining C2-F - Brainstorming what “Command and Control of the Future” would be by interviewing younger sailors Software Development - Develop flexible data fusion/analytics algorithms, and an intuitive UI for millennials Information Assurance Prototype Testing/Procurement Contracting, Acquisitions Maintenance and Support USN Strategic Decision Makers USN Analysts (N/J2) USN Operators (N/J3) Anti-IUU Fishing Enforcers (USCG, Partner Nations, etc.) Anti-IUU Fishing Stakeholders (NGOs, Legal Fishing) (Commercial entities that use/would benefit from enhanced C2-type systems) USN - Timely, accurate operational decisions - Decreased time to predict hot spots, ID & differentiate threats - Increased engagement and effectiveness of younger sailors - Up-to-date, reliable info in frontline environment Anti-IUU Fishing - Reduction in IUU fishing worldwide due to better deterrence - Better allocation of scarce / expensive interdiction resources - Widespread engagement of operators, governments, and the public USN - Work with fleet sponsor to get C2-F system on fleet needs list - Ensure C2-F makes it into FIMS database, engage S&T bridge personnel to talk with key decision makers - Work with NWDC, ONR S&T, PACFLT LOEs to test solution - Engage PACFLT N8/N9 shops to implement modular operational deployment & update pathways Anti IUU Fishing - Work with NGOs, gov’t departments, USCG, operators, etc. to find key influencers/stakeholders - Deploy solution where possible, Fixed - Existing Software tools/APIs, Data - IA process steps - Travel for site visits, pilots, interviews with sailors - R&D personnel - AWS & Distributed Computing - Overhead Data & Analytics APIs for accessing data (e.g. API for Global Fishing Watch, AIS), $$$ needed to access this Defining C2-F Ideas/feedback from young sailors Hackathon w/ Navy and DIUx support Software Development AWS, programmers, $$$ for both, SME on phenomenology of ships, activities - Need commanding officer to confirm decision-making benefits - Need intelligence officers from ONI / N2 and operators from N3 to confirm effectiveness of insights - Need IT approvals to integrate into systems - Need support of commercial partners if we want to leverage their platforms -Need support of existing PMOs/S&T personnel to make sure we’re not duplicating work Beneficiaries Mission Achievement Mission Budget/Costs Buy-In Deployment Value Proposition Key Activities Key Resources Key Partners Data Skytruth, Pew, GFW, TerraSAR Defining C2-F 7th,3rd Fleet junior officers, sailors Software development Palantir Skytruth, NPS/ONR, SeaVision, Sea Scout, Universities (e.g. Vanderbilt), NGOs Information Assurance GSA, NWDC Prototype Testing/Procurement USFF (NWDC), NAVSEA, SPAWAR, C7F CIG, PACFLT CSIG, IA contact Contracting, Acquisitions -IP Lawyer, subs with gov experience -DIUx, C3F N8/9, PACFLT N8/N9 Mission: Creating C2-F--Enabling Rapid Decisions from Heterogeneous Data Information Assurance Access to personnel to provide certification / approval Prototype Testing/Acquisition Navy testing venue and exercise (e.g. Trident Warrior), Military Sealift Command ships, 7th Fleet experimentation ships and personnel Contracting, Acquisitions Domain knowledge of software contracting and IP from lawyers, subs Variable - Maintenance and Support - Integration with existing systems and processes IMPROVE USN DECISIONS & OPS VIA C2-F WITH IMPROVED DATA HANDLING, UI/UX, COMMS, AND HARDWARE (1) Rapid Strategic Decisionmaking via Improved Reporting, Coordination, Visibility (2) Improved Tactical Decision Making via Timely, Accurate Information Sharing (3) More Effective Analysis via Searchable, Visualizable, Source- Flexible Data Integration (Layering & Filtering) (4) Increased Analyst Bandwidth via Predictive Intel and Alerts (e.g. Machine Learning) Flexibly Applied to Available Data (5) Improved Collection of Existing Data Streams (6) Increasing Morale & Engagement for Millenial Sailors ENHANCE ANTI-IUU FISHING CAPABILITIES (1) Improved Detection Using Data Fusion/Analytics (2) Enhanced Enforcement via Improved Communication (3) Lower Barriers to Engaging Civilians in Reporting IUU Fishing Activities
  • 63. Learning Progression: Week 1 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways:
  • 64. Learning Progression: Week 2 ● Week 2 ○ Hypotheses ■ Information sharing is a core problem ■ Predictive analytics for hotspots will add value ■ Sensor platforms for our needs exist ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with C7F N2: MOC description (reservist), data fusion skepticism/deployment emphasis (N2 Chief C7F), maybe use partner nation radar (IUU fishing operator) ○ Learning: ■ 7th Fleet wants details about surface ships--A2/AD is a problem because they can’t deploy normal sensor packages ■ Predicting hotspots is not useful--they know where these are! ■ Information sharing within the Maritime Operations Center (MOC) is not optimal ■ Sensors exist, but cannot be deployed in timely fashion!
  • 65. Learning Progression: Week 3 ● Week 3 ○ Hypotheses ■ Sensor deployment is the major issue ○ Experiments: ■ Visit to NPS ○ Learning: ■ N3 (Ops) owns N2 and N6--we had only been speaking to N2 ■ Pete: what decisions are people actually trying to make? ■ Ship-based radar is all that’s automated--data fusion is very manual! ■ Our problem came from PACOM->PACFLT->7th Fleet...affects how we think about it ■ Lots of single-purpose data fusion tools exist--don’t fall into that trap--how do you do modular updates without creating single-use tools? ■ There are specific systems (GCCS) that we should be thinking about learning more about
  • 66. Learning Progression: Week 4 ● Week 4 ○ Hypotheses ■ Data fusion/aggregation is the problem--need to find out more about specific needs ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with variety of stakeholders (N0, N2, N3, N6, J5, J8, etc.) ○ Learning: ■ PACOM, PACFLT, 7th Flt see different things--COP is not really a COP ■ Analysts do data layering manualy on GCCS, and there’s usually too much there to be useful ■ Automation would be helpful (and our own algorithms could be useful) ■ Common, easily searchable database would be desirable ■ Don’t actually care that much about A2/AD! Subset of a bigger problem! ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Updated previous MVP--now we include automated push alerts and clickable vessel-specific
  • 67. Learning Progression: Week 5 ● Week 5 ○ Hypotheses ■ We have identified a clear problem with data fusion, interaction--need to understand exactly where the biggest pain points are, map customer workflow precisely, think about acquisiton paths ○ Experiments: ■ Visit to USCG ops center ■ Acquisition discussions with C7F sponsor ■ Interviews with GCS users/operators and GCCS support contractors ○ Learning: ■ Customer workflow nailed down (JIOC SWO) ■ Functional org chart nailed down ■ Navy POR acquisition path laid out ■ POR-POR interaction within C2 system mapped Proposed solution (MVP)
  • 68. Learning Progression: Week 6 ● Week 6 ○ Hypotheses ■ The overall C2 system needs to be modernized--there are programs in existence to do this ○ Experiments: ■ Send out spreadsheet to contact list, get understanding of awareness of current programs ■ Speak with ONR research staff about existing programs ○ Learning: ■ Intel is not the same as COP ■ Most users do not have a good sense of which programs already exist for modernizing various parts of the C2 system (Quellfire, EWBM, ADAPT, etc.) ■ Very difficult to get UNCLASS-level details on C2 programs ■ anti-IUU Fishing (Illegal, Unregulated, Unreported) is a great analog use case for desirable Navy C2 functionality ○ Proposed solution (MVP)
  • 69. Learning Progression: Week 7 ● Week 7 ○ Hypotheses ■ Flexible integration of heterogeneous new sensor feeds into COP would be useful ■ IUU problem is a good analog for Navy COP ○ Experiments: ■ Interviews with PACOM COP/GCCS experts, IUU fishing stakeholders ○ Learning: ■ Wide variety of sensor feeds (drones, social media, etc.) exist that cannot be effectively integrated into GCCS/COP ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ MarineTraffic.com/Global Fishing Watch--would capabilities like this be of use to the Navy? ○ Key Takeaways:
  • 70. Learning Progression: Week 8 ● Week 8 ○ Hypotheses ■ New COP product is a worthwhile direction to go--acquisition and testing will be best done through 3rd Fleet ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with C3F ○ Learning: ■ Trident Warrior/NWDC are the best organizations to engage for testing/evaluation ■ Information assurance is an important step in the deployment process ■ Requirements are sourced from the fleets, acquisition occurs via SecDef budget ■ Substantial demand for IUU fishing-type technology in CIC--clickable order of battle for different ships ■ They want our week 4 MVP! ○ Proposed solution (MVP)
  • 71. Learning Progression: Week 9 ● Week 1 ○ Hypotheses ■ This is a problem with insufficient sensing ○ Experiments: ■ Conversations with mentors/stakeholders/contacts ○ Learning: ■ Sensors largely exist, but price point can be too high ■ Government struggles with sheer volume of open-source data ■ Internal information sharing is a big problem ■ Episodic persistence is acceptable--24/7 is not required ○ Proposed solution (MVP) ■ Diagram of entire ISR infrastructure with an emphasis on data aggregation ○ Key Takeaways:
  • 72. MVPs
  • 73. Analytics Engine Improved UI/UXBroadly-Accessible Database Week 1 MVP: Distributed Sensing Architecture
  • 74. Data Acquisition Contextualized Database Week 2 MVP: Sensor Deployment System Deployment Last Month Today Object-oriented Database Query - What data is most useful to capture? - What sensor modalities can capture? - What products exist? - What deployment options exist? - What is easiest to deploy? - What is “good-enough” time to data acquisition? - What is the deployment process? - Is .kmz format all that is necessary for compatibility? - What do companies like Palantir do today?
  • 75. Week 3 MVP AIS Weather
  • 76. Week 4 MVP: Layering
  • 77. Week 4 MVP: Push Alerts
  • 78. Week 4 MVP: Vessel-Level Info & Predictive Analytics
  • 79. Week 5 MVP Modular Device ● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better pattern recognition, alerts GCCS / ADS
  • 80. Week 6 - MVP: “Software Domain Awareness” Program POC Organization Function & Goals To be used by whom? Security Level Status Contract History Inputs Technical Details CSII Insight MTC2 Quellfire DCGS-N Increment 2 C2PC HAMDD SeaVision GCCS EWBM RC2 (Resilient C2)
  • 81. Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
  • 82. Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
  • 83. Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
  • 84. Week 7 MVP: Modular Intake, Algorithm, and Display
  • 85. Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics CIC PACOM Surface radar contact but no AIS… This is odd. Let me ALERT others.
  • 86. Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics CIC PACOM Surface radar contact but no AIS… This is odd. Let me ALERT others. I see an ALERT from DDG102. Lets share the C2 screen and take a look
  • 87. Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics CIC PACOM
  • 88. Week 8 MVP: Shareable Data & Analytics CIC PACOM
  • 91. JIOC J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J7 J6 J8 J9 N1 N4 N7N6 N8 N9 VADM Joe Aucoin ADM Scott Swift ADM Harry Harris Jr N2/N39 Intel and Info Ops N3 Operations N5 Planning N22 Op/Intel Overwatch N23 Collection Operations N391 Fleet Cryptology & Information Operations N31 Current Operations N32 Fleet Oceanographer N33 Future Operations N34 AT/CIP/NWS N52 Fleet Doctrine Strategy N53 Deliberate Plans Division N54 Maritime Assessments N55 Functional Plans Division Director (CPT Greg Husmann) Deputy Director (CDR Silas Ahn) Director (CPT Wes Bannister) Deputy Director (CDR Chris Adams) Director Deputy Director LT Jason Knudson Directorate (N/J/A/G) Description 1 Manpower and Personnel 2 Intelligence 3 Operations 4 Logistics, Engineering, Security & Cooperation 5 Planning 6 C4: Command, Control, Communication, Cyber 7 Training & Exercises 8 Resources & Assessments 9 Civil, Military Cooperation
  • 93. N2 Analysis Strategic Decisions CUB Task Forces Data Acquisition (among other things)N3 Operational Decisions Information aggregation + analysis platform
  • 94. Core Navy Procurement Process PACOM To win a war, we need to have awareness of potential adversary's disposition of forces within the area we intend to operate and be able to maintain that through all phases of the conflict (Joint Intelligence Preparation of the Environment) PACFLT Use the Navy in 3rd and 7th Fleet to conduct JIPOE 7th Fleet Direct ships, aircraft, submarines, marines, and other sensors to conduct JIPOE 7th Fleet N2 Task, Collect, Process, Exploit, and Disseminate and maintain JIPOE for C7F 7th Fleet N2, LT Knudson Identify potential operational gaps and determine possible ways to fill those gaps 1. Operational Requirements flow down from PACOM and is interpreted at each level: Operational Requirements
  • 95. USFF PACFLT 7th Fleet Do I have the tools to accomplish my Operational Requirement? Yes No YAY, Done Does PACFLT have the money and/or resources to fund it? Send Acquisitions Requirement to PACFLT Yes No YAY. Validated and resourced. Done. PACFLT “endorses” requirement, sends to US Fleet Forces Command Is USFF able to fund or resource this requirement? Yes No YAY. Validated and resourced. Done. Send to OPNAV OPNAV Is there an existing Program of Record? No YAY. Done Make new POR and include in Navy’s budget via SECNAV, SECDEF.. Send to Congress. Congress Budget approved? Yes Acquisition Requirements
  • 96. Congress Budget approved? Yes OPNAV PMO USFF Force Commands PACFLT 7th FLEET Money flows from SECDEF to SECNAV to CNO/OPNAV Primes/ NAC Program Management Office decides who to tap for production/development A government contractor (Boeing, Lockheed, etc.) or Naval Acquisition Command (SPAWAR, NAVSEA, etc.) builds this system Product made available to US Fleet Forces Command to issue to Navy units SURFFOR, SUBFOR, and IFOR man, train, and equip using 2-year money No GG PACFLT receives resources from the appropriate force command 7th FLEET GETS SOMETHING!!!! …. Many YEARS later…. YAY!!!! Program Execution
  • 97. Customer Discovery - Get/Keep/Grow Diagram Awareness Interest Consideration Purchase Keep Unbundling Up-sell Cross-sell Referral Activity & People - Evangelist & advocate from originator Flt - ??? Corey Hesselberg, CDR Jason Schwarzkopf, MIOC watch standers - Buy-in from flag officers - ADM Swift, VADM Aucoin, RADM Piersey - N8/9 - Dave Yoshihara (PacFlt N9) - 7th Fleet ??? - Maintainers (N6) - Bob Stevenson (PacFlt N6) - 7th Fleet ??? N/A Expanding COP & intel extensions / functionality within 7th Fleet Expanding user base within 7th Fleet Expanding tool set to other fleets Metrics % people who have heard of program before vs after *how to reassess? # people who say “we want this” Seems binary… any recommendati ons? # Systems outfitted ?? ?? ?? # users within 7th Fleet using tool # fleets using tool
  • 98. Map of System Functions and Needs QUELLFIRE GCCS (1) FOBM STORAGE/ COMMS CST GCCS (3)GCCS (2) STORAGE/ COMMS STORAGE/ COMMS Sensors Sensors Sensors .oth-.json Translator Visualization Analytics Ship-to-Ship Sharing Long-Term Storage KEY NEEDS FUNCTIONS & PROGRAMS SHIP 2 SHIP 3SHIP 1
  • 99. Week 8 - MVP? Modular Device ● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better pattern recognition, alerts GCCS / ADS
  • 100. Week 8 - MVP? Deployment Method! Modular Device ● Local storage of historical data→less bandwidth usage + ability to do better pattern recognition, alerts “C2-F”
  • 101. Cost Flows Database ($80k) Analytics Engine ($120k) Translation (ETLs) ($100k) AIS VMS Radar SAR Sat UI ($80k) Information Assurance ($240k) Testing ($480k) Maintenance and Support (VC) Assume 10 data streams, need cost validation on streams $380K $240K $480K $??? Total: $1.1 MM + Var Costs
  • 102. Customer Discovery DeploymentProduct Development Navy Testing Initial Testing Information Assurance Maintenance & Support Key Activities, Resources, and Partners TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9
  • 103. 3 Year Financial/Ops/Funding Timeline 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Cash Reserves Phase ProductGov’tCom’l Milestones Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 TRL 1 TRL 2 TR L 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 POC Wireframe Prototype Beta Prototype Marketable Product Beta Prototype Released to first customers (<3) Commercial Product Launch; 2 contracts Test in Navy env Navy-wide Deployment Maintenance and Support V2.0 Commercial Product Launch; 5 contracts signed Initialize System Development/ Customer Relationship Development Launch at scale Head count 4 10 20 50 15 customers; V2.5 launch CONTRACT SIGNED CONTRACT RENEWED SBIR/ DIUx Series A (In-Q-Tel, Impact Investor(s)) 2 com’l contracts $250k $0 $1.25M DoD Contract $2M $5M
  • 104. 3 Year Financial/Ops/Funding Timeline 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Cash Reserves Phase ProductGov’tCom’l Milestones Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 TRL 1 TRL 2 TR L 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 POC Wireframe Prototype Beta Prototype Marketable Product Beta Prototype Released to first customers (<3) Commercial Product Launch; 2 contracts Test in Navy env Navy-wide Deployment Maintenance and Support V2.0 Commercial Product Launch; 5 contracts signed Initialize System Development/ Customer Relationship Development Launch at scale Head count 4 10 20 50 15 customers; V2.5 launch CONTRACT SIGNED CONTRACT RENEWED SBIR/ DIUx Series A (In-Q-Tel, Impact Investor(s)) 2 com’l contracts $250k $0 $1.25M DoD Contract $2M $5M CAVEAT: This is what the timeline would look like if we worked on the project full time.