Jane Close Conoley, Ph.D. University of California, Santa Barbara
School Psychology Misdirected: An Argument for Prevention and Capacity Building.
For the past 35 years, at least, voices within the school psychology community have called for a re-thinking of the role of psychology and psychologists within public schools. The test and place activities of school psychologists have overwhelmed their professional practice with predictable results. Few teachers or administrators see school psychologists as resources for teaching and learning expertise, but rather as mere gatekeepers to special education services of unknown effectiveness. The calls for change have come using different conceptual vehicles, for example, mental health or behavioral consultation, curriculum based assessment, treatment validity of assessments, and most recently response to intervention. All, however, speak to the same issues:
· Children’s mental health is tied directly to their academic success.
· Behavioral success for children is related to instructional expertise of teachers.
Changing how we conceptualize and implement our practice is complicated by many organizational and regulatory forces and is compromised by some basic assumptions of modern psychology. Until those assumptions are dismissed, change is unlikely.
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Jane Close Conoley, Ph.D. University of California, Santa Barbara
1. School Psychology Misdirected U C Berkeley School Psychology Conference May 9, 2008 Jane Close Conoley, Ph.D. University of California Santa Barbara
2. Special Thanks to Gutkin, T.B. Ecological school psychology: A personal opinion and a plea for change To appear in: T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4 th ed.) . New York: Wiley.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium (2004) “Approximately 85% of Americans will not receive health care treatment for their diagnosable mental or substance-abuse disorder within a year. More than 70% of them will never receive specialized mental health care.” (Norcross, 2006, p. 683)
9. Milken Institute An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of Chronic Disease. National annual cost of mental disorders = $217 billion (treatment, lost economic output) - third only to cancer and coronary disease (DeVol & Bedroussian, 2007)
10.
11. Thomas Insel - Director of the National Institute of Mental Health Data such as these are indicative of “a systemic and unacceptable failure in the provision of [mental health] care” in the United States (Insel & Fenton, 2005, p. 590).
12. U. S. Surgeon General “The nation is facing a public crisis in mental healthcare for infants, children and adolescents.” (U.S. Public Health Service, 2000) The “foremost finding is that most children in need of mental health services do not get them.” (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999, p. 180) THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN
16. OUR HIGHEST PRIORITY GOALS – MOST IMPORTANT JOB ROLES 1. Engage and motivate primary caregivers (e.g., teachers, parents) in the lives of children so they take action in behalf of children 2. Give psychology away (Miller, 1969) to primary caregivers (e.g., teachers, parents) in the lives of children so they take effective action in behalf of children
26. Comprehensive programs consist of school readiness, parent involvement that empowers parents to take a role in education across grades K-12, and school-linked services designed to improve achievement by ensuring that the health and social needs of children are met .
27. Policymakers and educators have mostly ignored the nature of interactions between families and schools…this relationship may be “the missing link in school-linked social service programs” Smrekar (1994)
28.
29.
30.
31. This team, amongst other things, is a vehicle for establishing a common language, mapping existing school- and community-based resources, and identifying student, family, and staff needs.
I treasure the chance to talk with school psychology colleagues today and am particularly pleased to be on the same program with Frank, Mike, and Sue. All of whom have significant expertise to share with you and whose presentations promise to bring you up to the minute is what we know about serving educators, children, youth, and families. My talk today is heavily in debt to Dr. Terry Gutkin from San Francisco State University. He shared his forthcoming chapter in the Handbook of School Psychology with me along with various bibliographic and slide resources. As some of you may know, before most of you were born I finished my doctoral degree at the University of Texas and left there not knowing nearly enough, but completely convinced that only systemic change held a chance of preventing and alleviating childhood dysfunctions. In fact my favorite image from that period of time was from public health – draining the swamps (Slide 2) to eliminate mosquito borne disease (Slide 3) not by closing windows or putting on bug repellant but by eliminating the breeding grounds of the disease (slide 4) Many other public health metaphors followed but the belief that we should always strive to change the system that supported pathology into one that supported well being has remained with me. Like Seymour Sarason before me, I’ve felt that as a profession – despite spectacular examples to the contrary – we have remained mired in the swamps or direct service, especially assessment, based on a medical model understanding of people and their strengths and difficulties. (Slide 5)