SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  27
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Emergence and
Reduction in Physics
SEBASTIAN DE HARO
UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM AND UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
LONDON, 3 JANUARY 2017
Emergence and Reduction: motivation
 Emergence and reduction are two concepts which are often invoked in discussions
relating different levels in nature, or different disciplines in science:
 For example, it is sometimes said that life ‘emerges’ out of the underlying chemical or
biological components.
 The implication of this use of emergence is that there is novelty in that which
emerges (i.e. life).
 Motto: “more is different” (Philip W. Anderson, 1972).
 Reduction (or reductionism) is often used to imply that the whole is “nothing but”
the sum of its parts.
 For example, the physics of the solar system is nothing but the sum of the mutual two-
body interactions of the planets and the Sun.
Aims of this talk: emergence and reduction
(i) To clarify the use of these concepts (‘emergence’ and ‘reduction’)
in science, especially in physics.
(ii) Specifically: to argue that the contrast ‘emergence vs. reduction’
poses a false dichotomy, since they are independent.
(iii) To point out that the independence of the two concepts may open
interesting avenues for the philosophy of mind.
But I will not work this out in a theory of the mind.
Emergence vs. reduction:
not just an academic discussion
 Steven Weinberg: “One of the members of the [SSC] board argued
that we should not give the impression that we think that
elementary particle physics is more fundamental than other fields,
because it just tended to enrage our friends in other areas of
physics. The reason we give the impression that we think that
elementary particle physics is more fundamental than other
branches of physics is because it is. I do not know how to defend
the amounts being spent on particle physics without being frank
about this.”
 Philip Anderson: “They [the results of particle physics] are in no sense
more fundamental than what Alan Turing did in founding the
computer science, or what Francis Crick and James Watson did in
discovering the secret of life.”
This is what is left of the
Superconductor Super Collider…
Stephen Hawking
 “By far the most important [prediction] is supersymmetry which is
fundamental to most attempts to unify Einstein's General Relativity
with Quantum Theory. This would be confirmed by the discovery of
superpartners to the particles that we already know. The
Superconducting Super Collider (the SSC) was being built in Texas
and would have reached the energies at which super partners
were expected. However, the United States went through a fit of
feeling poor and canceled the project half way. At the risk of
causing embarrassment, I have to say I think this was a very short
sighted decision. I hope that the US, and other governments will
do better in the next millennium.” (Millennium lecture)
A misconstrued debate?
 On the surface of it, Anderson seems to have adopted the wiser attitude.
 But both seem to have part of the truth.
 In fact, they both agree in their acceptance of reductionism:
 “The reductionist hypothesis may still be a topic for controversy among
philosophers, but among the great majority of active scientists I think it is
accepted without question.” (Anderson, opening paragraph).
 In case this was not sufficiently clear: “We must all start with reductionism, which
I fully accept.”
 But reduction and reductionism (complete reduction, i.e. “nothing but…”)
are different things!
A misconstrued debate?
And a proposed reconciliation
 Reduction is often taken to be emergence’s natural opponent.
 But there is a growing consensus, in philosophy of physics, that emergence and
reduction need not be each other’s opposites.
 In fact, they are logically independent of each other!
 Jeremy Butterfield (2011):
 “Emergence, Reduction and Supervenience: A Varied Landscape”
 “Less is Different: Emergence and Reduction Reconciled”
 And so, we do not need to take sides in the ‘emergence vs. reduction’
debate.
 We better get some good idea of what emergence and reduction are in
physics.
 Else, how will our theories fare when (if!) we try to apply these concepts to the mind?
Intermezzo: vindicating
non-reductionist science
 The idea of reduction is, of course, ubiquitous in science, especially physics.
Familiar cases:
 At low speeds, special relativity (Einstein) reduces to classical mechanics (Newton).
 For sufficiently large systems, quantum mechanics reduces to classical mechanics, or
ℏ → 0 (more precisely, large-action).
 But the cases in which reduction fails are equally ubiquitous!
An analogy:
mapping a sphere to the plane
 There is no simple way to project a sphere onto the plane, without
‘tearing the sphere apart’. There will always be at least one point
(e.g. the North pole) which does not map.
 In doing so, we lose information about the topology of the sphere.
Example: Maxwell’s theory of
electromagnetism
 James Maxwell (1831-1879) unified electric and magnetic phenomena
through his theory of electromagnetism (Maxwell’s equations).
 According to this theory, light is a wave propagating at a constant speed, c.
 Maxwell’s theory’s basic quantity was the electromagnetic field. This field
failed to be reduced to the quantities of classical mechanics (which describes
particles). Nevertheless, Maxwell believed that his theory would ultimately
receive a mechanical explanation. This never happened.
 The shift to Maxwell’s theory required the introduction of new concepts.
Maxwell’s theory was not simply a complex application of the fundamental
principles already known.
 Reduction is useful in many cases. But there are cases in which one simply
needs to think in a different way. So, reduction is not always the most
productive way to proceed in formulating new scientific theories.
 Insisting on reduction in such cases could be like mapping the sphere to the plane!
Example: Maxwell’s theory of
electromagnetism
 One may say: but both Maxwell’s theory and classical mechanics are
special cases of a bigger framework, viz. field theory.
 Agreed! But this only reinforces my point. The issue is not about the lack
of an explanation or a more comprehensive theory, but about
reductionism not always being the right way to approach a problem.
Emergence, Reduction,
Supervenience
 Emergence: properties or behaviour of a system which are novel
and robust relative to some appropriate comparison class.
 Novel means, typically: not definable from the comparison class,
maybe showing features absent from the class.
 Robust: the same for various choices of, or assumptions about, the
comparison class.
 Think of a composite system (e.g. a metal): the properties and
behaviour (e.g. hardness, electrical conductivity, colour) are novel
and robust compared to those of its components (atoms).
 Robustness is the independence of the properties of the metal on the
specific properties (location, etc.) of the individual atoms.
Emergence, Reduction,
Supervenience
 Reduction: deduction of one theory (or phenomenon) from another.
 For example, classical mechanics can be deduced from quantum mechanics
(by taking a limit, ℏ → 0).
 Normally, reduction requires the introduction of bridge principles: new definitions,
or correspondence rules between the two theories, regarded as two languages,
i.e. a dictionary between the two (Ernest Nagel, 1961).
 Also, the taking of these limits is often delicate: the strict limits are often not well-
defined, and one needs to appropriately renormalise the physical quantities of
interest. This procedure is often not unique nor can it be a priori defined on the
grounds of the theory of interest only.
 Physical judgment is needed: to decide which is the limit of interest, and how to take
this limit.
Klaas Landsman, A Flea on Schrödinger’s Cat
Double-well potential
 The ground-state wave-function is symmetric around its two potentials.
 The naive limit ℏ → 0 preserves this symmetry, and so the state in the
‘classical’ limit still has two peaks.
 This is usually solved by breaking the symmetry, e.g. by adding a small term
to the potential that breaks the symmetry (since realistic potentials will have
correction terms that remove the symmetry).
 In this case, one of the two peaks is suppressed, and the classical limit is as we
would expect.
 But, in doing so, one is sneaking in extra information!
 In other cases, other kinds of extra information may be needed: initial conditions,
boundary conditions, choice of states to keep, etc.
Emergence, Reduction,
Supervenience
 Supervenience: a set of properties A supervenes upon another set B
just in case no two things can differ with respect to A-properties
without also differing with respect to their B-properties. In short:
“there cannot be an A-difference without a B-difference”.
 Take A = classical mechanics, B = quantum mechanics.
 Any change in A (e.g. a change in the position of the particle) will imply
a corresponding change in B (e.g. a change in some of the observables
of the corresponding quantum theory).
 Supervenience is weaker than reduction, because we do not need
to have an explicit relation between A and B (such a relation may
only be given implicitly, or may not exist at all).
Emergence and Reduction
 Clearly, there is a tension between emergence and reduction. For
emergence emphasises novelty, whereas reduction emphasises
deduction.
 And logic teaches that valid deduction gives no new ‘content’.
 So, how can there be novel behaviour, in cases in which there is
reduction?
 Indeed, many authors take the definition emergence to also involve
irreducibility (i.e. lack of reduction), thus turning this tension into a built-in
incompatibility.
 Answer: there can be novelty in the use of limits.
 As we have already seen, taking limits involves making choices about
e.g. which symmetries to break, or which states to keep!
A (technical, but important)
warning about reduction!
 There are additional reasons why reduction is often not unique, but requires
making choices. Recall the idea of reduction as taking a limit:
 Defining the limit of a sequence depends on a choice of a topology (e.g. a
choice of open sets).
 A given sequence may converge in one topology, but not in another.
 And so, to claim that classical mechanics can be deduced as a limit of special
relativity, one needs to say with respect to which topology it is deduced.
 It has been argued (S. Fletcher, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2016)
that there is no canonical choice of topology.
 So, also for this additional reason, reduction (viewed as deduction) requires
making some global choices about how theories or phenomena are to be
compared.
Summary so far, on reduction
 Consider completely reducing one theory to another (‘reductionism’):
 Reduction = deduction.
 There are several valid deductions possible, depending on:
 Choices of states and quantities, symmetries to break (flea on Schrödinger’s cat).
 Initial and boundary conditions.
 Non-uniqueness of limits (which limits to take, choices of topology).
 ...
 In most cases in which we are told that reduction has been successfully carried out,
implicit choices have been made about these issues.
 Additional (usually global) information is being sneaked in, to what (perhaps superficially)
looks like a complete reduction.
 And so, it is not true that the ‘parent’ theory, all by itself, determines everything (even if
everything can be deduced, given the right assumptions!).
Emergence and Reduction
 This means that reduction (deduction) allows for novelty, through the choices
made.
 So, emergence and reduction are, in fact, compatible!
 Claim (Butterfield 2011): emergence is independent of reduction and
supervenience. So there can be emergence with or without reduction
(and the same for the weaker notion of supervenience).
 Reduction without emergence: unsurprising, given that these are often seen as
each other’s opposites.
 Emergence without reduction: also unsurprising.
 Surprising, nevertheless, that such cases appear in physics! Vis-à-vis Anderson’s claim
that “The reductionist hypothesis... is accepted without question [by physicists]”.
 See George and Sachith’s talk!
 Reduction with emergence: surprising! And the examples abound!
Example 1: the double-well
potential
 We have already seen the possible emergence of a classical state of the
double-well potential from the quantum state.
 What emerges? In the limit ℏ → 0, the particle has a well-defined position
(determined deterministically).
 There is novelty, because that property is forbidden by the quantum theory.
 It will be robust, if it does not depend on details of the microscopic
perturbation (the flea on Schrödinger’s cat).
 Reduction: because there is a well-defined limit from which the classical
behaviour is mathematically derived.
 Since we needed to use extra information about how to take the limit (and in
making this choice we are often motivated by the kind of classical behaviour
we wish to reproduce), we may be inclined to call this reduction incomplete.
Example 2: Thermodynamics
 Thermodynamics is the branch of physics that describes physical systems in terms of
macroscopic quantities such as heat, temperature, energy, work, etc.
 Statistical mechanics is the application of (classical or quantum) mechanics to
systems of many particles (e.g. 1023
, roughly the number of atoms in 12g of carbon).
 The quantities and laws of thermodynamics readily follow from the ‘thermodynamic
limit’ of statistical mechanics, i.e. the limit in which the volume of the system and the
number of particles go to infinity (keeping their ratio constant).
 In this limit, thermodynamical quantities such as heat and temperature, which have
no microscopic analogue, emerge: in an uncontroversial way (as I have discussed:
these are novel properties, robust relative to the microscopic dynamics).
 So we have a case of emergence with reduction.
 Notice the strong sense of emergence here: the laws of thermodynamics emerge
along with the thermodynamical properties.
 The precise nature of the reduction limit is still a matter of debate (e.g. arrow of time!).
A warning!
 I have discussed a single
notion of emergence (novel
and robust behaviour, relative
to a comparison class).
 There are several ways of
construing ‘novelty’:
epistemic-ontological, weak-
strong (in principle/practice,
amount of anti-reductionism).
 Also the comparison class can
be synchronic or diachronic.
 So, unpacking the details of the notion of emergence discussed, we obtain different
kinds of emergence, all of which nevertheless fall under the same conception.
Guay & Sartenaer, A New Look at Emergence
Some philosophical options
for the mind
 I think it is interesting to look at some philosophical options available
in trying to conceptualise the mind:
 For simplicity, I base the comments here on the notion of ‘substance’, as
a useful notion.
 A single substance:
 Materialism: humans are only specific configurations of matter.
 Idealism: only mind. Berkeley, Hegel,...
 Dual aspect theory: one substance with two different aspects, a
physical and a mental aspect.
 Dualism: Plato, Descartes,... Two individual substances, linked in
some (usually problematic, but interesting) way.
An excursion: double aspect theory
 Emergence (and supervenience) seem to sit well with double aspect
theory.
 The words you speak have a physical aspect (sound waves with specific
combinations of frequencies, etc.) and a mental aspect (the meaning that is
attached to those frequencies).
 These two aspects cannot be separated without destrying the message of the
communication.
 This meaning is actually emergent, in the way I described before.
 The mind could work in this way as well. For our mental capacities are not
independent of the physical processes in our brain (which would amount
to a form of dualism).
 Even if our mental capacities are supervenient on the brain (no mental activity
possible without brain activity), emergence still allows for novelty in the contents
of our thoughts and in the targets of our desires.
Summary and some conclusions
 Emergence and reduction are independent notions.
 I am not even discussing cases in which reduction fails, which arise in physics.
 Even in cases in which there are strong forms of reduction (like the transition from
statistical mechanics to thermodynamics), reduction tends to be subtle and
incomplete (because non-unique). Even in such cases, no reductionism.
 Global choices need to be made, such as: which quantities to take the limit of, and
how (which quantities to keep and which ones to throw away), which physical states
are relevant, boundary conditions, initial conditions, topology,... Typically, the number
of choices that one can make is infinite.
 Despite the presence of deduction, this does not seem to be algorithmic.
 So, perhaps, we should not conflate reduction/deduction with determinism (since
there are choices that need to be made for deduction).
 We require our physical judgment to decide which forms of emergence are relevant.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

What is philosophy of science?
What is philosophy of science?What is philosophy of science?
What is philosophy of science?John Wilkins
 
Ontology Powerpoint
Ontology PowerpointOntology Powerpoint
Ontology PowerpointARH_Miller
 
Research misconduct
Research misconductResearch misconduct
Research misconductPriya Bhave.
 
Ari Pregen on Logical Fallacies
Ari Pregen on Logical FallaciesAri Pregen on Logical Fallacies
Ari Pregen on Logical FallaciesAri Pregen
 
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductResearch ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductDr Ghaiath Hussein
 
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptx
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptxSelective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptx
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptxDrDollyThankachan
 
Co authorship and attribution
Co authorship and attributionCo authorship and attribution
Co authorship and attributionJenny Delasalle
 
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.Sheetal Kamble
 
Presentation on structure of scientific revolution
Presentation on structure of scientific revolutionPresentation on structure of scientific revolution
Presentation on structure of scientific revolutionsalmansmd
 
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual FrameworkSocial Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual FrameworkSameena Siddique
 
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kindsCharacteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kindsPeterKentDelossantos1
 
Topic 5. determining truth
Topic 5. determining truthTopic 5. determining truth
Topic 5. determining truthdan_maribao
 
Sustainability of a Community Radio
Sustainability of a Community RadioSustainability of a Community Radio
Sustainability of a Community RadioCEMCA
 
Types of-qualitative-research
Types of-qualitative-researchTypes of-qualitative-research
Types of-qualitative-researchIntellspot
 
Qualitative research
Qualitative researchQualitative research
Qualitative researchProtik Roy
 

Tendances (20)

Imre lakatos
Imre lakatos Imre lakatos
Imre lakatos
 
What is philosophy of science?
What is philosophy of science?What is philosophy of science?
What is philosophy of science?
 
Real life experiences of supervising PhD students
Real life experiences of supervising PhD studentsReal life experiences of supervising PhD students
Real life experiences of supervising PhD students
 
Ontology Powerpoint
Ontology PowerpointOntology Powerpoint
Ontology Powerpoint
 
Research misconduct
Research misconductResearch misconduct
Research misconduct
 
Ari Pregen on Logical Fallacies
Ari Pregen on Logical FallaciesAri Pregen on Logical Fallacies
Ari Pregen on Logical Fallacies
 
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductResearch ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
 
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptx
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptxSelective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptx
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation.pptx
 
Co authorship and attribution
Co authorship and attributionCo authorship and attribution
Co authorship and attribution
 
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.
Hypothesis, theory and scientific laws.
 
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUALITATIVE RESEARCHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
 
Presentation on structure of scientific revolution
Presentation on structure of scientific revolutionPresentation on structure of scientific revolution
Presentation on structure of scientific revolution
 
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual FrameworkSocial Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
 
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kindsCharacteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
Characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
 
Literature Review How-To Guide
Literature Review How-To GuideLiterature Review How-To Guide
Literature Review How-To Guide
 
Topic 5. determining truth
Topic 5. determining truthTopic 5. determining truth
Topic 5. determining truth
 
Sustainability of a Community Radio
Sustainability of a Community RadioSustainability of a Community Radio
Sustainability of a Community Radio
 
NATURE OF RESEARCH
NATURE OF RESEARCHNATURE OF RESEARCH
NATURE OF RESEARCH
 
Types of-qualitative-research
Types of-qualitative-researchTypes of-qualitative-research
Types of-qualitative-research
 
Qualitative research
Qualitative researchQualitative research
Qualitative research
 

En vedette

Angie natalia dueñas reyes1
Angie natalia dueñas reyes1Angie natalia dueñas reyes1
Angie natalia dueñas reyes1klaumilenitha
 
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theory
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theoryBubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theory
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theorySebastian De Haro
 
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่น
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่นสวนพลังมุ่งมั่น
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่นtarn23
 
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and onlineifa2012_2
 
siskom etika-profesi
siskom etika-profesisiskom etika-profesi
siskom etika-profesihilma_alley
 
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑO
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑOJHON FERNANDO CARREÑO
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑOklaumilenitha
 
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 20123 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012ifa2012_2
 
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...Lowell Fields Millburn
 
Omay milena rojas martinez2
Omay milena rojas martinez2Omay milena rojas martinez2
Omay milena rojas martinez2klaumilenitha
 
Laboratorio excel
Laboratorio excelLaboratorio excel
Laboratorio exceljosetjitt
 
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話Daijirou Yamada
 

En vedette (18)

Angie natalia dueñas reyes1
Angie natalia dueñas reyes1Angie natalia dueñas reyes1
Angie natalia dueñas reyes1
 
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theory
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theoryBubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theory
Bubbles of True Vacuum and Duality in M-theory
 
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่น
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่นสวนพลังมุ่งมั่น
สวนพลังมุ่งมั่น
 
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online
3 feist ifa feist-475_older and online
 
siskom etika-profesi
siskom etika-profesisiskom etika-profesi
siskom etika-profesi
 
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑO
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑOJHON FERNANDO CARREÑO
JHON FERNANDO CARREÑO
 
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 20123 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012
3 biggs new2 prague symposium biggs kendig clemson weds 2012
 
KEVIN HARBEY VARGAS
KEVIN HARBEY VARGASKEVIN HARBEY VARGAS
KEVIN HARBEY VARGAS
 
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...
Global Choice...Right Source | SSOW 2012 - "More Than Simply Savings: Balanci...
 
Technical 20150228
Technical 20150228Technical 20150228
Technical 20150228
 
Omay milena rojas martinez2
Omay milena rojas martinez2Omay milena rojas martinez2
Omay milena rojas martinez2
 
Laboratorio excel
Laboratorio excelLaboratorio excel
Laboratorio excel
 
Yileny Lopez 2
Yileny Lopez 2Yileny Lopez 2
Yileny Lopez 2
 
Hb services .net application 2015 16
Hb services .net application 2015 16Hb services .net application 2015 16
Hb services .net application 2015 16
 
ASBABUL NUZUL JULYANA
ASBABUL NUZUL JULYANAASBABUL NUZUL JULYANA
ASBABUL NUZUL JULYANA
 
Natalia hernandez 2
Natalia hernandez 2Natalia hernandez 2
Natalia hernandez 2
 
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話
結婚式の画像がどうしてもほしかった話
 
Diego redvolucion 1
Diego redvolucion 1Diego redvolucion 1
Diego redvolucion 1
 

Similaire à Emergence and Reduction in Physics

Scientific Method
Scientific MethodScientific Method
Scientific Methodanhdbh
 
Entanglement And Quantum Mechanics
Entanglement And Quantum MechanicsEntanglement And Quantum Mechanics
Entanglement And Quantum MechanicsMegan Espinoza
 
Order, Chaos and the End of Reductionism
Order, Chaos and the End of ReductionismOrder, Chaos and the End of Reductionism
Order, Chaos and the End of ReductionismJohn47Wind
 
An Extraordinary Man From Demark
An Extraordinary Man From DemarkAn Extraordinary Man From Demark
An Extraordinary Man From DemarkAmanda Reed
 
Stephen Hawking Theory Of Everything
Stephen  Hawking    Theory Of  EverythingStephen  Hawking    Theory Of  Everything
Stephen Hawking Theory Of EverythingDhiraj Upadhyay
 
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...IOSR Journals
 
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum Theory
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum TheoryShort Review of the Unitary Quantum Theory
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum Theorytheijes
 
The Theory Of Quantum Mechanics
The Theory Of Quantum MechanicsThe Theory Of Quantum Mechanics
The Theory Of Quantum MechanicsAshley Thomas
 
Quantum Entanglement
Quantum EntanglementQuantum Entanglement
Quantum Entanglementpixiejen
 
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21andreatorrieri
 
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018SOCIEDAD JULIO GARAVITO
 
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson Publishers
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson PublishersHow Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson Publishers
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson PublishersCrimsonPublishersRDMS
 
The Physics Of Car Crashes
The Physics Of Car CrashesThe Physics Of Car Crashes
The Physics Of Car CrashesTracy Aldridge
 
The anisotropies of the universe
The  anisotropies of the universeThe  anisotropies of the universe
The anisotropies of the universeAlexander Decker
 
Physics Of Prime Numbers
Physics Of Prime NumbersPhysics Of Prime Numbers
Physics Of Prime NumbersJessica Moore
 

Similaire à Emergence and Reduction in Physics (20)

Scientific Method
Scientific MethodScientific Method
Scientific Method
 
Entanglement And Quantum Mechanics
Entanglement And Quantum MechanicsEntanglement And Quantum Mechanics
Entanglement And Quantum Mechanics
 
Order, Chaos and the End of Reductionism
Order, Chaos and the End of ReductionismOrder, Chaos and the End of Reductionism
Order, Chaos and the End of Reductionism
 
An Extraordinary Man From Demark
An Extraordinary Man From DemarkAn Extraordinary Man From Demark
An Extraordinary Man From Demark
 
Modern Astronomy
Modern AstronomyModern Astronomy
Modern Astronomy
 
Stephen Hawking Theory Of Everything
Stephen  Hawking    Theory Of  EverythingStephen  Hawking    Theory Of  Everything
Stephen Hawking Theory Of Everything
 
String theory of particle physics
String theory of particle physicsString theory of particle physics
String theory of particle physics
 
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...
The Phase Theory towards the Unification of the Forces of Nature the Heart Be...
 
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum Theory
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum TheoryShort Review of the Unitary Quantum Theory
Short Review of the Unitary Quantum Theory
 
The Theory Of Quantum Mechanics
The Theory Of Quantum MechanicsThe Theory Of Quantum Mechanics
The Theory Of Quantum Mechanics
 
Quantum Entanglement
Quantum EntanglementQuantum Entanglement
Quantum Entanglement
 
WAVE-VISUALIZATION
WAVE-VISUALIZATIONWAVE-VISUALIZATION
WAVE-VISUALIZATION
 
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21
Elaborato torrieri andrea_5_e_esame di stato 20.21
 
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018
General relativity vs. quantum mechanics issues of foundations uv 1_oct2018
 
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson Publishers
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson PublishersHow Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson Publishers
How Physics Became a Blind Science_Crimson Publishers
 
The Physics Of Car Crashes
The Physics Of Car CrashesThe Physics Of Car Crashes
The Physics Of Car Crashes
 
The Multiverse_Cosmic Origins
The Multiverse_Cosmic OriginsThe Multiverse_Cosmic Origins
The Multiverse_Cosmic Origins
 
New Physics Essay
New Physics EssayNew Physics Essay
New Physics Essay
 
The anisotropies of the universe
The  anisotropies of the universeThe  anisotropies of the universe
The anisotropies of the universe
 
Physics Of Prime Numbers
Physics Of Prime NumbersPhysics Of Prime Numbers
Physics Of Prime Numbers
 

Plus de Sebastian De Haro

Oxford slides on Duality and Emergence
Oxford slides on Duality and EmergenceOxford slides on Duality and Emergence
Oxford slides on Duality and EmergenceSebastian De Haro
 
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesGeneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesSebastian De Haro
 
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesPittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesSebastian De Haro
 
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the Sciences
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the SciencesLiberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the Sciences
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the SciencesSebastian De Haro
 
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics WuppertalDualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics WuppertalSebastian De Haro
 
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity DualityBerlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity DualitySebastian De Haro
 
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and MetaphysicsPrinceton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and MetaphysicsSebastian De Haro
 
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGE
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGEBig Questions in Science: small to LARGE
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGESebastian De Haro
 
London A Holographic Universe?
London A Holographic Universe?London A Holographic Universe?
London A Holographic Universe?Sebastian De Haro
 
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and GravityBerlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and GravitySebastian De Haro
 
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014Sebastian De Haro
 
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...Sebastian De Haro
 
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and Reduction
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and ReductionStrings, Quantum Gravity, and Reduction
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and ReductionSebastian De Haro
 
The Universe Out of Information?
The Universe Out of Information?The Universe Out of Information?
The Universe Out of Information?Sebastian De Haro
 
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic ScenariosReduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic ScenariosSebastian De Haro
 
From Einstein To Quantum Cryptography
From Einstein To Quantum CryptographyFrom Einstein To Quantum Cryptography
From Einstein To Quantum CryptographySebastian De Haro
 

Plus de Sebastian De Haro (20)

Oxford slides on Duality and Emergence
Oxford slides on Duality and EmergenceOxford slides on Duality and Emergence
Oxford slides on Duality and Emergence
 
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesGeneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
 
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity DualitiesPittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
Pittsburgh talk on Emergence and in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
 
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the Sciences
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the SciencesLiberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the Sciences
Liberal Arts Conference - Core Texts in the Sciences
 
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics WuppertalDualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
 
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity DualityBerlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
 
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and MetaphysicsPrinceton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
 
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGE
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGEBig Questions in Science: small to LARGE
Big Questions in Science: small to LARGE
 
London A Holographic Universe?
London A Holographic Universe?London A Holographic Universe?
London A Holographic Universe?
 
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and GravityBerlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
 
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014
Duality in AdS/CFT, Chicago 7 Nov. 2014
 
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
 
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and Reduction
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and ReductionStrings, Quantum Gravity, and Reduction
Strings, Quantum Gravity, and Reduction
 
The Universe Out of Information?
The Universe Out of Information?The Universe Out of Information?
The Universe Out of Information?
 
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic ScenariosReduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
 
Fysica 2011
Fysica 2011Fysica 2011
Fysica 2011
 
From Einstein To Quantum Cryptography
From Einstein To Quantum CryptographyFrom Einstein To Quantum Cryptography
From Einstein To Quantum Cryptography
 
CREA Black Holes
CREA Black HolesCREA Black Holes
CREA Black Holes
 
Leidsche Fles Symposium
Leidsche Fles SymposiumLeidsche Fles Symposium
Leidsche Fles Symposium
 
Studiemarathon
StudiemarathonStudiemarathon
Studiemarathon
 

Dernier

Human brain.. It's parts and function.
Human brain.. It's parts and function. Human brain.. It's parts and function.
Human brain.. It's parts and function. MUKTA MANJARI SAHOO
 
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGRAPE
 
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdf
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdfSUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdf
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdfsantiagojoderickdoma
 
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptx
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptxGenetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptx
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptxaishnasrivastava
 
An intro to explainable AI for polar climate science
An intro to  explainable AI for  polar climate scienceAn intro to  explainable AI for  polar climate science
An intro to explainable AI for polar climate scienceZachary Labe
 
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusAlternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusPradnya Wadekar
 
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba casoft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba caohsadfeeling
 
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  StudiesExcavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & StudiesPrachya Adhyayan
 
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...Sérgio Sacani
 
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening Test
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening TestSubstances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening Test
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening TestAkashDTejwani
 
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform Environment
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform EnvironmentControlling Parameters of Carbonate platform Environment
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform EnvironmentRahulVishwakarma71547
 
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)chatterjeesoumili50
 
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...marwaahmad357
 
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdfPests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsThermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsSérgio Sacani
 
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptx
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptxIB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptx
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptxUalikhanKalkhojayev1
 
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabWorld Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabkiyorndlab
 
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxCW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxmarwaahmad357
 

Dernier (20)

Human brain.. It's parts and function.
Human brain.. It's parts and function. Human brain.. It's parts and function.
Human brain.. It's parts and function.
 
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
 
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdf
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdfSUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdf
SUKDANAN DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE ANSWER KEYY.pdf
 
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptx
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptxGenetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptx
Genetic Engineering in bacteria for resistance.pptx
 
An intro to explainable AI for polar climate science
An intro to  explainable AI for  polar climate scienceAn intro to  explainable AI for  polar climate science
An intro to explainable AI for polar climate science
 
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusAlternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
 
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba casoft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
 
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  StudiesExcavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
 
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...
Legacy Analysis of Dark Matter Annihilation from the Milky Way Dwarf Spheroid...
 
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening Test
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening TestSubstances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening Test
Substances in Common Use for Shahu College Screening Test
 
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform Environment
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform EnvironmentControlling Parameters of Carbonate platform Environment
Controlling Parameters of Carbonate platform Environment
 
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)
TORSION IN GASTROPODS- Anatomical event (Zoology)
 
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
 
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdfPests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cumbu_Identification, Binomics, Integrated ManagementDr.UPR.pdf
 
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsThermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
 
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptx
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptxIB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptx
IB Biology New syllabus B3.2 Transport.pptx
 
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabWorld Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
 
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
 
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxCW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
 

Emergence and Reduction in Physics

  • 1. Emergence and Reduction in Physics SEBASTIAN DE HARO UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM AND UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE LONDON, 3 JANUARY 2017
  • 2. Emergence and Reduction: motivation  Emergence and reduction are two concepts which are often invoked in discussions relating different levels in nature, or different disciplines in science:  For example, it is sometimes said that life ‘emerges’ out of the underlying chemical or biological components.  The implication of this use of emergence is that there is novelty in that which emerges (i.e. life).  Motto: “more is different” (Philip W. Anderson, 1972).  Reduction (or reductionism) is often used to imply that the whole is “nothing but” the sum of its parts.  For example, the physics of the solar system is nothing but the sum of the mutual two- body interactions of the planets and the Sun.
  • 3. Aims of this talk: emergence and reduction (i) To clarify the use of these concepts (‘emergence’ and ‘reduction’) in science, especially in physics. (ii) Specifically: to argue that the contrast ‘emergence vs. reduction’ poses a false dichotomy, since they are independent. (iii) To point out that the independence of the two concepts may open interesting avenues for the philosophy of mind. But I will not work this out in a theory of the mind.
  • 4. Emergence vs. reduction: not just an academic discussion  Steven Weinberg: “One of the members of the [SSC] board argued that we should not give the impression that we think that elementary particle physics is more fundamental than other fields, because it just tended to enrage our friends in other areas of physics. The reason we give the impression that we think that elementary particle physics is more fundamental than other branches of physics is because it is. I do not know how to defend the amounts being spent on particle physics without being frank about this.”  Philip Anderson: “They [the results of particle physics] are in no sense more fundamental than what Alan Turing did in founding the computer science, or what Francis Crick and James Watson did in discovering the secret of life.”
  • 5. This is what is left of the Superconductor Super Collider…
  • 6. Stephen Hawking  “By far the most important [prediction] is supersymmetry which is fundamental to most attempts to unify Einstein's General Relativity with Quantum Theory. This would be confirmed by the discovery of superpartners to the particles that we already know. The Superconducting Super Collider (the SSC) was being built in Texas and would have reached the energies at which super partners were expected. However, the United States went through a fit of feeling poor and canceled the project half way. At the risk of causing embarrassment, I have to say I think this was a very short sighted decision. I hope that the US, and other governments will do better in the next millennium.” (Millennium lecture)
  • 7. A misconstrued debate?  On the surface of it, Anderson seems to have adopted the wiser attitude.  But both seem to have part of the truth.  In fact, they both agree in their acceptance of reductionism:  “The reductionist hypothesis may still be a topic for controversy among philosophers, but among the great majority of active scientists I think it is accepted without question.” (Anderson, opening paragraph).  In case this was not sufficiently clear: “We must all start with reductionism, which I fully accept.”  But reduction and reductionism (complete reduction, i.e. “nothing but…”) are different things!
  • 8. A misconstrued debate? And a proposed reconciliation  Reduction is often taken to be emergence’s natural opponent.  But there is a growing consensus, in philosophy of physics, that emergence and reduction need not be each other’s opposites.  In fact, they are logically independent of each other!  Jeremy Butterfield (2011):  “Emergence, Reduction and Supervenience: A Varied Landscape”  “Less is Different: Emergence and Reduction Reconciled”  And so, we do not need to take sides in the ‘emergence vs. reduction’ debate.  We better get some good idea of what emergence and reduction are in physics.  Else, how will our theories fare when (if!) we try to apply these concepts to the mind?
  • 9. Intermezzo: vindicating non-reductionist science  The idea of reduction is, of course, ubiquitous in science, especially physics. Familiar cases:  At low speeds, special relativity (Einstein) reduces to classical mechanics (Newton).  For sufficiently large systems, quantum mechanics reduces to classical mechanics, or ℏ → 0 (more precisely, large-action).  But the cases in which reduction fails are equally ubiquitous!
  • 10. An analogy: mapping a sphere to the plane  There is no simple way to project a sphere onto the plane, without ‘tearing the sphere apart’. There will always be at least one point (e.g. the North pole) which does not map.  In doing so, we lose information about the topology of the sphere.
  • 11. Example: Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism  James Maxwell (1831-1879) unified electric and magnetic phenomena through his theory of electromagnetism (Maxwell’s equations).  According to this theory, light is a wave propagating at a constant speed, c.  Maxwell’s theory’s basic quantity was the electromagnetic field. This field failed to be reduced to the quantities of classical mechanics (which describes particles). Nevertheless, Maxwell believed that his theory would ultimately receive a mechanical explanation. This never happened.  The shift to Maxwell’s theory required the introduction of new concepts. Maxwell’s theory was not simply a complex application of the fundamental principles already known.  Reduction is useful in many cases. But there are cases in which one simply needs to think in a different way. So, reduction is not always the most productive way to proceed in formulating new scientific theories.  Insisting on reduction in such cases could be like mapping the sphere to the plane!
  • 12. Example: Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism  One may say: but both Maxwell’s theory and classical mechanics are special cases of a bigger framework, viz. field theory.  Agreed! But this only reinforces my point. The issue is not about the lack of an explanation or a more comprehensive theory, but about reductionism not always being the right way to approach a problem.
  • 13. Emergence, Reduction, Supervenience  Emergence: properties or behaviour of a system which are novel and robust relative to some appropriate comparison class.  Novel means, typically: not definable from the comparison class, maybe showing features absent from the class.  Robust: the same for various choices of, or assumptions about, the comparison class.  Think of a composite system (e.g. a metal): the properties and behaviour (e.g. hardness, electrical conductivity, colour) are novel and robust compared to those of its components (atoms).  Robustness is the independence of the properties of the metal on the specific properties (location, etc.) of the individual atoms.
  • 14. Emergence, Reduction, Supervenience  Reduction: deduction of one theory (or phenomenon) from another.  For example, classical mechanics can be deduced from quantum mechanics (by taking a limit, ℏ → 0).  Normally, reduction requires the introduction of bridge principles: new definitions, or correspondence rules between the two theories, regarded as two languages, i.e. a dictionary between the two (Ernest Nagel, 1961).  Also, the taking of these limits is often delicate: the strict limits are often not well- defined, and one needs to appropriately renormalise the physical quantities of interest. This procedure is often not unique nor can it be a priori defined on the grounds of the theory of interest only.  Physical judgment is needed: to decide which is the limit of interest, and how to take this limit.
  • 15. Klaas Landsman, A Flea on Schrödinger’s Cat
  • 16. Double-well potential  The ground-state wave-function is symmetric around its two potentials.  The naive limit ℏ → 0 preserves this symmetry, and so the state in the ‘classical’ limit still has two peaks.  This is usually solved by breaking the symmetry, e.g. by adding a small term to the potential that breaks the symmetry (since realistic potentials will have correction terms that remove the symmetry).  In this case, one of the two peaks is suppressed, and the classical limit is as we would expect.  But, in doing so, one is sneaking in extra information!  In other cases, other kinds of extra information may be needed: initial conditions, boundary conditions, choice of states to keep, etc.
  • 17. Emergence, Reduction, Supervenience  Supervenience: a set of properties A supervenes upon another set B just in case no two things can differ with respect to A-properties without also differing with respect to their B-properties. In short: “there cannot be an A-difference without a B-difference”.  Take A = classical mechanics, B = quantum mechanics.  Any change in A (e.g. a change in the position of the particle) will imply a corresponding change in B (e.g. a change in some of the observables of the corresponding quantum theory).  Supervenience is weaker than reduction, because we do not need to have an explicit relation between A and B (such a relation may only be given implicitly, or may not exist at all).
  • 18. Emergence and Reduction  Clearly, there is a tension between emergence and reduction. For emergence emphasises novelty, whereas reduction emphasises deduction.  And logic teaches that valid deduction gives no new ‘content’.  So, how can there be novel behaviour, in cases in which there is reduction?  Indeed, many authors take the definition emergence to also involve irreducibility (i.e. lack of reduction), thus turning this tension into a built-in incompatibility.  Answer: there can be novelty in the use of limits.  As we have already seen, taking limits involves making choices about e.g. which symmetries to break, or which states to keep!
  • 19. A (technical, but important) warning about reduction!  There are additional reasons why reduction is often not unique, but requires making choices. Recall the idea of reduction as taking a limit:  Defining the limit of a sequence depends on a choice of a topology (e.g. a choice of open sets).  A given sequence may converge in one topology, but not in another.  And so, to claim that classical mechanics can be deduced as a limit of special relativity, one needs to say with respect to which topology it is deduced.  It has been argued (S. Fletcher, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2016) that there is no canonical choice of topology.  So, also for this additional reason, reduction (viewed as deduction) requires making some global choices about how theories or phenomena are to be compared.
  • 20. Summary so far, on reduction  Consider completely reducing one theory to another (‘reductionism’):  Reduction = deduction.  There are several valid deductions possible, depending on:  Choices of states and quantities, symmetries to break (flea on Schrödinger’s cat).  Initial and boundary conditions.  Non-uniqueness of limits (which limits to take, choices of topology).  ...  In most cases in which we are told that reduction has been successfully carried out, implicit choices have been made about these issues.  Additional (usually global) information is being sneaked in, to what (perhaps superficially) looks like a complete reduction.  And so, it is not true that the ‘parent’ theory, all by itself, determines everything (even if everything can be deduced, given the right assumptions!).
  • 21. Emergence and Reduction  This means that reduction (deduction) allows for novelty, through the choices made.  So, emergence and reduction are, in fact, compatible!  Claim (Butterfield 2011): emergence is independent of reduction and supervenience. So there can be emergence with or without reduction (and the same for the weaker notion of supervenience).  Reduction without emergence: unsurprising, given that these are often seen as each other’s opposites.  Emergence without reduction: also unsurprising.  Surprising, nevertheless, that such cases appear in physics! Vis-à-vis Anderson’s claim that “The reductionist hypothesis... is accepted without question [by physicists]”.  See George and Sachith’s talk!  Reduction with emergence: surprising! And the examples abound!
  • 22. Example 1: the double-well potential  We have already seen the possible emergence of a classical state of the double-well potential from the quantum state.  What emerges? In the limit ℏ → 0, the particle has a well-defined position (determined deterministically).  There is novelty, because that property is forbidden by the quantum theory.  It will be robust, if it does not depend on details of the microscopic perturbation (the flea on Schrödinger’s cat).  Reduction: because there is a well-defined limit from which the classical behaviour is mathematically derived.  Since we needed to use extra information about how to take the limit (and in making this choice we are often motivated by the kind of classical behaviour we wish to reproduce), we may be inclined to call this reduction incomplete.
  • 23. Example 2: Thermodynamics  Thermodynamics is the branch of physics that describes physical systems in terms of macroscopic quantities such as heat, temperature, energy, work, etc.  Statistical mechanics is the application of (classical or quantum) mechanics to systems of many particles (e.g. 1023 , roughly the number of atoms in 12g of carbon).  The quantities and laws of thermodynamics readily follow from the ‘thermodynamic limit’ of statistical mechanics, i.e. the limit in which the volume of the system and the number of particles go to infinity (keeping their ratio constant).  In this limit, thermodynamical quantities such as heat and temperature, which have no microscopic analogue, emerge: in an uncontroversial way (as I have discussed: these are novel properties, robust relative to the microscopic dynamics).  So we have a case of emergence with reduction.  Notice the strong sense of emergence here: the laws of thermodynamics emerge along with the thermodynamical properties.  The precise nature of the reduction limit is still a matter of debate (e.g. arrow of time!).
  • 24. A warning!  I have discussed a single notion of emergence (novel and robust behaviour, relative to a comparison class).  There are several ways of construing ‘novelty’: epistemic-ontological, weak- strong (in principle/practice, amount of anti-reductionism).  Also the comparison class can be synchronic or diachronic.  So, unpacking the details of the notion of emergence discussed, we obtain different kinds of emergence, all of which nevertheless fall under the same conception. Guay & Sartenaer, A New Look at Emergence
  • 25. Some philosophical options for the mind  I think it is interesting to look at some philosophical options available in trying to conceptualise the mind:  For simplicity, I base the comments here on the notion of ‘substance’, as a useful notion.  A single substance:  Materialism: humans are only specific configurations of matter.  Idealism: only mind. Berkeley, Hegel,...  Dual aspect theory: one substance with two different aspects, a physical and a mental aspect.  Dualism: Plato, Descartes,... Two individual substances, linked in some (usually problematic, but interesting) way.
  • 26. An excursion: double aspect theory  Emergence (and supervenience) seem to sit well with double aspect theory.  The words you speak have a physical aspect (sound waves with specific combinations of frequencies, etc.) and a mental aspect (the meaning that is attached to those frequencies).  These two aspects cannot be separated without destrying the message of the communication.  This meaning is actually emergent, in the way I described before.  The mind could work in this way as well. For our mental capacities are not independent of the physical processes in our brain (which would amount to a form of dualism).  Even if our mental capacities are supervenient on the brain (no mental activity possible without brain activity), emergence still allows for novelty in the contents of our thoughts and in the targets of our desires.
  • 27. Summary and some conclusions  Emergence and reduction are independent notions.  I am not even discussing cases in which reduction fails, which arise in physics.  Even in cases in which there are strong forms of reduction (like the transition from statistical mechanics to thermodynamics), reduction tends to be subtle and incomplete (because non-unique). Even in such cases, no reductionism.  Global choices need to be made, such as: which quantities to take the limit of, and how (which quantities to keep and which ones to throw away), which physical states are relevant, boundary conditions, initial conditions, topology,... Typically, the number of choices that one can make is infinite.  Despite the presence of deduction, this does not seem to be algorithmic.  So, perhaps, we should not conflate reduction/deduction with determinism (since there are choices that need to be made for deduction).  We require our physical judgment to decide which forms of emergence are relevant.