This document contains an assessment checklist used to evaluate assignments at several educational institutions in Malaysia. The checklist contains 13 criteria used to assess assignments, including whether learning outcomes, assessment criteria, and program outcomes are clear to students. Assignments are also evaluated based on appropriate task complexity, relevance to the program, realistic deadlines, and freedom from bias. The checklist is signed by an assessor and internal verifier upon review, and includes space for comments on specific assignment questions or tasks. A second section of the checklist is used specifically for English language assignments and focuses on grammatical accuracy.

1. FORM : 101/01-F07
REV : 1
SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Kolej Universiti Linton Institut Jati
Institut Teknologi Pertama Kolej Legenda
Institute Of Medical Sciences Mantin
Programme Name
Module Name Module Code
Name of Module
Leader
Assessment Type /
Reference No.
Name of Internal
Verifier
Lead Officer
(Assessment
Committee)
( A ) While some of the features below are essential, others will apply only in particular situations.
No Assignment features
 or
X or
N/A
Comments
1.
Are the relevant learning outcome(s), programme
outcome and associated assessment criteria clearly
specified and known to students?
2.
Is background information relevant and adequate
for the students?
3. Opportunity for the students to make decisions
4.
Are the tasks at appropriate level for students e.g
complexity of tasks, overall standard
5. Type of activity e.g group and individual work
6. Is this assessment relevant to the programme?
7. Are the tasks/questions developed clear?
8.
Is assignment practicable and relate to the
industry?

2. FORM : 101/01-F07
REV : 1
No Assignment features
 or
X or
N/A
Comments
9.
Are assessment criteria/ expected evidence clear
and known to students?
10.
Are marking/grading descriptors shown and
contextualised?
11. Is the deadline realistic for this assessment?
12. Is assignment free from bias?
13. Any specific comments on questions/tasks.
Note:  assessment has this feature
X assessment does not have this feature (comment/ suggestion to overcome this, to be included by
internal verifier)
N/A not applicable
Assessor’s Name and Signature Date
Name and Signature Date of Verification
Internal Verifier
Name and Signature Date of Verification
Lead Officer, Assessment Committee
( B ) Use by English Language Centre.
No Assignment features
 or
X or
N/A
Comments
1. No grammatical, punctuation errors and etc.
Name and Signature Date of Verification
English Language Centre