SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 37
MICRO BIOLOGICALASSAY OF
VACCINES
Under the guidence of
J. Venkateswara rao
(M. pharm)
Associate proffesor
Presented
by
K.SIVA GANESH
I/II M.Pharm
Pharmaceutical Analysis
CONTENTS
• Introduction to vaccines
• Microbiological assays
Adsorbed Diptheria vaccine
Rabies vaccine
Adsorbed Tetanus vaccine
• References
INTRODUCTION :
Vaccines:
A preparations of killed
micro organisms that are
attenuated/living fully virulent
organisms that is administered to
produce immunity to a paticular
disease.
ADSORBED DIPTHERIA VACCINE
DIFINITION :
Diptheria formal toxoid
+ mineral carrier
[which is hydrated aluminium
Hydroxide (or) calcium PO4].
Adsorbed Diptheria vaccine
Biological Assay
A . INTRADERMAL CHALLENGE METHOD
Principle:
The potency of adsorbed diphtheria vaccine is
determined by comparing the dose is necessary to protect
guinea pig against the erythrogenic effect of range of
intradermal injection of diphtheria toxin with dose of the
standard preparation of adsorbed diphtheria toxin
necessary to give the same protection.
Procedure :
Standard preparation:
Standard preparation consisting of toxoid adsorbed
on a aluminium hydroxide with polygeline.
Test animal:
 White guinea pig
 Weight between 250-350gm
Selection of challenge toxin:
Selection of preparation of diphtheria toxin
containing 67 –133Lr / 100 in limes flocculation (Lf) and 25000
– 50000minimal reacting doses for guinea pig skin in 1Lf
(limesflocculation).
Preparation of challenge toxin solution:
Dilute challenge toxin with a suitable diluents to
obtain achallenge toxin solution containing about 512 × 10-4Lf
in0.2ml.
DETERMINATION OF POTENCY OF THE VACCINE
Vaccine is dilute with the saline solution
Inject guinea pig subcutaneously (5 numbers)
After 28 days shave the both flanks of each guinea pig
0.2ml challenge toxin solution is inject to guinea pig intradermally
After 48 hrs, record the incidence of specific diphtheria erythema
Assay limit falls between 50% and 200% of the estimated potency.
10
B.LETHAL CHALLENGE METHOD :
TEST ANIMAL:
• Guinea pig.
• Weight between 250g – 350g.
• Divide them in to 6 groups of 16 animals.
• A group containing 5 animals.
• All guinea pigs have same sex.
Challenge toxin :
Diphtheria toxin containing NLT100 LD50 in 1ml.
Preparation of challenge toxin solution:
• Challenge toxin + Phosphate buffer saline solution (PH 7.4).
• Dilute the challenge toxin solution to 2LD50 , 1LD 50 , 1/2LD 50
in the same solution.
Determination of potency of the vaccine:
• 3 Dilutions of sample and standard vaccine prepared in saline
solution each dilution difference by 2.5 fold.
• Intermediate conc. inject subcutaneously into guinea pigs.
• This should (intermediate conc) protect 50% animal from
lethal effect of subcutaneous injection.
Allocate 6 dilutions , one to each of the 6 groups of 16 guinea
pigs(1ml)
After 28 days
Test challenge toxin dilution
1ml inject to 4 groups of 5 - guinea pigs - subcutaneously
After 4 days count the number of survival animals
Calculate the potency of the vaccine relative to the potency
Of standard preparation on the basis of number of animals
survived in each group of 16 animals.
Test validation :
• Vaccine under examination and standard preparation, the 50%
protective doses lies between the largest and smallest doses of
the preparation given to the guinea-pigs
RABIES VACCINE
DEFINITION :
• Rabies vaccine is a suspension of a suitable
strain of fixed rabies virus grown in suitable
approved cell culture and inactivated by a
suitable method.
• The vaccine is prepared immediately before use
by reconstitution from the dried vaccine with a
suitable sterile liquid.
Dried vaccine + sterile liquid Suspension.
BIOLOGICALASSAY OF RABIES VACCINE
Principle:
The potency of rabies vaccine is determined by
comparing a lethal intracerebral dose of a rabies virus with the
dose of the standard preparation of rabies necessary to give for
same protection.
Standard preparation: Freeze – dried preparation.
Test animals:
• White mice weight 11gm –15gm.
• 6 groups of 16 animals , 4 groups of
10 animals.
• These two groups are used for
titration of LD50 challenge
suspension.
• Injected 0.03ml/mice intracerebrally.
STANDARD CHALLENGE VIRUS SUSPENSION
Standard challenge virus suspension is prepared by injecting
Intracerebrally 0.03ml of 10 fold dilution standard
strain horse serum to the test animal.
Showing characteristic symptoms of encephalitis are
sacrified
Harvest their brains aseptically
Wash it with saline solution to remove blood clot
Homogenized brain with 10% digested casein hydrolysate (PH 7.2)
Centrifuge and supernated liquid is distributed into sterile vials and
stored at 2 – 80. 21
DETERMINATION OF CHALLENGE VIRUS
(Determination of virus titre of the challenge virus)
Prepare 3-10 fold dilution of standard challenge virus suspension.
0.03 ml inject intra cerebrally to a groups of 10 mice.
Observe for 14 days
Count the number of mice surviving in each group
Calculate the virus titre of standard challenge virus
suspension by statistical method.
22
DETERMINATION OF POTENCY OF THE VACCINE
Prepare 3-5 fold serial dilution of standard and test solution of vaccines
Separate mice in 6 groups of 16 each
Inject 0.03 ml intra peritoneally and 7 days
prepare same solution and
inject
Both standard and test should prepared in such away
After 7 days inject 0.03 ml standar virus suspension to vaccinated mice
Observe if for 14 days and calculate its potency by statistical method.
23
• Lowest dilution should protect the 50% of the animal
• Highest dilution protect less than 50% of the animal
ADSORBED TETANUS VACCINE
• Tetanus Toxoid Adsorbed USP, for intramuscular use, is a
sterile suspension of alum-precipitated (aluminum potassium
sulfate) toxoid in an isotonic sodium chloride solution
containing sodium phosphate buffer to control pH.
• Clostridium tetani culture is grown in a peptone-based
medium and detoxified with formaldehyde. The detoxified
material is then purified by serial ammonium sulfate
fractionation, followed by sterile filtration, and the toxoid is
adsorbed to aluminum potassium sulfate (alum). The adsorbed
toxoid is diluted with physiological saline solution 0.85%.
• Each 0.5 mL dose is formulated to contain 5 Lf
Biological Assay Of Tetanus Vaccine
Principle :
• The potency of tetanus vaccine is determined by
administration of the vaccine to animals i.e. guinea-pigs or
mice followed administration of either challenge with tetanus
toxin or by determining of the titre of antibodies against
tetanus Toxoid in the serum of the guinea-pigs.
• In both cases the potency of the vaccine is calculated by
comparison with a reference vaccine, calibrated in
International Units.
• Tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) BRP is calibrated in International
Units with reference to the International Standard.
A. CHALLENGE TOXIN IN GUINEA PIG
SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS:
• Healthy guinea pigs from the same stock should be selected of
weight 250-350 gm.
• Animals are distributed in not less than 6 equal groups containing
no. of animals sufficient to obtain results
• If the validity of the challenge toxin is to be determined 3 further
groups of the 5 animals each should be taken which are used as
unvaccinated control.
• Animals should be of same sex if both sex are included then the
should be equally distributed among groups.
SELECTION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN:
• Preparation of tetanus toxin containing not less than 50 times
the 50 percent paralytic dose per millilitre is selected.
• If the challenge toxin preparation has been shown to be stable,
it is not necessary to verify the paralytic dose for every assay.
PREPARATION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN SOLUTION:
• The challenge toxin is immediately diluted to 50 times the 50
percent paralytic dose per millilitre with the, peptone buffered
saline solution pH 7.4 etc to obtain stable challenge toxin.
DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE
SOLUTION:
• The vaccine to be examined and the reference preparation are
diluted with the 9g/l solution of NaCl.
• The dilution forms series which do not differ the by 2.5 folds
from the alternating previous and next dilutions.
• When injected subcutaneously with dose of 1.0 mL per guinea
pig should protect approximately 50% of animals from the
paralytic effects of tetanus toxin prescribed for test.
IMMUNIZATION CHALLENGE AND CHALLENGE:
• Allocate the dilutions to the groups.
• Then Inject subcutaneously 1 mL allocated dilution into the
guinea pig of respective groups.
DETERMINATION OF ACTIVITY OF THE CHALLENGE
TOXIN:
• 3 dilutions made from the challenge toxin and each dilution
were allocated to 1 group of 5 guinea pigs i.e. 3 groups if
necessary.
• Subcutaneously inject 1mL of allocated solution into each
guinea pig of the group.
• The activity and stability of the challenge toxin are determined
by carrying out a suitable number of determinations of the 50
percent paralytic dose.
REQUIREMENTS FOR A VALID ASSAY:
• The test is not valid unless, for both the vaccine to be
examined and the reference preparation the 50 per cent
protective dose lies between the largest and smallest doses of
the preparations given to the guinea-pigs,
• If applicable, the number of paralyzed animals in the 3 groups
of 5 injected with the dilutions of the challenge toxin solution
indicates that the challenge was approximately 50 times the 50
percent paralytic dose.
• The confidence limits (P = 0.95) are not less than 50 per cent
and not more than 200 percent of the estimated potency,
• The statistical analysis shows significant slope and no
deviation from linearity and parallelism of the dose.
READING AND INTERPRETATION OF
RESULTS:
• The guinea-pigs are examined twice daily. Remove and
humanely kill all animals showing definite signs of tetanus
paralysis.
• The number of guinea-pigs without paralysis 5 days after
injection of the challenge toxin are counted.
• Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined relative to
the potency of the reference preparation on the basis of the
proportion of challenged animals without paralysis in each of
the groups of vaccinated guinea-pigs, using the usual statistical
methods
B.CHALLENGE TOXIN IN MICE:
SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS:
• Use in the test healthy mice from the same stock, about 5
weeks old and from a strain shown to be suitable. Rest
same as guinea pig.
SELECTION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN:
• Preparation of tetanus toxin containing not less than 100
times the 50 per cent paralytic dose per millilitre is
selected.
• PREPARATION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN SOLUTION:
• DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE
SOLUTION:
• IMMUNIZATION CHALLENGE AND CHALLENGE:
• DETERMINATION OF ACTIVITY OF THE
CHALLENGE:
READING AND INTERPRETATION OF
RESULTS:
• The mice are examined twice daily. Remove and humanely kill
all animals showing definite signs of tetanus paralysis.
• The number of mice without paralysis 4 days after injection of
the challenge toxin are counted.
• Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined relative to
the potency of the reference preparation on the basis of the
proportion of challenged animals without paralysis in each of
the groups of vaccinated mices, using the usual statistical
methods.
C. DETERMINATION OF ANTBODIES IN GUINEA PIG
SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS:
• Healthy guinea pigs from the same stock should be
selected of weight 250-350 gm.
• Animals are distributed in not less than 6 equal groups
containing no. of animals sufficient to obtain results.
• Animals should be of same sex if both sex are included
then the should be equally distributed among groups.
• Use a further group of non-vaccinated guinea-pigs of the
same origin to provide a negative serum control. If test
consistency has been demonstrated, a reference negative
serum control may be used.
REFERENCE PREPARATION:
• A suitable reference preparation such as tetanus
vaccine(adsorbed) BRP or a batch of vaccine shown to be
effective in clinical studies, or a batch representative thereof,
and which has been calibrated in International Units with
reference to tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) BRP or the International
Standard for tetanus toxoid (adsorbed) are used.
DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE SOLUTION:
• The vaccine to be examined and the reference preparation are
diluted with the 9g/l solution of NaCl.
• The dilution forms series which do not differ the by 2.5 to 5
folds from the alternating previous and next dilutions. Use not
fewer than 3 dilutions within the range for example 0.5-16
IU/ml for each series. Use dilutions for immunization preferably
within 1 h of preparation. Allocate 1 dilution to each group of
guinea-pigs.
IMMUNISATION:
• Inject subcutaneously in the nape of each guinea-pig 1.0 ml of
the dilution allocated to its group.
BLOOD SAMPLING:
• 35-42 days after immunization, take a blood sample from each
vaccinated and control guinea-pig using a suitable method.
PREPARATION OF SERUM SAMPLES:
• Avoid frequent freezing and thawing of serum samples. To
avoid microbial contamination, it is preferable to carry out
manipulations in a laminar-flow cabinet.
DETERMINATION OF ANTIBODY TITRE:
• Determine the relative antibody titre or score of each
serum sample by a suitable immunochemical method .
The methods shown below (enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and toxin-binding
inhibition (ToBI)) have been found suitable.
CALCULATION OF POTENCY:
• Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined in
International Units relative to the reference preparation,
using the usual statistical methods.
NOTE: International Units of potency refer to the reference
vaccine and not to the International Units of antitoxin of the
reference guinea-pig serum.
Requirements For A Valid Assay :
• The confidence limits (P = 0.95) are not less than 50 percent
and not more than 200 per cent of the estimated potency.
• The statistical analysis shows significant slope and no
deviation from linearity and parallelism of the doseresponse
lines .
• The test may be repeated but when more than 1 test is
performed the results of all valid tests must be combined in the
estimate of potency.
READING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
• In order to minimize suffering in the test animals, it is
recommended to note the degree of paralysis on a scale such as
that shown below.
• The scale gives typical signs when injection of the challenge toxin
is made mid-ventrally directly behind the sternum with the needle
pointing towards the neck of the guinea-pig mice and .
• Grade T3 is taken as the end-point, but with experience grade T2
can be used instead.
• Tetanus toxin produces in at least 1 of the forelimbs paralysis that
can be recognized at an early stage.
The tetanus grades in guinea-pigs and mice are characterized by
• T1: slight stiffness of 1 forelimb, but difficult to observe
• T2: paralysis of 1 forelimb which still can function.
• T3: paralysis of 1 forelimb. The animal moves reluctantly, the
body is often slightly banana-shaped owing to scoliosis.
• T4 : the forelimb is completely stiff and the toes are
immovable. The muscular contraction of the forelimb is very
pronounced and usually scoliosis is observed;
• T5: tetanus seizures, continuous tonic spasm of muscles .

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

BIOASSAY OF TITANUS ANTI TIOXIN AND DIPTHERIA VACCINE
BIOASSAY OF TITANUS ANTI TIOXIN AND DIPTHERIA VACCINEBIOASSAY OF TITANUS ANTI TIOXIN AND DIPTHERIA VACCINE
BIOASSAY OF TITANUS ANTI TIOXIN AND DIPTHERIA VACCINE
 
Assay of adsorbed diptheria vaccine and adsorbed tetanus
Assay of adsorbed diptheria vaccine and adsorbed tetanusAssay of adsorbed diptheria vaccine and adsorbed tetanus
Assay of adsorbed diptheria vaccine and adsorbed tetanus
 
Biological test and assay of Antivenom
Biological test and assay of AntivenomBiological test and assay of Antivenom
Biological test and assay of Antivenom
 
Adsorbed Diphtheria Vaccine.
Adsorbed Diphtheria Vaccine.Adsorbed Diphtheria Vaccine.
Adsorbed Diphtheria Vaccine.
 
Bioassay of TT antitoxin
Bioassay of TT antitoxinBioassay of TT antitoxin
Bioassay of TT antitoxin
 
Human anti hemophilic factor
Human anti hemophilic  factorHuman anti hemophilic  factor
Human anti hemophilic factor
 
Microbiological assay of vaccines
Microbiological assay of vaccinesMicrobiological assay of vaccines
Microbiological assay of vaccines
 
Tetanus antitoxin (apa)
Tetanus antitoxin (apa)Tetanus antitoxin (apa)
Tetanus antitoxin (apa)
 
Biological tests and Bioassay of Oxytocin
Biological tests and Bioassay of OxytocinBiological tests and Bioassay of Oxytocin
Biological tests and Bioassay of Oxytocin
 
Absorbed Tatanus Vaccine
Absorbed Tatanus VaccineAbsorbed Tatanus Vaccine
Absorbed Tatanus Vaccine
 
Qualification of glassware
Qualification of glasswareQualification of glassware
Qualification of glassware
 
rabies vaccine and tetanus anti serum FOR PHARM ANALYSIS
 rabies vaccine and tetanus anti serum FOR PHARM ANALYSIS rabies vaccine and tetanus anti serum FOR PHARM ANALYSIS
rabies vaccine and tetanus anti serum FOR PHARM ANALYSIS
 
seminar on assay of oxytocin
 seminar on assay of oxytocin seminar on assay of oxytocin
seminar on assay of oxytocin
 
Bioassay of oxytocin
Bioassay of oxytocinBioassay of oxytocin
Bioassay of oxytocin
 
Biological test and assay tetanus toxoid adsorbed
Biological test and assay tetanus toxoid adsorbed Biological test and assay tetanus toxoid adsorbed
Biological test and assay tetanus toxoid adsorbed
 
Pharmaceutical reagents, PDAB, FC, MBTH
Pharmaceutical reagents, PDAB, FC, MBTHPharmaceutical reagents, PDAB, FC, MBTH
Pharmaceutical reagents, PDAB, FC, MBTH
 
Notes* for the subject 'Advanced Pharmaceutical Analysis'
Notes* for the subject 'Advanced Pharmaceutical Analysis'Notes* for the subject 'Advanced Pharmaceutical Analysis'
Notes* for the subject 'Advanced Pharmaceutical Analysis'
 
Qualification of instrumets
Qualification of instrumetsQualification of instrumets
Qualification of instrumets
 
Animal laboratory care and ethical requirements
Animal laboratory care and ethical requirementsAnimal laboratory care and ethical requirements
Animal laboratory care and ethical requirements
 
General Analytical Method for Milk
General Analytical Method for MilkGeneral Analytical Method for Milk
General Analytical Method for Milk
 

Similar to Micro biological assay of vaccines

Similar to Micro biological assay of vaccines (20)

Rabies vaccine ppt by royal
Rabies vaccine ppt by royalRabies vaccine ppt by royal
Rabies vaccine ppt by royal
 
S2 KAVANA BB APA-TETANUS ANTITOXIN.pptx
S2 KAVANA BB  APA-TETANUS ANTITOXIN.pptxS2 KAVANA BB  APA-TETANUS ANTITOXIN.pptx
S2 KAVANA BB APA-TETANUS ANTITOXIN.pptx
 
SCREENING OF immuno.pptx
SCREENING OF immuno.pptxSCREENING OF immuno.pptx
SCREENING OF immuno.pptx
 
Screening models for immunomodulatory agents
Screening models for immunomodulatory agentsScreening models for immunomodulatory agents
Screening models for immunomodulatory agents
 
Tuberculin purified protein derivative
Tuberculin purified protein derivativeTuberculin purified protein derivative
Tuberculin purified protein derivative
 
APA-RABIES VACCINES pharmceutical analysis m.pharm advanced pharmaceutical an...
APA-RABIES VACCINES pharmceutical analysis m.pharm advanced pharmaceutical an...APA-RABIES VACCINES pharmceutical analysis m.pharm advanced pharmaceutical an...
APA-RABIES VACCINES pharmceutical analysis m.pharm advanced pharmaceutical an...
 
Antiallergic activity by mast cell stabilization assay
Antiallergic activity by mast cell stabilization assayAntiallergic activity by mast cell stabilization assay
Antiallergic activity by mast cell stabilization assay
 
Immunodulators Screening methods
Immunodulators Screening methodsImmunodulators Screening methods
Immunodulators Screening methods
 
Immunoassay of insulin (neha)
Immunoassay of insulin (neha)Immunoassay of insulin (neha)
Immunoassay of insulin (neha)
 
Diphtheria vaccine
Diphtheria vaccineDiphtheria vaccine
Diphtheria vaccine
 
immunoassayofinsulinneha-220207120331.pptx
immunoassayofinsulinneha-220207120331.pptximmunoassayofinsulinneha-220207120331.pptx
immunoassayofinsulinneha-220207120331.pptx
 
Rabies jsk nagarajan
Rabies   jsk nagarajanRabies   jsk nagarajan
Rabies jsk nagarajan
 
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit d
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit dBio assy of antibiotics & vit d
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit d
 
Rabies Vaccine
Rabies VaccineRabies Vaccine
Rabies Vaccine
 
FMDV
FMDVFMDV
FMDV
 
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit d
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit dBio assy of antibiotics & vit d
Bio assy of antibiotics & vit d
 
ANTISNAKE VENOM.pptx
ANTISNAKE VENOM.pptxANTISNAKE VENOM.pptx
ANTISNAKE VENOM.pptx
 
b2. Bioassay of various endocrine hormones, drugs and autocoids.pdf
b2. Bioassay of various endocrine hormones, drugs and autocoids.pdfb2. Bioassay of various endocrine hormones, drugs and autocoids.pdf
b2. Bioassay of various endocrine hormones, drugs and autocoids.pdf
 
Tetanus antitoxin, streptokinase,_urokinase1
Tetanus antitoxin, streptokinase,_urokinase1Tetanus antitoxin, streptokinase,_urokinase1
Tetanus antitoxin, streptokinase,_urokinase1
 
Skin sensitisation (OECD: 406).
Skin sensitisation (OECD: 406).Skin sensitisation (OECD: 406).
Skin sensitisation (OECD: 406).
 

Recently uploaded

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptxAsian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 

Micro biological assay of vaccines

  • 1. MICRO BIOLOGICALASSAY OF VACCINES Under the guidence of J. Venkateswara rao (M. pharm) Associate proffesor Presented by K.SIVA GANESH I/II M.Pharm Pharmaceutical Analysis
  • 2. CONTENTS • Introduction to vaccines • Microbiological assays Adsorbed Diptheria vaccine Rabies vaccine Adsorbed Tetanus vaccine • References
  • 3. INTRODUCTION : Vaccines: A preparations of killed micro organisms that are attenuated/living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce immunity to a paticular disease.
  • 4. ADSORBED DIPTHERIA VACCINE DIFINITION : Diptheria formal toxoid + mineral carrier [which is hydrated aluminium Hydroxide (or) calcium PO4]. Adsorbed Diptheria vaccine
  • 5. Biological Assay A . INTRADERMAL CHALLENGE METHOD Principle: The potency of adsorbed diphtheria vaccine is determined by comparing the dose is necessary to protect guinea pig against the erythrogenic effect of range of intradermal injection of diphtheria toxin with dose of the standard preparation of adsorbed diphtheria toxin necessary to give the same protection.
  • 6. Procedure : Standard preparation: Standard preparation consisting of toxoid adsorbed on a aluminium hydroxide with polygeline. Test animal:  White guinea pig  Weight between 250-350gm
  • 7. Selection of challenge toxin: Selection of preparation of diphtheria toxin containing 67 –133Lr / 100 in limes flocculation (Lf) and 25000 – 50000minimal reacting doses for guinea pig skin in 1Lf (limesflocculation). Preparation of challenge toxin solution: Dilute challenge toxin with a suitable diluents to obtain achallenge toxin solution containing about 512 × 10-4Lf in0.2ml. DETERMINATION OF POTENCY OF THE VACCINE Vaccine is dilute with the saline solution Inject guinea pig subcutaneously (5 numbers) After 28 days shave the both flanks of each guinea pig 0.2ml challenge toxin solution is inject to guinea pig intradermally After 48 hrs, record the incidence of specific diphtheria erythema Assay limit falls between 50% and 200% of the estimated potency. 10
  • 8. B.LETHAL CHALLENGE METHOD : TEST ANIMAL: • Guinea pig. • Weight between 250g – 350g. • Divide them in to 6 groups of 16 animals. • A group containing 5 animals. • All guinea pigs have same sex.
  • 9. Challenge toxin : Diphtheria toxin containing NLT100 LD50 in 1ml. Preparation of challenge toxin solution: • Challenge toxin + Phosphate buffer saline solution (PH 7.4). • Dilute the challenge toxin solution to 2LD50 , 1LD 50 , 1/2LD 50 in the same solution.
  • 10. Determination of potency of the vaccine: • 3 Dilutions of sample and standard vaccine prepared in saline solution each dilution difference by 2.5 fold. • Intermediate conc. inject subcutaneously into guinea pigs. • This should (intermediate conc) protect 50% animal from lethal effect of subcutaneous injection.
  • 11. Allocate 6 dilutions , one to each of the 6 groups of 16 guinea pigs(1ml) After 28 days Test challenge toxin dilution 1ml inject to 4 groups of 5 - guinea pigs - subcutaneously After 4 days count the number of survival animals Calculate the potency of the vaccine relative to the potency Of standard preparation on the basis of number of animals survived in each group of 16 animals.
  • 12. Test validation : • Vaccine under examination and standard preparation, the 50% protective doses lies between the largest and smallest doses of the preparation given to the guinea-pigs
  • 13. RABIES VACCINE DEFINITION : • Rabies vaccine is a suspension of a suitable strain of fixed rabies virus grown in suitable approved cell culture and inactivated by a suitable method. • The vaccine is prepared immediately before use by reconstitution from the dried vaccine with a suitable sterile liquid. Dried vaccine + sterile liquid Suspension.
  • 14. BIOLOGICALASSAY OF RABIES VACCINE Principle: The potency of rabies vaccine is determined by comparing a lethal intracerebral dose of a rabies virus with the dose of the standard preparation of rabies necessary to give for same protection. Standard preparation: Freeze – dried preparation.
  • 15. Test animals: • White mice weight 11gm –15gm. • 6 groups of 16 animals , 4 groups of 10 animals. • These two groups are used for titration of LD50 challenge suspension. • Injected 0.03ml/mice intracerebrally.
  • 16. STANDARD CHALLENGE VIRUS SUSPENSION Standard challenge virus suspension is prepared by injecting Intracerebrally 0.03ml of 10 fold dilution standard strain horse serum to the test animal. Showing characteristic symptoms of encephalitis are sacrified Harvest their brains aseptically Wash it with saline solution to remove blood clot Homogenized brain with 10% digested casein hydrolysate (PH 7.2) Centrifuge and supernated liquid is distributed into sterile vials and stored at 2 – 80. 21
  • 17. DETERMINATION OF CHALLENGE VIRUS (Determination of virus titre of the challenge virus) Prepare 3-10 fold dilution of standard challenge virus suspension. 0.03 ml inject intra cerebrally to a groups of 10 mice. Observe for 14 days Count the number of mice surviving in each group Calculate the virus titre of standard challenge virus suspension by statistical method. 22
  • 18. DETERMINATION OF POTENCY OF THE VACCINE Prepare 3-5 fold serial dilution of standard and test solution of vaccines Separate mice in 6 groups of 16 each Inject 0.03 ml intra peritoneally and 7 days prepare same solution and inject Both standard and test should prepared in such away After 7 days inject 0.03 ml standar virus suspension to vaccinated mice Observe if for 14 days and calculate its potency by statistical method. 23
  • 19. • Lowest dilution should protect the 50% of the animal • Highest dilution protect less than 50% of the animal
  • 20. ADSORBED TETANUS VACCINE • Tetanus Toxoid Adsorbed USP, for intramuscular use, is a sterile suspension of alum-precipitated (aluminum potassium sulfate) toxoid in an isotonic sodium chloride solution containing sodium phosphate buffer to control pH. • Clostridium tetani culture is grown in a peptone-based medium and detoxified with formaldehyde. The detoxified material is then purified by serial ammonium sulfate fractionation, followed by sterile filtration, and the toxoid is adsorbed to aluminum potassium sulfate (alum). The adsorbed toxoid is diluted with physiological saline solution 0.85%. • Each 0.5 mL dose is formulated to contain 5 Lf
  • 21. Biological Assay Of Tetanus Vaccine Principle : • The potency of tetanus vaccine is determined by administration of the vaccine to animals i.e. guinea-pigs or mice followed administration of either challenge with tetanus toxin or by determining of the titre of antibodies against tetanus Toxoid in the serum of the guinea-pigs. • In both cases the potency of the vaccine is calculated by comparison with a reference vaccine, calibrated in International Units. • Tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) BRP is calibrated in International Units with reference to the International Standard.
  • 22.
  • 23. A. CHALLENGE TOXIN IN GUINEA PIG SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS: • Healthy guinea pigs from the same stock should be selected of weight 250-350 gm. • Animals are distributed in not less than 6 equal groups containing no. of animals sufficient to obtain results • If the validity of the challenge toxin is to be determined 3 further groups of the 5 animals each should be taken which are used as unvaccinated control. • Animals should be of same sex if both sex are included then the should be equally distributed among groups.
  • 24. SELECTION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN: • Preparation of tetanus toxin containing not less than 50 times the 50 percent paralytic dose per millilitre is selected. • If the challenge toxin preparation has been shown to be stable, it is not necessary to verify the paralytic dose for every assay. PREPARATION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN SOLUTION: • The challenge toxin is immediately diluted to 50 times the 50 percent paralytic dose per millilitre with the, peptone buffered saline solution pH 7.4 etc to obtain stable challenge toxin.
  • 25. DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE SOLUTION: • The vaccine to be examined and the reference preparation are diluted with the 9g/l solution of NaCl. • The dilution forms series which do not differ the by 2.5 folds from the alternating previous and next dilutions. • When injected subcutaneously with dose of 1.0 mL per guinea pig should protect approximately 50% of animals from the paralytic effects of tetanus toxin prescribed for test. IMMUNIZATION CHALLENGE AND CHALLENGE: • Allocate the dilutions to the groups. • Then Inject subcutaneously 1 mL allocated dilution into the guinea pig of respective groups.
  • 26. DETERMINATION OF ACTIVITY OF THE CHALLENGE TOXIN: • 3 dilutions made from the challenge toxin and each dilution were allocated to 1 group of 5 guinea pigs i.e. 3 groups if necessary. • Subcutaneously inject 1mL of allocated solution into each guinea pig of the group. • The activity and stability of the challenge toxin are determined by carrying out a suitable number of determinations of the 50 percent paralytic dose.
  • 27. REQUIREMENTS FOR A VALID ASSAY: • The test is not valid unless, for both the vaccine to be examined and the reference preparation the 50 per cent protective dose lies between the largest and smallest doses of the preparations given to the guinea-pigs, • If applicable, the number of paralyzed animals in the 3 groups of 5 injected with the dilutions of the challenge toxin solution indicates that the challenge was approximately 50 times the 50 percent paralytic dose. • The confidence limits (P = 0.95) are not less than 50 per cent and not more than 200 percent of the estimated potency, • The statistical analysis shows significant slope and no deviation from linearity and parallelism of the dose.
  • 28. READING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: • The guinea-pigs are examined twice daily. Remove and humanely kill all animals showing definite signs of tetanus paralysis. • The number of guinea-pigs without paralysis 5 days after injection of the challenge toxin are counted. • Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined relative to the potency of the reference preparation on the basis of the proportion of challenged animals without paralysis in each of the groups of vaccinated guinea-pigs, using the usual statistical methods
  • 29. B.CHALLENGE TOXIN IN MICE: SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS: • Use in the test healthy mice from the same stock, about 5 weeks old and from a strain shown to be suitable. Rest same as guinea pig. SELECTION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN: • Preparation of tetanus toxin containing not less than 100 times the 50 per cent paralytic dose per millilitre is selected. • PREPARATION OF CHALLENGE TOXIN SOLUTION: • DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE SOLUTION: • IMMUNIZATION CHALLENGE AND CHALLENGE: • DETERMINATION OF ACTIVITY OF THE CHALLENGE:
  • 30. READING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: • The mice are examined twice daily. Remove and humanely kill all animals showing definite signs of tetanus paralysis. • The number of mice without paralysis 4 days after injection of the challenge toxin are counted. • Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined relative to the potency of the reference preparation on the basis of the proportion of challenged animals without paralysis in each of the groups of vaccinated mices, using the usual statistical methods.
  • 31. C. DETERMINATION OF ANTBODIES IN GUINEA PIG SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TEST ANIMALS: • Healthy guinea pigs from the same stock should be selected of weight 250-350 gm. • Animals are distributed in not less than 6 equal groups containing no. of animals sufficient to obtain results. • Animals should be of same sex if both sex are included then the should be equally distributed among groups. • Use a further group of non-vaccinated guinea-pigs of the same origin to provide a negative serum control. If test consistency has been demonstrated, a reference negative serum control may be used.
  • 32. REFERENCE PREPARATION: • A suitable reference preparation such as tetanus vaccine(adsorbed) BRP or a batch of vaccine shown to be effective in clinical studies, or a batch representative thereof, and which has been calibrated in International Units with reference to tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) BRP or the International Standard for tetanus toxoid (adsorbed) are used. DILUTION OF THE TEST AND REFERENCE SOLUTION: • The vaccine to be examined and the reference preparation are diluted with the 9g/l solution of NaCl. • The dilution forms series which do not differ the by 2.5 to 5 folds from the alternating previous and next dilutions. Use not fewer than 3 dilutions within the range for example 0.5-16 IU/ml for each series. Use dilutions for immunization preferably within 1 h of preparation. Allocate 1 dilution to each group of guinea-pigs.
  • 33. IMMUNISATION: • Inject subcutaneously in the nape of each guinea-pig 1.0 ml of the dilution allocated to its group. BLOOD SAMPLING: • 35-42 days after immunization, take a blood sample from each vaccinated and control guinea-pig using a suitable method. PREPARATION OF SERUM SAMPLES: • Avoid frequent freezing and thawing of serum samples. To avoid microbial contamination, it is preferable to carry out manipulations in a laminar-flow cabinet.
  • 34. DETERMINATION OF ANTIBODY TITRE: • Determine the relative antibody titre or score of each serum sample by a suitable immunochemical method . The methods shown below (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and toxin-binding inhibition (ToBI)) have been found suitable. CALCULATION OF POTENCY: • Calculate the potency of the vaccine to be examined in International Units relative to the reference preparation, using the usual statistical methods. NOTE: International Units of potency refer to the reference vaccine and not to the International Units of antitoxin of the reference guinea-pig serum.
  • 35. Requirements For A Valid Assay : • The confidence limits (P = 0.95) are not less than 50 percent and not more than 200 per cent of the estimated potency. • The statistical analysis shows significant slope and no deviation from linearity and parallelism of the doseresponse lines . • The test may be repeated but when more than 1 test is performed the results of all valid tests must be combined in the estimate of potency.
  • 36. READING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: • In order to minimize suffering in the test animals, it is recommended to note the degree of paralysis on a scale such as that shown below. • The scale gives typical signs when injection of the challenge toxin is made mid-ventrally directly behind the sternum with the needle pointing towards the neck of the guinea-pig mice and . • Grade T3 is taken as the end-point, but with experience grade T2 can be used instead. • Tetanus toxin produces in at least 1 of the forelimbs paralysis that can be recognized at an early stage.
  • 37. The tetanus grades in guinea-pigs and mice are characterized by • T1: slight stiffness of 1 forelimb, but difficult to observe • T2: paralysis of 1 forelimb which still can function. • T3: paralysis of 1 forelimb. The animal moves reluctantly, the body is often slightly banana-shaped owing to scoliosis. • T4 : the forelimb is completely stiff and the toes are immovable. The muscular contraction of the forelimb is very pronounced and usually scoliosis is observed; • T5: tetanus seizures, continuous tonic spasm of muscles .