Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

Photomation or Fauxtomation?

366 vues

Publié le

Automation in the Newsroom and the impact on editorial labour: a case study. AP's image recognition technology project and how it requires new types of editorial tasks.

Presented on 1st February 2019 at COMPUTATION + JOURNALISM SYMPOSIUM 2019 http://cplusj.org/

Publié dans : Technologie
  • Secrets To Working Online, Hundreds of online opportunites you can profit with today! ■■■ http://ishbv.com/ezpayjobs/pdf
    Voulez-vous vraiment ?  Oui  Non
    Votre message apparaîtra ici

Photomation or Fauxtomation?

  1. 1. Photomation or Fauxtomation ? Automation in the Newsroom & the Impact on Editorial Labour: A Case Study Stuart Myles - Associated Press
  2. 2. AP handles ~4,000 images per day, with an archive of ~34 million @smyles We are adding automated metadata. Automation is meant to lead to less work. But it is actually leading to more editorial work.
  3. 3. @smyles
  5. 5. EXTERIOR
  6. 6. SI T
  7. 7. “New” Editorial Work • Label training data • Evaluate test results • Write definitions for concepts • Correct metadata in Production
  8. 8. @smyles Because AP’s customers are changing. Newsrooms have fewer editors or even no editors, so we need to auto publish based on metadata So…why automate? Perhaps it is worth exploring whether job loss is leading to automation, rather than automation leading to job loss? Early days I expect the relationship between automation and editorial work to continue to evolve
  9. 9. @smyles Thanks!