SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  26
Pore-Network Modelling of Liquid Water Transport
            Through The Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL)
                     In PEM Fuel Cells

                              Sreejith Pulloor Kuttanikkad
                                    Research Engineer
                             Department of Energy Technologies
                                   CEA Grenoble, France




S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   1 / 26
Outline

1   Context: Global Energy Issues
2   Alternate Energy Sources: Fuel Cells
      Challenges in Fuel Cell Technology
3   Objective of the Work
      Main Issue: water management inside PEMFC
      Pore-Network Modelling
4   Results
      Model Validation (single-phase, two-phase)
      Simulation of GDL Degradation
5   Conclusions
6   Recommendations for Future Work

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   2 / 26
Context: Global Energy Issues
Present situation and challenges




                                                                        The world’s energy system is
                                                                        based mainly on fossil fuels such
                                                                        as oil, gas and coal (80%)
                                                                        Only small contribution from
                                                                        renewable and alternate sources
World demand for fossil fuels will continue to grow (source: EIA
                 world energy outlook 2008)

 The major challenges:
         Sustainable and secure energy solutions
         Concerns over climate change, local pollution
 Solution:
         Develop alternate/renewable power sources (solar, wind, hydro, bio,
         nuclear, hydrogen & fuel cells)!
 S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)               Pore Network Modelling of GDL              12.02.2010   3 / 26
Fuel Cells: An Alternate Energy Source
What is a fuel cell and Why this technology is important


       An electrochemical device that combines hydrogen and oxygen to
       produce electricity, with water and heat as its by-product
       No combustion (clean, quiet, highly efficient, low/zero emission)




Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel cells
      High efficiency and power density
      low operating temperature and low noise

PEM fuel cells are promising power source for
automotive applications!




S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   4 / 26
Challenges in PEM Fuel Cell Technology

                                                                Hy
                                        Physical size,               dr
               gy



                                                                          og
                                        weight                               e
             lo




                                                                              n
                                                                                  de
           no




                                                                                    liv
         ch




                                                                                          er
       te




                                                                                             y
       n
    ge
  ro
   d
Hy




                           Cost            PEMFC         Performance



       Hy
           dr                                                                        on
                og                                                                cti
                   e                                                         du
                       n
                           sto                                       p     ro
                              ra         Durability               en
                                                                og
                                   ge                      dr
                                                         Hy                                      Schematic cross-section of a PEM fuel cell showing membrane,
                                                                                                                    GDL, catalyst layer etc.


Many studies are on-going to improve PEMFCs efficiency, reliability and to
reduce its cost especially for transport applications




                             Nano-scale                                            Micro-scale                              Macro-scale
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                                    Pore Network Modelling of GDL                                      12.02.2010      5 / 26
Objectives
Focused study on Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL)

       Study the degradation mechanisms in GDL (focusing on liquid water
       interaction with GDL)
       Specifically establish a link between degradation of a GDL at
       micro-scale and its influence on the transport properties at
       macro-scale using pore-scale modelling (pore-network approach)

                                                                  Effective
                                                                                         Pe
                                                        el        Properties                r   fo
                                                      od                                          rm
                                                r   km            at REV scale                      an
                                                                                                         ce
                                              wo
                                            et                                                                m
                                       -n                                                                         od
                                    re                                                                               e
                                 Po                                                                                   l


                       Pore-scale                                                                             Performance
                                                             -   Permeability                                     (V,I,t)
                                                             -   Effective diffusion
                                                             -   Capillary pressure
                                                             -   Relative permeability
                                                             -   etc.



                         Inputs                                                                               Comparison
                     - Structure
                     - Pore & throat size
                                                                                                                 with
                     - Wettability                                                                            experiments


S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                    Pore Network Modelling of GDL                                          12.02.2010   6 / 26
Main Issues
Role of GDL in water (by-product of the reaction) management




      To uniformly distribute the reactant
      gases to the surface of catalyst
      Delivering water to the membrane and
      removing the excess water
      Enhanced gas diffusion through the
      GDL to the CL is important
      Too much product water can reduce
      gas transport



Conflicting requirement for achieving higher performance
       Water (sufficient) required for proton conductance and cooling
       But more water reduces diffusive transport of reactants by flooding the electrodes

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL        12.02.2010   7 / 26
Main Issues
Loss of hydrophobic coating over time


       To prevent the water flooding, GDL is often treated with hydrophobic agents
       (PTFE)
       However, loss of PTFE over time is observed

              Hydrophobic coating (PTFE)
                                                                   Hydrophilic pore
                                 Hydrophobic pore



                                                    Liquid water
               Gas flow




                                                                                      GDL




           Polymer Electrolyte Membrane


Flooding and drying phenomena inside the core cell are closely linked to the pore-properties
(wettability characteristics, pore size distribution,..) and to the transport properties of
GDL


S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                                                      Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   8 / 26
Pore Network Modelling, Why and How?
                                                                 To link the degradation
                                                                 mechanisms to the macroscopic
                                                                 transport properties
                                                                 Models based on continuum
                                                                 theory (Darcy approach) does not
                                                                 explicitly account for microscopic
                                                                 properties
                                                                    Pore (provides
                                                                    volume for the flow)   Poutlet

      Ideal for studying single and two phase




                                                                                               Flow direction
      flow at the microscopic scale




                                                                       Periodic




                                                                                                                    Periodic
      Can model explicit pore scale with
                                                                L
      minimum computational expense
      Do not need to specify parameters
      such as Permeability, Relative
      Permeability, Diffusivity and Capillary                                           Pinlet
                                                               Mass conservation in pores
      Pressure Curve                                                                          Throat (provides
                                                                                              resistance to the flow)

                                                               Local flux in each throat




S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL                                               12.02.2010     9 / 26
Pore-Network Model (PNM) for GDL
Difficulties

       PNMs have traditionally been used in geo-science and petroleum
       Industrial porous materials are significantly different from soils (highly
       porous, partially or fully hydrophobic, thin system, deformations are
       significant)
       For the modelling of industrial porous materials, the concepts and
       algorithms from geo-sciences are employed




S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   10 / 26
Liquid water movement inside GDL
Invasion percolation process



      Water invasion in GDL is generally
      dominated by capillary effects
      Invasion takes place via quasi-static
      displacement of a fluid
      Invade the pores and throats based on their
      Pc potential calculated by the
      Young-Laplace equation
                                         2σ cos θ
                  Pc = Pnw − Pw = −
                                            r
      Uniform pressure boundary condition on the
      inlet, periodic boundary conditions on the                    A 3D Network made with pores and throats

      lateral sides, and exit condition on outlet

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL                      12.02.2010     11 / 26
Pore-Network Model Development
A pore-network model has been developed and validated by comparing to
literature data
                                 -6
                             1   0m
                          2x
                     25
          40 pores




               Z




                             40
                                      po
                                         re              s
                                           s          re
                                                    po
                                               10

                                                                        output = effective and relative parameters
Inputs = thickness, size, PSD,
                                                                        (diffusion, permeability), capillary pressure,
wettability etc.                                                        2-phase flow pattern etc.
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                        Pore Network Modelling of GDL               12.02.2010   12 / 26
Model Validation
Computation of absolute permeability and diffusivity




                                                      8


                                                      7       d = dÑ       Ò
                                                                               + (dÑ   Ü   − dÑ Ò )[{−δ ln(z(1 − exp(−1.0/δ)) + exp(−1.0/δ))}1/γ ]
                                                              dÑ   Ò
                                                                       = 10µm¸ dÑ          Ü   = 25µm
                                                      6       δ = 0.2¸ γ = 6.0
                                                              z=Ö      Ò   (0, 1)
                                                      5




                                                ¹℄
                                                      4




                                                %
                                                      3


                                                      2


                                                      1


                                                      0
                                                          0                5                   10         15            20           25              30
                                                                                                                µÑ℄
              K        Pinlet − Poutlet                                                             ÈÓÖ   Ë Þ


 Q     =    −       A                                Pore size distribution for Toray 090, created based on Weibull
              µ                L                                                distribution

                     Cinlet − Coutlet
  J    =    −Deff A
                            L
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)    Pore Network Modelling of GDL                                                      12.02.2010            13 / 26
Air permeability (Toray 090)
Validation: Comparison with literature results



            Authors             Type of         Porosity Thickness K
                                Study                    [µm]      [×10−12 m2 ]

            This work           PNM             0.77            252     9.6
            Gostick,            PNM             0.78            252     9.5
            2007
            Gostick,            Expt.           0.78            290     9.0
            2006
            Sinha,              PNM             0.62            275     5.6
            2007
            Koido,              LBM             0.8             200     9.0
            2008



S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)       Pore Network Modelling of GDL         12.02.2010   14 / 26
Relative diffusivity (Toray 090)
Validation: Comparison with literature results


                                                                        Deff
            Authors                 Type of        Porosity Thickness   D0
                                    Study

            This work               PNM            0.77           252   0.48
            Gostick                 PNM            0.78           252   0.46
            2007
            Zamel, 2009             Expt.      0.78               370   0.275
            Tomadakis               Analytical –                  –     0.62
            & Sotirchos,
            1993
            Bruggeman,              Analytical –                  –     0.6875
            1935
            Nam & Ka-               Analytical –                  –     0.559
            viany, 2003

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)       Pore Network Modelling of GDL          12.02.2010   15 / 26
Two-phase flow validation
Relative permeability, comparison with LBM simulation results

                                     Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ      Ð ØÝ 
ÙÖÚ ×
                  1                                                             ½
                                       ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 
¸Kwr
                                       ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 
¸Kgr
                                        Kwr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ
                                        Kgr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ
                 0.8                                                            ¼º




                 0.6                                                            ¼º
        Kwr ¹℄




                                                                                      Kgr ¹℄
                 0.4                                                            ¼º




                 0.2                                                            ¼º¾




                  0                                                             ¼
                       0       0.2        0.4            0.6         0.8    1
                                          Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)    Pore Network Modelling of GDL         12.02.2010          16 / 26
Two-phase flow validation
   Pc(s) curve, comparison with experimental results




                              Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ   ×     ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ   Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
                  10000
                                                            Û Ø Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 110, 80µ
                                                                 Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 80, 80µ
                   8000


                   6000
È ℄




                   4000
Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ




                   2000


                      0


                  −2000


                  −4000


                  −6000
                          0   0.2               0.4              0.6             0.8        1
                                                Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄



                                                                                                             Fairweather et al 2010




         S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                                   Pore Network Modelling of GDL                      12.02.2010   17 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
One scenario: increase the fraction of hydrophilic pores

Degradation mechanism: One scenario is to increase the fraction of
hydrophilic pores in the network (loss of PTFE coating)
                                                            How to simulate such scenario?




Why choose this scenario?
      Distribution of PTFE is not uniform
                                                      Model GDL with mix of hydrophilic and
      within a GDL (manufacturing and
                                                              hydrophobic pores
      operational effects)
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL               12.02.2010   18 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
 Percolation probability of the network


                                        ÚÓÐÙØ ÓÒ Ó Ø Ô Ö
ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ        Ð ØÝ

                  100



                   80
Ð ØÝ ±℄




                   60
È Ö
ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ




                   40



                   20



                    0


                        0     10   20      30       40      50         60          70   80   90
                                                ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
 ÈÓÖ × ±℄


     Let Pc be percolation threshold and p be the fraction of hydrophilic pores
                            For p > Pc : invasion takes place through a path of hydrophilic pores
                            For p < Pc : hydrophilic pores do not form a percolating cluster and
                            some hydrophobic pores are necessarily invaded
    S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                                         Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   19 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on saturation along the thickness

                                     Ä ÕÙ   Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ Ð     ÐÓÒ Ø    Ø 
 Ò ××
                           0.8
                                                                                  ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 
                                                                               ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
                           0.7                                                           ¾¼±
                                                                                         ¿¼±
                                                                                          ¼±
                           0.6                                                            ¼±
                                                                                          ¼±
                                                                                          ¼±
                                                                                          ¼±
       Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄




                           0.5


                           0.4


                           0.3


                           0.2


                           0.1


                            0
                                 0   50             100               150              200              250
                                            ×Ø Ò
   ÐÓÒ Ø     ÓÛ     Ö 
Ø ÓÒ 10−6 Ñ℄

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)            Pore Network Modelling of GDL                      12.02.2010    20 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Sw and Deff

                                 Î Ö Ø ÓÒ Ó   ×     Ù× ÓÒ 
Ó    
 ÒØ Û Ø ÐÓ×× Ò Ý ÖÓÔ Ó 
 ØÝ
                    ¼º                                                                               0.8
                                                                                        Ë´Ûµ
                                                                                        ÈÆÅ
                                                                  ÖÙ    Ñ Ò¸ ǫ1.5 · (1 − s)1.5




                                                                                                        ¹℄
                    ¼º                                                                               0.7




                                                                                                        Ø ÖÓÙ
                                                                                                     0.6
         ¹℄




                    ¼º
              D0
         D




                                                                                                     0.5




                                                                                                        Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ Ø Ö
         Ù× Ú Øݸ




                    ¼º
                                                                                                     0.4
                    ¼º¿
                                                                                                     0.3
         
Ø Ú




                    ¼º¾
                                                                                                     0.2




                                                                                                        Ä ÕÙ
                    ¼º½                                                                              0.1


                         ¼                                                                          0
                             0          20             40              60              80        100
                                                     ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
 ÈÓÖ × ±℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                 Pore Network Modelling of GDL                  12.02.2010                    21 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Pc-S curves

                                    Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ × ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
                            10000
                                                                                              ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 
                                                                                           ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
                                                                                                     ¾¼±
                             8000                                                                    ¿¼±
                                                                                                      ¼±
                                                                                                      ¼±
                             6000                                                                     ¼±
                                                                                                      ¼±
                                                                                                      ¼±
      Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ È ℄




                                                                                                      ¼±
                                                                                               ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
                             4000


                             2000


                                0


                            −2000


                            −4000


                            −6000
                                    0       0.2      0.4       0.6        0.8          1
                                                   Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)                      Pore Network Modelling of GDL                  12.02.2010   22 / 26
Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on gas relative permeability

                            Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ       Ð ØÝ Ó × × ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
                                                                        ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 
               1
                                                                    ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
                                                                                 ¾¼±
                                                                                 ¿¼±
                                                                                  ¼±
              0.8
                                                                                  ¼±
                                                                                  ¼±
                                                                                  ¼±
                                                                                  ¼±
                                                                                  ¼±
              0.6
                                                                         ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 
      ¹℄Kgr




              0.4




              0.2




               0
                    0               0.2           0.4               0.6      0.8                1
                                                   Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)         Pore Network Modelling of GDL            12.02.2010       23 / 26
Major findings and conclusions

       Developed a pore-network model to link between pore-scale
       degradation mechanism and macro-scale transport properties
       Calculated the evolution of effective properties (D,K,Pc,Kr) based on
       the scenario that the fraction of hydrophilic pores increase over time
       (i.e. loss of PTFE)
       Initially no significant effects, but gas diffusion starts to decrease
       dramatically as fraction of hydrophilic pores are above the percolation
       threshold of the system
       Gas diffusion is the most important process for the performance of
       PEMFC
       Degradation (loss of PTFE) induce reduction in gas diffusion and in
       turn affects fuel cell performance
       An optimal hydrophobic GDL can be designed based on the
       simulation results

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   24 / 26
Future Work and Broader Implications

       Study other degradation mechanisms (e.g, structural changes)
       Coupling of the models at various scales and models of various
       components


       The model as a design tool for better GDL with optimal wettability
       characteristics and structure, which in turn helps in improving the
       performance of PEMFC
       Fuel cell technology has the potential to increase the security of
       energy supply (with substantial reduction in emissions)
       Fuel cell technology is closely linked to the development of hydrogen
       economy
       The contributions from alternate and renewable energy sources will
       increase rapidly over the years

S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT)   Pore Network Modelling of GDL   12.02.2010   25 / 26
Thank you for your attention!

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Pore-network simulation of GDL in PEM Fuel cells

Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewmadlovescience
 
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewmadlovescience
 
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewtshankar20134
 
Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Components of pem fuel cells an overviewComponents of pem fuel cells an overview
Components of pem fuel cells an overviewsunitha81
 
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overviewMaiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overviewkutty79
 
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...IJPEDS-IAES
 
Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725yusangchang
 
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...nooriasukmaningtyas
 
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...IDES Editor
 
Optimizing Wind Power Performance US
Optimizing Wind Power Performance USOptimizing Wind Power Performance US
Optimizing Wind Power Performance USLaura Proctor
 
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...IRJET Journal
 
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system network
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system networkCharacteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system network
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system networkAranga Rajan
 
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through Simulation
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through SimulationShip Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through Simulation
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through SimulationYann Rageul
 
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...Dr. Amarjeet Singh
 
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...Padmanabhan Krishnan
 

Similaire à Pore-network simulation of GDL in PEM Fuel cells (20)

Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
 
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
 
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overviewComponents of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
Components of pem_fuel_cells_an_overview
 
Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Components of pem fuel cells an overviewComponents of pem fuel cells an overview
Components of pem fuel cells an overview
 
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overviewMaiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overview
Maiyalagan, Components of pem fuel cells an overview
 
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...
Designing Controller for Joined Dynamic Nonlinear PEMFC and Buck Converter Sy...
 
Pushkar N Patil
Pushkar N PatilPushkar N Patil
Pushkar N Patil
 
Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725
 
Ll1411
Ll1411Ll1411
Ll1411
 
A brief on Cost of Eenergy issue
A brief on Cost of Eenergy issueA brief on Cost of Eenergy issue
A brief on Cost of Eenergy issue
 
Geisbrecht2009
Geisbrecht2009Geisbrecht2009
Geisbrecht2009
 
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...
Solving combined economic emission dispatch problem in wind integrated power ...
 
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...
Genetic algorithm based Different Re-dispatching Scheduling of Generator Unit...
 
Optimizing Wind Power Performance US
Optimizing Wind Power Performance USOptimizing Wind Power Performance US
Optimizing Wind Power Performance US
 
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...
A novel approach for solving Optimal Economic load dispatch problem in power ...
 
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system network
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system networkCharacteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system network
Characteristics and applications of Energy Storage in Power system network
 
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through Simulation
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through SimulationShip Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through Simulation
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through Simulation
 
Fuel cells
Fuel cellsFuel cells
Fuel cells
 
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...
Total Ionization Cross Sections due to Electron Impact of Ammonia from Thresh...
 
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
 

Pore-network simulation of GDL in PEM Fuel cells

  • 1. Pore-Network Modelling of Liquid Water Transport Through The Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL) In PEM Fuel Cells Sreejith Pulloor Kuttanikkad Research Engineer Department of Energy Technologies CEA Grenoble, France S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 1 / 26
  • 2. Outline 1 Context: Global Energy Issues 2 Alternate Energy Sources: Fuel Cells Challenges in Fuel Cell Technology 3 Objective of the Work Main Issue: water management inside PEMFC Pore-Network Modelling 4 Results Model Validation (single-phase, two-phase) Simulation of GDL Degradation 5 Conclusions 6 Recommendations for Future Work S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 2 / 26
  • 3. Context: Global Energy Issues Present situation and challenges The world’s energy system is based mainly on fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal (80%) Only small contribution from renewable and alternate sources World demand for fossil fuels will continue to grow (source: EIA world energy outlook 2008) The major challenges: Sustainable and secure energy solutions Concerns over climate change, local pollution Solution: Develop alternate/renewable power sources (solar, wind, hydro, bio, nuclear, hydrogen & fuel cells)! S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 3 / 26
  • 4. Fuel Cells: An Alternate Energy Source What is a fuel cell and Why this technology is important An electrochemical device that combines hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity, with water and heat as its by-product No combustion (clean, quiet, highly efficient, low/zero emission) Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel cells High efficiency and power density low operating temperature and low noise PEM fuel cells are promising power source for automotive applications! S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 4 / 26
  • 5. Challenges in PEM Fuel Cell Technology Hy Physical size, dr gy og weight e lo n de no liv ch er te y n ge ro d Hy Cost PEMFC Performance Hy dr on og cti e du n sto p ro ra Durability en og ge dr Hy Schematic cross-section of a PEM fuel cell showing membrane, GDL, catalyst layer etc. Many studies are on-going to improve PEMFCs efficiency, reliability and to reduce its cost especially for transport applications Nano-scale Micro-scale Macro-scale S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 5 / 26
  • 6. Objectives Focused study on Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL) Study the degradation mechanisms in GDL (focusing on liquid water interaction with GDL) Specifically establish a link between degradation of a GDL at micro-scale and its influence on the transport properties at macro-scale using pore-scale modelling (pore-network approach) Effective Pe el Properties r fo od rm r km at REV scale an ce wo et m -n od re e Po l Pore-scale Performance - Permeability (V,I,t) - Effective diffusion - Capillary pressure - Relative permeability - etc. Inputs Comparison - Structure - Pore & throat size with - Wettability experiments S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 6 / 26
  • 7. Main Issues Role of GDL in water (by-product of the reaction) management To uniformly distribute the reactant gases to the surface of catalyst Delivering water to the membrane and removing the excess water Enhanced gas diffusion through the GDL to the CL is important Too much product water can reduce gas transport Conflicting requirement for achieving higher performance Water (sufficient) required for proton conductance and cooling But more water reduces diffusive transport of reactants by flooding the electrodes S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 7 / 26
  • 8. Main Issues Loss of hydrophobic coating over time To prevent the water flooding, GDL is often treated with hydrophobic agents (PTFE) However, loss of PTFE over time is observed Hydrophobic coating (PTFE) Hydrophilic pore Hydrophobic pore Liquid water Gas flow GDL Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Flooding and drying phenomena inside the core cell are closely linked to the pore-properties (wettability characteristics, pore size distribution,..) and to the transport properties of GDL S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 8 / 26
  • 9. Pore Network Modelling, Why and How? To link the degradation mechanisms to the macroscopic transport properties Models based on continuum theory (Darcy approach) does not explicitly account for microscopic properties Pore (provides volume for the flow) Poutlet Ideal for studying single and two phase Flow direction flow at the microscopic scale Periodic Periodic Can model explicit pore scale with L minimum computational expense Do not need to specify parameters such as Permeability, Relative Permeability, Diffusivity and Capillary Pinlet Mass conservation in pores Pressure Curve Throat (provides resistance to the flow) Local flux in each throat S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 9 / 26
  • 10. Pore-Network Model (PNM) for GDL Difficulties PNMs have traditionally been used in geo-science and petroleum Industrial porous materials are significantly different from soils (highly porous, partially or fully hydrophobic, thin system, deformations are significant) For the modelling of industrial porous materials, the concepts and algorithms from geo-sciences are employed S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 10 / 26
  • 11. Liquid water movement inside GDL Invasion percolation process Water invasion in GDL is generally dominated by capillary effects Invasion takes place via quasi-static displacement of a fluid Invade the pores and throats based on their Pc potential calculated by the Young-Laplace equation 2σ cos θ Pc = Pnw − Pw = − r Uniform pressure boundary condition on the inlet, periodic boundary conditions on the A 3D Network made with pores and throats lateral sides, and exit condition on outlet S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 11 / 26
  • 12. Pore-Network Model Development A pore-network model has been developed and validated by comparing to literature data -6 1 0m 2x 25 40 pores Z 40 po re s s re po 10 output = effective and relative parameters Inputs = thickness, size, PSD, (diffusion, permeability), capillary pressure, wettability etc. 2-phase flow pattern etc. S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 12 / 26
  • 13. Model Validation Computation of absolute permeability and diffusivity 8 7 d = dÑ Ò + (dÑ Ü − dÑ Ò )[{−δ ln(z(1 − exp(−1.0/δ)) + exp(−1.0/δ))}1/γ ] dÑ Ò = 10µm¸ dÑ Ü = 25µm 6 δ = 0.2¸ γ = 6.0 z=Ö Ò (0, 1) 5 ¹℄ 4 % 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 µÑ℄ K Pinlet − Poutlet ÈÓÖ Ë Þ Q = − A Pore size distribution for Toray 090, created based on Weibull µ L distribution Cinlet − Coutlet J = −Deff A L S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 13 / 26
  • 14. Air permeability (Toray 090) Validation: Comparison with literature results Authors Type of Porosity Thickness K Study [µm] [×10−12 m2 ] This work PNM 0.77 252 9.6 Gostick, PNM 0.78 252 9.5 2007 Gostick, Expt. 0.78 290 9.0 2006 Sinha, PNM 0.62 275 5.6 2007 Koido, LBM 0.8 200 9.0 2008 S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 14 / 26
  • 15. Relative diffusivity (Toray 090) Validation: Comparison with literature results Deff Authors Type of Porosity Thickness D0 Study This work PNM 0.77 252 0.48 Gostick PNM 0.78 252 0.46 2007 Zamel, 2009 Expt. 0.78 370 0.275 Tomadakis Analytical – – 0.62 & Sotirchos, 1993 Bruggeman, Analytical – – 0.6875 1935 Nam & Ka- Analytical – – 0.559 viany, 2003 S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 15 / 26
  • 16. Two-phase flow validation Relative permeability, comparison with LBM simulation results Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ Ð ØÝ ÙÖÚ × 1 ½ ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó ¸Kwr ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó ¸Kgr Kwr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ Kgr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ 0.8 ¼º 0.6 ¼º Kwr ¹℄ Kgr ¹℄ 0.4 ¼º 0.2 ¼º¾ 0 ¼ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄ S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 16 / 26
  • 17. Two-phase flow validation Pc(s) curve, comparison with experimental results Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ × ÙÒ Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ 10000 Û Ø Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 110, 80µ Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 80, 80µ 8000 6000 È ℄ 4000 Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ 2000 0 −2000 −4000 −6000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄ Fairweather et al 2010 S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 17 / 26
  • 18. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL One scenario: increase the fraction of hydrophilic pores Degradation mechanism: One scenario is to increase the fraction of hydrophilic pores in the network (loss of PTFE coating) How to simulate such scenario? Why choose this scenario? Distribution of PTFE is not uniform Model GDL with mix of hydrophilic and within a GDL (manufacturing and hydrophobic pores operational effects) S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 18 / 26
  • 19. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL Percolation probability of the network ÚÓÐÙØ ÓÒ Ó Ø Ô Ö ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ Ð ØÝ 100 80 Ð ØÝ ±℄ 60 È Ö ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð ÈÓÖ × ±℄ Let Pc be percolation threshold and p be the fraction of hydrophilic pores For p > Pc : invasion takes place through a path of hydrophilic pores For p < Pc : hydrophilic pores do not form a percolating cluster and some hydrophobic pores are necessarily invaded S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 19 / 26
  • 20. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on saturation along the thickness Ä ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ Ð ÐÓÒ Ø Ø Ò ×× 0.8 ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 0.7 ¾¼± ¿¼± ¼± 0.6 ¼± ¼± ¼± ¼± Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄ 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 ×Ø Ò ÐÓÒ Ø ÓÛ Ö Ø ÓÒ 10−6 Ñ℄ S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 20 / 26
  • 21. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Sw and Deff Î Ö Ø ÓÒ Ó × Ù× ÓÒ Ó ÒØ Û Ø ÐÓ×× Ò Ý ÖÓÔ Ó ØÝ ¼º 0.8 Ë´Ûµ ÈÆÅ ÖÙ Ñ Ò¸ ǫ1.5 · (1 − s)1.5 ¹℄ ¼º 0.7 Ø ÖÓÙ 0.6 ¹℄ ¼º D0 D 0.5 Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ Ø Ö Ù× Ú Øݸ ¼º 0.4 ¼º¿ 0.3 Ø Ú ¼º¾ 0.2 Ä ÕÙ ¼º½ 0.1 ¼ 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð ÈÓÖ × ±℄ S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 21 / 26
  • 22. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Pc-S curves Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ × ÙÒ Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ 10000 ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð ¾¼± 8000 ¿¼± ¼± ¼± 6000 ¼± ¼± ¼± Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ È ℄ ¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð 4000 2000 0 −2000 −4000 −6000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄ S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 22 / 26
  • 23. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on gas relative permeability Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ Ð ØÝ Ó × × ÙÒ Ø ÓÒ Ó Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó 1 ½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð ¾¼± ¿¼± ¼± 0.8 ¼± ¼± ¼± ¼± ¼± 0.6 ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð ¹℄Kgr 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄ S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 23 / 26
  • 24. Major findings and conclusions Developed a pore-network model to link between pore-scale degradation mechanism and macro-scale transport properties Calculated the evolution of effective properties (D,K,Pc,Kr) based on the scenario that the fraction of hydrophilic pores increase over time (i.e. loss of PTFE) Initially no significant effects, but gas diffusion starts to decrease dramatically as fraction of hydrophilic pores are above the percolation threshold of the system Gas diffusion is the most important process for the performance of PEMFC Degradation (loss of PTFE) induce reduction in gas diffusion and in turn affects fuel cell performance An optimal hydrophobic GDL can be designed based on the simulation results S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 24 / 26
  • 25. Future Work and Broader Implications Study other degradation mechanisms (e.g, structural changes) Coupling of the models at various scales and models of various components The model as a design tool for better GDL with optimal wettability characteristics and structure, which in turn helps in improving the performance of PEMFC Fuel cell technology has the potential to increase the security of energy supply (with substantial reduction in emissions) Fuel cell technology is closely linked to the development of hydrogen economy The contributions from alternate and renewable energy sources will increase rapidly over the years S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 25 / 26
  • 26. Thank you for your attention!