Preparation and characterization of self reinforced fibre polymer composites ...
Pore-network simulation of GDL in PEM Fuel cells
1. Pore-Network Modelling of Liquid Water Transport
Through The Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL)
In PEM Fuel Cells
Sreejith Pulloor Kuttanikkad
Research Engineer
Department of Energy Technologies
CEA Grenoble, France
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 1 / 26
2. Outline
1 Context: Global Energy Issues
2 Alternate Energy Sources: Fuel Cells
Challenges in Fuel Cell Technology
3 Objective of the Work
Main Issue: water management inside PEMFC
Pore-Network Modelling
4 Results
Model Validation (single-phase, two-phase)
Simulation of GDL Degradation
5 Conclusions
6 Recommendations for Future Work
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 2 / 26
3. Context: Global Energy Issues
Present situation and challenges
The world’s energy system is
based mainly on fossil fuels such
as oil, gas and coal (80%)
Only small contribution from
renewable and alternate sources
World demand for fossil fuels will continue to grow (source: EIA
world energy outlook 2008)
The major challenges:
Sustainable and secure energy solutions
Concerns over climate change, local pollution
Solution:
Develop alternate/renewable power sources (solar, wind, hydro, bio,
nuclear, hydrogen & fuel cells)!
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 3 / 26
4. Fuel Cells: An Alternate Energy Source
What is a fuel cell and Why this technology is important
An electrochemical device that combines hydrogen and oxygen to
produce electricity, with water and heat as its by-product
No combustion (clean, quiet, highly efficient, low/zero emission)
Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel cells
High efficiency and power density
low operating temperature and low noise
PEM fuel cells are promising power source for
automotive applications!
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 4 / 26
5. Challenges in PEM Fuel Cell Technology
Hy
Physical size, dr
gy
og
weight e
lo
n
de
no
liv
ch
er
te
y
n
ge
ro
d
Hy
Cost PEMFC Performance
Hy
dr on
og cti
e du
n
sto p ro
ra Durability en
og
ge dr
Hy Schematic cross-section of a PEM fuel cell showing membrane,
GDL, catalyst layer etc.
Many studies are on-going to improve PEMFCs efficiency, reliability and to
reduce its cost especially for transport applications
Nano-scale Micro-scale Macro-scale
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 5 / 26
6. Objectives
Focused study on Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL)
Study the degradation mechanisms in GDL (focusing on liquid water
interaction with GDL)
Specifically establish a link between degradation of a GDL at
micro-scale and its influence on the transport properties at
macro-scale using pore-scale modelling (pore-network approach)
Effective
Pe
el Properties r fo
od rm
r km at REV scale an
ce
wo
et m
-n od
re e
Po l
Pore-scale Performance
- Permeability (V,I,t)
- Effective diffusion
- Capillary pressure
- Relative permeability
- etc.
Inputs Comparison
- Structure
- Pore & throat size
with
- Wettability experiments
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 6 / 26
7. Main Issues
Role of GDL in water (by-product of the reaction) management
To uniformly distribute the reactant
gases to the surface of catalyst
Delivering water to the membrane and
removing the excess water
Enhanced gas diffusion through the
GDL to the CL is important
Too much product water can reduce
gas transport
Conflicting requirement for achieving higher performance
Water (sufficient) required for proton conductance and cooling
But more water reduces diffusive transport of reactants by flooding the electrodes
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 7 / 26
8. Main Issues
Loss of hydrophobic coating over time
To prevent the water flooding, GDL is often treated with hydrophobic agents
(PTFE)
However, loss of PTFE over time is observed
Hydrophobic coating (PTFE)
Hydrophilic pore
Hydrophobic pore
Liquid water
Gas flow
GDL
Polymer Electrolyte Membrane
Flooding and drying phenomena inside the core cell are closely linked to the pore-properties
(wettability characteristics, pore size distribution,..) and to the transport properties of
GDL
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 8 / 26
9. Pore Network Modelling, Why and How?
To link the degradation
mechanisms to the macroscopic
transport properties
Models based on continuum
theory (Darcy approach) does not
explicitly account for microscopic
properties
Pore (provides
volume for the flow) Poutlet
Ideal for studying single and two phase
Flow direction
flow at the microscopic scale
Periodic
Periodic
Can model explicit pore scale with
L
minimum computational expense
Do not need to specify parameters
such as Permeability, Relative
Permeability, Diffusivity and Capillary Pinlet
Mass conservation in pores
Pressure Curve Throat (provides
resistance to the flow)
Local flux in each throat
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 9 / 26
10. Pore-Network Model (PNM) for GDL
Difficulties
PNMs have traditionally been used in geo-science and petroleum
Industrial porous materials are significantly different from soils (highly
porous, partially or fully hydrophobic, thin system, deformations are
significant)
For the modelling of industrial porous materials, the concepts and
algorithms from geo-sciences are employed
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 10 / 26
11. Liquid water movement inside GDL
Invasion percolation process
Water invasion in GDL is generally
dominated by capillary effects
Invasion takes place via quasi-static
displacement of a fluid
Invade the pores and throats based on their
Pc potential calculated by the
Young-Laplace equation
2σ cos θ
Pc = Pnw − Pw = −
r
Uniform pressure boundary condition on the
inlet, periodic boundary conditions on the A 3D Network made with pores and throats
lateral sides, and exit condition on outlet
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 11 / 26
12. Pore-Network Model Development
A pore-network model has been developed and validated by comparing to
literature data
-6
1 0m
2x
25
40 pores
Z
40
po
re s
s re
po
10
output = effective and relative parameters
Inputs = thickness, size, PSD,
(diffusion, permeability), capillary pressure,
wettability etc. 2-phase flow pattern etc.
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 12 / 26
13. Model Validation
Computation of absolute permeability and diffusivity
8
7 d = dÑ Ò
+ (dÑ Ü − dÑ Ò )[{−δ ln(z(1 − exp(−1.0/δ)) + exp(−1.0/δ))}1/γ ]
dÑ Ò
= 10µm¸ dÑ Ü = 25µm
6 δ = 0.2¸ γ = 6.0
z=Ö Ò (0, 1)
5
¹℄
4
%
3
2
1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
µÑ℄
K Pinlet − Poutlet ÈÓÖ Ë Þ
Q = − A Pore size distribution for Toray 090, created based on Weibull
µ L distribution
Cinlet − Coutlet
J = −Deff A
L
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 13 / 26
14. Air permeability (Toray 090)
Validation: Comparison with literature results
Authors Type of Porosity Thickness K
Study [µm] [×10−12 m2 ]
This work PNM 0.77 252 9.6
Gostick, PNM 0.78 252 9.5
2007
Gostick, Expt. 0.78 290 9.0
2006
Sinha, PNM 0.62 275 5.6
2007
Koido, LBM 0.8 200 9.0
2008
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 14 / 26
15. Relative diffusivity (Toray 090)
Validation: Comparison with literature results
Deff
Authors Type of Porosity Thickness D0
Study
This work PNM 0.77 252 0.48
Gostick PNM 0.78 252 0.46
2007
Zamel, 2009 Expt. 0.78 370 0.275
Tomadakis Analytical – – 0.62
& Sotirchos,
1993
Bruggeman, Analytical – – 0.6875
1935
Nam & Ka- Analytical – – 0.559
viany, 2003
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 15 / 26
16. Two-phase flow validation
Relative permeability, comparison with LBM simulation results
Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ Ð ØÝ
ÙÖÚ ×
1 ½
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó
¸Kwr
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó
¸Kgr
Kwr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ
Kgr ´À Ó¸ ¾¼½¼µ
0.8 ¼º
0.6 ¼º
Kwr ¹℄
Kgr ¹℄
0.4 ¼º
0.2 ¼º¾
0 ¼
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 16 / 26
17. Two-phase flow validation
Pc(s) curve, comparison with experimental results
Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ × ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
10000
Û Ø Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 110, 80µ
Ö¹ ÒØÖÙ× ÓÒ ´θ = 80, 80µ
8000
6000
È ℄
4000
Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ
2000
0
−2000
−4000
−6000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
Fairweather et al 2010
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 17 / 26
18. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
One scenario: increase the fraction of hydrophilic pores
Degradation mechanism: One scenario is to increase the fraction of
hydrophilic pores in the network (loss of PTFE coating)
How to simulate such scenario?
Why choose this scenario?
Distribution of PTFE is not uniform
Model GDL with mix of hydrophilic and
within a GDL (manufacturing and
hydrophobic pores
operational effects)
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 18 / 26
19. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Percolation probability of the network
ÚÓÐÙØ ÓÒ Ó Ø Ô Ö
ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ Ð ØÝ
100
80
Ð ØÝ ±℄
60
È Ö
ÓÐ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
ÈÓÖ × ±℄
Let Pc be percolation threshold and p be the fraction of hydrophilic pores
For p > Pc : invasion takes place through a path of hydrophilic pores
For p < Pc : hydrophilic pores do not form a percolating cluster and
some hydrophobic pores are necessarily invaded
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 19 / 26
20. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on saturation along the thickness
Ä ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ ÔÖÓ Ð ÐÓÒ Ø Ø
Ò ××
0.8
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó
½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
0.7 ¾¼±
¿¼±
¼±
0.6 ¼±
¼±
¼±
¼±
Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
×Ø Ò
ÐÓÒ Ø ÓÛ Ö
Ø ÓÒ 10−6 Ñ℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 20 / 26
21. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Sw and Deff
Î Ö Ø ÓÒ Ó × Ù× ÓÒ
Ó
ÒØ Û Ø ÐÓ×× Ò Ý ÖÓÔ Ó
ØÝ
¼º 0.8
Ë´Ûµ
ÈÆÅ
ÖÙ Ñ Ò¸ ǫ1.5 · (1 − s)1.5
¹℄
¼º 0.7
Ø ÖÓÙ
0.6
¹℄
¼º
D0
D
0.5
Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ Ø Ö
Ù× Ú Øݸ
¼º
0.4
¼º¿
0.3
Ø Ú
¼º¾
0.2
Ä ÕÙ
¼º½ 0.1
¼ 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
ÈÓÖ × ±℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 21 / 26
22. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on Pc-S curves
Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÔÖ ××ÙÖ × ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Ð ÕÙ Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
10000
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó
½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
¾¼±
8000 ¿¼±
¼±
¼±
6000 ¼±
¼±
¼±
Ô ÐÐ ÖÝ ÈÖ ××ÙÖ È ℄
¼±
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
4000
2000
0
−2000
−4000
−6000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 22 / 26
23. Simulation of degradation mechanism in GDL
Result: Effect of loss in hydrophobicity on gas relative permeability
Ê Ð Ø Ú Ô ÖÑ Ð ØÝ Ó × × ÙÒ
Ø ÓÒ Ó Û Ø Ö × ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ó
1
½¼± ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
¾¼±
¿¼±
¼±
0.8
¼±
¼±
¼±
¼±
¼±
0.6
ÀÝ ÖÓÔ Ð
¹℄Kgr
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Ë ØÙÖ Ø ÓÒ¸ ËÛ ¹℄
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 23 / 26
24. Major findings and conclusions
Developed a pore-network model to link between pore-scale
degradation mechanism and macro-scale transport properties
Calculated the evolution of effective properties (D,K,Pc,Kr) based on
the scenario that the fraction of hydrophilic pores increase over time
(i.e. loss of PTFE)
Initially no significant effects, but gas diffusion starts to decrease
dramatically as fraction of hydrophilic pores are above the percolation
threshold of the system
Gas diffusion is the most important process for the performance of
PEMFC
Degradation (loss of PTFE) induce reduction in gas diffusion and in
turn affects fuel cell performance
An optimal hydrophobic GDL can be designed based on the
simulation results
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 24 / 26
25. Future Work and Broader Implications
Study other degradation mechanisms (e.g, structural changes)
Coupling of the models at various scales and models of various
components
The model as a design tool for better GDL with optimal wettability
characteristics and structure, which in turn helps in improving the
performance of PEMFC
Fuel cell technology has the potential to increase the security of
energy supply (with substantial reduction in emissions)
Fuel cell technology is closely linked to the development of hydrogen
economy
The contributions from alternate and renewable energy sources will
increase rapidly over the years
S. Pulloor Kuttanikkad (CEA/IMFT) Pore Network Modelling of GDL 12.02.2010 25 / 26