SWOT Analysis: Uber MBA 686 SWOT ANALYSIS: UBER John Brooks, Sara Vong, Ade Adesida, & Tyler Frankenfield. ATSJ Marketing. Benedictine University STRENGTHS The name Uber is synonymous with the ride service market. Uber has enjoyed and capitalized upon first to market advantages. Although Uber isn’t a market disrupter by the strictest definition, as some have ascribed to it, it has completely changed the ride service market, which has long been dominated by cab companies (Christensen, Raynor, & McDonald, 2015). Uber has distinct advantages over traditional cab companies, where in many cities; expensive tokens are required to operate (Salmon, 2011). The tokens also serve to limit the fleet of cabs available, which is not in the best interest of consumers. Consumers have noticed this, and as such have voted with their wallets. Uber drivers use their own vehicles, which makes for a large fleet. This means supply is not a limiting factor. Unlike cab companies, Uber does not have employees, rather it has independent contractors. This helps reduce overhead costs even more, which are already low. This allows Uber to pass along better pay to drivers, and better rates to consumers (Worstall, 2014). In addition to saving money, consumers benefit from the user friendly nature of being able to pull out a smart phone, and have a driver there to pick them up within minutes. Other conveniences include the ease of payment via the app, a rating system that allows users to select highly rated drivers, and customers can choose the level of service (SUV, taxi, black car, etc.….). Although there is much debate about exactly what Uber’s current value is, there is no debate about whether or not it is a successful and valuable company. This makes it an attractive company for many investors. In fact, earlier this year Uber raised $3.5 billion from the Saudi Sovereign Wealth Fund (Konrad, 2016). All signs point to Uber being primed for expansion into new markets. WEAKNESSES Uber’s business process and product are simple and easily replicated, and there is nothing Uber can do to stop competitors from eating into their market share (Chan, 2015). Uber may have gained a first mover advantage in the ride sharing market, but with no barriers to entry, the market will become even more competitive. Internationally, Uber has shown a weak knowledge of local markets. As evidenced by the recent sale of Uber China to local rival Didi Chuxing, local strategies are required for local markets (Somerville, 2016). Uber tried to use strategies that were successful in other markets and rushed entry into China and Indonesia without an understanding of the culture, business dynamics and consumers (Somerville, 2016). Uber has already made significant investments in their technology and research and development, and have undergone a trial and error period that new startups will not have to endure because they can learn from Uber’s mistakes and costs to their reputation. Bei ...