Melnyk ppt chapter_22

S
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Chapter 22
Ethical Considerations for
Evidence Implementation and
Evidence Generation
Chapter 22
Ethical Considerations for
Evidence Implementation and
Evidence Generation
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Ethical Principles That Guide Healthcare
Practice
•
Beneficence: Captures the importance of doing good for
patients
•
Nonmaleficence: Addresses the importance of not
harming patients
•
Autonomy: Acknowledges that patients have the right to
make decisions about their health, lives, and bodies
•
Justice: Declares that resources should be distributed
fairly among people and without prejudice
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Core Ethical Principles as the Foundation
for the IOM’s Core Dimensions of Quality
IOM Quality Dimension Core Ethical Principles
Safety ?
Effectiveness ?
Patient-centeredness ?
Timeliness ?
Equity ?
Efficiency ?
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Core Ethical Principles as the Foundation
for the IOM’s Core Dimensions of
Quality—(cont.)
IOM Quality
Dimension
Core Ethical
Principles
Safety Nonmaleficence
Effectiveness Beneficence
Patient-centeredness Autonomy
Timeliness Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Equity Justice
Efficiency Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Question
Is the following statement true or false?
There is a lack of agreement regarding the question of
whether ethical principles need to be applied to
evidence-based quality improvement initiatives.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Answer
False
Rationale: It is broadly agreed that ethical principles are an
important consideration in the application of EBP and in
EBQI initiatives. The real debate is whether all of the
requirements that are placed on clinical research also need
to be applied to EBQI initiatives.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Ethical Conflict and Evidence-Based
Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives
Examples of when EBQI initiatives can conflict with ethical
principles:
•
Attempts to improve quality for some patients that
may cause harm for others
•
Strategies intended to improve quality that may turn
out to be ineffective and waste scarce resources
•
Activities declared to be quality improvement that
may be more accurately described as clinical
research
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Between Research and
EBQI: Definitions
Definitions
•
Clinical research: Activities involving direct interaction
by investigators with human subjects or material of
human origin; generates knowledge on which practice
should be based
•
Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI)
initiatives: Systematic, evidence-based activities
designed to immediately improve healthcare delivery
in specific settings
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Between Research and
EBQI—(cont.)
Similarities
•
Both involve human participants
•
Both may use similar data collection procedures to
evaluate outcomes (e.g., surveys and physiological
measurements)
•
Both may use the same data analysis methods to
manage and process data
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Between Research and
EBQI—(cont.)
Differences
Research EBP/EBQI
Patient participation viewed
as an optional activity
All patients receive the same
evidence-based intervention
as part of routine care
Aim is to generalize findings
to a population wider than
the research subjects
Aim is to improve care of
patients in a specific
organization/setting
Aim is to disseminate
findings for use outside of
the organization
Aim is to provide internal
data to practitioners to guide
further practice changes
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Between Research and
EBQI—(cont.)
Ethical implications
•
If efforts are not made to improve quality through
EBQI, principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence
may be violated
•
If EBQI does not offer the same treatment strategies
to all patients, then the principle of justice and
autonomy may be violated, especially if patient
consent is not obtained
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Current Controversies in Human Subject
Protection Related to EBQI
•
Should EBQIs require the same standards of patient
consent as clinical research?
•
Is it ethical to implement EBP in one setting while
continuing with traditional (and possibly substandard)
practice in another?
•
Should informed consent be obtained from the patients
receiving traditional care?
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Among Research, EBQI,
and Evidence-Based Clinical Practice
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Differentiating Among Research, EBQI,
and Evidence-Based Clinical Practice—
(cont.)
•
Research is not an integral part of routine clinical practice
o
In contrast, EBQI is an integral part of the ongoing
management of clinical care delivery (EBP)
•
Research often carries risks for patients
o
Risks with EBQI activities are usually very low;
sometimes the risks may be greater if the EBQI
activities are not implemented
•
Generally, research is focused on generating evidence for
practice, whereas EBQI is focused on implementing
evidence in practice
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Ethical Principles as Applied to Research,
EBP, and EBQI
•
Social or scientific value: For research, EBP, or EBQI to
be ethical, it should be worth doing
•
Scientific validity: Research projects must be
methodologically sound enough to ensure valid and
generalizable findings; poorly designed or implemented
EBP or EBQI projects waste resources and the time of
those involved
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Ethical Principles as Applied to Research,
EBP, and EBQI—(cont.)
•
Fair subject selection: Inclusion and exclusion criteria for
recruiting study participants should be based on scientific
rationale, not convenience or vulnerability; patients
involved in an EBP or EBQI project should be determined
by the population of patients served by the organization
rather than the ability to generalize outcome findings
•
Favorable risk–benefit ratio: Research, EBP, and EBQI
should be committed to minimizing the risks and
maximizing the gains of all studies and projects
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Ethical Principles as Applied to Research,
EBP, and EBQI—(cont.)
•
Independent review: Independent review of research is
ethically required because of potential conflicts of interest
and resultant human rights violations
•
Respect for potential and enrolled subjects: The well-
being of the individual research subject takes precedence
over all other interests; refusal of EBP treatment is
always the patient’s right
•
Informed consent: Informed consent, whether for
research participation or for treatment, is a foundational
component of clinical and research ethics
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Question
The nurses on a nephrology unit wish to implement an
evidence-based change in the assessment and
management of patients’ arteriovenous fistulas. Which of
the following should perform the first (and possibly only)
review for the ethical considerations of this change?
a.The hospital’s ethics review board
b.The state board of nursing’s ethics committee
c.Expert nurses on the unit
d.The leadership and management of the unit
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Answer
d. The leadership and management of the unit
Rationale: The first review should be performed by the unit
management and supervisors to critically examine the
strength of the evidence on which the change is based to
assure the project’s scientific value and validity and to
assure that the risk–benefit ratio is appropriately low. The
review also assures that resources are available and are
fairly distributed.
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
A Final Dilemma…
•
The ethical commitment to care for and do good for
patients (beneficence), coupled with an avoidance of
harm (nonmaleficence), implies a commitment to
improve clinical practice whenever possible
•
Professionals and organizations have an ethical
responsibility to conduct these types of projects to
demonstrate whether evidence-based changes
demonstrate sustainable improvement in outcomes
•
This commitment places a responsibility on patients to
participate in EBQI initiatives
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Question
Controversy about ethical principles as applied to EBQI
versus clinical research is seen most clearly in which of the
following domains of ethics?
a.Scientific validity
b.Social or scientific value
c.Fair subject selection
d.Independent review
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved
Answer
d. Independent review
Rationale: There is significant controversy surrounding the
question of the need for independent ethical review for
EBQI, with many experts citing a different standard for
clinical research than evidence-based practice changes. It
is generally agreed that questions of scientific validity,
social or scientific value, and fair subject selection should
be applied in similar degree to both; however, the need to
have EBP initiatives brought before an ethical review
committee is still equivocal.
1 sur 22

Recommandé

Chapter019 par
Chapter019Chapter019
Chapter019stanbridge
252 vues20 diapositives
Melnyk ppt chapter_22 par
Melnyk ppt chapter_22Melnyk ppt chapter_22
Melnyk ppt chapter_22stanbridge
4.4K vues22 diapositives
Chapter011 par
Chapter011Chapter011
Chapter011stanbridge
1.7K vues27 diapositives
Chapter010 par
Chapter010Chapter010
Chapter010stanbridge
441 vues18 diapositives
Chapter005 par
Chapter005Chapter005
Chapter005stanbridge
506 vues27 diapositives
3043 Chapter008 par
 3043 Chapter008 3043 Chapter008
3043 Chapter008stanbridge
466 vues22 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Chapter004 par
Chapter004Chapter004
Chapter004stanbridge
419 vues16 diapositives
Chapter013 par
Chapter013Chapter013
Chapter013stanbridge
335 vues24 diapositives
Chapter018 par
Chapter018Chapter018
Chapter018stanbridge
466 vues20 diapositives
Chapter020 par
Chapter020Chapter020
Chapter020stanbridge
540 vues22 diapositives
Chapter014 par
Chapter014Chapter014
Chapter014stanbridge
509 vues14 diapositives
Chapter003 par
Chapter003Chapter003
Chapter003stanbridge
1.1K vues20 diapositives

Similaire à Melnyk ppt chapter_22

Chapter020 par
Chapter020Chapter020
Chapter020stanbridge
942 vues22 diapositives
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams.docx par
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health  Lippincott Williams.docxCopyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health  Lippincott Williams.docx
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams.docxdickonsondorris
8 vues27 diapositives
Chapter 18 par
Chapter 18Chapter 18
Chapter 18stanbridge
2.1K vues28 diapositives
Chapter 12 par
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12stanbridge
12.1K vues39 diapositives
NUR 3043 Chapter004 par
NUR 3043 Chapter004NUR 3043 Chapter004
NUR 3043 Chapter004stanbridge
477 vues16 diapositives
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care System par
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care SystemAn Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care System
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care SystemBermanInstitute
350 vues15 diapositives

Similaire à Melnyk ppt chapter_22(20)

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams.docx par dickonsondorris
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health  Lippincott Williams.docxCopyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health  Lippincott Williams.docx
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams.docx
NUR 3043 Chapter004 par stanbridge
NUR 3043 Chapter004NUR 3043 Chapter004
NUR 3043 Chapter004
stanbridge477 vues
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care System par BermanInstitute
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care SystemAn Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care System
An Ethics Framework for the Learning Health Care System
BermanInstitute350 vues
NUR 304 Chapter005 par stanbridge
NUR 304 Chapter005NUR 304 Chapter005
NUR 304 Chapter005
stanbridge692 vues
Chapter 5 par bodo-con
Chapter 5Chapter 5
Chapter 5
bodo-con10.3K vues
Ethics of clinical trials par Ssuna Bashir
Ethics of clinical trialsEthics of clinical trials
Ethics of clinical trials
Ssuna Bashir919 vues
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx par write22
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docxQualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx
write222 vues
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx par stirlingvwriters
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docxQualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx
Qualitative Nursing Study Feasibility Assessments.docx

Plus de stanbridge

Micro Lab 3 Lecture par
Micro Lab 3 LectureMicro Lab 3 Lecture
Micro Lab 3 Lecturestanbridge
5.8K vues43 diapositives
Creating a poster v2 par
Creating a poster v2Creating a poster v2
Creating a poster v2stanbridge
866 vues8 diapositives
Creating a poster par
Creating a posterCreating a poster
Creating a posterstanbridge
602 vues8 diapositives
Sample poster par
Sample posterSample poster
Sample posterstanbridge
484 vues1 diapositive
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination par
OT 5018 Thesis DisseminationOT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
OT 5018 Thesis Disseminationstanbridge
383 vues6 diapositives
Ot5101 005 week 5 par
Ot5101 005 week 5Ot5101 005 week 5
Ot5101 005 week 5stanbridge
512 vues20 diapositives

Plus de stanbridge(20)

Micro Lab 3 Lecture par stanbridge
Micro Lab 3 LectureMicro Lab 3 Lecture
Micro Lab 3 Lecture
stanbridge5.8K vues
Creating a poster v2 par stanbridge
Creating a poster v2Creating a poster v2
Creating a poster v2
stanbridge866 vues
Creating a poster par stanbridge
Creating a posterCreating a poster
Creating a poster
stanbridge602 vues
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination par stanbridge
OT 5018 Thesis DisseminationOT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
stanbridge383 vues
Ot5101 005 week 5 par stanbridge
Ot5101 005 week 5Ot5101 005 week 5
Ot5101 005 week 5
stanbridge512 vues
Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors par stanbridge
Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors
Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors
stanbridge4.4K vues
Ch 5 developmental stages of the learner par stanbridge
Ch 5   developmental stages of the learnerCh 5   developmental stages of the learner
Ch 5 developmental stages of the learner
stanbridge13.5K vues
OT 5101 week2 theory policy par stanbridge
OT 5101 week2 theory policyOT 5101 week2 theory policy
OT 5101 week2 theory policy
stanbridge188 vues
OT 5101 week3 planning needs assessment par stanbridge
OT 5101 week3 planning needs assessmentOT 5101 week3 planning needs assessment
OT 5101 week3 planning needs assessment
stanbridge319 vues
NUR 3043 Chapter007 par stanbridge
NUR 3043 Chapter007NUR 3043 Chapter007
NUR 3043 Chapter007
stanbridge1.4K vues
NUR 3043 Chapter006 par stanbridge
NUR 3043 Chapter006NUR 3043 Chapter006
NUR 3043 Chapter006
stanbridge475 vues
Melnyk ppt chapter_21 par stanbridge
Melnyk ppt chapter_21Melnyk ppt chapter_21
Melnyk ppt chapter_21
stanbridge332 vues
Education week 1 chapter 1 par stanbridge
Education  week 1 chapter 1Education  week 1 chapter 1
Education week 1 chapter 1
stanbridge768 vues
Education Week 1 Introduction par stanbridge
Education Week 1 IntroductionEducation Week 1 Introduction
Education Week 1 Introduction
stanbridge261 vues
Education Week 1 Intro par stanbridge
Education Week 1 IntroEducation Week 1 Intro
Education Week 1 Intro
stanbridge155 vues
ENG 1060 Week1 APA Formatting par stanbridge
ENG 1060 Week1 APA FormattingENG 1060 Week1 APA Formatting
ENG 1060 Week1 APA Formatting
stanbridge591 vues
SOC 1010 Week 2 Chapter 2 par stanbridge
SOC 1010 Week 2 Chapter 2SOC 1010 Week 2 Chapter 2
SOC 1010 Week 2 Chapter 2
stanbridge250 vues

Dernier

Material del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docx par
Material del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docxMaterial del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docx
Material del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docxNorberto Millán Muñoz
68 vues9 diapositives
Lecture: Open Innovation par
Lecture: Open InnovationLecture: Open Innovation
Lecture: Open InnovationMichal Hron
95 vues56 diapositives
Classification of crude drugs.pptx par
Classification of crude drugs.pptxClassification of crude drugs.pptx
Classification of crude drugs.pptxGayatriPatra14
65 vues13 diapositives
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptx par
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptxUse of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptx
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptxAKSHAY MANDAL
81 vues15 diapositives
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx par
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptxSachin Nitave
56 vues35 diapositives
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx par
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptxOEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptxInge de Waard
165 vues29 diapositives

Dernier(20)

Lecture: Open Innovation par Michal Hron
Lecture: Open InnovationLecture: Open Innovation
Lecture: Open Innovation
Michal Hron95 vues
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptx par AKSHAY MANDAL
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptxUse of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptx
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture.pptx
AKSHAY MANDAL81 vues
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx par Sachin Nitave
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx
7 NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.pptx
Sachin Nitave56 vues
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx par Inge de Waard
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptxOEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx
Inge de Waard165 vues
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively par PECB
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks EffectivelyISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively
PECB 457 vues
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx par Jisc
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptxAre we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx
Jisc71 vues
AI Tools for Business and Startups par Svetlin Nakov
AI Tools for Business and StartupsAI Tools for Business and Startups
AI Tools for Business and Startups
Svetlin Nakov89 vues
UWP OA Week Presentation (1).pptx par Jisc
UWP OA Week Presentation (1).pptxUWP OA Week Presentation (1).pptx
UWP OA Week Presentation (1).pptx
Jisc68 vues
Plastic waste.pdf par alqaseedae
Plastic waste.pdfPlastic waste.pdf
Plastic waste.pdf
alqaseedae110 vues

Melnyk ppt chapter_22

  • 1. Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 22 Ethical Considerations for Evidence Implementation and Evidence Generation Chapter 22 Ethical Considerations for Evidence Implementation and Evidence Generation
  • 2. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Ethical Principles That Guide Healthcare Practice • Beneficence: Captures the importance of doing good for patients • Nonmaleficence: Addresses the importance of not harming patients • Autonomy: Acknowledges that patients have the right to make decisions about their health, lives, and bodies • Justice: Declares that resources should be distributed fairly among people and without prejudice
  • 3. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Core Ethical Principles as the Foundation for the IOM’s Core Dimensions of Quality IOM Quality Dimension Core Ethical Principles Safety ? Effectiveness ? Patient-centeredness ? Timeliness ? Equity ? Efficiency ?
  • 4. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Core Ethical Principles as the Foundation for the IOM’s Core Dimensions of Quality—(cont.) IOM Quality Dimension Core Ethical Principles Safety Nonmaleficence Effectiveness Beneficence Patient-centeredness Autonomy Timeliness Beneficence Nonmaleficence Equity Justice Efficiency Beneficence Nonmaleficence
  • 5. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Question Is the following statement true or false? There is a lack of agreement regarding the question of whether ethical principles need to be applied to evidence-based quality improvement initiatives.
  • 6. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Answer False Rationale: It is broadly agreed that ethical principles are an important consideration in the application of EBP and in EBQI initiatives. The real debate is whether all of the requirements that are placed on clinical research also need to be applied to EBQI initiatives.
  • 7. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Ethical Conflict and Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives Examples of when EBQI initiatives can conflict with ethical principles: • Attempts to improve quality for some patients that may cause harm for others • Strategies intended to improve quality that may turn out to be ineffective and waste scarce resources • Activities declared to be quality improvement that may be more accurately described as clinical research
  • 8. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Between Research and EBQI: Definitions Definitions • Clinical research: Activities involving direct interaction by investigators with human subjects or material of human origin; generates knowledge on which practice should be based • Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) initiatives: Systematic, evidence-based activities designed to immediately improve healthcare delivery in specific settings
  • 9. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Between Research and EBQI—(cont.) Similarities • Both involve human participants • Both may use similar data collection procedures to evaluate outcomes (e.g., surveys and physiological measurements) • Both may use the same data analysis methods to manage and process data
  • 10. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Between Research and EBQI—(cont.) Differences Research EBP/EBQI Patient participation viewed as an optional activity All patients receive the same evidence-based intervention as part of routine care Aim is to generalize findings to a population wider than the research subjects Aim is to improve care of patients in a specific organization/setting Aim is to disseminate findings for use outside of the organization Aim is to provide internal data to practitioners to guide further practice changes
  • 11. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Between Research and EBQI—(cont.) Ethical implications • If efforts are not made to improve quality through EBQI, principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence may be violated • If EBQI does not offer the same treatment strategies to all patients, then the principle of justice and autonomy may be violated, especially if patient consent is not obtained
  • 12. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Current Controversies in Human Subject Protection Related to EBQI • Should EBQIs require the same standards of patient consent as clinical research? • Is it ethical to implement EBP in one setting while continuing with traditional (and possibly substandard) practice in another? • Should informed consent be obtained from the patients receiving traditional care?
  • 13. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Among Research, EBQI, and Evidence-Based Clinical Practice
  • 14. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Differentiating Among Research, EBQI, and Evidence-Based Clinical Practice— (cont.) • Research is not an integral part of routine clinical practice o In contrast, EBQI is an integral part of the ongoing management of clinical care delivery (EBP) • Research often carries risks for patients o Risks with EBQI activities are usually very low; sometimes the risks may be greater if the EBQI activities are not implemented • Generally, research is focused on generating evidence for practice, whereas EBQI is focused on implementing evidence in practice
  • 15. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Ethical Principles as Applied to Research, EBP, and EBQI • Social or scientific value: For research, EBP, or EBQI to be ethical, it should be worth doing • Scientific validity: Research projects must be methodologically sound enough to ensure valid and generalizable findings; poorly designed or implemented EBP or EBQI projects waste resources and the time of those involved
  • 16. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Ethical Principles as Applied to Research, EBP, and EBQI—(cont.) • Fair subject selection: Inclusion and exclusion criteria for recruiting study participants should be based on scientific rationale, not convenience or vulnerability; patients involved in an EBP or EBQI project should be determined by the population of patients served by the organization rather than the ability to generalize outcome findings • Favorable risk–benefit ratio: Research, EBP, and EBQI should be committed to minimizing the risks and maximizing the gains of all studies and projects
  • 17. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Ethical Principles as Applied to Research, EBP, and EBQI—(cont.) • Independent review: Independent review of research is ethically required because of potential conflicts of interest and resultant human rights violations • Respect for potential and enrolled subjects: The well- being of the individual research subject takes precedence over all other interests; refusal of EBP treatment is always the patient’s right • Informed consent: Informed consent, whether for research participation or for treatment, is a foundational component of clinical and research ethics
  • 18. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Question The nurses on a nephrology unit wish to implement an evidence-based change in the assessment and management of patients’ arteriovenous fistulas. Which of the following should perform the first (and possibly only) review for the ethical considerations of this change? a.The hospital’s ethics review board b.The state board of nursing’s ethics committee c.Expert nurses on the unit d.The leadership and management of the unit
  • 19. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Answer d. The leadership and management of the unit Rationale: The first review should be performed by the unit management and supervisors to critically examine the strength of the evidence on which the change is based to assure the project’s scientific value and validity and to assure that the risk–benefit ratio is appropriately low. The review also assures that resources are available and are fairly distributed.
  • 20. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved A Final Dilemma… • The ethical commitment to care for and do good for patients (beneficence), coupled with an avoidance of harm (nonmaleficence), implies a commitment to improve clinical practice whenever possible • Professionals and organizations have an ethical responsibility to conduct these types of projects to demonstrate whether evidence-based changes demonstrate sustainable improvement in outcomes • This commitment places a responsibility on patients to participate in EBQI initiatives
  • 21. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Question Controversy about ethical principles as applied to EBQI versus clinical research is seen most clearly in which of the following domains of ethics? a.Scientific validity b.Social or scientific value c.Fair subject selection d.Independent review
  • 22. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved Answer d. Independent review Rationale: There is significant controversy surrounding the question of the need for independent ethical review for EBQI, with many experts citing a different standard for clinical research than evidence-based practice changes. It is generally agreed that questions of scientific validity, social or scientific value, and fair subject selection should be applied in similar degree to both; however, the need to have EBP initiatives brought before an ethical review committee is still equivocal.